MaltSci 麦伴科研

Appearance

Popular Reports / cell-biology

This report is written by MaltSci based on the latest literature and research findings

What are the mechanisms of cellular stress responses? ​

Abstract ​

Cellular stress responses are essential adaptive mechanisms that enable cells to survive and function under adverse conditions such as oxidative stress, nutrient deprivation, and thermal shock. These responses are orchestrated by a complex network of signaling pathways that detect stressors and initiate appropriate protective mechanisms, thereby maintaining cellular homeostasis. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for elucidating various pathological conditions, including cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and metabolic disorders. Prolonged cellular stress can lead to maladaptive responses, contributing to aging and increasing susceptibility to diseases. This review provides a comprehensive overview of key mechanisms involved in cellular stress responses, including the definition and types of cellular stress, the roles of molecular chaperones and heat shock proteins, and the critical function of autophagy. We explore the interplay between autophagy and apoptosis, discussing their implications for cell survival and death. Additionally, we examine the relevance of stress responses in various disease contexts, specifically focusing on cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and metabolic disorders. By integrating recent findings, we aim to highlight the implications of these stress response mechanisms in health and disease, ultimately seeking to inform potential therapeutic targets. Understanding these mechanisms will contribute to the ongoing discourse in the field of biomedical research and inform future directions for enhancing cellular resilience.

Outline ​

This report will discuss the following questions.

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Overview of Cellular Stress Responses
    • 2.1 Definition and Types of Cellular Stress
    • 2.2 Importance of Stress Responses in Cellular Function
  • 3 Key Mechanisms of Cellular Stress Responses
    • 3.1 Signaling Pathways Involved in Stress Responses
    • 3.2 Role of Molecular Chaperones and Heat Shock Proteins
    • 3.3 Autophagy and Its Role in Stress Adaptation
  • 4 Interplay Between Autophagy and Apoptosis
    • 4.1 Mechanisms of Crosstalk
    • 4.2 Implications for Cell Survival and Death
  • 5 Stress Responses in Disease Contexts
    • 5.1 Cancer
    • 5.2 Neurodegenerative Diseases
    • 5.3 Metabolic Disorders
  • 6 Future Directions and Therapeutic Implications
    • 6.1 Potential Therapeutic Targets
    • 6.2 Challenges in Translating Research to Clinical Applications
  • 7 Summary

1 Introduction ​

Cellular stress responses are essential adaptive mechanisms that enable cells to survive and function under adverse conditions such as oxidative stress, nutrient deprivation, and thermal shock. These responses are orchestrated by a complex network of signaling pathways that detect stressors and initiate appropriate protective mechanisms, thereby maintaining cellular homeostasis. The significance of understanding these mechanisms extends beyond basic cellular biology; it is crucial for elucidating various pathological conditions, including cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and metabolic disorders. For instance, prolonged cellular stress can lead to maladaptive responses, contributing to aging and increasing susceptibility to diseases [1].

Research in this field has evolved significantly, with recent advancements in molecular biology and genomics shedding light on the intricate details of cellular stress pathways. Studies have demonstrated that these pathways not only mediate cellular repair and survival but also play pivotal roles in regulating cell death and apoptosis when damage exceeds repair capacity [2]. Furthermore, the interplay between various stress response mechanisms, such as autophagy and apoptosis, is increasingly recognized as a critical factor in determining cell fate under stress [3][4]. This growing body of knowledge underscores the necessity of a comprehensive understanding of cellular stress responses to inform therapeutic strategies aimed at enhancing cellular resilience.

This review aims to provide a thorough overview of the key mechanisms involved in cellular stress responses. The first section will define cellular stress and its various types, emphasizing the importance of these responses in maintaining cellular function. Following this, we will delve into the key mechanisms of cellular stress responses, including the signaling pathways that mediate these processes, the roles of molecular chaperones and heat shock proteins, and the critical function of autophagy in stress adaptation. The subsequent section will explore the interplay between autophagy and apoptosis, discussing the mechanisms of crosstalk and their implications for cell survival and death.

Additionally, we will examine the relevance of stress responses in various disease contexts, specifically focusing on cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and metabolic disorders. By integrating recent findings, we aim to highlight the implications of these stress response mechanisms in health and disease, ultimately seeking to inform potential therapeutic targets. Finally, we will outline future directions in this field, addressing the challenges of translating research into clinical applications and identifying potential therapeutic targets for enhancing cellular resilience.

Through this comprehensive overview, we aspire to deepen the understanding of cellular stress responses and their implications for both fundamental biology and clinical applications, thereby contributing to the ongoing discourse in the field of biomedical research.

2 Overview of Cellular Stress Responses ​

2.1 Definition and Types of Cellular Stress ​

Cellular stress responses are complex mechanisms that enable cells to detect and adapt to various forms of stress, thereby maintaining homeostasis and promoting survival under adverse conditions. These responses can be broadly categorized into two types: universal mechanisms that are activated in response to macromolecular damage, and stressor-specific responses that vary according to the nature of the stressor.

The universal cellular stress response represents a defense mechanism of extraordinary physiological and pathophysiological significance. It is triggered by damage inflicted on macromolecules by environmental forces, leading to the activation of various protective pathways. This response encompasses the detection of stress, the activation of repair mechanisms, and, when necessary, the initiation of apoptosis when stress levels exceed cellular tolerance limits [2]. Key components of this response include the activation of stress proteins, which are conserved across different organisms and are critical for cellular protection [2].

Stressor-specific responses, on the other hand, are tailored to the particular type of stress encountered. For instance, oxidative stress triggers specific cellular pathways that include the upregulation of antioxidant proteins and the activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) in the endoplasmic reticulum [5]. Different stressors can induce various cellular repair mechanisms, including autophagy, which helps in the degradation of damaged organelles and proteins, thereby restoring cellular function [1].

The mechanisms underlying cellular stress responses can be further elucidated through specific pathways:

  1. DNA Damage Response (DDR): Cells have evolved intricate pathways to detect and repair DNA damage. These mechanisms ensure genomic integrity and prevent the propagation of mutations, which can lead to diseases such as cancer [6].

  2. Unfolded Protein Response (UPR): This pathway is activated in response to the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. The UPR aims to restore normal function by halting protein translation, degrading misfolded proteins, and increasing the production of molecular chaperones [5].

  3. Mitochondrial Stress Signaling: Mitochondria play a pivotal role in cellular energy metabolism and are central to the stress response. Mitochondrial dysfunction can lead to the release of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which serve as signaling molecules that activate protective pathways [7].

  4. Autophagy: This process is crucial for the degradation of damaged cellular components, thus promoting cell survival under stress conditions. It is often activated in parallel with other stress response mechanisms [1].

  5. Regulated Cell Death (RCD): When stress is beyond repair, cells may undergo regulated forms of cell death, such as apoptosis, to prevent the spread of damage. This process is tightly regulated and can be influenced by various signaling pathways [8].

  6. Heat Shock Response (HSR): This is a universal protective mechanism activated by elevated temperatures and other stressors, leading to the expression of heat shock proteins that assist in protein folding and protection against aggregation [9].

In summary, cellular stress responses involve a network of signaling pathways that detect stress, activate protective mechanisms, and regulate cell fate decisions. The ability of cells to adapt to stress is vital for maintaining homeostasis and preventing disease, particularly in the context of aging and various pathological conditions [1][10]. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing therapeutic strategies aimed at enhancing cellular resilience in the face of stress.

2.2 Importance of Stress Responses in Cellular Function ​

Cellular stress responses are critical mechanisms that allow cells to detect and adapt to various forms of stress, ensuring their survival and proper function under adverse conditions. These responses are not only vital for individual cell health but also play significant roles in maintaining overall organismal homeostasis.

The cellular stress response is a universal mechanism of extraordinary physiological and pathophysiological significance, representing a defense reaction of cells to damage inflicted by environmental forces on macromolecules. The response encompasses a range of mechanisms that cells employ to cope with different types of stressors, including oxidative stress, DNA damage, and protein misfolding. It is characterized by the activation of specific pathways that can either promote repair processes or lead to programmed cell death when damage is irreparable [2].

One of the key components of cellular stress responses is the integrated stress response (ISR), which activates a complex program allowing cells to survive under stress conditions. The ISR reprograms gene expression to enhance the transcription and translation of stress response genes while repressing the synthesis of non-essential proteins, thereby reducing the metabolic burden on the cell [8]. Additionally, stress granules (SGs) can form as a result of ISR activation, serving to inhibit various forms of regulated cell death (RCD) such as apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necroptosis, thus promoting cellular resilience [8].

The stress response mechanisms are interconnected and include several specific pathways. For instance, the DNA damage response (DDR) activates repair mechanisms in response to genotoxic stress, while the unfolded protein response (UPR) is triggered by the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Both pathways share common elements and can influence each other, reflecting a highly coordinated response to cellular stress [7].

Moreover, the immune system serves as a major extrinsic protection mechanism against cellular stress. Natural killer (NK) cells, for example, can directly recognize and respond to stressed cells, particularly those associated with viral infections or early malignant transformations. This recognition is facilitated by specific receptors and ligands that engage with stressed cells [6].

Cellular stress responses are not solely limited to immediate protective mechanisms; they also influence systemic responses across tissues and organs. Stressed cells can emit signals that facilitate a coordinated adaptive response throughout the organism, thereby linking local cellular responses to broader physiological outcomes [7].

The importance of stress responses in cellular function is underscored by their role in preventing diseases such as cancer and age-associated disorders. Persistent stress and the inability to adequately respond to it can lead to cellular dysfunction, contributing to the aging process and increasing susceptibility to various diseases [1]. Furthermore, in the context of transplantation and regenerative medicine, understanding cellular stress responses is crucial for ensuring the quality and viability of cells used in therapeutic applications [1].

In summary, cellular stress responses encompass a complex network of mechanisms that detect stress, activate protective pathways, and maintain cellular and systemic homeostasis. These responses are essential for cell survival and function, highlighting their significance in health and disease management.

3 Key Mechanisms of Cellular Stress Responses ​

3.1 Signaling Pathways Involved in Stress Responses ​

Cellular stress responses are complex adaptive mechanisms that enable cells to maintain homeostasis and promote survival under various stress conditions. These responses are governed by intricate signaling pathways that orchestrate a multitude of cellular processes, including repair, adaptation, and, if necessary, apoptosis. Key mechanisms and signaling pathways involved in cellular stress responses include the following:

  1. Integrated Stress Response (ISR): The ISR is a fundamental adaptive pathway activated by diverse stress stimuli. A core event in this pathway is the phosphorylation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 alpha (eIF2α) by one of the eIF2α kinase family members. This phosphorylation leads to a decrease in global protein synthesis while promoting the expression of specific genes, including the transcription factor ATF4, which facilitates cellular recovery from stress (Pakos-Zebrucka et al., 2016)[11].

  2. Unfolded Protein Response (UPR): The UPR is a critical response to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. It enhances the capacity of the ER to fold proteins correctly and promotes the degradation of misfolded proteins. The UPR involves three main pathways: IRE1, PERK, and ATF6, each of which activates different downstream signaling cascades that help restore ER homeostasis (Hotamisligil & Davis, 2016)[12].

  3. Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) Pathways: These pathways, particularly p38 MAPK and JNK, are crucial for mediating cellular responses to various stressors, including oxidative stress, heat shock, and inflammatory cytokines. MAPK signaling can lead to adaptive responses that promote cell survival or, under severe stress, trigger apoptosis (Canovas & Nebreda, 2021)[13].

  4. Mitochondrial Stress Response: Mitochondria play a pivotal role in cellular stress signaling, especially in response to metabolic and oxidative stress. Mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPRmt) is activated under mitochondrial stress, promoting mitochondrial integrity and function. This response is essential for cancer cell survival under stress conditions (O'Malley et al., 2020)[14].

  5. Oxidative Stress Response: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) serve as critical signaling molecules in response to stress. Cells utilize antioxidant defense mechanisms to counteract oxidative stress, involving the activation of pathways that regulate genes responsible for detoxifying ROS and maintaining redox homeostasis (Ray et al., 2012)[15].

  6. Cell-Nan-Autonomous Signaling: Stress responses are not only cell-autonomous but can also involve communication between cells. Cell-non-autonomous signaling pathways coordinate stress responses across tissues, enabling a systemic response to stressors. This coordination is vital for maintaining organismal proteostasis and overall health (O'Brien & van Oosten-Hawle, 2016)[16].

  7. Cell Death and Senescence Pathways: In response to chronic stress, cells may activate pathways leading to senescence or programmed cell death (apoptosis). These pathways are critical for eliminating damaged cells and preventing the propagation of stress-induced mutations (Cicalese et al., 2021)[17].

In summary, cellular stress responses involve a multifaceted network of signaling pathways that are essential for maintaining cellular integrity and function in the face of various stressors. These mechanisms not only help cells adapt to immediate challenges but also play a significant role in long-term health and disease outcomes. Understanding these pathways provides valuable insights into potential therapeutic targets for diseases associated with cellular stress dysregulation.

3.2 Role of Molecular Chaperones and Heat Shock Proteins ​

Cellular stress responses are critical mechanisms that allow cells to adapt to various forms of environmental stress, including heat shock, oxidative stress, and tissue damage. One of the key components of these responses is the family of proteins known as molecular chaperones, particularly heat shock proteins (HSPs). These proteins play a vital role in maintaining protein homeostasis and protecting cells from stress-induced damage.

Molecular chaperones, such as HSP70, HSP90, and HSP60, are essential for proper protein folding, assembly, and degradation. Under conditions of stress, these proteins assist in preventing the aggregation of misfolded proteins and facilitate their refolding or proteolytic degradation. For instance, exposure to environmental stress triggers the inducible expression of heat shock proteins, which function as molecular chaperones or proteases. They interact with diverse protein substrates to assist in their folding, thereby preventing the formation of damaged or misfolded molecules. This process is crucial for cell survival during stress conditions, as it restores protein homeostasis and mitigates the effects of stress [18].

The heat shock response is initiated when cells encounter stress, leading to a dramatic change in gene expression patterns and an increase in the synthesis of heat shock proteins. These proteins act by binding to partially denatured proteins, dissociating protein aggregates, and ensuring the correct folding and intracellular translocation of newly synthesized polypeptides [19]. The signaling pathways that lead to the activation of heat shock transcription factors (HSFs), which bind to the promoters of heat shock genes, are crucial for this response [20].

In addition to their protective roles, molecular chaperones are also implicated in regulating apoptosis and cell growth. They function at key regulatory points in the control of apoptosis, indicating their dual role in promoting cell survival and mediating cell death under certain conditions [18]. For example, the chaperone Hsp90 has been shown to play a significant role in cellular signaling pathways and is often overexpressed in various cancers, suggesting its involvement in the tolerance of genetic disarray characteristic of malignant transformation [21].

Moreover, molecular chaperones can exhibit immunomodulatory activities and are increasingly recognized for their roles in various disease states, including cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, and cardiovascular disorders [22]. The interplay between molecular chaperones and signaling pathways is complex, as these chaperones not only assist in protein folding but also influence cellular decisions regarding survival or apoptosis during stress [23].

In summary, the mechanisms of cellular stress responses are intricately linked to the functions of molecular chaperones and heat shock proteins. These proteins are essential for protecting cells from stress-induced damage, maintaining protein homeostasis, and regulating cellular processes related to survival and apoptosis. Understanding these mechanisms is crucial for developing therapeutic strategies targeting molecular chaperones in various diseases.

3.3 Autophagy and Its Role in Stress Adaptation ​

Cellular stress responses are critical for maintaining homeostasis and ensuring cell survival under adverse conditions. Among the various mechanisms that cells employ to cope with stress, autophagy plays a pivotal role. Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved catabolic process that facilitates the degradation and recycling of cellular components, including damaged organelles and misfolded proteins. This process is particularly important in the context of various stressors, such as nutrient deprivation, oxidative stress, and exposure to pathogens.

Autophagy can be triggered by multiple forms of cellular stress, including nutrient or growth factor deprivation, hypoxia, reactive oxygen species (ROS), DNA damage, and the presence of intracellular pathogens. The initiation of autophagy involves the formation of double-membrane structures known as autophagosomes, which encapsulate the cellular material targeted for degradation. These autophagosomes subsequently fuse with lysosomes, where the contents are degraded by lysosomal enzymes [24].

One of the key aspects of autophagy is its ability to adapt to the specific type of stress encountered. For instance, in the context of metabolic stress, autophagy serves as a mechanism for cellular quality control by removing potentially toxic proteins and organelles, thus maintaining cellular function and viability [25]. During oxidative stress, autophagy can promote the clearance of damaged organelles, such as mitochondria, and contribute to the detoxification of ROS [26]. This selective degradation is crucial for cellular survival and adaptation, especially in environments where stressors are prevalent [27].

Furthermore, the regulation of autophagy is intricately linked to various signaling pathways. Stress-responsive transcription factors, such as p53 and NF-κB, have been shown to play significant roles in modulating autophagy in response to stress [28]. These factors can either enhance or inhibit autophagic processes depending on the context and type of stress encountered. For example, in the setting of cancer, the interplay between autophagy and cellular senescence highlights the dual roles of autophagy as both a pro-survival and pro-death mechanism [29].

In addition to its role in stress adaptation, autophagy also interacts with other cellular stress responses, creating a complex network of signaling pathways. This integration allows for a coordinated response to stress, enabling cells to switch between survival and apoptosis depending on the severity and duration of the stressor [30]. For instance, under mild stress conditions, autophagy may act as a survival mechanism, while under severe stress, cells may transition to programmed cell death if the stress is unmanageable [31].

Overall, autophagy serves as a critical mechanism of cellular stress response, allowing cells to adapt to changing environmental conditions and maintain homeostasis. Its multifaceted role in regulating cellular health underscores its potential as a therapeutic target in various diseases, including cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and metabolic diseases [32]. Understanding the precise mechanisms by which autophagy is regulated and its interactions with other stress responses will be essential for developing effective strategies to manipulate autophagy for therapeutic purposes.

4 Interplay Between Autophagy and Apoptosis ​

4.1 Mechanisms of Crosstalk ​

Cellular stress responses are critical for maintaining homeostasis and determining cell fate under adverse conditions. Among the various mechanisms that cells employ, the interplay between autophagy and apoptosis is particularly significant. Autophagy, a process of cellular degradation and recycling, serves as a survival mechanism, while apoptosis, or programmed cell death, is a response to severe stress that prevents damage to surrounding cells. The crosstalk between these two processes involves complex signaling pathways and regulatory mechanisms.

The mechanisms of crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis can be categorized into several paradigms. One primary paradigm involves the physical and functional interactions between specific proteins that are involved in both processes. For instance, apoptotic proteins such as caspases can influence autophagy by degrading autophagic proteins, thereby determining whether a cell will survive or undergo apoptosis (Rubinstein and Kimchi, 2012)[33].

Another significant mechanism of crosstalk is through shared signaling pathways. Both autophagy and apoptosis can be regulated by common upstream signals such as reactive oxygen species (ROS), calcium ions, and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress pathways. Under conditions of ER stress, for example, autophagy can either inhibit apoptosis by preventing caspase activation or promote apoptosis by degrading essential autophagic proteins (Song et al., 2017)[34]. This dual role of autophagy highlights its context-dependent function, where it can act as a protector or a killer based on the cellular environment.

Sphingolipids have also been identified as key regulators in the crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis. These bioactive lipids can modulate the induction of either process, effectively "switching" the cellular response based on their specific species. For instance, sphingosine-1-phosphate promotes cell survival via autophagy, while ceramide is associated with the induction of apoptosis (Young et al., 2013)[35].

Furthermore, the role of oxidative stress is critical in this interplay. Autophagy helps mitigate oxidative damage by degrading ROS-producing organelles, while elevated oxidative stress can trigger autophagy as a protective response. This bidirectional relationship shapes the fate of cells, particularly in stem cells, where the balance between autophagy and apoptosis influences self-renewal and differentiation (Rossin et al., 2025)[36].

Recent studies have highlighted the importance of understanding these mechanisms, especially in the context of diseases such as cancer, where the dysregulation of autophagy and apoptosis can lead to tumor progression and treatment resistance. For instance, the activation of autophagy in response to chemotherapy can sometimes lead to drug resistance, emphasizing the need for therapeutic strategies that target both pathways concurrently (Bata and Cosford, 2021)[37].

In conclusion, the crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis is governed by a variety of mechanisms, including protein interactions, shared signaling pathways, and the influence of bioactive lipids and oxidative stress. Understanding these intricate relationships is crucial for developing effective therapeutic interventions in various diseases.

4.2 Implications for Cell Survival and Death ​

Cellular stress responses are critical for maintaining cellular homeostasis and determining cell fate under adverse conditions. The interplay between autophagy and apoptosis is a key aspect of these responses, influencing whether a cell survives or undergoes programmed cell death.

Autophagy is a catabolic process that degrades dysfunctional cellular components through lysosomal pathways, serving primarily as a survival mechanism during stress. It is activated in response to various stressors, including nutrient deprivation, infection, and hypoxia, allowing cells to recycle damaged organelles and proteins to maintain metabolic balance. In contrast, apoptosis, or programmed cell death, is a highly regulated process that leads to the self-destruction of cells in response to severe or irreparable cellular damage.

The relationship between autophagy and apoptosis is complex, as both processes can be triggered by common upstream signals, leading to either a survival response or cell death. For instance, stress conditions can initiate autophagy to help cells endure temporary damage, but if the stress is excessive or prolonged, apoptosis may be activated as a final resort to eliminate severely damaged cells. This transition from autophagy to apoptosis can be mediated by various signaling pathways and molecular mechanisms.

Research has shown that autophagy can inhibit apoptosis by degrading pro-apoptotic factors and preventing the activation of caspases, the enzymes responsible for executing apoptosis. Conversely, in certain contexts, autophagy may promote apoptosis by degrading key proteins involved in autophagic processes, such as Beclin-1 and Atg5, thereby facilitating the apoptotic machinery. This dual role of autophagy highlights its significance in cellular decision-making processes under stress.

The molecular mechanisms underlying the crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis include various signaling pathways such as the PERK/ATF4, IRE1α, and ATF6 pathways, which are activated during endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. These pathways can regulate both autophagic and apoptotic processes, leading to an integrated cellular response to stress. For example, under ER stress, autophagy may initially protect cells by removing damaged organelles, but if stress persists, apoptosis may be triggered as a protective mechanism to prevent further damage to surrounding tissues.

Moreover, epigenetic modifications also play a crucial role in regulating the expression of genes involved in autophagy and apoptosis. Changes in DNA methylation and histone modifications can alter the balance between these two processes, potentially leading to pathological conditions such as cancer. Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) has been identified as another factor that modulates the aggregation of misfolded proteins, influencing both autophagy and apoptosis pathways.

In summary, the interplay between autophagy and apoptosis is essential for determining cell fate in response to stress. While autophagy primarily acts as a protective mechanism to promote cell survival, it can also lead to apoptosis under certain conditions. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that govern this interplay is vital for developing therapeutic strategies targeting these pathways in various diseases, including cancer and neurodegenerative disorders [33][34][38].

5 Stress Responses in Disease Contexts ​

5.1 Cancer ​

Cellular stress responses are critical mechanisms that enable cells to adapt to adverse conditions, particularly in the context of cancer. These responses can be triggered by various stressors, including oxidative stress, metabolic alterations, genotoxic stress, and hypoxia. Understanding these mechanisms is essential, as they play a significant role in cancer progression and therapy resistance.

  1. Types of Cellular Stress: Cancer cells encounter multiple forms of stress such as oxidative stress from reactive oxygen species (ROS), metabolic stress due to nutrient deprivation, and genotoxic stress resulting from DNA damage. These stressors typically initiate programmed cell death in normal cells; however, cancer cells have evolved to resist these signals, allowing them to survive and proliferate despite the adverse conditions [39].

  2. Regulatory Molecules: Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) are pivotal in modulating the cellular stress response in cancer. LncRNAs are involved in various regulatory processes, influencing metabolic stress, oxidative stress, and genotoxic stress responses. They help cancer cells to adapt by promoting or inhibiting transcription, splicing, and translation [40].

  3. Mitochondrial Stress Response: Mitochondria play a crucial role in cellular stress responses, particularly in cancer. They are involved in sensing various stress signals and can trigger pathways that either lead to cell death or survival. The mitochondrial unfolded protein response (UPR) is an emerging pathway that helps alleviate cellular stress, thus maintaining mitochondrial integrity and promoting cancer cell survival [14].

  4. Immune Surveillance: Cellular stress responses also interact with the immune system. Cancer cells can manipulate stress pathways to evade immune detection. For instance, the stress responses activated by tumor cells can modulate the inflammatory environment, affecting how immune cells recognize and respond to the tumor [41].

  5. Adaptive Mechanisms: Cancer cells utilize various adaptive mechanisms to survive stress. These include the activation of heat shock proteins (HSPs), antioxidant responses mediated by nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2), and the unfolded protein response (UPR). These pathways enable cancer cells to manage stress effectively and contribute to therapeutic resistance [42].

  6. Intercellular Communication: The tumor microenvironment (TME) also plays a significant role in stress responses. Non-malignant cells, including fibroblasts and immune cells, respond to the stress signals emitted by cancer cells, creating a complex interplay that can either support or inhibit tumor progression [43].

  7. Clinical Implications: Understanding the mechanisms of cellular stress responses in cancer has important clinical implications. Targeting these pathways can enhance the efficacy of existing therapies and lead to the development of novel therapeutic strategies aimed at overcoming resistance [44].

In summary, cellular stress responses in cancer involve a sophisticated network of signaling pathways and regulatory molecules that allow cancer cells to survive and thrive under adverse conditions. These mechanisms not only contribute to cancer progression but also present potential targets for therapeutic intervention.

5.2 Neurodegenerative Diseases ​

Cellular stress responses play a critical role in maintaining cellular homeostasis and survival, particularly in the context of neurodegenerative diseases. These responses are activated in reaction to various stressors, including oxidative stress, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and neuroinflammation, which are prevalent in conditions such as Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), Huntington's disease (HD), and Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

One prominent mechanism of cellular stress response is the integrated stress response (ISR), a conserved network that regulates protein synthesis in response to internal or external stressors. The ISR pathway is crucial for cell survival and homeostasis, particularly in the central nervous system (CNS). Dysregulation of ISR signaling has been implicated in various neurodegenerative diseases. Acute ISR activation can provide neuroprotection by promoting cell survival mechanisms, while prolonged ISR activation may lead to neurodegeneration through pathways involving protein misfolding, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial dysfunction (Bravo-Jimenez et al., 2025) [45].

Oxidative stress is another key factor in cellular stress responses. It results from an imbalance between reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and the antioxidant defense systems. In neurodegenerative diseases, oxidative stress can induce damage to lipids, proteins, and nucleic acids, contributing to neuronal injury and death. The mechanisms through which oxidative stress exerts its detrimental effects include mitochondrial dysfunction, activation of inflammatory pathways, and apoptosis (Yaribeygi et al., 2018) [46]. Additionally, oxidative stress can lead to the activation of cell death pathways, further exacerbating neuronal loss (Higgins et al., 2010) [47].

Another critical aspect of the cellular stress response is the unfolded protein response (UPR), which is activated during ER stress. This response aims to restore normal function by halting protein translation, degrading misfolded proteins, and activating stress-responsive genes. In neurodegenerative diseases, persistent ER stress and an inadequate UPR can contribute to neuronal cell death (Doyle et al., 2011) [48].

Mitophagy, a specific form of autophagy targeting damaged mitochondria, is also essential in the context of cellular stress responses. It plays a vital role in maintaining mitochondrial quality control and is crucial for cellular adaptation to stress. Dysregulation of mitophagy has been linked to neurodegenerative diseases, as impaired clearance of dysfunctional mitochondria can lead to increased oxidative stress and neuronal death (Swerdlow & Wilkins, 2020) [49].

Furthermore, cellular senescence, characterized by a state of permanent cell cycle arrest, can also impact neurodegeneration. Senescent cells can secrete pro-inflammatory factors that exacerbate neuroinflammation and tissue dysfunction, contributing to the progression of neurodegenerative diseases (Gillispie et al., 2021) [50].

In summary, the mechanisms of cellular stress responses in neurodegenerative diseases encompass a complex interplay of oxidative stress, ER stress, ISR, mitophagy, and cellular senescence. These responses are critical for cellular adaptation and survival but can also lead to detrimental effects when dysregulated, ultimately contributing to the pathogenesis of neurodegenerative disorders. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for developing effective therapeutic strategies aimed at mitigating cellular stress and promoting neuronal health.

5.3 Metabolic Disorders ​

Cellular stress responses are crucial mechanisms that enable cells to adapt to various stressors, particularly in the context of metabolic disorders. These responses involve a complex interplay of signaling pathways, organelle function, and molecular chaperones, all aimed at maintaining cellular homeostasis and preventing damage.

One primary feature of cellular stress in metabolic disorders is endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. The ER is essential for protein folding and processing, and its dysfunction can lead to a range of metabolic issues. ER stress arises from various stressors, including proteotoxicity, lipotoxicity, and glucotoxicity, which are often linked to metabolic disturbances such as obesity and type 2 diabetes. When the ER is stressed, it activates adaptive responses, such as the unfolded protein response (UPR), which aims to restore normal function by enhancing protein folding capacity and degrading misfolded proteins [51].

Molecular chaperones (MCs) play a critical role in cellular adaptation to stress. They assist in protein stabilization and refolding, thereby contributing to stress tolerance against inflammatory and metabolic disorders. The phenomenon of hormesis, where low doses of stressors induce a beneficial adaptive response, highlights the importance of MCs in this context [52]. Additionally, various organelles, including mitochondria and lysosomes, are involved in sensing metabolic changes and orchestrating stress responses, indicating that cellular stress responses are not localized but rather systemic [53].

In metabolic disorders, oxidative stress is another significant factor. It results from an imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the cellular antioxidant defenses. This oxidative stress can lead to cellular dysfunction, including impaired signaling pathways, altered metabolism, and inflammation [54]. Inflammation itself can exacerbate metabolic dysfunction, as proinflammatory cytokines secreted by adipose tissue contribute to insulin resistance and other metabolic abnormalities [55].

Moreover, the activation of stress kinases, such as c-jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), has been implicated in the pathogenesis of metabolic syndrome. JNK activation can influence various metabolic processes, including glucose and lipid metabolism, and its inhibition has been proposed as a potential therapeutic target for metabolic disorders [56].

Finally, the neuroendocrine system, particularly the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, plays a vital role in mediating stress responses. Chronic stress can lead to persistent activation of this axis, resulting in metabolic dysregulation, such as increased fat accumulation and insulin resistance [55]. The interplay between stress, inflammation, and metabolism underscores the complexity of cellular stress responses in the context of metabolic disorders.

In summary, cellular stress responses involve a multifaceted network of mechanisms, including ER stress activation, the role of molecular chaperones, oxidative stress management, stress kinase signaling, and neuroendocrine regulation. Understanding these pathways is crucial for developing therapeutic strategies aimed at mitigating the impact of metabolic disorders.

6 Future Directions and Therapeutic Implications ​

6.1 Potential Therapeutic Targets ​

Cellular stress responses are critical mechanisms that enable cells to adapt to various stressors, ensuring their survival and functionality. The responses are initiated by a range of stressors, including oxidative stress, DNA damage, nutrient deprivation, and pathological conditions such as inflammation or hypoxia. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for developing therapeutic strategies aimed at mitigating the effects of stress on cellular function and overall health.

The primary mechanisms involved in cellular stress responses include:

  1. Intracellular Signaling Pathways: Cells activate several signaling pathways in response to stress. These pathways include the DNA damage response, the unfolded protein response (UPR), and autophagy. For instance, the DNA damage response helps maintain genomic integrity, while the UPR addresses misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. Autophagy facilitates the degradation of damaged organelles and proteins, thereby supporting cellular homeostasis[7].

  2. Mitochondrial Function: Mitochondria play a pivotal role in cellular stress responses. Stress conditions can lead to mitochondrial dysfunction, which is linked to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and can trigger cell death or senescence if not properly managed. The activation of mitophagy, a specific form of autophagy targeting dysfunctional mitochondria, is essential for maintaining mitochondrial health and preventing cellular damage[57].

  3. Immune System Engagement: The immune system is an extrinsic protective mechanism against cellular stress. For example, natural killer (NK) cells can recognize and eliminate stressed or damaged cells, thus preventing the spread of potential malignancies. The interaction between stressed cells and the immune system highlights the importance of immune responses in cellular stress management[6].

  4. Hormonal and Cytokine Responses: Stress responses are also mediated by neuroendocrine factors, such as glucocorticoids, which can modulate inflammation and cellular repair processes. Chronic stress leads to elevated cortisol levels, which can suppress immune responses and contribute to various stress-related diseases[58].

Future directions in the study of cellular stress responses involve exploring the therapeutic implications of these mechanisms. Potential therapeutic targets include:

  • Modulation of Stress Response Pathways: Therapeutic strategies may focus on enhancing the activity of autophagy and mitophagy to promote the clearance of damaged cellular components. This could be particularly beneficial in age-related diseases and conditions characterized by cellular senescence[59].

  • Targeting the Immune Response: Developing agents that can enhance the recognition and elimination of stressed cells by the immune system may provide new avenues for cancer therapy and treatments for chronic inflammatory diseases[60].

  • Regulation of Hormonal Responses: Interventions that modulate the neuroendocrine response to stress, such as cortisol synthesis inhibitors or agents that enhance resilience to stress, could mitigate the adverse effects of chronic stress on health[61].

  • MicroRNA Therapeutics: The role of microRNAs in regulating stress responses presents an exciting area for therapeutic development. Modulating specific microRNAs involved in stress signaling pathways may provide a novel approach to treating stress-related disorders[62].

In conclusion, cellular stress responses encompass a complex interplay of signaling pathways, mitochondrial function, immune engagement, and hormonal regulation. Future therapeutic strategies should aim to target these pathways to enhance cellular resilience and combat the detrimental effects of chronic stress, potentially improving outcomes in various diseases associated with cellular dysfunction and aging.

6.2 Challenges in Translating Research to Clinical Applications ​

Cellular stress responses are critical mechanisms that enable cells to adapt to various stressors, ensuring cellular homeostasis and survival. The primary mechanisms involved in cellular stress responses include the activation of signaling pathways that facilitate repair, adaptation, and, if necessary, programmed cell death. Different stressors, such as oxidative stress, DNA damage, and metabolic disturbances, trigger distinct cellular responses.

  1. Mechanisms of Cellular Stress Responses: Cellular stress responses encompass several pathways:

    • DNA Damage Response (DDR): This pathway is activated in response to genotoxic stress, enabling cells to repair damaged DNA or undergo apoptosis if the damage is irreparable. It plays a crucial role in preventing tumorigenesis by eliminating cells with significant genomic instability (Galluzzi et al., 2018) [7].
    • Unfolded Protein Response (UPR): Triggered by the accumulation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum, the UPR aims to restore normal function by halting protein translation, degrading misfolded proteins, and increasing the production of molecular chaperones (Galluzzi et al., 2018) [7].
    • Mitochondrial Stress Signaling: Mitochondrial dysfunction can lead to the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn activate stress response pathways aimed at restoring mitochondrial function or inducing cell death if the stress is chronic (Cicalese et al., 2021) [17].
    • Autophagy: This process involves the degradation of damaged organelles and proteins, facilitating cellular recovery and homeostasis. It is a critical response to nutrient deprivation and stress (Cicalese et al., 2021) [17].
    • Cellular Senescence: Persistent stress can lead to cellular senescence, a state of irreversible cell cycle arrest that prevents the proliferation of damaged cells but can contribute to aging and age-related diseases (Qin et al., 2024) [59].

  2. Future Directions and Therapeutic Implications: Understanding the intricate networks of cellular stress responses opens avenues for therapeutic interventions. Targeting specific pathways could lead to the development of treatments for stress-related diseases. For instance, enhancing the UPR or autophagy might alleviate conditions like neurodegeneration and cancer, where stress responses are dysregulated (Dutta et al., 2022) [63]. Additionally, manipulating the cellular senescence process could offer strategies for combating age-related disorders (Mensch & Zierz, 2020) [3].

    Furthermore, the role of microRNAs in modulating stress responses presents another potential therapeutic target. MicroRNAs can regulate gene expression related to stress signaling pathways, suggesting that they could be harnessed to develop treatments for stress-induced disorders (Du et al., 2019) [62].

  3. Challenges in Translating Research to Clinical Applications: Despite the promising insights into cellular stress responses, several challenges hinder the translation of this research into clinical applications. The complexity of stress response networks and their context-dependent nature complicate the identification of universal therapeutic targets. Moreover, the interplay between various stress pathways and the influence of individual genetic backgrounds add layers of complexity that must be considered when developing treatments (Poljšak & Milisav, 2012) [1].

    Additionally, the need for robust diagnostic methods to assess the state of cellular stress in patients is critical for the successful application of targeted therapies. Current research efforts must focus on developing reliable biomarkers that can indicate stress levels and the efficacy of therapeutic interventions (Balakin et al., 2025) [61].

In conclusion, while the mechanisms of cellular stress responses are well-characterized, future research must address the challenges of translating these findings into effective clinical strategies. The integration of molecular insights with clinical applications will be essential for advancing therapeutic approaches to stress-related diseases.

7 Conclusion ​

The mechanisms of cellular stress responses play a pivotal role in maintaining cellular homeostasis and influencing cell fate under adverse conditions. Key findings from this review highlight the complexity of these responses, which include various signaling pathways such as the integrated stress response, unfolded protein response, and autophagy. These pathways not only facilitate cellular repair and adaptation but also determine whether cells undergo apoptosis when damage is irreparable. Current research indicates that dysregulation of these stress responses is implicated in numerous diseases, including cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and metabolic syndromes. As our understanding of these mechanisms deepens, it opens new avenues for therapeutic interventions aimed at enhancing cellular resilience. Future research should focus on identifying specific therapeutic targets within these pathways and addressing the challenges of translating laboratory findings into clinical applications. This includes the development of reliable biomarkers for assessing cellular stress levels and the efficacy of potential treatments, ultimately aiming to improve outcomes for patients suffering from stress-related diseases.

References ​

  • [1] Borut Poljšak;Irina Milisav. Clinical implications of cellular stress responses.. Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences(IF=3.4). 2012. PMID:22642596. DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2012.2510.
  • [2] Dietmar Kültz. Molecular and evolutionary basis of the cellular stress response.. Annual review of physiology(IF=19.1). 2005. PMID:15709958. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.67.040403.103635.
  • [3] Alexander Mensch;Stephan Zierz. Cellular Stress in the Pathogenesis of Muscular Disorders-From Cause to Consequence.. International journal of molecular sciences(IF=4.9). 2020. PMID:32823799. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21165830.
  • [4] Ben Loos;Anna-Mart Engelbrecht;Richard A Lockshin;Daniel J Klionsky;Zahra Zakeri. The variability of autophagy and cell death susceptibility: Unanswered questions.. Autophagy(IF=14.3). 2013. PMID:23846383. DOI: 10.4161/auto.25560.
  • [5] Sadao Wakabayashi;Hiderou Yoshida. The essential biology of the endoplasmic reticulum stress response for structural and computational biologists.. Computational and structural biotechnology journal(IF=4.1). 2013. PMID:24688718. DOI: 10.5936/csbj.201303010.
  • [6] C J Chan;M J Smyth;L Martinet. Molecular mechanisms of natural killer cell activation in response to cellular stress.. Cell death and differentiation(IF=15.4). 2014. PMID:23579243. DOI: 10.1038/cdd.2013.26.
  • [7] Lorenzo Galluzzi;Takahiro Yamazaki;Guido Kroemer. Linking cellular stress responses to systemic homeostasis.. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology(IF=90.2). 2018. PMID:30305710. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-018-0068-0.
  • [8] Prem Prasad Lamichhane;Parimal Samir. Cellular Stress: Modulator of Regulated Cell Death.. Biology(IF=3.5). 2023. PMID:37759572. DOI: 10.3390/biology12091172.
  • [9] M G Santoro. Heat shock factors and the control of the stress response.. Biochemical pharmacology(IF=5.6). 2000. PMID:10605935. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-2952(99)00299-3.
  • [10] Michael Collins;Melody S Clark;Manuela Truebano. The environmental cellular stress response: the intertidal as a multistressor model.. Cell stress & chaperones(IF=3.2). 2023. PMID:37129699. DOI: 10.1007/s12192-023-01348-7.
  • [11] Karolina Pakos-Zebrucka;Izabela Koryga;Katarzyna Mnich;Mila Ljujic;Afshin Samali;Adrienne M Gorman. The integrated stress response.. EMBO reports(IF=6.2). 2016. PMID:27629041. DOI: 10.15252/embr.201642195.
  • [12] Gökhan S Hotamisligil;Roger J Davis. Cell Signaling and Stress Responses.. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology(IF=8.4). 2016. PMID:27698029. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a006072.
  • [13] Begoña Canovas;Angel R Nebreda. Diversity and versatility of p38 kinase signalling in health and disease.. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology(IF=90.2). 2021. PMID:33504982. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-020-00322-w.
  • [14] Jordan O'Malley;Rahul Kumar;Joseph Inigo;Nagendra Yadava;Dhyan Chandra. Mitochondrial Stress Response and Cancer.. Trends in cancer(IF=17.5). 2020. PMID:32451306. DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2020.04.009.
  • [15] Paul D Ray;Bo-Wen Huang;Yoshiaki Tsuji. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis and redox regulation in cellular signaling.. Cellular signalling(IF=3.7). 2012. PMID:22286106. DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.01.008.
  • [16] Daniel O'Brien;Patricija van Oosten-Hawle. Regulation of cell-non-autonomous proteostasis in metazoans.. Essays in biochemistry(IF=5.7). 2016. PMID:27744329. DOI: 10.1042/EBC20160006.
  • [17] Stephanie M Cicalese;Josiane Fernandes da Silva;Fernanda Priviero;R Clinton Webb;Satoru Eguchi;Rita C Tostes. Vascular Stress Signaling in Hypertension.. Circulation research(IF=16.2). 2021. PMID:33793333. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.121.318053.
  • [18] C Jolly;R I Morimoto. Role of the heat shock response and molecular chaperones in oncogenesis and cell death.. Journal of the National Cancer Institute(IF=7.2). 2000. PMID:11018092. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/92.19.1564.
  • [19] S Leppä;L Sistonen. Heat shock response--pathophysiological implications.. Annals of medicine(IF=4.3). 1997. PMID:9073326. DOI: 10.3109/07853899708998745.
  • [20] I J Benjamin;D R McMillan. Stress (heat shock) proteins: molecular chaperones in cardiovascular biology and disease.. Circulation research(IF=16.2). 1998. PMID:9686751. DOI: 10.1161/01.res.83.2.117.
  • [21] Luke Whitesell;Rochelle Bagatell;Ryan Falsey. The stress response: implications for the clinical development of hsp90 inhibitors.. Current cancer drug targets(IF=3.5). 2003. PMID:14529386. DOI: 10.2174/1568009033481787.
  • [22] Alireza Shamaei-Tousi;Julian P Halcox;Brian Henderson. Stressing the obvious? Cell stress and cell stress proteins in cardiovascular disease.. Cardiovascular research(IF=13.3). 2007. PMID:17141205. DOI: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2006.10.025.
  • [23] Vladimir L Gabai;Michael Y Sherman. Invited review: Interplay between molecular chaperones and signaling pathways in survival of heat shock.. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)(IF=3.3). 2002. PMID:11896044. DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01101.2001.
  • [24] Guido Kroemer;Guillermo Mariño;Beth Levine. Autophagy and the integrated stress response.. Molecular cell(IF=16.6). 2010. PMID:20965422. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.023.
  • [25] Joseph Satriano;Kumar Sharma. Autophagy and metabolic changes in obesity-related chronic kidney disease.. Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association(IF=5.6). 2013. PMID:23901047. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gft229.
  • [26] Kiichi Nakahira;Suzanne M Cloonan;Kenji Mizumura;Augustine M K Choi;Stefan W Ryter. Autophagy: a crucial moderator of redox balance, inflammation, and apoptosis in lung disease.. Antioxidants & redox signaling(IF=6.1). 2014. PMID:23879400. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2013.5373.
  • [27] Inna Rabinovich-Nikitin;Matthew Love;Lorrie A Kirshenbaum. Intersection of autophagy regulation and circadian rhythms in the heart.. Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease(IF=4.2). 2022. PMID:35065229. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2022.166354.
  • [28] Federico Pietrocola;Valentina Izzo;Mireia Niso-Santano;Erika Vacchelli;Lorenzo Galluzzi;Maria Chiara Maiuri;Guido Kroemer. Regulation of autophagy by stress-responsive transcription factors.. Seminars in cancer biology(IF=15.7). 2013. PMID:23726895. DOI: .
  • [29] Yoojin Kwon;Ji Wook Kim;Jo Ae Jeoung;Mi-Sung Kim;Chanhee Kang. Autophagy Is Pro-Senescence When Seen in Close-Up, but Anti-Senescence in Long-Shot.. Molecules and cells(IF=6.5). 2017. PMID:28927262. DOI: 10.14348/molcells.2017.0151.
  • [30] I Tavassoly;J Parmar;A N Shajahan-Haq;R Clarke;W T Baumann;J J Tyson. Dynamic Modeling of the Interaction Between Autophagy and Apoptosis in Mammalian Cells.. CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology(IF=3.0). 2015. PMID:26225250. DOI: 10.1002/psp4.29.
  • [31] Franklin C Torres. Facing and Overcoming Academic Challenges: Perspectives From Deaf Latino/a First-Generation College Students.. American annals of the deaf(IF=0.9). 2019. PMID:31080180. DOI: 10.1353/aad.2019.0008.
  • [32] Yan Cheng;Xingcong Ren;William N Hait;Jin-Ming Yang. Therapeutic targeting of autophagy in disease: biology and pharmacology.. Pharmacological reviews(IF=17.3). 2013. PMID:23943849. DOI: 10.1124/pr.112.007120.
  • [33] Assaf D Rubinstein;Adi Kimchi. Life in the balance - a mechanistic view of the crosstalk between autophagy and apoptosis.. Journal of cell science(IF=3.6). 2012. PMID:23377657. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.115865.
  • [34] Shuling Song;Jin Tan;Yuyang Miao;Mengmeng Li;Qiang Zhang. Crosstalk of autophagy and apoptosis: Involvement of the dual role of autophagy under ER stress.. Journal of cellular physiology(IF=4.0). 2017. PMID:28067409. DOI: 10.1002/jcp.25785.
  • [35] Megan M Young;Mark Kester;Hong-Gang Wang. Sphingolipids: regulators of crosstalk between apoptosis and autophagy.. Journal of lipid research(IF=4.1). 2013. PMID:23152582. DOI: 10.1194/jlr.R031278.
  • [36] Daniela Rossin;Maria-Giulia Perrelli;Marco Lo Iacono;Raffaella Rastaldo;Claudia Giachino. Dynamic Interplay Between Autophagy and Oxidative Stress in Stem Cells: Implications for Regenerative Medicine.. Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland)(IF=6.6). 2025. PMID:40563323. DOI: 10.3390/antiox14060691.
  • [37] Nicole Bata;Nicholas D P Cosford. Cell Survival and Cell Death at the Intersection of Autophagy and Apoptosis: Implications for Current and Future Cancer Therapeutics.. ACS pharmacology & translational science(IF=3.7). 2021. PMID:34927007. DOI: 10.1021/acsptsci.1c00130.
  • [38] Subhajit Chakraborty;Piyasa Nandi;Jagdish Mishra; Niharika;Ankan Roy;Soumen Manna;Tirthankar Baral;Prahallad Mishra;Pradyumna Kumar Mishra;Samir Kumar Patra. Molecular mechanisms in regulation of autophagy and apoptosis in view of epigenetic regulation of genes and involvement of liquid-liquid phase separation.. Cancer letters(IF=10.1). 2024. PMID:38458592. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2024.216779.
  • [39] Patrick Connerty;Richard B Lock;Charles E de Bock. Long Non-coding RNAs: Major Regulators of Cell Stress in Cancer.. Frontiers in oncology(IF=3.3). 2020. PMID:32266130. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00285.
  • [40] Katerina Pierouli;Eleni Papakonstantinou;Louis Papageorgiou;Io Diakou;Thanasis Mitsis;Konstantina Dragoumani;Demetrios A Spandidos;Flora Bacopoulou;George P Chrousos;George Ν Goulielmos;Elias Eliopoulos;Dimitrios Vlachakis. Long non‑coding RNAs and microRNAs as regulators of stress in cancer (Review).. Molecular medicine reports(IF=3.5). 2022. PMID:36281919. DOI: .
  • [41] Ruth Seelige;Stephen Searles;Jack D Bui. Mechanisms regulating immune surveillance of cellular stress in cancer.. Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS(IF=6.2). 2018. PMID:28744671. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-017-2597-7.
  • [42] Gabriella D'Orazi;Mara Cirone. Mutant p53 and Cellular Stress Pathways: A Criminal Alliance That Promotes Cancer Progression.. Cancers(IF=4.4). 2019. PMID:31052524. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11050614.
  • [43] Aldo Ummarino;Nicholas Calà;Paola Allavena. Extrinsic and Cell-Intrinsic Stress in the Immune Tumor Micro-Environment.. International journal of molecular sciences(IF=4.9). 2024. PMID:39596467. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252212403.
  • [44] Marilyne Labrie;Joan S Brugge;Gordon B Mills;Ioannis K Zervantonakis. Therapy resistance: opportunities created by adaptive responses to targeted therapies in cancer.. Nature reviews. Cancer(IF=66.8). 2022. PMID:35264777. DOI: 10.1038/s41568-022-00454-5.
  • [45] Maria Astrid Bravo-Jimenez;Shivangi Sharma;Soheila Karimi-Abdolrezaee. The integrated stress response in neurodegenerative diseases.. Molecular neurodegeneration(IF=17.5). 2025. PMID:39972469. DOI: 10.1186/s13024-025-00811-6.
  • [46] Habib Yaribeygi;Yunes Panahi;Behjat Javadi;Amirhossein Sahebkar. The Underlying Role of Oxidative Stress in Neurodegeneration: A Mechanistic Review.. CNS & neurological disorders drug targets(IF=3.0). 2018. PMID:29692267. DOI: 10.2174/1871527317666180425122557.
  • [47] Gavin C Higgins;Philip M Beart;Yea Seul Shin;Minghui Jessica Chen;Nam Sang Cheung;Phillip Nagley. Oxidative stress: emerging mitochondrial and cellular themes and variations in neuronal injury.. Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD(IF=3.1). 2010. PMID:20463398. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-2010-100321.
  • [48] Karen M Doyle;Donna Kennedy;Adrienne M Gorman;Sanjeev Gupta;Sandra J M Healy;Afshin Samali. Unfolded proteins and endoplasmic reticulum stress in neurodegenerative disorders.. Journal of cellular and molecular medicine(IF=4.2). 2011. PMID:21722302. DOI: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01374.x.
  • [49] Natalie S Swerdlow;Heather M Wilkins. Mitophagy and the Brain.. International journal of molecular sciences(IF=4.9). 2020. PMID:33352896. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21249661.
  • [50] Gregory J Gillispie;Eric Sah;Sudarshan Krishnamurthy;Mohamed Y Ahmidouch;Bin Zhang;Miranda E Orr. Evidence of the Cellular Senescence Stress Response in Mitotically Active Brain Cells-Implications for Cancer and Neurodegeneration.. Life (Basel, Switzerland)(IF=3.4). 2021. PMID:33671362. DOI: 10.3390/life11020153.
  • [51] Imke L Lemmer;Nienke Willemsen;Nazia Hilal;Alexander Bartelt. A guide to understanding endoplasmic reticulum stress in metabolic disorders.. Molecular metabolism(IF=6.6). 2021. PMID:33484951. DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2021.101169.
  • [52] P K Lakshmi;Shweta Kumar;Sulakshhna Pawar;Beena Briget Kuriakose;M S Sudheesh;Rajesh Singh Pawar. Targeting metabolic syndrome with phytochemicals: Focus on the role of molecular chaperones and hormesis in drug discovery.. Pharmacological research(IF=10.5). 2020. PMID:32492491. DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104925.
  • [53] Yusuke Sekine;Ryan Houston;Shiori Sekine. Cellular metabolic stress responses via organelles.. Experimental cell research(IF=3.5). 2021. PMID:33582095. DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2021.112515.
  • [54] Vibha Rani;Gagan Deep;Rakesh K Singh;Komaraiah Palle;Umesh C S Yadav. Oxidative stress and metabolic disorders: Pathogenesis and therapeutic strategies.. Life sciences(IF=5.1). 2016. PMID:26851532. DOI: .
  • [55] Ioannis Kyrou;George P Chrousos;Constantine Tsigos. Stress, visceral obesity, and metabolic complications.. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences(IF=4.8). 2006. PMID:17148735. DOI: 10.1196/annals.1367.008.
  • [56] Richa Garg;Sanjana Kumariya;Roshan Katekar;Saurabh Verma;Umesh K Goand;Jiaur R Gayen. JNK signaling pathway in metabolic disorders: An emerging therapeutic target.. European journal of pharmacology(IF=4.7). 2021. PMID:33812885. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2021.174079.
  • [57] Teng Sun;Yu Han;Jia-Lei Li;Xiang-Ying Jiao;Lin Zuo;Jin Wang;Hai-Xiong Wang;Jun-Li Yang;Ji-Min Cao;Jian-Xun Wang. FOXO3a-dependent PARKIN negatively regulates cardiac hypertrophy by restoring mitophagy.. Cell & bioscience(IF=6.2). 2022. PMID:36539848. DOI: 10.1186/s13578-022-00935-y.
  • [58] T M O'Connor;D J O'Halloran;F Shanahan. The stress response and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis: from molecule to melancholia.. QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians(IF=6.4). 2000. PMID:10873181. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/93.6.323.
  • [59] Tian Qin;Tao Chen;Rui Ma;Huan Li;Cui Li;Jin Zhao;Jinguo Yuan;Zuoming Zhang;Xiaoxuan Ning. Stress Hormones: Unveiling the Role in Accelerated Cellular Senescence.. Aging and disease(IF=6.9). 2024. PMID:39226159. DOI: 10.14336/AD.2024.0262.
  • [60] Zeming Wu;Jing Qu;Weiqi Zhang;Guang-Hui Liu. Stress, epigenetics, and aging: Unraveling the intricate crosstalk.. Molecular cell(IF=16.6). 2024. PMID:37963471. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2023.10.006.
  • [61] Evgenii Balakin;Ksenia Yurku;Mark Ivanov;Alexander Izotov;Valeriya Nakhod;Vasiliy Pustovoyt. Regulation of Stress-Induced Immunosuppression in the Context of Neuroendocrine, Cytokine, and Cellular Processes.. Biology(IF=3.5). 2025. PMID:39857306. DOI: 10.3390/biology14010076.
  • [62] Jie Du;Mingliang Li;Qiong Huang;Wanli Liu;Wen-Qun Li;Yuan-Jian Li;Zhi-Cheng Gong. The critical role of microRNAs in stress response: Therapeutic prospect and limitation.. Pharmacological research(IF=10.5). 2019. PMID:30553824. DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.12.007.
  • [63] Naibedya Dutta;Gilberto Garcia;Ryo Higuchi-Sanabria. Hijacking Cellular Stress Responses to Promote Lifespan.. Frontiers in aging(IF=4.3). 2022. PMID:35821861. DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2022.860404.

MaltSci Intelligent Research Services ​

Search for more papers on MaltSci.com ​

cellular stress responses · signaling pathways · autophagy · heat shock proteins · disease mechanisms

© 2025 MaltSci