MaltSci 麦伴科研

Appearance

Popular Reports / Neuroscience

This report is written by MaltSci based on the latest literature and research findings

What are the mechanisms of stroke and recovery? ​

Abstract ​

Stroke remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, characterized by the rapid loss of brain function due to disrupted blood supply. This review synthesizes current research on the mechanisms of stroke and recovery, highlighting the distinct pathophysiological processes involved in ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Ischemic strokes primarily result from blood vessel obstruction, leading to excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation, while hemorrhagic strokes arise from bleeding, causing increased intracranial pressure and subsequent neuronal damage. Recovery mechanisms involve spontaneous neuroplasticity, which allows the brain to reorganize and adapt, as well as therapeutic interventions aimed at enhancing these natural processes. Rehabilitation strategies, including physical and occupational therapy, are crucial in promoting neuroplasticity and improving functional outcomes. Furthermore, pharmacological interventions and the role of psychological factors are explored, emphasizing the need for a holistic approach to stroke management. Despite advancements, barriers to effective rehabilitation and disparities in stroke care persist, necessitating ongoing research into personalized treatment strategies. The review concludes by advocating for an integrated approach that combines insights from various fields to enhance recovery and improve the quality of life for stroke patients.

Outline ​

This report will discuss the following questions.

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Mechanisms of Stroke
    • 2.1 Ischemic Stroke: Pathophysiology and Risk Factors
    • 2.2 Hemorrhagic Stroke: Causes and Consequences
    • 2.3 Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms in Stroke
    • 2.4 Role of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress
  • 3 Recovery Mechanisms Following Stroke
    • 3.1 Neuroplasticity: The Brain's Adaptive Response
    • 3.2 Rehabilitation Strategies: Physical and Occupational Therapy
    • 3.3 Pharmacological Interventions and Emerging Therapies
    • 3.4 Psychological and Social Factors in Recovery
  • 4 Challenges in Stroke Management and Recovery
    • 4.1 Barriers to Effective Rehabilitation
    • 4.2 Disparities in Stroke Care
    • 4.3 Future Directions in Stroke Research
  • 5 Conclusion

1 Introduction ​

Stroke is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide, significantly impacting public health and healthcare systems. It is characterized by the rapid loss of brain function due to disturbance in the blood supply, resulting in ischemic or hemorrhagic events. Understanding the underlying mechanisms of stroke and the processes involved in recovery is crucial for developing effective therapeutic strategies and improving patient outcomes. The intricate pathophysiology of stroke encompasses various factors, including thrombus formation, emboli, and atherosclerosis, which contribute to neuronal damage and subsequent disability [1]. The urgency to comprehend these mechanisms is underscored by the fact that stroke remains a primary cause of long-term disability, necessitating a multifaceted approach to management and rehabilitation.

The significance of exploring stroke mechanisms extends beyond academic inquiry; it has profound implications for clinical practice and patient care. Advances in neuroimaging and molecular biology have illuminated the cellular and molecular changes that occur during and after a stroke, revealing potential targets for therapeutic intervention [2]. Furthermore, a better understanding of neuroplasticity—the brain's ability to reorganize itself after injury—can enhance rehabilitation strategies and improve recovery outcomes [3]. This review aims to synthesize current research findings on the mechanisms of stroke and recovery, focusing on the pathophysiological changes during stroke, the body's natural recovery processes, and the role of various interventions.

Current research has delineated the mechanisms of stroke into distinct categories: ischemic stroke, which is caused by the obstruction of blood flow, and hemorrhagic stroke, resulting from bleeding in or around the brain. Each type of stroke presents unique pathophysiological challenges and recovery dynamics. For instance, ischemic strokes often involve excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation, which exacerbate neuronal injury [1]. In contrast, hemorrhagic strokes may lead to different cellular responses and recovery pathways, necessitating tailored therapeutic approaches [2]. Understanding these differences is critical for developing targeted treatments that can mitigate damage and promote recovery.

Recovery mechanisms following stroke are equally complex and involve various biological processes, including neuroplasticity, which facilitates the reorganization of neural networks to compensate for lost functions [4]. Rehabilitation strategies, such as physical and occupational therapy, play a pivotal role in harnessing neuroplasticity to improve functional outcomes [5]. Additionally, pharmacological interventions and emerging therapies are being investigated to enhance recovery by promoting neurogenesis and synaptic plasticity [6]. Psychological and social factors also significantly influence recovery, highlighting the need for a holistic approach to stroke management [7].

Despite advancements in our understanding of stroke and recovery mechanisms, several challenges remain. Barriers to effective rehabilitation, disparities in stroke care, and the variability of recovery outcomes across individuals complicate the clinical landscape [8]. Addressing these challenges requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates insights from neurology, rehabilitation science, and psychosocial support to optimize patient care.

This review is organized as follows: we will first explore the mechanisms of stroke, differentiating between ischemic and hemorrhagic types, and discuss the cellular and molecular processes involved, including the roles of inflammation and oxidative stress. Next, we will delve into the recovery mechanisms that follow stroke, focusing on neuroplasticity, rehabilitation strategies, pharmacological interventions, and the psychological aspects of recovery. Finally, we will address the challenges faced in stroke management and recovery, outlining future directions for research that could pave the way for innovative therapeutic approaches.

In conclusion, understanding the multifaceted mechanisms of stroke and recovery is essential for improving patient outcomes and developing effective treatments. By synthesizing current research findings, this review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiological changes during stroke, the natural recovery processes, and the role of interventions that can enhance recovery. Through this synthesis, we hope to illuminate the complexities of stroke and recovery, ultimately contributing to advancements in clinical practice and future research endeavors.

2 Mechanisms of Stroke ​

2.1 Ischemic Stroke: Pathophysiology and Risk Factors ​

Stroke is a complex medical condition characterized by the disruption of blood supply to the brain, leading to neuronal cell death and a cascade of pathophysiological changes. Ischemic stroke, the most common type, results from a blockage in a blood vessel supplying the brain, causing a reduction in oxygen and nutrients, which ultimately affects neuronal function and survival.

The pathophysiology of ischemic stroke involves several interrelated mechanisms. Initially, the ischemic event triggers a series of cellular responses, including excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Excitotoxicity arises from excessive release of neurotransmitters, particularly glutamate, leading to overactivation of glutamate receptors, which can cause neuronal injury and death. Concurrently, oxidative stress occurs due to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during ischemia, further damaging cellular structures and impairing function.

Following the initial injury, the inflammatory response is activated. Immune cells, including microglia and infiltrating peripheral immune cells, are recruited to the site of injury. These cells can adopt pro-inflammatory or anti-inflammatory phenotypes, influencing the extent of tissue damage and repair. While acute inflammation can exacerbate neuronal injury, it also plays a critical role in subsequent repair processes, including angiogenesis and neurogenesis [8][9].

Recovery from stroke is facilitated by various mechanisms, which can be categorized into spontaneous recovery and therapeutic-induced recovery. Spontaneous recovery involves intrinsic biological processes that promote functional recovery following injury. This includes neuroplasticity, where the brain reorganizes itself by forming new neural connections. Studies have shown that following stroke, there is an increase in axonal sprouting and synaptic formation in the periinfarct cortex, a process driven by a unique microenvironment that temporarily favors growth [6][10].

Therapeutic interventions aim to enhance these natural recovery processes. Rehabilitation strategies, such as physical therapy and task-specific training, are designed to promote neuroplastic changes that improve motor function. Exercise has been shown to stimulate neurogenesis and improve motor recovery by enhancing synaptic plasticity and reducing depressive symptoms associated with stroke [11].

Additionally, the role of the immune system in recovery is increasingly recognized. Infiltrating immune cells and cytokines can influence neurogenesis and angiogenesis, promoting repair and recovery of neurological function [7][9]. For instance, post-stroke inflammatory cells can secrete growth factors that facilitate the regeneration of neural tissues.

Recent research has also focused on the importance of the glymphatic system, which plays a critical role in maintaining brain homeostasis and clearing metabolic waste. After stroke, the glymphatic system may be compromised, contributing to brain edema and further impairing recovery [12].

In summary, the mechanisms of ischemic stroke involve a complex interplay of cellular injury, inflammation, and subsequent recovery processes. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for developing effective therapeutic strategies to enhance recovery and improve outcomes for stroke patients. The interplay between spontaneous recovery and therapeutic interventions highlights the potential for innovative treatments aimed at maximizing neuroplasticity and functional recovery.

2.2 Hemorrhagic Stroke: Causes and Consequences ​

Stroke is a significant neurological event characterized by the sudden loss of brain function due to disruption of blood supply, leading to ischemic or hemorrhagic conditions. The mechanisms underlying stroke and subsequent recovery are complex and multifaceted, involving various pathological processes and cellular responses.

In the case of hemorrhagic stroke, the primary cause is the rupture of blood vessels, which leads to bleeding in or around the brain. This event causes an increase in intracranial pressure and disrupts normal blood flow, resulting in neuronal damage. The pathophysiology of hemorrhagic stroke involves excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation, which collectively contribute to brain injury and functional impairment. The intricate interactions among these mechanisms can exacerbate tissue damage and influence recovery outcomes[1].

Recovery from stroke, particularly hemorrhagic stroke, is driven by several mechanisms that operate at cellular, molecular, and systemic levels. One crucial aspect is neuroplasticity, which refers to the brain's ability to reorganize and adapt following injury. This plasticity can manifest through the formation of new synapses, the sprouting of axons, and the remapping of functional areas within the brain. Enhanced neuronal excitability during this recovery phase facilitates the reallocation of neuronal resources to compensate for lost functions[3][4].

Moreover, the role of immune cells in recovery is gaining attention. Following a stroke, peripheral immune cells infiltrate the brain and contribute to both damage and repair processes. These cells can release cytokines that influence neuroinflammation and neuronal survival, thereby impacting functional recovery. Understanding the dual roles of these immune responses is critical for developing therapeutic strategies aimed at improving recovery outcomes[8].

Research indicates that the timing and nature of therapeutic interventions can significantly affect recovery. Spontaneous recovery often occurs within the first weeks post-stroke, with variability among individuals. Factors such as age, the extent of brain damage, and the presence of comorbid conditions can influence the degree of recovery. Therapies that promote neuroplasticity, such as rehabilitation exercises and pharmacological agents, aim to enhance the brain's natural recovery mechanisms[6][13].

Recent advancements in neuroimaging and functional studies have provided insights into the dynamic changes occurring in neural circuits after stroke. These studies reveal that successful recovery is associated with the reorganization of neural pathways and the establishment of new connections that can restore functionality. For instance, the peri-infarct cortex shows significant changes in neural activity that correlate with recovery processes[7].

In summary, the mechanisms of stroke, particularly hemorrhagic stroke, involve complex interactions between excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation. Recovery is facilitated by neuroplasticity, immune responses, and therapeutic interventions that promote reorganization and functional compensation in the brain. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for developing effective treatments aimed at enhancing recovery and improving the quality of life for stroke survivors.

2.3 Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms in Stroke ​

Stroke is a complex neurological event characterized by the disruption of blood flow to the brain, leading to significant cellular and molecular changes that result in injury and dysfunction. The pathogenesis of stroke can be divided into several key mechanisms, including excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and the involvement of non-coding RNAs.

  1. Excitotoxicity and Calcium Overload: Following a stroke, there is a pathological release of neurotransmitters, particularly glutamate, which leads to excessive calcium influx into neurons. This excitotoxicity contributes to neuronal injury and death, as elevated intracellular calcium levels activate a cascade of damaging processes, including mitochondrial dysfunction and the activation of proteolytic enzymes [1].

  2. Oxidative Stress: The ischemic event results in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which further exacerbates neuronal damage. ROS can lead to lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and DNA damage, compounding the injury initiated by the loss of blood flow [1].

  3. Neuroinflammation: Inflammatory processes play a dual role in stroke. In the acute phase, inflammation can exacerbate tissue damage, as immune cells infiltrate the brain and release pro-inflammatory cytokines. Damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are crucial in this process, promoting blood-brain barrier permeability and leading to further neuronal injury [14]. Conversely, in the later stages, inflammatory responses can aid in tissue repair and regeneration [14].

  4. Role of Non-Coding RNAs: Non-coding RNAs, including microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs, have emerged as critical regulators in the pathophysiology of stroke. They are involved in various processes such as angiogenesis and neuroprotection, and their modulation may offer therapeutic potential in cerebrovascular diseases [1].

  5. Neurogenesis and Angiogenesis: Post-stroke recovery involves intrinsic repair mechanisms such as neurogenesis (the formation of new neurons) and angiogenesis (the formation of new blood vessels). These processes are vital for restoring brain function and are influenced by various signaling pathways and molecular mediators [15]. Neurogenesis is particularly important as it helps replace lost neurons and supports functional recovery [15].

  6. Spontaneous Recovery Mechanisms: After a stroke, the brain exhibits spontaneous recovery mechanisms characterized by axonal sprouting and the establishment of new synaptic connections. This neuroplasticity is essential for functional recovery and is influenced by the cellular environment, which can promote or inhibit regeneration [6].

  7. Immune System Involvement: Immune cells play a complex role in stroke recovery. While they can contribute to early damage, they also facilitate repair processes through the release of growth factors and modulation of inflammation. Understanding the dual role of immune cells is critical for developing effective therapeutic strategies [9].

  8. Molecular Mediators and Therapeutic Targets: Advances in understanding the molecular mediators involved in stroke recovery have identified potential therapeutic targets. These include pathways related to angiogenesis and neurogenesis, which are critical for promoting functional recovery [15].

In summary, the mechanisms of stroke involve a multifaceted interplay of excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and the role of non-coding RNAs. Recovery mechanisms hinge on neurogenesis, angiogenesis, and neuroplasticity, all of which are influenced by immune responses and specific molecular mediators. Further research into these mechanisms will aid in the development of novel therapeutic approaches to enhance recovery following stroke.

2.4 Role of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress ​

Stroke, particularly ischemic stroke, is characterized by the disruption of cerebral blood flow, leading to a cascade of pathological events that result in neuronal injury and cell death. The mechanisms underlying stroke and recovery involve complex interactions between inflammation and oxidative stress, both of which play critical roles in the pathophysiology of stroke.

Ischemic stroke initiates a series of processes, including excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammation. These mechanisms are interrelated and significantly contribute to neuronal damage. Excitotoxicity occurs when excessive glutamate release leads to overactivation of glutamate receptors, resulting in increased intracellular calcium levels, which can trigger cell death pathways. Concurrently, oxidative stress is characterized by an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the body’s antioxidant defenses. Following an ischemic event, there is a rapid increase in ROS, which overwhelms the brain's antioxidant capacity, leading to oxidative damage to cellular components, including lipids, proteins, and DNA [16].

Inflammation is another crucial component of stroke pathology. Following ischemic injury, the innate immune response is activated, resulting in the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, which can exacerbate neuronal injury. In particular, interleukin-6 (IL-6) has been identified as a key pro-inflammatory cytokine that influences the severity of neurological deficits and patient prognosis in acute ischemic stroke [17]. This inflammatory response can be detrimental in the acute phase of stroke, but it also plays a role in tissue repair and recovery during the chronic phase [18].

The interplay between oxidative stress and inflammation is critical. For instance, oxidative stress can activate various signaling pathways, such as nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), which further amplifies the inflammatory response [19]. Conversely, inflammatory mediators can increase oxidative stress by enhancing ROS production from immune cells. This dual interaction contributes to blood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption, neuronal apoptosis, and the overall worsening of stroke outcomes [20].

Recovery from stroke involves both endogenous repair mechanisms and therapeutic interventions aimed at mitigating the damage caused by oxidative stress and inflammation. Targeting oxidative stress has emerged as a potential therapeutic strategy, with research indicating that enhancing the activity of nuclear factor E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), a key regulator of antioxidant defenses, can protect against ischemia/reperfusion injury [21]. Additionally, natural products with antioxidant properties, such as polyphenols, have shown promise in reducing oxidative damage and improving recovery outcomes [22].

In summary, the mechanisms of stroke and recovery are intricately linked to the roles of inflammation and oxidative stress. Understanding these mechanisms provides insight into potential therapeutic targets that could enhance recovery and improve clinical outcomes for stroke patients. The development of strategies that effectively modulate these pathways is crucial for advancing stroke management and rehabilitation.

3 Recovery Mechanisms Following Stroke ​

3.1 Neuroplasticity: The Brain's Adaptive Response ​

Stroke is a significant medical condition characterized by the reduction of blood flow to the brain, leading to neuronal damage and consequent impairments in sensation, movement, or cognition. The mechanisms underlying stroke and recovery are multifaceted, with neuroplasticity being a central component of the recovery process.

Neuroplasticity refers to the brain's ability to reorganize and adapt in response to changes in the environment, which is crucial for recovery following a stroke. After a stroke, a time-limited window of neuroplasticity opens, during which the brain can undergo significant rewiring and synaptic strengthening, facilitating recovery of lost functions. This plasticity can manifest through various mechanisms, including axonal sprouting, dendritic remodeling, synaptic modulation, and neurogenesis[23][24].

During the recovery phase, neuroplasticity is influenced by several factors, including the type of rehabilitation therapy applied, the timing of interventions, and the overall health and age of the patient. For instance, physical rehabilitation techniques, such as task-oriented training and robotic-assisted movement, have been shown to enhance neuroplastic changes by promoting motor learning and engagement of surviving neuronal circuits[25].

Microglia, the resident immune cells of the brain, play a crucial role in regulating neuroplasticity following stroke. They are activated shortly after a stroke and undergo phenotypic changes that influence neuroinflammation and the recovery process. Microglial activation has been linked to the remodeling of neural circuits and the restoration of neurovascular networks, thereby supporting the functional recovery of the brain[24][26].

Moreover, the timing of rehabilitation interventions is critical. Research indicates that spontaneous recovery mechanisms occur within the first few weeks post-stroke, and this period is characterized by enhanced neuroplasticity. Thus, early rehabilitation strategies are essential for maximizing recovery outcomes[4][6].

The integration of pharmacological interventions alongside rehabilitation strategies has also been explored to enhance neuroplasticity and improve recovery. Compounds such as citicoline and fluoxetine are being investigated for their potential to support neuronal repair and promote functional recovery in the chronic phase of stroke[27].

In summary, the recovery mechanisms following a stroke are deeply rooted in neuroplasticity, which is shaped by the interplay of various biological, therapeutic, and environmental factors. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for developing effective rehabilitation strategies that can enhance recovery and improve the quality of life for stroke survivors.

3.2 Rehabilitation Strategies: Physical and Occupational Therapy ​

Stroke is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality, leading to a variety of disabilities. The mechanisms underlying stroke and subsequent recovery involve complex neurobiological processes, which can be categorized into spontaneous recovery mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.

Spontaneous recovery after stroke is characterized by a series of cellular, molecular, and systemic changes that occur in response to brain injury. Following a stroke, the brain activates several recovery mechanisms, including plastic adaptation, hyperexcitability, and synaptogenesis. These mechanisms can be triggered by different types of damage, such as diffuse damage that reduces the effective size of the neural network or localized damage from a stroke that alters spontaneous activity. It has been observed that the combined application of these mechanisms is essential for restoring the brain's spontaneous activity, indicating that cooperation among different recovery processes is crucial for effective recovery (Berger et al., 2019) [28].

The recovery process is further influenced by the patient's specific conditions, including their pre-stroke health and the extent of brain damage. Research has shown that the best recovery outcomes typically involve the restitution of function in injured but surviving neural tissue. This process is often enhanced by restorative therapies aimed at promoting neuroplastic changes, which resemble the mechanisms seen during spontaneous recovery (Cassidy & Cramer, 2017) [6].

In terms of rehabilitation strategies, both physical and occupational therapies play a pivotal role in stroke recovery. Rehabilitation efforts should be grounded in a thorough understanding of the underlying mechanisms of recovery. This includes the use of neuroimaging techniques to monitor brain reorganization and the development of tailored therapeutic approaches based on individual patient needs (Ances & D'Esposito, 2000) [29]. Effective rehabilitation requires a comprehensive strategy that encompasses proper patient selection, goal setting, and active participation from both patients and their families, often involving interdisciplinary teams (Reddy & Reddy, 1997) [30].

Moreover, the implementation of therapies such as aerobic exercise and environmental enrichment has been shown to promote task-specific neuroplasticity, enhancing recovery outcomes. These interventions are believed to activate beneficial molecular changes associated with stroke recovery and can be adapted for clinical use (Livingston-Thomas et al., 2016) [11].

In summary, recovery from stroke is facilitated by a combination of spontaneous neurobiological mechanisms and targeted rehabilitation strategies. Understanding these mechanisms allows for the development of effective therapies aimed at maximizing recovery and improving the quality of life for stroke survivors. The continuous evolution of research in this field emphasizes the importance of multimodal approaches that harness both spontaneous recovery processes and therapeutic interventions to enhance rehabilitation outcomes.

3.3 Pharmacological Interventions and Emerging Therapies ​

Stroke is a complex neurological disorder characterized by impaired blood flow to the brain, leading to significant disability and mortality. The mechanisms of stroke can be categorized into two main types: ischemic stroke, which occurs due to blockage of blood vessels, and hemorrhagic stroke, which results from the rupture of blood vessels. The pathophysiological processes involved in stroke include excitotoxicity, calcium overload, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation, all of which contribute to neuronal death and tissue damage [31].

Following a stroke, the brain initiates various recovery mechanisms, which can be broadly classified into spontaneous recovery and therapeutic-induced recovery. Spontaneous recovery occurs at cellular, molecular, and systems levels, often involving neuroplastic changes that help restore function in injured but surviving neural tissue. The degree of spontaneous recovery is variable and generally incomplete, underscoring the need for therapeutic interventions to enhance recovery outcomes [6].

Recent studies have highlighted several mechanisms that are critical for recovery after stroke. These include:

  1. Plastic Adaptation: The brain's ability to reorganize and form new neural connections in response to injury. This plasticity is fundamental for regaining lost functions [28].

  2. Hyperexcitability: Following stroke, certain areas of the brain may become hyperexcitable, which can facilitate the reorganization of neural circuits and promote recovery [28].

  3. Synaptogenesis: The formation of new synapses is essential for the recovery of functional activity in the brain. This process is influenced by various pharmacological agents that can enhance synaptic plasticity [28].

Pharmacological interventions have gained attention as potential means to enhance recovery following stroke. Various agents have been explored, including:

  • Antidepressants: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) like fluoxetine have shown promise in improving motor deficits in stroke patients, independent of their antidepressant effects [32].

  • Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors and Memantine: These agents have been evaluated for their potential to improve cognitive and motor recovery [33].

  • Neuroprotective Agents: Research is ongoing to identify neuroprotective compounds that can mitigate secondary injury following stroke. These include drugs that target excitotoxicity and neuroinflammation [34].

  • Cell-based Therapies: Emerging therapies such as neural stem cell transplantation aim to promote recovery by replacing damaged neurons and enhancing neuroplasticity [31].

The combination of these pharmacological approaches, along with rehabilitation strategies, is critical for maximizing recovery outcomes. However, the efficacy of many pharmacological agents remains to be fully validated through large-scale clinical trials, emphasizing the need for continued research in this area [33][34].

In summary, the mechanisms of stroke involve complex pathophysiological processes leading to neuronal damage, while recovery mechanisms include spontaneous neuroplasticity and therapeutic interventions aimed at enhancing recovery. Ongoing research is essential to identify effective pharmacological strategies that can significantly improve recovery outcomes in stroke patients.

3.4 Psychological and Social Factors in Recovery ​

Stroke is a significant cause of adult disability, and understanding the mechanisms involved in recovery is crucial for developing effective therapeutic strategies. Recovery after stroke involves a combination of spontaneous mechanisms and therapeutic interventions that facilitate functional restitution.

The primary mechanisms identified in the recovery process include plastic adaptation, hyperexcitability, and synaptogenesis. Plastic adaptation refers to the brain's ability to reorganize itself by forming new connections in response to injury. Hyperexcitability is characterized by increased neural activity in response to the loss of function, which can promote recovery by enhancing remaining neural pathways. Synaptogenesis involves the formation of new synapses, allowing for improved communication between neurons. These mechanisms often work in tandem, as evidenced by studies showing that the combined application of all three mechanisms is necessary to fully recover the spontaneous activity of the brain following stroke [28].

Spontaneous recovery mechanisms occur at various levels, including cellular, molecular, and systems levels. This recovery is typically incomplete and varies among individuals. The best outcomes are generally associated with the restoration of function in injured but surviving neural tissue. Several restorative therapies aim to enhance recovery by fostering neuroplastic changes, which are similar to those observed during spontaneous recovery [6].

Research has also highlighted the importance of neural biomarkers in predicting recovery outcomes. The implementation of these biomarkers in clinical settings could enable a multimodal approach to assess brain state and recovery potential [6].

Moreover, the role of genetic factors in stroke recovery has gained attention. Studies suggest that biological mechanisms such as inflammation and repair processes are influenced by genetic variations. Recommendations have been made for harmonizing phenotype data to facilitate multicenter genetic studies that can elucidate the genetic underpinnings of stroke outcomes [35].

Cellular and trophic mechanisms are also vital for tissue regeneration following stroke. Recent research has indicated that stem/progenitor cells and neurotrophic factors play significant roles in tissue repair, providing optimism for therapeutic developments aimed at enhancing recovery [36].

The understanding of neural circuit mechanisms involved in recovery has evolved with advancements in technology, allowing for greater resolution in studying neural dynamics post-stroke. This includes exploring functional remapping, which is a process where the brain compensates for lost functions by reorganizing its circuitry [7].

Overall, recovery after stroke is a multifaceted process that integrates various biological, genetic, and therapeutic factors. Future research focusing on these diverse mechanisms will be essential for developing targeted interventions to improve recovery outcomes and reduce disability following stroke.

4 Challenges in Stroke Management and Recovery ​

4.1 Barriers to Effective Rehabilitation ​

Stroke is a complex neurological event characterized by a disruption of blood flow to the brain, leading to cellular injury and subsequent functional impairments. The mechanisms underlying stroke can be broadly categorized into two types: ischemic and hemorrhagic. Ischemic strokes are often caused by thrombus formation, emboli, or atherosclerosis, resulting in excitotoxicity, calcium overload, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation. Hemorrhagic strokes, on the other hand, involve bleeding into the brain, which can also lead to similar pathophysiological processes. Understanding these molecular mechanisms is essential for developing effective therapeutic approaches aimed at minimizing damage and enhancing recovery after stroke (Maida et al. 2024) [1].

Recovery from stroke involves a series of spontaneous and therapeutic-induced mechanisms. Spontaneous recovery refers to the natural healing processes that occur following stroke, which can include neuroplasticity, synaptogenesis, and functional reorganization of neural circuits. For instance, plastic adaptation, hyperexcitability, and synaptogenesis have been identified as critical mechanisms that facilitate the restoration of functional activity in the brain after stroke (Berger et al. 2019) [28]. These processes often mirror learning mechanisms observed in healthy individuals, suggesting that the brain can reorganize itself to compensate for lost functions (Rijntjes 2006) [5].

However, despite the brain's inherent capacity for recovery, the degree of functional restoration is highly variable among individuals. Factors such as the extent of the initial brain injury, lesion localization, and the presence of comorbidities can significantly influence recovery outcomes. Moreover, while neuroimaging studies have provided insights into the dynamic reorganization of brain networks post-stroke, translating these findings into effective rehabilitation strategies remains a challenge (Ances & D'Esposito 2000) [29].

Barriers to effective rehabilitation after stroke are multifaceted. One significant challenge is the limited understanding of the mechanisms that govern recovery. While recent advances in neurobiology have elucidated various pathways involved in recovery, including the roles of peripheral immune cells and neuroinflammatory responses, translating this knowledge into clinical practice is still in its infancy (Zhang et al. 2022) [8]. Additionally, individual variability in genetic factors may play a crucial role in recovery outcomes, emphasizing the need for personalized rehabilitation approaches (Lindgren et al. 2022) [35].

Another barrier is the timing and accessibility of rehabilitation services. Early intervention is crucial for maximizing recovery, yet many patients do not receive timely rehabilitation due to logistical issues, lack of resources, or inadequate healthcare infrastructure. Furthermore, the psychological aspects of stroke, including depression and anxiety, can hinder participation in rehabilitation programs and affect overall recovery (Livingston-Thomas et al. 2016) [11].

In summary, the mechanisms of stroke and recovery are complex and involve a myriad of biological processes. While there is a growing understanding of these mechanisms, significant barriers to effective rehabilitation persist, necessitating ongoing research and innovative approaches to improve outcomes for stroke survivors.

4.2 Disparities in Stroke Care ​

Stroke is a complex neurological condition characterized by the interruption of blood supply to the brain, leading to significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. The mechanisms underlying stroke can be broadly categorized into ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Ischemic strokes, which account for the majority of cases, occur due to thrombus or emboli obstructing blood flow, while hemorrhagic strokes result from the rupture of blood vessels. The intricate pathophysiology of stroke involves various factors such as thrombus formation, emboli, and atherosclerosis, contributing to excitotoxicity, calcium overload, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation, which are critical in the progression of brain injury following a stroke (Maida et al. 2024) [1].

The recovery process after a stroke is equally complex and involves multiple mechanisms at cellular, molecular, and systems levels. Recovery mechanisms can be classified into spontaneous recovery, which occurs naturally following the stroke, and therapeutic-induced recovery, which is facilitated by interventions aimed at enhancing neuroplasticity and functional recovery. Spontaneous recovery is characterized by a gradual return of function due to reorganization and adaptation of neural circuits, often involving processes such as plastic adaptation, hyperexcitability, and synaptogenesis (Berger et al. 2019) [28]. Neuroimaging studies have revealed that reorganization within motor and language areas is a dynamic process that resembles learning in healthy individuals, indicating that the brain can adapt in response to injury (Rijntjes 2006) [5].

The role of the immune system in recovery after stroke has garnered increasing attention. Peripheral immune cells contribute to both the acute damage processes and the later recovery phases. These immune cells can influence neuronal repair through various mechanisms, including the release of cytokines and participation in angiogenesis and neurogenesis, which are essential for tissue regeneration (Zhang et al. 2022) [8]. Furthermore, iron metabolism has been shown to play a crucial role in neurological recovery, as it is involved in various endogenous repair mechanisms such as gliosis and synaptic plasticity (Guo et al. 2022) [37].

Despite advancements in understanding stroke recovery mechanisms, disparities in stroke care persist, affecting outcomes. Factors contributing to these disparities include access to healthcare resources, differences in treatment protocols, and variations in patient demographics and comorbidities. The International Stroke Genetics Consortium has highlighted the need for harmonizing data collection methods to better understand genetic influences on stroke recovery, which may provide insights into personalized therapeutic approaches (Lindgren et al. 2022) [35].

Overall, the interplay of various biological mechanisms, including neuroplasticity, immune responses, and genetic factors, is crucial for understanding stroke recovery and addressing the challenges in stroke management and care disparities. Further research is necessary to develop targeted therapies that can enhance recovery and improve outcomes for stroke patients.

4.3 Future Directions in Stroke Research ​

Stroke is a complex neurological event characterized by the disruption of blood flow to the brain, leading to neuronal injury and various degrees of functional impairment. The mechanisms underlying stroke and subsequent recovery involve a multifaceted interplay of molecular, cellular, and systemic processes.

The pathophysiology of stroke can be attributed to factors such as thrombus formation, emboli, and atherosclerosis, which contribute to ischemic or hemorrhagic conditions. Key mechanisms involved in the progression of stroke include excitotoxicity, calcium overload, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation. Furthermore, non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), particularly microRNAs and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), play crucial roles in the pathophysiology and recovery following cerebral ischemia, suggesting potential therapeutic, diagnostic, and prognostic applications in cerebrovascular diseases [1].

Recovery from stroke is facilitated by several mechanisms, which can be broadly categorized into spontaneous recovery and therapeutic-induced recovery. Spontaneous recovery refers to the natural restorative processes that occur post-stroke, involving neuroplastic changes that enable the brain to reorganize and adapt. This includes the reorganization of neural circuits, which is influenced by lesion localization and the dynamic nature of neural plasticity [5]. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have revealed insights into these processes, indicating that recovery is linked to the establishment of new neural connections and the enhancement of existing ones [3].

The mechanisms of recovery can be understood through various perspectives. One critical aspect is the role of peripheral immune cells, which have been shown to influence recovery through cytokine release and interactions with neuronal cells. These immune responses can either facilitate or hinder recovery, highlighting the dual nature of immune cell involvement in post-stroke outcomes [8]. Additionally, three cooperative mechanisms—plastic adaptation, hyperexcitability, and synaptogenesis—have been identified as essential for restoring functional activity after stroke. The synergy of these mechanisms is necessary for effective recovery [28].

Future directions in stroke research should focus on integrating findings from various studies to develop comprehensive therapeutic strategies. Advances in neuroimaging and molecular biology will be pivotal in elucidating the complex interactions between neural circuits and recovery processes. The understanding of how changes in neural activity, population dynamics, and interhemispheric interactions contribute to recovery will inform the development of targeted interventions [7]. Furthermore, exploring the role of epigenetic mechanisms in neuroplasticity may reveal novel pathways for enhancing recovery [38].

In summary, the mechanisms of stroke and recovery are intricate and involve a combination of biological processes that require further exploration. A holistic approach that incorporates insights from neurobiology, immunology, and advanced imaging techniques will be essential in overcoming the challenges of stroke management and improving recovery outcomes.

5 Conclusion ​

The findings presented in this review highlight the intricate mechanisms underlying stroke and recovery, emphasizing the importance of understanding both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. The pathophysiological processes, including excitotoxicity, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation, play crucial roles in neuronal damage and subsequent recovery. Recovery mechanisms, driven by neuroplasticity, immune responses, and therapeutic interventions, underscore the potential for enhancing patient outcomes through targeted rehabilitation strategies. Despite advancements in stroke research, challenges such as disparities in care and the variability of recovery outcomes persist. Future research should focus on personalized approaches that integrate genetic, immunological, and neurobiological insights to optimize recovery and improve the quality of life for stroke survivors. The exploration of novel therapeutic targets and the role of emerging technologies in understanding neural dynamics will be vital in shaping effective interventions for stroke management.

References ​

  • [1] Carlo Domenico Maida;Rosario Luca Norrito;Salvatore Rizzica;Marco Mazzola;Elisa Rita Scarantino;Antonino Tuttolomondo. Molecular Pathogenesis of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Strokes: Background and Therapeutic Approaches.. International journal of molecular sciences(IF=4.9). 2024. PMID:38928006. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25126297.
  • [2] Wenlu Li;Paul George;Matine M Azadian;MingMing Ning;Amar Dhand;Steven C Cramer;S Thomas Carmichael;Eng H Lo. Changing genes, cells and networks to reprogram the brain after stroke.. Nature neuroscience(IF=20.0). 2025. PMID:40456908. DOI: 10.1038/s41593-025-01981-8.
  • [3] D Tombari;M C Ricciardi;N Bonaffini;M Pasquini;M Cecconi;V Di Piero;G L Lenzi. Functional MRI, drugs, and poststroke recovery.. Clinical and experimental hypertension (New York, N.Y. : 1993)(IF=3.5). 2006. PMID:16833038. DOI: 10.1080/10641960600549348.
  • [4] Mary T Joy;S Thomas Carmichael. Encouraging an excitable brain state: mechanisms of brain repair in stroke.. Nature reviews. Neuroscience(IF=26.7). 2021. PMID:33184469. DOI: 10.1038/s41583-020-00396-7.
  • [5] Michel Rijntjes. Mechanisms of recovery in stroke patients with hemiparesis or aphasia: new insights, old questions and the meaning of therapies.. Current opinion in neurology(IF=4.4). 2006. PMID:16415681. DOI: 10.1097/01.wco.0000203886.28068.38.
  • [6] Jessica M Cassidy;Steven C Cramer. Spontaneous and Therapeutic-Induced Mechanisms of Functional Recovery After Stroke.. Translational stroke research(IF=4.3). 2017. PMID:27109642. DOI: 10.1007/s12975-016-0467-5.
  • [7] Baruc Campos;Hoseok Choi;Andrew T DeMarco;Anna Seydell-Greenwald;Sara J Hussain;Mary T Joy;Peter E Turkeltaub;William Zeiger. Rethinking Remapping: Circuit Mechanisms of Recovery after Stroke.. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience(IF=4.0). 2023. PMID:37940595. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1425-23.2023.
  • [8] Zhaolong Zhang;Mengfei Lv;Xin Zhou;Yu Cui. Roles of peripheral immune cells in the recovery of neurological function after ischemic stroke.. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience(IF=4.0). 2022. PMID:36339825. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2022.1013905.
  • [9] Yinzhong Ma;Shilun Yang;Qianyan He;Dianhui Zhang;Junlei Chang. The Role of Immune Cells in Post-Stroke Angiogenesis and Neuronal Remodeling: The Known and the Unknown.. Frontiers in immunology(IF=5.9). 2021. PMID:34975872. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.784098.
  • [10] S Thomas Carmichael. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of neural repair after stroke: making waves.. Annals of neurology(IF=7.7). 2006. PMID:16634041. DOI: 10.1002/ana.20845.
  • [11] Jessica Livingston-Thomas;Paul Nelson;Sudhir Karthikeyan;Sabina Antonescu;Matthew Strider Jeffers;Susan Marzolini;Dale Corbett. Exercise and Environmental Enrichment as Enablers of Task-Specific Neuroplasticity and Stroke Recovery.. Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics(IF=6.9). 2016. PMID:26868018. DOI: 10.1007/s13311-016-0423-9.
  • [12] Xiangyue Zhou;Youwei Li;Cameron Lenahan;Yibo Ou;Minghuan Wang;Yue He. Glymphatic System in the Central Nervous System, a Novel Therapeutic Direction Against Brain Edema After Stroke.. Frontiers in aging neuroscience(IF=4.5). 2021. PMID:34421575. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.698036.
  • [13] Steven C Cramer. Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery.. Annals of neurology(IF=7.7). 2008. PMID:18383072. DOI: 10.1002/ana.21393.
  • [14] Rosita Stanzione;Maurizio Forte;Maria Cotugno;Franca Bianchi;Simona Marchitti;Speranza Rubattu. Role of DAMPs and of Leukocytes Infiltration in Ischemic Stroke: Insights from Animal Models and Translation to the Human Disease.. Cellular and molecular neurobiology(IF=4.8). 2022. PMID:32996044. DOI: 10.1007/s10571-020-00966-4.
  • [15] Mitch R Paro;Arijit R Chakraborty;Sophia Angelo;Shyam Nambiar;Ketan R Bulsara;Rajkumar Verma. Molecular mediators of angiogenesis and neurogenesis after ischemic stroke.. Reviews in the neurosciences(IF=4.1). 2023. PMID:36073599. DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2022-0049.
  • [16] C L Allen;U Bayraktutan. Oxidative stress and its role in the pathogenesis of ischaemic stroke.. International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society(IF=8.7). 2009. PMID:19930058. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2009.00387.x.
  • [17] Hanna Pawluk;Alina Woźniak;Agnieszka Tafelska-Kaczmarek;Agnieszka Kosinska;Mateusz Pawluk;Krzysztof Sergot;Renata Grochowalska;Renata Kołodziejska. The Role of IL-6 in Ischemic Stroke.. Biomolecules(IF=4.8). 2025. PMID:40305179. DOI: 10.3390/biom15040470.
  • [18] J Y Kim;M Kawabori;M A Yenari. Innate inflammatory responses in stroke: mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets.. Current medicinal chemistry(IF=3.5). 2014. PMID:24372209. DOI: 10.2174/0929867321666131228205146.
  • [19] Alexandru Gerdanovics;Ioana Cristina Stănescu;Camelia Manuela Mîrza;Gabriela Bombonica Dogaru;Cristina Ariadna Nicula;Paul-Mihai Boarescu;Cezara-Andreea Gerdanovics;Adriana Elena Bulboacă. Proinflammatory Risk Factors in Patients with Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)(IF=6.6). 2025. PMID:41154538. DOI: 10.3390/antiox14101229.
  • [20] Hansen Chen;Yacong He;Shuang Chen;Suhua Qi;Jiangang Shen. Therapeutic targets of oxidative/nitrosative stress and neuroinflammation in ischemic stroke: Applications for natural product efficacy with omics and systemic biology.. Pharmacological research(IF=10.5). 2020. PMID:32407958. DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104877.
  • [21] Rongrong Zhang;Mengxue Xu;Yu Wang;Fei Xie;Gang Zhang;Xinyue Qin. Nrf2-a Promising Therapeutic Target for Defensing Against Oxidative Stress in Stroke.. Molecular neurobiology(IF=4.3). 2017. PMID:27696223. DOI: 10.1007/s12035-016-0111-0.
  • [22] Salaheldin Abdelraouf Abdelsalam;Kaviyarasi Renu;Hamad Abu Zahra;Basem M Abdallah;Enas M Ali;Vishnu Priya Veeraraghavan;Kalaiselvi Sivalingam;Larance Ronsard;Rebai Ben Ammar;Devanathadesikan Seshadri Vidya;Palaniyandi Karuppaiya;S Y Al-Ramadan;Peramaiyan Rajendran. Polyphenols Mediate Neuroprotection in Cerebral Ischemic Stroke-An Update.. Nutrients(IF=5.0). 2023. PMID:36904106. DOI: 10.3390/nu15051107.
  • [23] Timothy H Murphy;Dale Corbett. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour.. Nature reviews. Neuroscience(IF=26.7). 2009. PMID:19888284. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2735.
  • [24] Chenye Qiao;Zongjian Liu;Shuyan Qie. The Implications of Microglial Regulation in Neuroplasticity-Dependent Stroke Recovery.. Biomolecules(IF=4.8). 2023. PMID:36979506. DOI: 10.3390/biom13030571.
  • [25] Wangwang Yan;Yuzhou Lin;Yi-Feng Chen;Yuling Wang;Jingxin Wang;Mingming Zhang. Enhancing Neuroplasticity for Post-Stroke Motor Recovery: Mechanisms, Models, and Neurotechnology.. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society(IF=5.2). 2025. PMID:40100694. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2025.3551753.
  • [26] Fang Yu;Tingting Huang;Yuanyuan Ran;Da Li;Lin Ye;Guiqin Tian;Jianing Xi;Zongjian Liu. New Insights Into the Roles of Microglial Regulation in Brain Plasticity-Dependent Stroke Recovery.. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience(IF=4.0). 2021. PMID:34421544. DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2021.727899.
  • [27] Rafał Szelenberger;Joanna Kostka;Joanna Saluk-Bijak;Elżbieta Miller. Pharmacological Interventions and Rehabilitation Approach for Enhancing Brain Self-repair and Stroke Recovery.. Current neuropharmacology(IF=5.3). 2020. PMID:31362657. DOI: 10.2174/1570159X17666190726104139.
  • [28] D Berger;E Varriale;L Michiels van Kessenich;H J Herrmann;L de Arcangelis. Three cooperative mechanisms required for recovery after brain damage.. Scientific reports(IF=3.9). 2019. PMID:31676810. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-50946-y.
  • [29] B M Ances;M D'Esposito. Neuroimaging of recovery of function after stroke: implications for rehabilitation.. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair(IF=3.7). 2000. PMID:11272473. DOI: 10.1177/154596830001400302.
  • [30] M P Reddy;V Reddy. Stroke rehabilitation.. American family physician(IF=3.5). 1997. PMID:9105202. DOI: .
  • [31] Faheem Shehjar;Briana Maktabi;Zainab A Rahman;Ghaith A Bahader;Antonisamy William James;Ahmed Naqvi;Reetika Mahajan;Zahoor A Shah. Stroke: Molecular mechanisms and therapies: Update on recent developments.. Neurochemistry international(IF=4.0). 2023. PMID:36460240. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuint.2022.105458.
  • [32] F Chollet;S C Cramer;C Stinear;L J Kappelle;J C Baron;C Weiller;P Azouvi;M Hommel;U Sabatini;T Moulin;J Tardy;M Valenti;S Montgomery;H Adams. Pharmacological therapies in post stroke recovery: recommendations for future clinical trials.. Journal of neurology(IF=4.6). 2014. PMID:24221642. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-013-7172-z.
  • [33] Xabier Beristain;Esteban Golombievski. Pharmacotherapy to Enhance Cognitive and Motor Recovery Following Stroke.. Drugs & aging(IF=3.8). 2015. PMID:26423272. DOI: 10.1007/s40266-015-0299-0.
  • [34] Zhenhua Zhou;Jianfei Lu;Wen-Wu Liu;Anatol Manaenko;Xianhua Hou;Qiyong Mei;Jun-Long Huang;Jiping Tang;John H Zhang;Honghong Yao;Qin Hu. Advances in stroke pharmacology.. Pharmacology & therapeutics(IF=12.5). 2018. PMID:29807056. DOI: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2018.05.012.
  • [35] Arne G Lindgren;Robynne G Braun;Jennifer Juhl Majersik;Philip Clatworthy;Shraddha Mainali;Colin P Derdeyn;Jane Maguire;Christina Jern;Jonathan Rosand;John W Cole;Jin-Moo Lee;Pooja Khatri;Paul Nyquist;Stéphanie Debette;Loo Keat Wei;Tatjana Rundek;Dana Leifer;Vincent Thijs;Robin Lemmens;Laura Heitsch;Kameshwar Prasad;Jordi Jimenez Conde;Martin Dichgans;Natalia S Rost;Steven C Cramer;Julie Bernhardt;Bradford B Worrall;Israel Fernandez-Cadenas; . International stroke genetics consortium recommendations for studies of genetics of stroke outcome and recovery.. International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society(IF=8.7). 2022. PMID:33739214. DOI: 10.1177/17474930211007288.
  • [36] Bogusław Machalinski. Tissue regeneration in stroke: cellular and trophic mechanisms.. Expert review of neurotherapeutics(IF=3.4). 2014. PMID:25008949. DOI: 10.1586/14737175.2014.939172.
  • [37] Xin Guo;Xiaofang Jin;Kang Han;Shaomeng Kang;Siyu Tian;Xin Lv;Mudi Feng;Huiwen Zheng;Yong Zuo;Guodong Xu;Ming Hu;Jing Xu;Peiyuan Lv;Yan-Zhong Chang. Iron promotes neurological function recovery in mice with ischemic stroke through endogenous repair mechanisms.. Free radical biology & medicine(IF=8.2). 2022. PMID:35202785. DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2022.02.017.
  • [38] Ryan J Felling;Hongjun Song. Epigenetic mechanisms of neuroplasticity and the implications for stroke recovery.. Experimental neurology(IF=4.2). 2015. PMID:25263580. DOI: .

MaltSci Intelligent Research Services ​

Search for more papers on MaltSci.com ​

Stroke Mechanisms · Neuroplasticity · Rehabilitation Strategies · Ischemic Stroke · Hemorrhagic Stroke

© 2025 MaltSci