MaltSci 麦伴科研

Appearance

Popular Reports / Emerging Frontiers

This report is written by MaltSci based on the latest literature and research findings

How does synthetic biology design biological systems? ​

Abstract ​

Synthetic biology has emerged as a revolutionary interdisciplinary field that integrates biology, engineering, and computer science to design and construct novel biological systems. This report explores the principles, methodologies, and applications of synthetic biology, highlighting its potential to address critical global challenges such as healthcare, food security, and environmental sustainability. The core concepts of modularity, standardization, and the Design-Build-Test-Learn cycle are central to the systematic engineering of biological systems, allowing for the rational design of bioparts and devices. Key advancements in genetic engineering, particularly the CRISPR genome editing technology, have significantly enhanced the capabilities of synthetic biology, enabling precise modifications of genetic material and the creation of complex genetic networks. Real-world applications of synthetic biology are illustrated through case studies in healthcare, agriculture, and environmental management, showcasing innovations such as engineered therapeutics, crop improvements, and bioremediation strategies. Despite the progress made, the field faces challenges including the unpredictability of biological systems, the need for improved interoperability among components, and ethical considerations surrounding the manipulation of life forms. This report emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and the integration of computational tools to advance synthetic biology further. Ultimately, synthetic biology holds the promise of transforming various industries and reshaping our understanding of biological systems, offering scalable and sustainable solutions to some of the most pressing challenges of our time.

Outline ​

This report will discuss the following questions.

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Fundamentals of Synthetic Biology
    • 2.1 Definition and Scope
    • 2.2 Historical Development
    • 2.3 Key Concepts and Terminology
  • 3 Tools and Techniques in Synthetic Biology
    • 3.1 Genetic Engineering and Cloning
    • 3.2 CRISPR and Genome Editing
    • 3.3 Bioinformatics and Computational Tools
  • 4 Design Principles of Biological Systems
    • 4.1 Modular Design and Standardization
    • 4.2 Systematic Engineering Approaches
    • 4.3 Design-Build-Test-Learn Cycle
  • 5 Applications of Synthetic Biology
    • 5.1 Healthcare Innovations
    • 5.2 Agricultural Biotechnology
    • 5.3 Environmental Applications
  • 6 Challenges and Ethical Considerations
    • 6.1 Technical and Scientific Challenges
    • 6.2 Ethical Implications and Public Perception
    • 6.3 Regulatory Frameworks
  • 7 Conclusion

1 Introduction ​

Synthetic biology has emerged as a transformative interdisciplinary field that integrates principles from biology, engineering, and computer science to design and construct novel biological systems. This innovative domain seeks to harness the capabilities of living organisms by employing engineering principles such as standardization, modularity, and abstraction, allowing for the rational design of biological parts, devices, and systems. As the world faces pressing challenges related to healthcare, food security, and environmental sustainability, synthetic biology offers a promising avenue for developing solutions that are both scalable and sustainable[1][2]. The significance of synthetic biology lies not only in its potential to revolutionize industries but also in its capacity to reshape our understanding of life itself.

The evolution of synthetic biology can be traced back to the early 2000s, when researchers began to articulate foundational principles aimed at redesigning biological systems. These principles include the separation of design from fabrication, the use of standardized biological components, and the application of iterative design processes[3][4]. Over the past two decades, substantial advancements have been made in the field, resulting in the development of complex synthetic systems that demonstrate functionality in various applications, from medical therapeutics to biofuels and environmental remediation[5][6]. Despite these advancements, the field still grapples with significant challenges, including the unpredictability of biological systems and the need for improved interoperability among biological parts[7][8].

Current research in synthetic biology is characterized by a diverse array of methodologies and tools that facilitate the design and engineering of biological systems. Genetic engineering and cloning techniques, along with groundbreaking genome editing technologies such as CRISPR, have revolutionized our ability to manipulate genetic material with precision[5][8]. Additionally, bioinformatics and computational tools play a crucial role in modeling biological processes and guiding experimental design, thereby enhancing the efficiency of the design-build-test-learn cycle that is central to synthetic biology[8][9].

This report is organized into several key sections that will provide a comprehensive overview of the methodologies and strategies employed in synthetic biology. The first section will delve into the fundamentals of synthetic biology, including its definition, historical development, and key concepts[5]. Following this, we will explore the various tools and techniques that are essential for synthetic biology, with a focus on genetic engineering, CRISPR technology, and bioinformatics[2][8]. The subsequent section will discuss the design principles that underpin the construction of biological systems, emphasizing modular design, systematic engineering approaches, and the iterative design cycle[3][4].

In addition to the theoretical underpinnings, this report will highlight real-world applications of synthetic biology across healthcare, agriculture, and environmental sectors. Case studies will illustrate how synthetic biology is being utilized to address complex biological challenges, such as developing novel therapeutics, enhancing crop resilience, and creating sustainable bioprocesses[6][8]. Finally, we will address the challenges and ethical considerations that accompany the rapid advancement of synthetic biology, including technical hurdles, public perception, and regulatory frameworks[3][5].

By examining the principles, tools, and applications of synthetic biology, this report aims to provide a comprehensive resource for researchers, practitioners, and students interested in the innovative approaches that this field offers. Understanding the methodologies and strategies involved in designing biological systems will not only deepen our appreciation for synthetic biology but also illuminate its implications for the future of biotechnology and its role in solving global challenges.

2 Fundamentals of Synthetic Biology ​

2.1 Definition and Scope ​

Synthetic biology is defined as the application of engineering design principles to biology, aimed at the rational design and engineering of biologically based parts, devices, or systems. This field integrates foundational advances in molecular biology with engineering methodologies, allowing for the systematic construction of biological systems with defined functionalities. The core principles guiding synthetic biology include modularity, standardization, and abstraction, which facilitate the design, assembly, and testing of synthetic biological systems.

The design process in synthetic biology often follows a systematic framework known as the Design-Build-Test-Learn cycle. This iterative cycle encompasses several stages: specifying the biological system, modeling its components, analyzing the design, assembling the parts, and testing the functionality of the constructed system. By leveraging computational tools and mathematical modeling, synthetic biologists can create robust and predictable biological systems that can perform predefined functions[8].

Biological systems are dismantled and reassembled into novel configurations to create useful applications. This involves encoding designs in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), where DNA serves as the blueprint for biological parts. These parts are then combined to form devices, which are integrated into larger biological systems[5]. The approach is often compared to using modular toy building blocks, allowing for the easy combination and optimization of bioparts, which are shared in open registries for collaboration among researchers worldwide[3].

Synthetic biology encompasses various strategies, including "top-down" and "bottom-up" approaches. The top-down strategy utilizes existing natural biological components to construct synthetic networks, whereas the bottom-up strategy aims to create biological systems from scratch, designing new components that do not exist in nature. This latter approach seeks to understand and reconstruct minimal biological systems capable of basic life functions, such as self-replication and self-organization[6].

Advancements in DNA synthesis and sequencing technologies have significantly contributed to the capabilities of synthetic biology, enabling the development of complex genetic systems and metabolic pathways. These systems range from simple genetic switches to intricate biosynthetic pathways that can produce pharmaceuticals, biofuels, and other valuable compounds[10].

Furthermore, synthetic biology emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration, drawing insights from various fields such as engineering, computer science, and social sciences. This collaborative approach not only enhances the design and functionality of synthetic systems but also addresses the ethical and societal implications of biotechnological advancements[3].

In summary, synthetic biology represents a convergence of biology and engineering, employing a systematic and modular approach to design biological systems. By utilizing principles of standardization and abstraction, researchers are able to innovate and optimize biological functions for a wide array of applications, from healthcare to environmental sustainability[4][11][12].

2.2 Historical Development ​

Synthetic biology is fundamentally concerned with the design and engineering of biological systems, leveraging principles from both engineering and biology. The historical development of synthetic biology can be traced back to its early articulation of guiding principles that have shaped its current practices. One of the key aspects of synthetic biology is the systematic approach to redesigning biological entities to fulfill specific functions, such as generating new chemicals, enhancing human health, and addressing environmental challenges [1].

The design process in synthetic biology typically follows a structured cycle known as the Design-Build-Test-Learn cycle. This framework allows synthetic biologists to dismantle and reassemble biological cells and processes to create novel systems with useful applications [5]. The design is encoded in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), where biological parts (bioparts) are constructed and combined into devices, which are then integrated into larger biological systems. This modular approach facilitates rapid prototyping and the exchange of designs among researchers globally [5].

Central to the development of synthetic biology are advances in DNA sequencing and synthesis technologies, which have enabled the manipulation of genetic components at unprecedented scales [5]. The field employs engineering principles such as standardization, modularity, and abstraction, allowing for the creation of compatible designs akin to building blocks. These modular designs not only simplify the assembly process but also enhance the predictability of the resulting biological systems [5].

Moreover, the integration of computational tools and methodologies has been pivotal in advancing synthetic biology. Computational design tools assist in modeling and analyzing biological systems, thus streamlining the design cycle [8]. The ability to simulate and predict outcomes before physical implementation has revolutionized how synthetic biologists approach the construction of new systems.

Historically, synthetic biology has evolved from simple control devices aimed at regulating single genes to more complex multi-gene networks that enable sophisticated functionalities. This progression highlights the discipline's capability to design intricate systems that can operate in living organisms, with applications ranging from drug development to environmental remediation [13].

The interdisciplinary nature of synthetic biology has also played a crucial role in its development. Collaborations between biologists, engineers, and even professionals from fields such as design and ethics have enriched the discourse surrounding synthetic biology, providing diverse perspectives that enhance its methodologies and applications [3].

In summary, synthetic biology's approach to designing biological systems is characterized by a structured design cycle, the use of modular and standardized components, significant advances in computational tools, and a collaborative interdisciplinary framework. This combination of strategies has allowed synthetic biology to emerge as a powerful engineering discipline with the potential to transform various sectors, including healthcare, agriculture, and environmental management [11].

2.3 Key Concepts and Terminology ​

Synthetic biology employs a systematic approach to the design and engineering of biological systems, utilizing principles derived from traditional engineering disciplines. The fundamental concepts and methodologies involved in synthetic biology can be outlined as follows:

  1. Modularity: One of the key principles of synthetic biology is modularity, which involves decoupling complex biological systems into smaller, orthogonal sub-systems. This allows for the reuse of these modules across various applications, akin to how engineering uses standardized parts. The modular approach facilitates the design of complex systems by enabling components to be combined in predictable ways [14].

  2. Standardization: Synthetic biology relies heavily on the use of standardized biological parts, often referred to as "bioparts." These bioparts are encoded by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and are assembled to create devices and systems that perform specific functions. The standardization of these parts promotes compatibility and efficiency in design, enabling rapid prototyping and easier sharing of designs among researchers [5].

  3. Design-Build-Test-Learn Cycle: The design process in synthetic biology follows an iterative cycle known as the Design-Build-Test-Learn cycle. This involves designing a biological system, building it, testing its functionality, and learning from the results to inform future designs. Computers play a critical role in this cycle, from mathematical modeling to the automation of assembly and experimentation [5].

  4. Interdisciplinary Collaboration: The field of synthetic biology benefits from collaboration across various disciplines, including biology, engineering, computer science, and even social sciences. This interdisciplinary approach enriches the design process by incorporating diverse perspectives and methodologies, thereby enhancing the understanding of how biological systems function and how they can be engineered [3].

  5. Applications and Impact: Synthetic biology has a wide range of applications, including healthcare, environmental sustainability, and industrial processes. It aims to improve human health by developing better diagnostic tools and treatments, as well as to create sustainable industrial processes that reduce environmental impact. For instance, engineered organisms can be designed to produce biofuels or biopharmaceuticals, thereby contributing to both economic and ecological goals [5].

  6. Advancements in Technology: The progress in DNA sequencing and synthesis technologies has significantly propelled the field of synthetic biology. These advancements allow for the precise engineering of genetic components, enabling the construction of complex biological systems that can perform desired functions [15].

  7. Understanding Biological Principles: A fundamental goal of synthetic biology is to understand the underlying principles of biological systems. By constructing synthetic systems, researchers can gain insights into natural biological phenomena, which can inform both synthetic design and biological research [12].

In summary, synthetic biology integrates engineering principles with biological knowledge to design and construct new biological systems. This approach emphasizes modularity, standardization, and an iterative design process, all of which are supported by advancements in technology and interdisciplinary collaboration. The potential applications of synthetic biology are vast, aiming to address critical challenges in health, environment, and industry.

3 Tools and Techniques in Synthetic Biology ​

3.1 Genetic Engineering and Cloning ​

Synthetic biology is a rapidly evolving interdisciplinary field that focuses on the design and engineering of biological systems by applying engineering principles to biological processes. This discipline employs a systematic approach known as the Design-Build-Test-Learn cycle, which is essential for the development of new biological functionalities and systems.

The design phase in synthetic biology involves creating detailed specifications for biological systems, which are encoded in DNA. This process begins with the selection and assembly of standardized biological parts, known as bioparts, which can be combined to form devices that ultimately contribute to the construction of larger biological systems. The concept of modularity is central to this process, allowing for the easy combination and optimization of different bioparts, much like building blocks. This modular approach facilitates the sharing of specifications in open registries, enabling collaboration among synthetic biologists worldwide[5].

Advancements in molecular biology and engineering design principles have led to the development of various tools that streamline the design and assembly of biological systems. These tools include in silico biosystems design, DNA synthesis and assembly technologies, and construct verification methods. For instance, tools such as Selenzyme provide automated workflows for enzyme selection in metabolic pathway design, allowing researchers to efficiently identify the best candidates for catalyzing specific reactions[16].

In addition to standardization and modularity, synthetic biology leverages computational tools and automation to enhance the design process. These technologies enable high-throughput assembly and testing of genetic constructs, allowing for rapid prototyping of new biological systems[17]. The integration of software tools as "genetic compilers" facilitates the transformation of high-level design specifications into engineered genetic circuits, which can be tested and optimized using automated experimental platforms[18].

Moreover, the field has recognized the importance of biological synergies—interactions between biological parts that can produce emergent behaviors beneficial for system functionality. By understanding and harnessing these synergies, synthetic biologists can enhance the performance of designed systems, such as in functional circuit design or multi-drug treatments[19].

Overall, synthetic biology represents a paradigm shift in how biological systems are designed and engineered, moving from a purely theoretical understanding to a practical application of engineering principles that enable the creation of novel biological entities with tailored functionalities. The continuous development of tools and methodologies in this field not only facilitates the design and construction of biological systems but also holds the potential to revolutionize various applications, including healthcare, agriculture, and environmental sustainability[6][8][11].

3.2 CRISPR and Genome Editing ​

Synthetic biology employs a systematic approach to design and construct biological systems by dismantling and reassembling biological cells and processes to create novel systems with useful functions. The foundational principle of synthetic biology is the encoding of designs through deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), which serves as the basis for constructing biological parts (bioparts). These bioparts are combined to form devices, which are then integrated into larger biological systems. This design process is facilitated by computers, which are utilized throughout the Design-Build-Test-Learn cycle, encompassing mathematical modeling and the automation of assembly and experimentation through robotics [5].

Central to the advancements in synthetic biology is the development of genome editing technologies, particularly the CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats) system. CRISPR technology has revolutionized genetic manipulation by providing a precise and adaptable tool for genome editing. Initially discovered in bacteria as a defense mechanism against foreign nucleic acids, CRISPR has been repurposed for various applications, including single-nucleotide resolution editing, multiple-gene editing, transcriptional regulation, and large-scale genomic modifications [20].

The versatility of CRISPR systems allows for targeted DNA cleavage, enabling diverse genome engineering approaches such as insertions, deletions, and modifications. This capability is particularly valuable in metabolic engineering, where CRISPR facilitates the discovery and evaluation of relevant genes and pathways, thus streamlining the construction of genetically modified strains [21]. Moreover, the CRISPR-Cas9 system is favored due to its simplicity and effectiveness across many species, as it does not typically introduce foreign DNA at the target site, adhering to straightforward design principles for target selection [22].

Recent innovations in CRISPR technology include the development of CRISPR-based tools that extend beyond traditional genome editing to encompass gene expression control, epigenome editing, and even RNA editing [23]. These advancements have broadened the scope of synthetic biology applications, impacting areas such as healthcare, environmental sustainability, and industrial processes [5].

Furthermore, the integration of computational tools and design principles from engineering—such as standardization, modularity, and abstraction—has enhanced the rapid prototyping and sharing of designs among synthetic biologists globally. This collaborative framework is vital for optimizing bioparts and ensuring their compatibility in various biological systems [5].

In summary, synthetic biology leverages CRISPR and other genome editing technologies to design and build biological systems with enhanced functionalities. The continuous evolution of these tools and techniques is pivotal in addressing complex biological challenges and advancing applications across multiple fields, including biomedicine and environmental science.

3.3 Bioinformatics and Computational Tools ​

Synthetic biology employs a range of bioinformatics and computational tools to facilitate the design and engineering of biological systems. The discipline integrates principles from engineering with biological sciences, aiming to create novel functionalities not observed in nature. Central to this process is the Design-Build-Test-Learn cycle, which is enhanced by advanced computational methodologies.

Bioinformatics plays a crucial role in the design and build stages of synthetic biology. Tools developed for these stages assist in the selection, synthesis, assembly, and optimization of biological parts, devices, and systems. For instance, bioinformatics tools can be used to identify and optimize enzyme candidates for specific metabolic pathways, as demonstrated by the Selenzyme tool, which guides users through decision-making steps to shortlist the best enzyme candidates based on various criteria, including sequence similarity and predicted properties[16].

The integration of bioinformatics with synthetic biology not only streamlines the design process but also enhances the ability to prototype and test biological systems rapidly. Computational design tools enable the modeling of genetic circuits and the simulation of biological processes, which helps in predicting how these systems will behave in vivo. This predictive capability is vital for developing reliable biological systems, as it allows for the optimization of genetic constructs before experimental implementation[24].

Moreover, the use of high-throughput sequencing and synthesis technologies has revolutionized the field, allowing for the rapid and cost-effective generation of DNA sequences. This capability underpins the construction of complex biological devices and systems, enabling researchers to manipulate biological components with precision. The application of modularity and standardization principles further facilitates the assembly of genetic parts into functional systems, akin to engineering with standardized components[6].

In addition to design and build tools, bioinformatics aids in the testing phase by providing methodologies for screening and quantifying the performance of engineered biological systems. Tools that analyze metabolic outputs or monitor gene expression levels are essential for evaluating the functionality of synthetic constructs and for iterating on designs based on experimental feedback[24].

Overall, the combination of bioinformatics and computational tools in synthetic biology not only accelerates the engineering of biological systems but also enhances the predictability and reliability of these systems, paving the way for innovative applications in healthcare, environmental sustainability, and industrial biotechnology[11][17][18].

4 Design Principles of Biological Systems ​

4.1 Modular Design and Standardization ​

Synthetic biology employs engineering principles to design and construct biological systems, with a strong emphasis on modular design and standardization. The primary aim is to streamline the development of biological devices and systems by utilizing standardized biological parts, which can be combined in various configurations to achieve desired functionalities.

Modular design allows for the decoupling of complex biological systems into smaller, orthogonal sub-systems. This decoupling facilitates the reuse of these modules across different applications, similar to how standard components are used in engineering. The ability to interchange and optimize these modules is a key feature of synthetic biology, enabling rapid prototyping and the efficient exchange of designs among researchers globally[5].

Standardization in synthetic biology is critical for ensuring that biological parts can be easily understood, reproduced, and utilized by different researchers. The Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL) serves as a data standard for sharing biological designs and information regarding their implementation and characterization. This standardization is essential not only for individual cell systems but also for multicellular systems, where designs may involve a mixture of different cell types with varying genotypes and phenotypes[25].

The design process in synthetic biology follows a systematic framework known as the Design-Build-Test-Learn cycle. This cycle integrates various stages, including mathematical modeling, in silico simulations, and the automation of assembly and experimentation using robotic systems[26]. The iterative nature of this cycle allows researchers to refine their designs based on experimental outcomes, thereby enhancing the reliability and functionality of the engineered systems.

Moreover, the principles of modularity and standardization are reinforced by advances in molecular biology, which have enabled the manipulation of genetic regulatory elements and biosynthetic pathways. This manipulation is crucial for the modular assembly of genetic components, allowing for the construction of complex biosynthetic pathways and the development of novel biological functions[19].

In conclusion, synthetic biology leverages modular design and standardization to create biological systems that are not only innovative but also reproducible and scalable. These principles facilitate the development of complex biological devices and systems that can address a variety of challenges in healthcare, environmental sustainability, and industrial processes, ultimately changing the way we interact with biological systems[1][27].

4.2 Systematic Engineering Approaches ​

Synthetic biology employs systematic engineering principles to design biological systems, leveraging methodologies from both engineering and biology to create novel functions and capabilities in living organisms. The discipline is characterized by several foundational design principles, which include modularity, standardization, and abstraction, all of which are essential for the efficient construction and manipulation of biological components.

One of the primary frameworks guiding synthetic biology is the Design-Build-Test-Learn cycle. This iterative process enables synthetic biologists to specify a biological system, model its behavior, analyze its functionality, assemble the necessary components, and ultimately test the system to evaluate its performance. This structured approach allows for the systematic exploration and refinement of biological designs, ensuring that the engineered systems are robust and predictable [26].

The design of biological systems begins with the concept of modularity, which involves breaking down complex biological processes into smaller, interchangeable parts. These modules can be combined in various configurations to create new functions. For instance, synthetic biology allows for the assembly of genetic regulatory elements and biosynthetic enzymes into pathways that can be engineered to produce desired metabolites or perform specific tasks [5]. This modular approach not only facilitates the design of complex systems but also enhances the programmability and reliability of the biological constructs [28].

Standardization is another critical principle in synthetic biology. It involves creating well-characterized biological parts that can be reliably used across different systems. This standardization is akin to using standardized components in engineering, where each part is designed to fit seamlessly with others, thereby simplifying the assembly process. By establishing a library of standardized parts, researchers can more easily share and exchange designs, fostering collaboration and accelerating innovation [4].

Abstraction in synthetic biology refers to the simplification of biological components and their behaviors to make them more accessible for engineering purposes. By abstracting the complexities of biological interactions, synthetic biologists can focus on higher-level design principles without needing to understand every mechanistic detail of the underlying biological processes. This abstraction allows interdisciplinary teams to apply engineering principles to biological systems, thereby broadening the scope of potential applications [1].

Moreover, advancements in DNA synthesis and sequencing technologies have significantly enhanced the capabilities of synthetic biology. These technologies enable the rapid construction of genetic circuits and pathways, facilitating the design and implementation of complex biological systems [6]. The integration of computational tools further supports the design process by providing platforms for modeling and simulating biological systems before physical assembly [10].

Overall, synthetic biology represents a paradigm shift in how biological systems are designed and engineered. By applying engineering principles to biology, researchers aim to create predictable, scalable, and efficient systems that can address various challenges in healthcare, environmental sustainability, and industrial applications [8]. The ongoing development of methodologies and tools in synthetic biology continues to enhance the ability to design and construct sophisticated biological systems with unprecedented precision and functionality.

4.3 Design-Build-Test-Learn Cycle ​

Synthetic biology employs a systematic approach to design biological systems, fundamentally grounded in the principles of engineering. Central to this approach is the Design-Build-Test-Learn (DBTL) cycle, which facilitates the iterative development of synthetic biological systems. This cycle allows for the systematic construction and testing of biological constructs, leading to a refined understanding and improvement of biological functionalities.

The DBTL cycle consists of four key stages:

  1. Design: In this phase, biological systems are conceptualized using engineering principles such as modularity, standardization, and abstraction. These principles enable the creation of biological parts, devices, and systems that can be assembled in a predictable manner. For instance, synthetic biologists design genetic circuits by combining various bioparts—encoded by DNA—to achieve desired functionalities. The design process often utilizes computational tools and mathematical modeling to simulate the behavior of the biological system before physical assembly, thereby minimizing errors and enhancing predictability [5][19].

  2. Build: This stage involves the physical assembly of the designed biological components. Advances in DNA synthesis and assembly technologies have significantly streamlined this process, allowing for rapid prototyping of biological systems. Techniques such as modular DNA assembly enable the combination of different genetic regulatory elements and biosynthetic enzymes to create complex metabolic pathways [26]. The build phase also emphasizes the importance of constructing systems that are robust and capable of functioning as intended within biological contexts [29].

  3. Test: After building the biological system, it is subjected to rigorous testing to evaluate its performance and functionality. This testing phase is critical for identifying any discrepancies between the predicted and actual behaviors of the system. The data obtained during testing is essential for understanding how the biological parts interact and function within the larger system [29]. High-throughput screening methods and robotic platforms are increasingly being employed to automate data collection and analysis, thus accelerating the testing process [30].

  4. Learn: The final stage of the DBTL cycle involves analyzing the results obtained from the testing phase to inform future designs. Insights gained from testing can lead to refinements in the design of biological systems, allowing for continuous improvement. This learning process is crucial for overcoming challenges such as contextual sensitivity and noise, which can affect the performance of synthetic circuits [31]. By integrating feedback from testing into the design phase, synthetic biology can evolve more sophisticated and effective biological systems.

Overall, the DBTL cycle embodies the iterative nature of synthetic biology, allowing researchers to build increasingly complex systems while refining their understanding of biological design principles. The integration of computational tools, automation, and a deep understanding of cellular metabolism and genetic regulation enhances the predictability and efficiency of biological system design, paving the way for innovative applications in healthcare, environmental sustainability, and beyond [32][33].

5 Applications of Synthetic Biology ​

5.1 Healthcare Innovations ​

Synthetic biology is a multidisciplinary field that focuses on the design and construction of new biological systems and functions using standardized biological parts. This approach allows for the engineering of biological systems with novel functionalities that can address various challenges, particularly in healthcare.

The design of biological systems in synthetic biology typically involves a systematic process that includes the dismantling and reassembly of biological components. Biological designs are encoded by deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), which serves as the foundational blueprint for creating biological parts. These parts can be combined to form devices, which in turn are integrated into larger biological systems. This modularity allows for rapid prototyping and the efficient exchange of designs among researchers, akin to building with toy blocks [5].

Advancements in DNA sequencing and synthesis technologies have significantly propelled the field forward, enabling the construction of complex genetic networks capable of reprogramming cellular activities. For instance, synthetic biology has led to the development of synthetic mammalian gene circuits that can be engineered to produce therapeutic proteins or to respond to specific disease conditions [34]. Such engineered systems can facilitate novel therapeutic strategies for diseases like cancer and metabolic disorders [34].

In healthcare, synthetic biology has been applied in several innovative ways. For example, engineered cells can be designed to sense specific biomarkers associated with diseases and respond by producing therapeutic agents. This capability is particularly promising for personalized medicine, where treatments can be tailored to individual patient profiles [35]. Furthermore, synthetic biology has contributed to the development of advanced vaccines and diagnostic tools, showcasing its potential to enhance disease prevention and management [36].

Moreover, synthetic biology encompasses the creation of living therapeutics, such as engineered bacteria that can diagnose and treat diseases by responding to environmental signals. These synthetic bacteria represent a novel approach to therapy, offering advantages over traditional methods [37]. The ability to design and implement such systems has opened new avenues for addressing complex health challenges that are difficult to tackle with conventional approaches [38].

Overall, synthetic biology's engineering principles allow for the creation of biological systems that are not only innovative but also capable of addressing critical biomedical issues, thereby transforming healthcare and enhancing therapeutic strategies. The ongoing research and application of synthetic biology hold the promise of significant advancements in medical treatments and diagnostics, paving the way for a new era of precision medicine [39].

5.2 Agricultural Biotechnology ​

Synthetic biology employs engineering principles to design and modify biological systems, particularly in the context of agricultural biotechnology. This interdisciplinary field focuses on the systematic construction of new biological entities and functions, leveraging advancements in molecular biology, genetic engineering, and computational modeling.

At its core, synthetic biology involves a structured "Design-Build-Test-Learn" cycle, where biological components are systematically designed, constructed, and tested for desired functions. This approach allows researchers to create genetic circuits and pathways that can enhance specific traits in plants, such as yield, stress tolerance, and nutrient use efficiency [40]. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into this framework has further revolutionized the design process, enabling more efficient and targeted modifications in crop genomes [41].

One significant application of synthetic biology in agriculture is the development of crops with improved traits. For instance, through genetic circuit design, researchers can enhance photosynthetic efficiency, reshape plant architecture, and modify metabolic pathways to increase resilience against environmental stressors [41]. This is achieved by employing techniques such as CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing, which allows for precise modifications in plant DNA, thereby facilitating the engineering of crops tailored to specific agricultural needs [42].

Moreover, synthetic biology is instrumental in addressing global food security challenges by creating crops that are more nutrient-dense and capable of thriving in adverse conditions. Innovations in plant synthetic biology have led to advancements in areas such as nitrogen fixation, pathogen resistance, and biofortification [40]. For example, the engineering of synthetic plant-microbiota systems aims to improve nutrient uptake and overall plant health, thereby reducing the reliance on chemical fertilizers [43].

The use of microfluidics in synthetic biology also plays a crucial role in agricultural biotechnology. Microfluidic platforms enable precise control over biochemical reactions and facilitate high-throughput screening of genetic constructs, allowing for rapid prototyping and testing of synthetic circuits in various host organisms, including plants [44]. This integration enhances the efficiency of the design-build-test-learn cycle, ultimately leading to the development of more effective agricultural solutions.

Despite the promising potential of synthetic biology in agriculture, several challenges remain. These include regulatory hurdles, public acceptance, and the need for extensive field testing to ensure the safety and efficacy of engineered crops [40]. Nonetheless, the advancements in synthetic biology provide a robust framework for creating sustainable agricultural systems capable of meeting the increasing demands for food production while minimizing environmental impacts [18].

In conclusion, synthetic biology represents a transformative approach to agricultural biotechnology, combining engineering principles with biological sciences to design crops that are not only more productive but also resilient and sustainable. The ongoing research and application of synthetic biology techniques hold significant promise for addressing the pressing challenges of food security and environmental sustainability in the 21st century.

5.3 Environmental Applications ​

Synthetic biology employs engineering principles to design and construct biological systems with a wide range of applications, including significant contributions to environmental sustainability. The design process involves dismantling and reassembling biological cells and processes to create novel systems that can perform useful functions. The applications in environmental contexts often focus on ecological restoration, pollution remediation, and sustainable industrial practices.

One prominent application of synthetic biology in the environmental domain is the construction of synthetic microbial consortia. These consortia are formed by co-cultivating two or more microorganisms under specific environmental conditions. This approach leverages the division of labor among different microbial species, which enhances biological processing efficiencies and reduces the metabolic burden on individual organisms. The construction of such consortia can significantly contribute to ecological restoration efforts and improve the efficiency of bioremediation processes, where microbes are used to degrade environmental pollutants [45].

Moreover, synthetic biology seeks to address environmental challenges through innovative solutions, such as the development of sustainable industrial processes for chemical synthesis. By designing microbial systems capable of producing biofuels or biodegradable materials, synthetic biology can reduce reliance on fossil fuels and decrease environmental impact. This application not only contributes to energy sustainability but also helps mitigate the adverse effects of conventional agricultural practices by creating better fertilizers and enhancing soil health [5].

The design principles of synthetic biology, including modularity and standardization, enable rapid prototyping and the efficient exchange of biological parts among researchers. This modular approach allows for the creation of customizable biological systems that can be tailored to specific environmental applications. For instance, the development of engineered microbes that can efficiently metabolize pollutants can be adapted to different environmental conditions, enhancing their effectiveness in various bioremediation scenarios [2].

Furthermore, the integration of computational tools and robotics in the design-build-test-learn cycle of synthetic biology facilitates the rapid assembly and testing of engineered systems. This advancement allows researchers to explore complex ecological interactions and develop synthetic ecosystems that can be used to study ecological and evolutionary dynamics in controlled environments [46].

In summary, synthetic biology employs a systematic and engineering-based approach to design biological systems with diverse applications, particularly in environmental sustainability. By constructing synthetic microbial consortia and developing innovative microbial processes, synthetic biology aims to address pressing environmental challenges, improve ecological health, and create sustainable solutions for the future [5][45][47].

6 Challenges and Ethical Considerations ​

6.1 Technical and Scientific Challenges ​

Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary field focused on the design and engineering of biological systems using principles borrowed from engineering and computer science. The process of designing biological systems is complex and faces several technical and scientific challenges.

One of the primary challenges in synthetic biology is the inherent complexity and unpredictability of biological systems. Biological components and their interactions are not always well understood, which complicates the engineering process. As noted by Kelwick et al. (2014), "biological systems are generally complex and unpredictable, and are therefore, intrinsically difficult to engineer." This complexity necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the systems involved, which is still developing within the field. Moreover, the integration of modular components to create functional systems can lead to issues such as syntactic and semantic errors, parameter mismatches, and contextual sensitivity, as highlighted by Kittleson et al. (2012) [31].

The design cycle in synthetic biology involves specifying, modeling, analyzing, assembling, and testing biological systems. This cycle requires an expanding repertoire of tools and methodologies to effectively address the challenges posed by biological complexity [8]. Advances in DNA synthesis capabilities and computational design tools have facilitated progress in pathway design and construction. However, as Chubukov et al. (2016) indicate, "we cannot yet engineer biological systems as easily and precisely as we engineer physical systems," underscoring the ongoing need for improved design frameworks and methodologies [48].

Another significant challenge lies in the optimization of genetic systems. While advancements in DNA synthesis have made it possible to construct complex pathways, determining the optimal expression levels of proteins for maximum production remains a heuristic and non-systematic process [48]. Toxic metabolic intermediates can adversely affect production, and the dynamic regulation of pathways is still an immature tool that requires further development [48].

In addition to these technical challenges, ethical considerations also play a critical role in the field of synthetic biology. The potential for creating genetically modified organisms (GMOs) raises questions about biosafety, environmental impact, and ethical implications of manipulating life forms. As researchers continue to develop synthetic biology applications, they must navigate the complex landscape of regulatory frameworks and public perception surrounding genetic engineering [10].

In summary, the design of biological systems in synthetic biology involves navigating a myriad of technical and scientific challenges, including the complexity of biological interactions, optimization of genetic components, and the ethical implications of engineered organisms. Continued advancements in tools and methodologies, alongside a robust ethical framework, will be essential for the successful application of synthetic biology in various fields, including healthcare, environmental sustainability, and industrial biotechnology.

6.2 Ethical Implications and Public Perception ​

Synthetic biology is a multidisciplinary field that integrates biology with engineering principles to design and construct biological systems. This involves modifying existing organisms or creating new biological entities by combining natural and synthetic components. The primary goal is to develop systems that can perform specific functions or produce valuable products, addressing challenges in various domains such as medicine, agriculture, and environmental sustainability.

The design of biological systems in synthetic biology typically employs concepts such as modularity, standardization, and abstraction. By utilizing interchangeable biological parts, synthetic biologists can create complex systems that are both predictable and efficient. However, the engineering of biological systems is fraught with challenges. For instance, biological systems are inherently complex and unpredictable, leading to issues such as syntactic and semantic errors, parameter mismatches, and contextual sensitivity. These challenges necessitate a robust framework for describing and reasoning about biological information, as well as an emphasis on modular design to facilitate the development of functional systems [31][49].

Ethical considerations are a significant aspect of synthetic biology. As this field advances, it raises various ethical challenges that need to be addressed. Practicing synthetic biologists have identified issues such as precarious employment, pressures from industry, gender inequity, and the potential negative effects of the hyping of synthetic biology [50]. The ethical landscape of synthetic biology also encompasses concerns about the moral status of synthetic organisms, implications for life, and the societal impact of these technologies [47].

Public perception of synthetic biology is another critical area influenced by these ethical implications. The novelty of synthetic biology and its potential applications can lead to both excitement and apprehension among the public. The challenges of public acceptance, regulation, and commercialization are paramount, as maintaining trust among stakeholders is essential for the field's progress [51]. The need for effective communication regarding the benefits and risks of synthetic biology is crucial, as exaggerated claims can hinder the development of sound regulatory models that address public concerns [51].

In conclusion, while synthetic biology holds great promise for innovative applications, it is accompanied by significant challenges and ethical considerations that must be thoughtfully navigated. Addressing these issues requires a collaborative effort among scientists, ethicists, policymakers, and the public to ensure that the development of synthetic biology aligns with societal values and expectations.

6.3 Regulatory Frameworks ​

Synthetic biology is a multidisciplinary field that integrates biology and engineering to design and create biological systems with various applications. The design process in synthetic biology involves rationally constructing biological parts, devices, or systems to meet specific functional goals. This discipline utilizes knowledge from diverse scientific areas such as biotechnology, molecular biology, and bioinformatics, while applying engineering principles like modularization, standardization, and abstraction to develop complex biological systems[47].

One of the primary challenges in synthetic biology is the inherent complexity and unpredictability of biological systems. As biological components interact in ways that are not fully understood, this complexity poses significant engineering challenges. To overcome these obstacles, researchers are focusing on creating core platforms that facilitate high-throughput biological engineering. These platforms encompass the entire biological design cycle, including DNA construction, parts libraries, and computational design tools[11].

Moreover, synthetic biology has been recognized for its potential to produce novel applications in various fields, including medicine, energy, and environmental sustainability. However, the realization of this potential is currently limited by challenges such as the diversity of available biological parts and the need for effective design frameworks[10].

In addition to technical challenges, synthetic biology raises numerous ethical considerations that must be addressed as the field evolves. Ethical challenges identified by practicing synthetic biologists include precarious employment, pressures from industry, gender inequity, and the negative consequences of exaggerated claims about the capabilities of synthetic biology[50]. These pragmatic ethical issues contrast with the more abstract and speculative concerns typically discussed in the ethics literature, emphasizing the need for a more grounded approach to ethical analysis in synthetic biology[47].

The regulatory frameworks surrounding synthetic biology are crucial for ensuring the safe and responsible development of this technology. Given the potential for significant implications from synthetic biology applications, there is a pressing need for robust regulatory oversight. This is particularly important to prevent unlicensed operations that could lead to the release of experimental organisms into the environment[52]. The challenges of maintaining public trust and developing adaptive, ethically sound regulatory models responsive to stakeholder concerns are paramount in navigating the complexities of synthetic biology[51].

In conclusion, the design of biological systems in synthetic biology involves addressing both technical and ethical challenges. While the engineering of biological systems presents unique complexities, the ethical implications and regulatory needs must also be considered to foster responsible innovation in this rapidly advancing field.

7 Conclusion ​

The exploration of synthetic biology reveals a landscape rich with innovation and potential, yet fraught with challenges that necessitate careful navigation. Key findings highlight the effectiveness of modular design and standardization in facilitating the engineering of biological systems, which has transformative implications across healthcare, agriculture, and environmental sustainability. The ongoing evolution of tools and methodologies, particularly in genome editing and computational modeling, empowers researchers to construct increasingly complex and functional biological systems. However, the unpredictability of biological interactions remains a significant hurdle, underscoring the need for enhanced design frameworks and interdisciplinary collaboration. Furthermore, ethical considerations and public perception play critical roles in shaping the future of synthetic biology. Addressing these concerns through transparent communication and robust regulatory frameworks is essential to foster public trust and ensure the responsible advancement of this field. Looking ahead, future research should focus on refining synthetic biology tools, expanding the library of standardized biological parts, and developing comprehensive ethical guidelines that can adapt to the rapidly changing landscape of biotechnology. The promise of synthetic biology lies not only in its potential to solve pressing global challenges but also in its ability to redefine our understanding of life itself, making it imperative for stakeholders to engage in thoughtful discourse and collaborative efforts as this field continues to evolve.

References ​

  • [1] Jeffrey C Way;James J Collins;Jay D Keasling;Pamela A Silver. Integrating biological redesign: where synthetic biology came from and where it needs to go.. Cell(IF=42.5). 2014. PMID:24679533. DOI: .
  • [2] Fernán Federici;Timothy J Rudge;Bernardo Pollak;Jim Haseloff;Rodrigo A Gutiérrez. Synthetic Biology: opportunities for Chilean bioindustry and education.. Biological research(IF=4.6). 2013. PMID:24510141. DOI: .
  • [3] Christina M Agapakis. Designing synthetic biology.. ACS synthetic biology(IF=3.9). 2014. PMID:24156739. DOI: 10.1021/sb4001068.
  • [4] Jürgen Pleiss. The promise of synthetic biology.. Applied microbiology and biotechnology(IF=4.3). 2006. PMID:17269152. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-006-0664-3.
  • [5] Kathryn L Garner. Principles of synthetic biology.. Essays in biochemistry(IF=5.7). 2021. PMID:34693448. DOI: 10.1042/EBC20200059.
  • [6] Simon Ausländer;David Ausländer;Martin Fussenegger. Synthetic Biology-The Synthesis of Biology.. Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)(IF=16.9). 2017. PMID:27943572. DOI: 10.1002/anie.201609229.
  • [7] Timothy K Lu;Ahmad S Khalil;James J Collins. Next-generation synthetic gene networks.. Nature biotechnology(IF=41.7). 2009. PMID:20010597. DOI: 10.1038/nbt.1591.
  • [8] Richard Kelwick;James T MacDonald;Alexander J Webb;Paul Freemont. Developments in the tools and methodologies of synthetic biology.. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology(IF=4.8). 2014. PMID:25505788. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2014.00060.
  • [9] Søren D Petersen;Lucas Levassor;Christine M Pedersen;Jan Madsen;Lea G Hansen;Jie Zhang;Ahmad K Haidar;Rasmus J N Frandsen;Jay D Keasling;Tilmann Weber;Nikolaus Sonnenschein;Michael K Jensen. teemi: An open-source literate programming approach for iterative design-build-test-learn cycles in bioengineering.. PLoS computational biology(IF=3.6). 2024. PMID:38457467. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011929.
  • [10] Yen-Hsiang Wang;Kathy Y Wei;Christina D Smolke. Synthetic biology: advancing the design of diverse genetic systems.. Annual review of chemical and biomolecular engineering(IF=12.8). 2013. PMID:23413816. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-061312-103351.
  • [11] Allen A Cheng;Timothy K Lu. Synthetic biology: an emerging engineering discipline.. Annual review of biomedical engineering(IF=9.6). 2012. PMID:22577777. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150118.
  • [12] David A Drubin;Jeffrey C Way;Pamela A Silver. Designing biological systems.. Genes & development(IF=7.7). 2007. PMID:17289915. DOI: 10.1101/gad.1507207.
  • [13] Marcel Tigges;Martin Fussenegger. Recent advances in mammalian synthetic biology-design of synthetic transgene control networks.. Current opinion in biotechnology(IF=7.0). 2009. PMID:19762224. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2009.07.009.
  • [14] Manuel Porcar;Amparo Latorre;Andrés Moya. What Symbionts Teach us about Modularity.. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology(IF=4.8). 2013. PMID:25023877. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2013.00014.
  • [15] Mario Juhas. On the road to synthetic life: the minimal cell and genome-scale engineering.. Critical reviews in biotechnology(IF=7.7). 2016. PMID:25578717. DOI: 10.3109/07388551.2014.989423.
  • [16] Pablo Carbonell;Jerry Wong;Neil Swainston;Eriko Takano;Nicholas J Turner;Nigel S Scrutton;Douglas B Kell;Rainer Breitling;Jean-Loup Faulon. Selenzyme: enzyme selection tool for pathway design.. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)(IF=5.4). 2018. PMID:29425325. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty065.
  • [17] Ran Chao;YongBo Yuan;HuiMin Zhao. Building biological foundries for next-generation synthetic biology.. Science China. Life sciences(IF=9.5). 2015. PMID:25985756. DOI: 10.1007/s11427-015-4866-8.
  • [18] Samuel M D Oliveira;Douglas Densmore. Hardware, Software, and Wetware Codesign Environment for Synthetic Biology.. Biodesign research(IF=4.7). 2022. PMID:37850136. DOI: 10.34133/2022/9794510.
  • [19] Jean-Yves Trosset;Pablo Carbonell. Synergistic Synthetic Biology: Units in Concert.. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology(IF=4.8). 2013. PMID:25022769. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2013.00011.
  • [20] Jie Meng;Yue Qiu;Shuobo Shi. CRISPR/Cas9 Systems for the Development of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cell Factories.. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology(IF=4.8). 2020. PMID:33330425. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.594347.
  • [21] Keiji Nishida;Akihiko Kondo. CRISPR-derived genome editing technologies for metabolic engineering.. Metabolic engineering(IF=6.8). 2021. PMID:33307189. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2020.12.002.
  • [22] Vincent A Brazelton;Scott Zarecor;David A Wright;Yuan Wang;Jie Liu;Keting Chen;Bing Yang;Carolyn J Lawrence-Dill. A quick guide to CRISPR sgRNA design tools.. GM crops & food(IF=4.7). 2015. PMID:26745836. DOI: 10.1080/21645698.2015.1137690.
  • [23] Masataka Nishiga;Chun Liu;Lei S Qi;Joseph C Wu. The use of new CRISPR tools in cardiovascular research and medicine.. Nature reviews. Cardiology(IF=44.2). 2022. PMID:35145236. DOI: 10.1038/s41569-021-00669-3.
  • [24] Pablo Carbonell;Andrew Currin;Adrian J Jervis;Nicholas J W Rattray;Neil Swainston;Cunyu Yan;Eriko Takano;Rainer Breitling. Bioinformatics for the synthetic biology of natural products: integrating across the Design-Build-Test cycle.. Natural product reports(IF=10.6). 2016. PMID:27185383. DOI: 10.1039/c6np00018e.
  • [25] Bradley Brown;Bryan Bartley;Jacob Beal;Jasmine E Bird;Ángel Goñi-Moreno;James Alastair McLaughlin;Göksel Mısırlı;Nicholas Roehner;David James Skelton;Chueh Loo Poh;Irina Dana Ofiteru;Katherine James;Anil Wipat. Capturing Multicellular System Designs Using Synthetic Biology Open Language (SBOL).. ACS synthetic biology(IF=3.9). 2020. PMID:32786354. DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.0c00176.
  • [26] Rosanna Young;Matthew Haines;Marko Storch;Paul S Freemont. Combinatorial metabolic pathway assembly approaches and toolkits for modular assembly.. Metabolic engineering(IF=6.8). 2021. PMID:33301873. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2020.12.001.
  • [27] Sergio Garcia;Cong T Trinh. Modular design: Implementing proven engineering principles in biotechnology.. Biotechnology advances(IF=12.5). 2019. PMID:31181317. DOI: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.06.002.
  • [28] Effendi Leonard;David Nielsen;Kevin Solomon;Kristala Jones Prather. Engineering microbes with synthetic biology frameworks.. Trends in biotechnology(IF=14.9). 2008. PMID:18977048. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2008.08.003.
  • [29] Rongming Liu;Marcelo C Bassalo;Ramsey I Zeitoun;Ryan T Gill. Genome scale engineering techniques for metabolic engineering.. Metabolic engineering(IF=6.8). 2015. PMID:26453944. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.09.013.
  • [30] Jan Benedict Spannenkrebs;Aron Eiermann;Thomas Zoll;Silke Hackenschmidt;Johannes Kabisch. Closing the loop: establishing an autonomous test-learn cycle to optimize induction of bacterial systems using a robotic platform.. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology(IF=4.8). 2024. PMID:39911814. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1528224.
  • [31] Joshua T Kittleson;Gabriel C Wu;J Christopher Anderson. Successes and failures in modular genetic engineering.. Current opinion in chemical biology(IF=6.1). 2012. PMID:22818777. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2012.06.009.
  • [32] David Tew. Synthetic biology and healthcare.. Emerging topics in life sciences(IF=3.3). 2019. PMID:33523174. DOI: 10.1042/ETLS20190086.
  • [33] Xian-En Zhang;Chenli Liu;Junbiao Dai;Yingjin Yuan;Caixia Gao;Yan Feng;Bian Wu;Ping Wei;Chun You;Xiaowo Wang;Tong Si. Enabling technology and core theory of synthetic biology.. Science China. Life sciences(IF=9.5). 2023. PMID:36753021. DOI: 10.1007/s11427-022-2214-2.
  • [34] Haifeng Ye;Dominique Aubel;Martin Fussenegger. Synthetic mammalian gene circuits for biomedical applications.. Current opinion in chemical biology(IF=6.1). 2013. PMID:24466575. DOI: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.10.006.
  • [35] Fabian Tolle;Pascal Stücheli;Martin Fussenegger. Genetic circuitry for personalized human cell therapy.. Current opinion in biotechnology(IF=7.0). 2019. PMID:30852360. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.02.003.
  • [36] Xiao Tan;Justin H Letendre;James J Collins;Wilson W Wong. Synthetic biology in the clinic: engineering vaccines, diagnostics, and therapeutics.. Cell(IF=42.5). 2021. PMID:33571426. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.017.
  • [37] Phuong Vo;Hyang-Mi Lee;Dokyun Na. Synthetic Bacteria for Therapeutics.. Journal of microbiology and biotechnology(IF=3.1). 2019. PMID:31216840. DOI: 10.4014/jmb.1904.04016.
  • [38] Xu Yan;Xu Liu;Cuihuan Zhao;Guo-Qiang Chen. Applications of synthetic biology in medical and pharmaceutical fields.. Signal transduction and targeted therapy(IF=52.7). 2023. PMID:37169742. DOI: 10.1038/s41392-023-01440-5.
  • [39] Yvonne Y Chen;Christina D Smolke. From DNA to targeted therapeutics: bringing synthetic biology to the clinic.. Science translational medicine(IF=14.6). 2011. PMID:22030748. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002944.
  • [40] Xingyan Ye;Kezhen Qin;Alisdair R Fernie;Youjun Zhang. Prospects for synthetic biology in 21st century agriculture.. Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao(IF=7.1). 2025. PMID:39742963. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgg.2024.12.016.
  • [41] Daolei Zhang;Fan Xu;Fanhua Wang;Liang Le;Li Pu. Synthetic biology and artificial intelligence in crop improvement.. Plant communications(IF=11.6). 2025. PMID:39668563. DOI: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.101220.
  • [42] Soyoung Park;Vimalraj Mani;Kihun Ha;Jin A Kim;Sichul Lee. Plant synthetic biology: from knowledge to biomolecules.. Frontiers in plant science(IF=4.8). 2025. PMID:41230228. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1562216.
  • [43] Marc-Sven Roell;Matias D Zurbriggen. The impact of synthetic biology for future agriculture and nutrition.. Current opinion in biotechnology(IF=7.0). 2020. PMID:31812911. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.10.004.
  • [44] Chiara Leal-Alves;Zhiyang Deng;Natalia Kermeci;Steve C C Shih. Integrating microfluidics and synthetic biology: advancements and diverse applications across organisms.. Lab on a chip(IF=5.4). 2024. PMID:38712893. DOI: 10.1039/d3lc01090b.
  • [45] Yu Liang;Anzhou Ma;Guoqiang Zhuang. Construction of Environmental Synthetic Microbial Consortia: Based on Engineering and Ecological Principles.. Frontiers in microbiology(IF=4.5). 2022. PMID:35283862. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.829717.
  • [46] Yu Tanouchi;Robert P Smith;Lingchong You. Engineering microbial systems to explore ecological and evolutionary dynamics.. Current opinion in biotechnology(IF=7.0). 2012. PMID:22310174. DOI: .
  • [47] Ayşe Kurtoğlu;Abdullah Yıldız;Berna Arda. The view of synthetic biology in the field of ethics: a thematic systematic review.. Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology(IF=4.8). 2024. PMID:38863492. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1397796.
  • [48] Victor Chubukov;Aindrila Mukhopadhyay;Christopher J Petzold;Jay D Keasling;Héctor García Martín. Synthetic and systems biology for microbial production of commodity chemicals.. NPJ systems biology and applications(IF=3.5). 2016. PMID:28725470. DOI: 10.1038/npjsba.2016.9.
  • [49] Yunzi Luo;Jung-Kul Lee;Huimin Zhao. Challenges and opportunities in synthetic biology for chemical engineers.. Chemical engineering science(IF=4.3). 2013. PMID:24222925. DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2012.06.013.
  • [50] Jacqueline Dalziell;Wendy Rogers. Scientists' Views on the Ethics, Promises and Practices of Synthetic Biology: A Qualitative Study of Australian Scientific Practice.. Science and engineering ethics(IF=3.0). 2023. PMID:38082028. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-023-00461-1.
  • [51] Tania Bubela;Gregory Hagen;Edna Einsiedel. Synthetic biology confronts publics and policy makers: challenges for communication, regulation and commercialization.. Trends in biotechnology(IF=14.9). 2012. PMID:22119159. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.10.003.
  • [52] Steven Yearley. The ethical landscape: identifying the right way to think about the ethical and societal aspects of synthetic biology research and products.. Journal of the Royal Society, Interface(IF=3.5). 2009. PMID:19447816. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2009.0055.focus.

MaltSci Intelligent Research Services ​

Search for more papers on MaltSci.com ​

Synthetic Biology · Biological System Design · Genetic Engineering · CRISPR Technology · Modularity

© 2025 MaltSci