MaltSci 麦伴科研

Appearance

Popular Reports / proteomics

This report is written by MaltSci based on the latest literature and research findings

How does spatial proteomics map protein localization? ​

Abstract ​

The localization of proteins within cells and tissues is fundamental to understanding cellular function and organization. As proteins are integral to cellular processes, their spatial distribution is closely linked to their functionality and overall health of the organism. Traditional proteomics methods often overlook the spatial context of proteins, leading to a fragmented understanding of their roles in biological pathways. This limitation has prompted the rise of spatial proteomics, which utilizes advanced imaging and mass spectrometry techniques to generate high-resolution maps of protein localization. The significance of spatial proteomics extends to its implications for disease mechanisms, including cancer progression and neurodegenerative diseases, where aberrant protein localization is often observed. Recent advancements in spatial proteomics methodologies, such as mass spectrometry imaging, proximity labeling, and fluorescence microscopy, have greatly improved the ability to map protein localization, analyze thousands of proteins simultaneously, and explore protein-protein interactions and signaling pathways. Additionally, the incorporation of machine learning techniques has further enhanced data analysis, enabling more accurate interpretations of complex datasets. This review will discuss the diverse methodologies of spatial proteomics, the biological significance of protein localization, its applications in cancer research, neurobiology, developmental biology, and drug discovery, as well as the challenges and future directions of the field. Ultimately, spatial proteomics is reshaping our understanding of protein dynamics and interactions, paving the way for innovative therapeutic strategies.

Outline ​

This report will discuss the following questions.

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Methodologies in Spatial Proteomics
    • 2.1 Mass Spectrometry Imaging
    • 2.2 Proximity Labeling Techniques
    • 2.3 Fluorescence Microscopy Approaches
    • 2.4 Other Emerging Techniques
  • 3 Biological Significance of Protein Localization
    • 3.1 Role in Cellular Function
    • 3.2 Implications in Disease Mechanisms
    • 3.3 Protein-Protein Interactions and Signaling Pathways
  • 4 Applications of Spatial Proteomics
    • 4.1 Cancer Research
    • 4.2 Neurobiology
    • 4.3 Developmental Biology
    • 4.4 Drug Discovery and Therapeutics
  • 5 Challenges and Future Directions
    • 5.1 Technical Limitations
    • 5.2 Data Analysis and Interpretation
    • 5.3 Integration with Other Omics Approaches
  • 6 Summary

1 Introduction ​

The study of protein localization within cells and tissues is a cornerstone of understanding cellular function and organization. Proteins are not merely passive participants in cellular processes; their spatial distribution is intricately linked to their functionality and, consequently, to the overall health of the organism. As such, elucidating the spatial proteome—the complete map of protein localization and dynamics—has become increasingly crucial in the fields of cell biology and biomedical research. Traditional proteomics methods, which often employ bulk analysis techniques, typically fail to capture the spatial context of proteins, leading to a fragmented understanding of their roles in complex biological pathways [1][2]. This limitation has spurred the development of spatial proteomics, an emerging discipline that integrates advanced imaging and mass spectrometry techniques to provide high-resolution maps of protein localization within their native environments [3][4].

The significance of spatial proteomics lies not only in its ability to provide a comprehensive view of protein distribution but also in its implications for understanding disease mechanisms. For instance, the localization of proteins can reveal insights into cancer progression, neurodegenerative diseases, and developmental biology, where aberrant protein localization often correlates with pathological states [5][6]. Furthermore, spatial proteomics facilitates the exploration of protein-protein interactions and signaling pathways, enabling researchers to decipher the molecular underpinnings of cellular processes and disease [2][7].

Recent advancements in spatial proteomics methodologies, such as mass spectrometry imaging, proximity labeling, and fluorescence microscopy, have significantly enhanced our ability to map protein localization with unprecedented specificity and throughput [4][6]. These technologies allow for the analysis of thousands of proteins in a single experiment, capturing the dynamic nature of protein localization and enabling the identification of biomarkers and therapeutic targets in various diseases [5][6]. The integration of machine learning techniques into spatial proteomics data analysis further amplifies the potential of this field by facilitating the interpretation of complex datasets and improving the accuracy of protein localization assignments [4][8].

In this review, we will first explore the diverse methodologies employed in spatial proteomics, including mass spectrometry imaging, proximity labeling techniques, and fluorescence microscopy approaches, among others. We will then discuss the biological significance of protein localization, particularly its role in cellular function, implications in disease mechanisms, and contributions to protein-protein interactions and signaling pathways. Following this, we will examine the applications of spatial proteomics in key areas such as cancer research, neurobiology, developmental biology, and drug discovery. Finally, we will address the challenges and future directions of spatial proteomics, including technical limitations, data analysis and interpretation hurdles, and the need for integration with other omics approaches.

Through this comprehensive overview, we aim to highlight how spatial proteomics is reshaping our understanding of protein dynamics and interactions within their native environments, ultimately paving the way for novel insights into cellular biology and the development of innovative therapeutic strategies.

2 Methodologies in Spatial Proteomics ​

2.1 Mass Spectrometry Imaging ​

Spatial proteomics employs various methodologies to map protein localization within biological tissues, with mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) emerging as a powerful tool in this field. MSI allows for the direct detection and quantification of proteins across tissue sections while preserving their spatial distribution and histological context. This technique facilitates an unbiased analysis of complex and heterogeneous tissues, providing insights into the spatial organization of proteins that are crucial for understanding cellular functions and disease mechanisms.

One significant advancement in MSI is the development of Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI), which enables the simultaneous detection of numerous proteins within tissue sections. MALDI-MSI captures the abundance and distribution of proteins across different regions, allowing researchers to create spatial distribution maps that reflect the proteomic landscape of the tissue. However, challenges such as simultaneous peptide quantification and identification have historically limited the application of MSI. To address these challenges, HIT-MAP (High-resolution Informatics Toolbox in MALDI-MSI Proteomics) has been developed, which provides a bioinformatics workflow to annotate and visualize high-resolution MSI datasets effectively, enhancing the utility of MSI in spatial proteomics[9].

In addition to MSI, mass spectrometry-based spatial proteomics has evolved to incorporate high-throughput techniques that enable the analysis of thousands of proteins. Techniques such as label-free quantification and tandem mass tags (TMT) have been utilized to improve the throughput and sensitivity of spatial proteomic studies. For instance, recent studies have demonstrated that label-free methods can achieve high proteome coverage (up to 3500 proteins) at spatial resolutions of approximately 50 μm, allowing for detailed mapping of protein distributions in tissues[10].

Moreover, spatial proteomics has also integrated machine learning approaches to enhance data analysis and interpretation. Machine learning algorithms can process complex spatial proteomic datasets, improving the accuracy of protein localization assignments and facilitating the identification of cellular processes and interactions within tissues[4].

Overall, the methodologies employed in spatial proteomics, particularly mass spectrometry imaging, represent a robust framework for mapping protein localization in tissues. This approach not only advances our understanding of protein dynamics and interactions but also provides valuable insights into disease mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets[2][6].

2.2 Proximity Labeling Techniques ​

Spatial proteomics aims to elucidate the localization and interactions of proteins within their native cellular environments, thereby providing insights into their functional roles in various biological contexts. One of the most promising methodologies in spatial proteomics is proximity labeling, which employs engineered enzymes to facilitate the identification and mapping of proteins in close proximity to a specific target protein.

Proximity labeling techniques operate through enzymatic reactions that modify biomolecules in living cells based on their spatial proximity to a tagged protein. The most commonly used enzymes in this context are biotin ligases, such as BirA, and ascorbate peroxidase (APEX). When the engineered enzyme is expressed in a specific cellular compartment, it catalyzes the modification of nearby proteins with biotin, allowing for their subsequent isolation and identification via mass spectrometry [11].

The APEX-based proximity labeling technique involves the oxidation of biotin-phenols into reactive biotin-phenoxyl radicals in the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). These radicals biotinylate electron-rich amino acids within a radius of several nanometers from the APEX enzyme, effectively tagging proteins that are spatially close to the enzyme [11]. This method enables researchers to perform temporally and spatially resolved proteomic mapping, capturing the dynamics of protein interactions in their native cellular context.

Recent advancements in proximity labeling have expanded its applications beyond traditional proteomics. For instance, the technique has been utilized to profile local RNA and DNA, as well as to explore spatial cell-cell interaction networks in live animal models [12]. This versatility positions proximity labeling as a crucial tool in "spatiomics," which refers to the extraction of spatially distributed biological information within cells or organisms.

Moreover, innovative adaptations of proximity labeling, such as the integration of isotope-coded probes, have enabled quantitative analysis of spatial proteomes at nanometer resolution [13]. This has proven particularly valuable in mapping intricate protein distributions within organelles and subcellular compartments, revealing previously inaccessible details about protein localization and dynamics.

In summary, proximity labeling techniques serve as a powerful approach in spatial proteomics by enabling the precise mapping of protein localization and interactions within living cells. By leveraging the advantages of enzymatic labeling, researchers can overcome the limitations of traditional methods, thus gaining deeper insights into the complex spatial arrangements of proteins and their functional implications in biological systems [14][15][16].

2.3 Fluorescence Microscopy Approaches ​

Spatial proteomics is a rapidly evolving field that focuses on understanding the localization and dynamics of proteins within cells, which is crucial for elucidating their functions and the cellular processes they govern. Among the various methodologies employed in spatial proteomics, fluorescence microscopy stands out as a powerful tool for visualizing protein localization in living cells.

Fluorescence microscopy techniques allow researchers to observe proteins tagged with fluorescent markers, providing insights into their spatial distribution and dynamics. The innovative method known as fluorescent speckle microscopy (FSM) utilizes a very low concentration of fluorescently labeled subunits, which minimizes background fluorescence and enhances the visibility of protein dynamics within cellular structures. This approach has demonstrated significant efficacy in studying microtubule movements and actin dynamics, allowing for the observation of protein assembly and turnover in real-time [17].

Another noteworthy fluorescence-based technique is the application of DNA-barcode technology for spatial omics. This method leverages the specificity of DNA-based imaging to map protein localization at high resolution, offering a comprehensive approach to linking protein presence with spatial context within tissues [18]. Additionally, APEX proximity labeling, which utilizes an engineered ascorbate peroxidase to biotinylate proteins in proximity to a target, enables spatially resolved proteomic mapping that can be analyzed through mass spectrometry. This method allows for a dynamic assessment of protein localization changes in response to various biological stimuli [11].

The advancements in fluorescence microscopy, coupled with mass spectrometry, have enabled the generation of high-resolution spatial proteome maps. These maps are essential for understanding the complex architecture of the cellular environment, including single-cell variations and the dynamics of protein interactions. For instance, mass spectrometry-based spatial proteomics has been employed to profile the localization of thousands of proteins simultaneously, thus facilitating a comprehensive understanding of their roles in cellular functions [4].

In summary, fluorescence microscopy approaches in spatial proteomics encompass a variety of innovative techniques that provide detailed insights into protein localization and dynamics. These methodologies, including FSM, DNA-barcode imaging, and APEX proximity labeling, are instrumental in mapping the spatial organization of proteins, ultimately enhancing our understanding of cellular processes and disease mechanisms [2][6].

2.4 Other Emerging Techniques ​

Spatial proteomics is a burgeoning field that seeks to elucidate the spatial organization of proteins within cells and tissues, thereby providing insights into their functional roles in various biological processes and diseases. The methodologies employed in spatial proteomics have evolved significantly, leveraging advancements in mass spectrometry (MS), imaging techniques, and computational approaches.

One of the fundamental methodologies in spatial proteomics is mass spectrometry-based spatial proteomics, which allows for the unbiased and quantitative assessment of protein localization. This approach typically involves the creation of whole cell extracts from differentially labeled subcellular fractions. For instance, a study demonstrated the application of mass spectrometry to measure the relative distribution of over 2,000 proteins within specific cellular compartments, such as the cytoplasm and nucleus, thereby providing a comprehensive view of protein localization dynamics in response to various stimuli, such as DNA damage [1].

Imaging-based techniques also play a critical role in spatial proteomics. These techniques allow researchers to visualize protein localization at high resolution within intact tissues. Advances in microscopy, coupled with mass spectrometry, have enabled the generation of detailed organellar maps that capture the localizations of thousands of proteins in a single experiment [3]. Such imaging methods can be integrated with mass spectrometry to produce spatially resolved proteomic data that highlight the dynamic interactions and localizations of proteins in cellular contexts [2].

Emerging techniques in spatial proteomics include innovative approaches like Spatial Proteomics through On-site Tissue-protein-labeling (SPOT), which combines direct labeling of tissue proteins in situ with quantitative mass spectrometry. This method has shown promise in profiling spatially-resolved proteomics across diverse tissue types, enabling detailed comparisons of proteomic profiles based on pathological annotations [6].

Another noteworthy technique is the use of proximity labeling for spatial proteomics (PSPro), which integrates antibody-targeted biotinylation with affinity purification to achieve single-cell-type proteome capture with sub-micrometer resolution. This approach allows for the detailed mapping of protein localization and interactions within complex tissue environments, thereby enhancing our understanding of tissue architecture and cellular heterogeneity [7].

Furthermore, recent advances in machine learning algorithms have significantly enhanced the analysis of spatial proteomics data. These algorithms facilitate the integration of heterogeneous data sources, allowing for improved classification of proteins to specific subcellular compartments and providing insights into the spatial dynamics of protein localization [19]. Bayesian modeling approaches have also been introduced to quantify uncertainty in protein localization assignments, thereby enriching the analysis of spatial proteomics [20].

In summary, spatial proteomics employs a diverse array of methodologies, including mass spectrometry, imaging techniques, and innovative labeling approaches, to map protein localization within cells and tissues. These methodologies are continually evolving, with emerging techniques and computational tools enhancing the resolution and accuracy of spatial proteomic analyses, ultimately advancing our understanding of cellular processes and disease mechanisms.

3 Biological Significance of Protein Localization ​

3.1 Role in Cellular Function ​

Spatial proteomics is a sophisticated and interdisciplinary approach that focuses on the localization and dynamics of proteins within cells, which is critical for understanding their biological functions. The mapping of protein localization through spatial proteomics involves several advanced techniques and methodologies that provide insights into the intricate spatial organization of proteins and their roles in cellular processes.

One of the primary methods utilized in spatial proteomics is mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics, which allows for high-throughput analysis of protein localization. This approach can capture the distribution of proteins across different subcellular compartments, providing a comprehensive overview of the spatial proteome. For instance, Boisvert et al. (2010) employed mass spectrometry to analyze the subcellular distribution of over 2,000 proteins in HCT116 cells, revealing that the proteome is predominantly partitioned into specific subcellular locations, with only a minor subset of proteins found in multiple compartments [1].

The subcellular localization of proteins is tightly linked to their function. For example, proteins must be located in specific organelles or compartments to carry out their roles effectively, such as signaling, metabolism, or cell division. Mislocalization of proteins can lead to dysfunctional cellular processes and is often associated with various diseases. Therefore, understanding the localization of proteins provides crucial insights into their physiological roles and the mechanisms underlying disease states [5].

Recent advances in spatial proteomics have facilitated the study of protein localization dynamics, which is essential for elucidating the cellular responses to various stimuli. For instance, the research by Martinez-Val et al. (2021) highlighted how dynamic changes in the subcellular localization of signaling proteins, such as those involved in EGFR phospho-signaling, can affect cellular responses to external stimuli. Their high-throughput workflow allowed for the profiling of both the global proteome and phospho-proteome across different subcellular fractions, demonstrating how proteins can relocate in response to stress and other environmental cues [21].

Moreover, the integration of machine learning techniques into spatial proteomics has enhanced the analysis of complex datasets, allowing for more accurate assignments of proteins to their respective subcellular locations. For example, Crook et al. (2018) proposed a Bayesian mixture modeling approach that quantifies uncertainty in protein localization, enabling a probabilistic assignment of proteins to subcellular niches. This methodology provides a deeper understanding of protein dynamics and localization, which is crucial for interpreting their biological significance [20].

In summary, spatial proteomics serves as a powerful tool for mapping protein localization, offering insights into the biological significance of protein distribution within cells. By elucidating the spatial context of proteins, researchers can better understand their roles in cellular functions and the implications of their mislocalization in disease processes. The ongoing advancements in methodologies and technologies in spatial proteomics will continue to enhance our understanding of cellular biology and its applications in medical research.

3.2 Implications in Disease Mechanisms ​

Spatial proteomics is a critical methodology for mapping protein localization within cells, which is vital for understanding their functional roles in both health and disease. The eukaryotic cell is compartmentalized into various subcellular niches, including membrane-bound and membrane-less organelles, where proteins localize to execute specific biological functions. This localization is not static; dynamic movement of proteins between these niches is essential for processes such as signaling, growth, proliferation, motility, and programmed cell death. Aberrant protein localization has been associated with a variety of diseases, highlighting the importance of understanding spatial proteomics for elucidating disease mechanisms [22].

The techniques employed in spatial proteomics for determining the localization and dynamics of proteins include advanced imaging methods, mass spectrometry, and biochemical fractionation. For instance, mass spectrometry-based spatial proteomics offers an unbiased and high-throughput approach to analyze the subcellular distribution of proteins. This method can measure the relative distribution of proteins across different cellular compartments, such as the cytoplasm and nucleus, revealing insights into how protein localization changes in response to physiological and experimental perturbations, such as DNA damage [1].

In terms of biological significance, the subcellular localization of proteins is tightly linked to their functional roles. For example, spatial proteomics has begun to uncover complex protein architectures, including single-cell variations and dynamic translocations, which are critical for understanding cellular regulation and the molecular basis of diseases. The ability to visualize and quantify protein expression profiles at single-cell resolution allows researchers to explore the spatial context within tissues, which is crucial for identifying how proteins interact and function within their native environments [2].

The implications of spatial proteomics in disease mechanisms are profound. For example, in cancer research, spatial proteomics can elucidate the heterogeneity of tumor tissues by mapping protein localization and expression patterns. This can lead to the identification of biomarkers for early diagnosis and therapeutic targets, ultimately contributing to personalized medicine approaches. The study of protein localization in breast cancer has highlighted the need for understanding the biological processes that contribute to cellular heterogeneity, which can significantly affect treatment outcomes [5]. Furthermore, spatial proteomics techniques have been pivotal in profiling tumor immune microenvironments, helping to identify key cell populations and predict treatment responses, particularly in understanding resistance mechanisms to therapies [23].

In conclusion, spatial proteomics serves as a powerful tool for mapping protein localization, which is integral to understanding cellular functions and disease mechanisms. The insights gained from this field can lead to significant advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, particularly in complex diseases such as cancer, where the spatial dynamics of proteins can influence disease progression and treatment efficacy [4][24].

3.3 Protein-Protein Interactions and Signaling Pathways ​

Spatial proteomics is a cutting-edge approach that provides insights into protein localization within cells, which is critical for understanding various biological processes and disease mechanisms. The mapping of protein localization is achieved primarily through mass spectrometry (MS)-based techniques and imaging methods that allow for the analysis of the spatial distribution of proteins across different cellular compartments.

One of the major advancements in spatial proteomics is the use of mass spectrometry to create high-resolution maps of protein localization. For instance, the application of mass spectrometry-based proteomics allows for an unbiased and quantitative analysis of the proteome, facilitating the measurement of protein distribution in various subcellular locations. A study demonstrated the use of spatial proteomics to analyze over 2,000 proteins in HCT116 cells, revealing that proteins are predominantly localized to specific subcellular compartments such as the cytoplasm, nucleus, and nucleolus, with only a minor subset being distributed across multiple locations (Boisvert et al., 2010) [1].

In addition to mass spectrometry, imaging-based techniques also play a crucial role in spatial proteomics. These methods enable researchers to visualize the localization of proteins within the cellular architecture, providing a dynamic view of protein interactions and signaling pathways. For example, advancements in matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) allow for the direct detection of protein abundance and distribution across tissue sections, preserving spatial information crucial for understanding complex biological tissues (Guo et al., 2021) [9].

The biological significance of protein localization cannot be overstated. The localization of proteins is tightly linked to their function, as it determines their availability for interactions with other biomolecules. For instance, proteins that are localized to the nucleus are often involved in transcriptional regulation, while those in the cytoplasm may participate in metabolic processes or signaling pathways. This spatial regulation is essential for maintaining cellular homeostasis and responding to environmental cues.

Moreover, the spatial organization of proteins influences protein-protein interactions and signaling pathways. Proteins that are in close proximity are more likely to interact, leading to the formation of complexes that are vital for various cellular functions. For example, spatial proteomics can reveal how proteins involved in signaling pathways are localized and how their interactions change in response to stimuli, such as DNA damage (Boisvert et al., 2010) [1]. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for elucidating the mechanisms underlying diseases such as cancer, where protein mislocalization can contribute to tumorigenesis and treatment resistance (Brožová et al., 2023) [5].

Furthermore, the integration of machine learning (ML) techniques in spatial proteomics enhances the analysis of complex data sets, enabling the identification of patterns and relationships between protein localization and cellular functions (Mou et al., 2022) [4]. This interdisciplinary approach not only facilitates the understanding of protein dynamics but also supports the identification of potential therapeutic targets and biomarkers for diseases.

In summary, spatial proteomics serves as a powerful tool for mapping protein localization, which is crucial for understanding the functional implications of proteins in cellular processes and their interactions. The insights gained from spatial proteomics are essential for advancing our knowledge of cell biology and the underlying mechanisms of diseases, thereby paving the way for innovative therapeutic strategies.

4 Applications of Spatial Proteomics ​

4.1 Cancer Research ​

Spatial proteomics is an advanced methodology that allows for the detailed mapping of protein localization within tissues, providing critical insights into the molecular underpinnings of various diseases, particularly cancer. This technique focuses on the spatial organization of proteins at subcellular resolution, thereby enabling researchers to explore the dynamics of protein distribution and their interactions within the tumor microenvironment (TME).

One of the primary applications of spatial proteomics in cancer research is its ability to profile tumor immune microenvironments at single-cell resolution. This has significantly enhanced our understanding of cancer biology, including the identification of key cell populations within solid tumors and the prediction of treatment responses. Spatial proteomics technologies have been pivotal in elucidating mechanisms of resistance to therapies, which remain a major challenge in oncology. By investigating the localization, protein signatures, and interactions of immunosuppressive cell populations, researchers can better understand how these cells contribute to cancer resistance, particularly in the context of immunotherapy [23].

Moreover, spatial proteomics facilitates the detection and quantification of proteins while preserving the intact tissue architecture. This is crucial for understanding the cellular interactions and signaling pathways that govern tumor behavior and therapy response. For instance, the spatial organization of proteins within the TME can influence tumor progression, metastasis, and immune evasion. Techniques such as laser microdissection combined with mass spectrometry, or antibody-based imaging, are commonly employed to achieve this high-resolution mapping of tissue architectures [25].

Recent advancements have introduced innovative approaches like Spatial Proteomics through On-site Tissue-protein-labeling (SPOT), which allows for direct labeling of tissue proteins in situ. This method enhances the spatial resolution of proteomic profiling and has been successfully applied to various types of tissues, including human prostate cancer samples. SPOT enables the identification of distinct proteomic profiles associated with different Gleason scores, thus advancing the understanding of tumor heterogeneity and potential therapeutic targets [6].

Additionally, the integration of machine learning techniques with spatial proteomics is emerging as a powerful tool for analyzing complex datasets generated from these studies. Machine learning algorithms can help in the interpretation of spatial proteomic data, facilitating the identification of patterns that correlate with clinical outcomes [4].

In summary, spatial proteomics serves as a vital tool in cancer research by mapping protein localization and dynamics within the TME. This approach not only aids in the identification of novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets but also enhances the understanding of the intricate molecular landscapes that characterize cancer biology. As the field continues to evolve, the potential for spatial proteomics to inform personalized treatment strategies and improve patient outcomes remains significant [5][25].

4.2 Neurobiology ​

Spatial proteomics serves as a crucial tool for mapping protein localization within cells and tissues, particularly in the field of neurobiology. The technique utilizes various advanced methodologies to investigate the dynamic localization and distribution of proteins at subcellular levels, providing insights into their functional roles and interactions within the complex cellular environment.

One of the primary methods employed in spatial proteomics is mass spectrometry (MS), which enables high-throughput analysis of protein localization. For instance, the study by Boisvert et al. (2010) utilized mass spectrometry-based proteomics to analyze the subcellular distribution of over 2,000 proteins in HCT116 cells, revealing that the proteome is predominantly partitioned into specific subcellular locations, with only a minor subset of proteins being distributed across multiple compartments. This study exemplifies the ability of spatial proteomics to quantify protein localization changes in response to stimuli, such as DNA damage, highlighting the relocation of the proteasome from the cytoplasm to the nucleus upon stress [1].

Furthermore, the application of machine learning (ML) techniques has significantly enhanced the analysis of spatial proteomics data. Mou et al. (2022) reviewed the integration of ML methods in spatial proteomics, emphasizing their role in analyzing complex datasets derived from both MS-based and imaging-based approaches. This integration facilitates a more reliable analysis of protein localization, which is essential for understanding cellular processes and disease mechanisms [4].

In neurobiology, spatial proteomics has been pivotal in understanding the localization of proteins within brain tissues. For example, the SPOT (Spatial Proteomics through On-site Tissue-protein-labeling) technique has been developed to label tissue proteins directly in situ, allowing for the profiling of spatially-resolved proteomics in mouse brain regions. This method demonstrated the ability to discern specific proteomic profiles associated with different brain areas, thereby advancing our understanding of the molecular landscape in neurobiology [6].

Moreover, the use of Bayesian mixture modeling approaches in spatial proteomics allows for a probabilistic assignment of proteins to subcellular locations, addressing the uncertainty associated with protein localization [20]. This is particularly relevant in neurobiology, where proteins may exhibit dynamic localization changes that are critical for neuronal function and signaling.

In summary, spatial proteomics employs a combination of mass spectrometry, imaging techniques, and advanced computational methods to map protein localization within cells and tissues. Its applications in neurobiology not only enhance our understanding of protein functions in the brain but also pave the way for discovering new biomarkers and therapeutic targets relevant to neurological diseases. The integration of spatial proteomics with cell biology is set to provide profound insights into the intricate workings of cellular processes in the nervous system.

4.3 Developmental Biology ​

Spatial proteomics is a cutting-edge approach that enables the mapping of protein localization within cells and tissues, providing crucial insights into the spatial organization of biological processes. This technique utilizes advanced methodologies such as mass spectrometry and imaging to visualize and quantify protein expression profiles at a subcellular resolution. The following outlines how spatial proteomics effectively maps protein localization, particularly in the context of developmental biology.

One of the primary challenges in understanding cellular functions is the precise identification of protein localization and its changes under various physiological conditions. Spatial proteomics addresses this challenge by employing high-throughput mass spectrometry techniques, which allow for an unbiased and quantitative assessment of the proteome's distribution across different cellular compartments. For instance, a study utilized mass spectrometry-based proteomics to analyze over 2,000 proteins in HCT116 cells, demonstrating that proteins are predominantly localized in specific subcellular regions, with only a minor subset exhibiting dual localization [1].

In developmental biology, understanding the dynamic localization of proteins is critical as it often correlates with functional roles during processes such as differentiation and morphogenesis. For example, spatial proteomics has been applied to study the gradual changes in the proteome landscape during mouse ovarian folliculogenesis. This research identified 401 proteins, revealing specific localization patterns that are essential for follicle development, and highlighted key proteins involved in apoptosis and developmental pathways [26].

Moreover, the integration of machine learning algorithms into spatial proteomics data analysis has significantly enhanced the ability to interpret complex datasets. These algorithms facilitate the reliable analysis of spatial proteomic data, enabling researchers to discern intricate localization patterns and their implications in cellular dynamics [4]. This is particularly beneficial in developmental contexts where multiple proteins may localize to various cellular compartments in response to developmental cues.

Spatial proteomics also leverages imaging techniques to provide visual representations of protein localization. Techniques such as matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) enable the mapping of protein distributions in their native tissue environments, allowing researchers to correlate protein localization with specific developmental stages or conditions [27].

In summary, spatial proteomics serves as a powerful tool for mapping protein localization by combining quantitative mass spectrometry, advanced imaging techniques, and machine learning methodologies. This approach not only elucidates the spatial organization of proteins but also enhances our understanding of their functional roles during developmental processes, ultimately paving the way for novel insights into cellular mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets in various diseases.

4.4 Drug Discovery and Therapeutics ​

Spatial proteomics is an innovative approach that facilitates the mapping of protein localization within cells and tissues, thereby providing critical insights into cellular functions and disease mechanisms. This technique is particularly valuable in drug discovery and therapeutic development, as it enhances our understanding of the molecular landscape of diseases, such as cancer.

The fundamental principle of spatial proteomics involves the analysis of protein localization at various subcellular levels, which is essential for understanding how proteins function within their specific cellular contexts. By employing advanced mass spectrometry (MS) and imaging techniques, researchers can acquire large-scale spatial proteomic data. These methods allow for the detection and quantification of proteins while preserving the spatial architecture of tissues. For instance, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) is a prominent tool in this field, enabling the direct visualization of protein distribution across tissue sections [9].

In the context of drug discovery, spatial proteomics can be leveraged to identify potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets by revealing the subcellular localization and dynamics of proteins implicated in disease. For example, spatial proteomics has been applied to breast cancer research, where understanding the heterogeneity of protein expression within tumor tissues can inform the development of more effective therapies [5]. This approach allows for the differentiation between various cancer subtypes and the identification of unique protein signatures associated with treatment responses.

Moreover, the advent of machine learning (ML) techniques in spatial proteomics enhances the analysis of complex datasets, facilitating the identification of patterns and correlations that may not be apparent through traditional methods [4]. By integrating ML algorithms into spatial proteomic workflows, researchers can achieve more reliable analyses and gain deeper insights into cellular processes that underlie disease progression and therapeutic responses.

Additionally, novel methodologies such as Spatial Proteomics through On-site Tissue-protein-labeling (SPOT) allow for the direct labeling of proteins in their native tissue environments, thereby improving the accuracy of proteomic profiling [6]. This technique is particularly beneficial for profiling spatially resolved proteomes in various tissue types, including those from cancer patients, where it can reveal distinct proteomic profiles associated with different tumor grades.

In summary, spatial proteomics serves as a powerful tool in drug discovery and therapeutics by enabling the detailed mapping of protein localization and dynamics. This capability is crucial for understanding disease mechanisms, identifying biomarkers, and developing targeted therapies that can improve patient outcomes. The integration of advanced analytical techniques and methodologies in spatial proteomics is paving the way for significant advancements in personalized medicine and therapeutic strategies.

5 Challenges and Future Directions ​

5.1 Technical Limitations ​

Spatial proteomics is an advanced field that focuses on understanding the localization and dynamics of proteins within cells and tissues. This discipline employs various techniques, primarily mass spectrometry (MS) and imaging-based approaches, to acquire large-scale spatial proteomic data, thereby allowing researchers to map protein localization effectively. However, despite its potential, spatial proteomics faces several challenges and technical limitations that must be addressed for future advancements.

One significant challenge in spatial proteomics is the inherent complexity of biological systems. The subcellular localization of proteins is not static; proteins can exhibit multi-localization, dynamically relocalize in response to stimuli, or exist within poorly characterized compartments. For instance, studies indicate that up to half of proteins may reside in multiple locations, complicating their assignment to specific subcellular niches (Crook et al. 2018). Current methodologies often rely on supervised machine learning algorithms that assign proteins to subcellular locations based on common gradient profiles. However, these methods do not adequately quantify the uncertainty associated with such assignments, which can lead to inaccurate interpretations of protein functions (Crook et al. 2018).

Another challenge is achieving high spatial resolution in protein mapping. Techniques such as mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI) preserve spatial distribution and histology but struggle with simultaneous peptide quantification and identification (Guo et al. 2021). This limitation can hinder the ability to discern subtle variations in protein localization that are critical for understanding cellular processes.

Moreover, the technical demands of current spatial proteomics methods often lead to trade-offs among sampling precision, throughput, and proteome coverage. For example, while laser microdissection-mass spectrometry (LMD-MS) offers precise sampling, it may compromise the overall throughput and coverage of the proteome being analyzed (Mao et al. 2025). Therefore, innovative approaches that enhance these aspects without sacrificing others are essential for advancing the field.

In addition to methodological challenges, there are also practical limitations regarding the analysis and interpretation of spatial proteomic data. The integration of machine learning techniques into data analysis pipelines is still in its nascent stages, and the need for robust statistical frameworks to manage the complexity of spatial data is paramount (Mou et al. 2022). The development of new algorithms, such as the Bayesian mixture modeling approach, aims to provide probabilistic assignments of proteins to subcellular locations, thereby enhancing the interpretative power of spatial proteomics (Crook et al. 2018).

Looking ahead, addressing these technical limitations will be crucial for the evolution of spatial proteomics. Innovations in direct tissue-protein labeling methods, such as the Spatial Proteomics through On-site Tissue-protein-labeling (SPOT) technique, offer promising avenues for improved spatial resolution and versatility in proteomic profiling (Xu et al. 2024). Furthermore, ongoing advancements in imaging techniques and machine learning applications will likely enhance the analytical capabilities of spatial proteomics, allowing for more comprehensive insights into cellular biology and disease mechanisms.

In conclusion, while spatial proteomics provides a powerful tool for mapping protein localization, it is imperative to overcome the technical challenges and limitations associated with current methodologies. By doing so, the field can significantly contribute to our understanding of cellular dynamics and inform therapeutic strategies in disease contexts.

5.2 Data Analysis and Interpretation ​

Spatial proteomics is a cutting-edge field that investigates the localization and dynamics of proteins within cells, utilizing various experimental approaches, particularly mass spectrometry (MS) and imaging techniques. This discipline has emerged as a powerful tool for understanding protein function and cellular processes, particularly in the context of diseases such as cancer.

The mapping of protein localization through spatial proteomics involves several key methodologies. Primarily, mass spectrometry-based spatial proteomics allows for high-throughput and unbiased analysis of the subcellular distribution of proteins. This approach has been demonstrated to analyze whole cell extracts created from differentially labeled subcellular fractions, enabling the measurement of the relative distribution of thousands of proteins across various cellular compartments, such as the cytoplasm and nucleus. For instance, a study utilized this technique to measure the distribution of over 2,000 proteins in HCT116 cells, revealing that most proteins are predominantly localized in specific compartments, with only a minor subset being distributed across multiple locations [1].

However, the field faces significant challenges, particularly in data analysis and interpretation. The complexity of spatial proteomic data, characterized by high dimensionality and the need for robust statistical frameworks, poses a major hurdle. Current analytical approaches, while powerful, often struggle with the intricacies of multi-localization and dynamic relocalization of proteins. For instance, it has been suggested that Bayesian modeling could offer advantages over existing methods, addressing some limitations in analytical processing [28].

To facilitate effective data analysis, several machine learning (ML) methodologies have been proposed. These include supervised and semi-supervised learning techniques, clustering, and novelty detection, which are essential for extracting meaningful insights from spatial proteomic datasets. Innovative software solutions implementing state-of-the-art analysis pipelines have been developed, providing researchers with tools to analyze complex data sets across various biological conditions [29].

The future of spatial proteomics is poised for significant advancements, particularly in the context of integrating ML methods to enhance data interpretation. The ability to analyze spatially targeted proteomics data rapidly is critical for understanding biological processes at a finer scale. For example, a recent study developed a multivariate approach for exploring differential protein profiles in distinct tissue regions, highlighting the dynamic nature of host-pathogen interactions [30]. Moreover, new methodologies such as Spatial Proteomics through On-site Tissue-protein-labeling (SPOT) have emerged, enabling the direct labeling of tissue proteins and subsequent quantitative analysis, thereby expanding the potential for spatial proteomic applications in clinical research [6].

In conclusion, spatial proteomics is advancing rapidly, providing valuable insights into protein localization and dynamics within cells. Despite the challenges associated with data analysis and interpretation, ongoing developments in analytical techniques and machine learning methodologies hold promise for overcoming these hurdles, paving the way for more comprehensive and clinically relevant applications in understanding cellular biology and disease mechanisms.

5.3 Integration with Other Omics Approaches ​

Spatial proteomics is an advanced field that focuses on understanding the localization and dynamics of proteins within their cellular environments. This approach employs various methodologies, primarily mass spectrometry (MS) and imaging techniques, to capture spatially resolved proteomic data. The mapping of protein localization is achieved through the analysis of whole cell extracts or tissue sections, where proteins are quantified and their distribution across different cellular compartments is characterized.

One significant challenge in spatial proteomics is the inherent complexity of biological samples, which can result in intricate data sets that are difficult to interpret. As highlighted in the literature, traditional methods such as microscopy and cell fractionation often fall short due to their low throughput and limited ability to analyze known components. To address these limitations, mass spectrometry-based proteomics has emerged as a high-throughput, unbiased approach that allows for the quantification of protein localization across various subcellular regions. For instance, a study demonstrated the use of mass spectrometry to analyze the relative distribution of over 2,000 proteins in HCT116 cells, revealing that proteins are predominantly localized to specific cellular compartments, with only a minor subset showing multi-localization [1].

Despite the advancements in spatial proteomics, several challenges persist. These include the need for robust analytical frameworks to process complex data, as well as the development of new algorithms that can effectively capture dynamic changes in protein localization. For example, the integration of machine learning methods has been suggested to enhance the analysis of spatial proteomics data, facilitating a better understanding of cellular biology and disease mechanisms [4].

Future directions in spatial proteomics involve not only improving existing methodologies but also integrating spatial proteomics with other omics approaches, such as transcriptomics and metabolomics. This multimodal integration is essential for gaining a comprehensive view of cellular processes and interactions within the tumor microenvironment and other biological contexts. The combination of spatially resolved molecular data with traditional omics allows for a deeper understanding of cellular heterogeneity and the intricate relationships between different biomolecules [6].

For instance, advancements in spatial omics technologies, including spatial transcriptomics and proteomics, are being utilized to visualize changes in molecular information within tissues. This integration can yield intuitive visual results that are critical for deciphering complex biological questions, particularly in cancer research where understanding the tumor microenvironment is vital [31]. Furthermore, new methods like Spatial and Cell-type Proteomics (SCPro) have been developed to enhance cell-type resolution and spatial heterogeneity characterization, demonstrating the potential of combining multiplexed imaging with proteomics [32].

In conclusion, while spatial proteomics provides powerful tools for mapping protein localization and understanding cellular dynamics, the field faces challenges that require innovative analytical strategies and integration with other omics approaches. Continued advancements in these areas are expected to yield significant insights into cell biology and disease mechanisms, paving the way for novel therapeutic strategies.

6 Conclusion ​

Spatial proteomics has emerged as a transformative discipline in the study of protein localization, significantly enhancing our understanding of cellular dynamics and the molecular basis of diseases. The methodologies employed, particularly mass spectrometry imaging, proximity labeling, and fluorescence microscopy, have provided researchers with powerful tools to map protein localization at unprecedented resolutions. Major findings highlight the critical role of protein localization in cellular functions, its implications in disease mechanisms, and the intricate protein-protein interactions that govern signaling pathways. Current challenges include technical limitations, complex data analysis, and the integration of spatial proteomics with other omics approaches. Future research should focus on overcoming these challenges by developing innovative methodologies and computational tools, as well as exploring the integration of spatial proteomics with transcriptomics and metabolomics. Such advancements will pave the way for deeper insights into cellular biology, ultimately contributing to the development of novel therapeutic strategies and improving patient outcomes in complex diseases like cancer and neurodegenerative disorders.

References ​

  • [1] François-Michel Boisvert;Yun Wah Lam;Douglas Lamont;Angus I Lamond. A quantitative proteomics analysis of subcellular proteome localization and changes induced by DNA damage.. Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP(IF=5.5). 2010. PMID:20026476. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M900429-MCP200.
  • [2] Emma Lundberg;Georg H H Borner. Spatial proteomics: a powerful discovery tool for cell biology.. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology(IF=90.2). 2019. PMID:30659282. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-018-0094-y.
  • [3] Georg H H Borner. Organellar Maps Through Proteomic Profiling - A Conceptual Guide.. Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP(IF=5.5). 2020. PMID:32345598. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.R120.001971.
  • [4] Minjie Mou;Ziqi Pan;Mingkun Lu;Huaicheng Sun;Yunxia Wang;Yongchao Luo;Feng Zhu. Application of Machine Learning in Spatial Proteomics.. Journal of chemical information and modeling(IF=5.3). 2022. PMID:36378082. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01161.
  • [5] Klára Brožová;Brigitte Hantusch;Lukas Kenner;Klaus Kratochwill. Spatial Proteomics for the Molecular Characterization of Breast Cancer.. Proteomes(IF=3.6). 2023. PMID:37218922. DOI: 10.3390/proteomes11020017.
  • [6] Yuanwei Xu;T Mamie Lih;Angelo M De Marzo;Qing Kay Li;Hui Zhang. SPOT: spatial proteomics through on-site tissue-protein-labeling.. Clinical proteomics(IF=3.3). 2024. PMID:39443867. DOI: 10.1186/s12014-024-09505-5.
  • [7] Yiheng Mao;Yuan Li;Zhendong Zheng;Yanfen Xu;Mi Ke;An He;Fuchao Liang;Keren Zhang;Xi Wang;Weina Gao;Ruijun Tian. All-at-once spatial proteome profiling of complex tissue context with single-cell-type resolution by proximity proteomics.. Cell systems(IF=7.7). 2025. PMID:40345200. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2025.101291.
  • [8] Jan Rhomberg-Kauert;Max Karlsson;Divya Thiagarajan;Tomasz Kallas;Filip Karlsson;Simon Fredriksson;Johan Dahlberg;Alvaro Martinez Barrio. Using adjusted local assortativity with Molecular Pixelation unveils colocalization of membrane proteins with immunological significance.. Frontiers in immunology(IF=5.9). 2024. PMID:38983848. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1309916.
  • [9] G Guo;M Papanicolaou;N J Demarais;Z Wang;K L Schey;P Timpson;T R Cox;A C Grey. Automated annotation and visualisation of high-resolution spatial proteomic mass spectrometry imaging data using HIT-MAP.. Nature communications(IF=15.7). 2021. PMID:34050164. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-23461-w.
  • [10] Yumi Kwon;Jongmin Woo;Fengchao Yu;Sarah M Williams;Lye Meng Markillie;Ronald J Moore;Ernesto S Nakayasu;Jing Chen;Martha Campbell-Thompson;Clayton E Mathews;Alexey I Nesvizhskii;Wei-Jun Qian;Ying Zhu. Proteome-Scale Tissue Mapping Using Mass Spectrometry Based on Label-Free and Multiplexed Workflows.. Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP(IF=5.5). 2024. PMID:39307423. DOI: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100841.
  • [11] Thanh My Thi Nguyen;Junhyung Kim;Thi Tram Doan;Min-Woo Lee;Mihye Lee. APEX Proximity Labeling as a Versatile Tool for Biological Research.. Biochemistry(IF=3.0). 2020. PMID:31718172. DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.9b00791.
  • [12] Myeong-Gyun Kang;Hyun-Woo Rhee. Molecular Spatiomics by Proximity Labeling.. Accounts of chemical research(IF=17.7). 2022. PMID:35512328. DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00061.
  • [13] Myeong-Gyun Kang;Sanghee Shin;Dong-Gi Jang;Ohyeon Kwon;Song-Yi Lee;Pratyush Kumar Mishra;Minkyo Jung;Ji Young Mun;Jung-Min Kee;Jong-Seo Kim;Hyun-Woo Rhee. Intracristal space proteome mapping using super-resolution proximity labeling with isotope-coded probes.. Nature communications(IF=15.7). 2025. PMID:40835710. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-62756-0.
  • [14] Jieyu Guo;Shuang Guo;Siao Lu;Jun Gong;Long Wang;Liqiong Ding;Qingjie Chen;Wu Liu. The development of proximity labeling technology and its applications in mammals, plants, and microorganisms.. Cell communication and signaling : CCS(IF=8.9). 2023. PMID:37777761. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-023-01310-1.
  • [15] Olha Shkel;Yevheniia Kharkivska;Yun Kyung Kim;Jun-Seok Lee. Proximity Labeling Techniques: A Multi-Omics Toolbox.. Chemistry, an Asian journal(IF=3.3). 2022. PMID:34850572. DOI: 10.1002/asia.202101240.
  • [16] Chang-Ryul Choi;Hyun-Woo Rhee. Proximity labeling: an enzymatic tool for spatial biology.. Trends in biotechnology(IF=14.9). 2022. PMID:34663510. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.09.008.
  • [17] C M Waterman-Storer;A Desai;J C Bulinski;E D Salmon. Fluorescent speckle microscopy, a method to visualize the dynamics of protein assemblies in living cells.. Current biology : CB(IF=7.5). 1998. PMID:9811609. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9822(07)00515-5.
  • [18] Florian Schueder;Eduard M Unterauer;Mahipal Ganji;Ralf Jungmann. DNA-Barcoded Fluorescence Microscopy for Spatial Omics.. Proteomics(IF=3.9). 2020. PMID:33030780. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201900368.
  • [19] Lisa M Breckels;Sean B Holden;David Wojnar;Claire M Mulvey;Andy Christoforou;Arnoud Groen;Matthew W B Trotter;Oliver Kohlbacher;Kathryn S Lilley;Laurent Gatto. Learning from Heterogeneous Data Sources: An Application in Spatial Proteomics.. PLoS computational biology(IF=3.6). 2016. PMID:27175778. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004920.
  • [20] Oliver M Crook;Claire M Mulvey;Paul D W Kirk;Kathryn S Lilley;Laurent Gatto. A Bayesian mixture modelling approach for spatial proteomics.. PLoS computational biology(IF=3.6). 2018. PMID:30481170. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006516.
  • [21] Ana Martinez-Val;Dorte B Bekker-Jensen;Sophia Steigerwald;Claire Koenig;Ole Østergaard;Adi Mehta;Trung Tran;Krzysztof Sikorski;Estefanía Torres-Vega;Ewa Kwasniewicz;Sólveig Hlín Brynjólfsdóttir;Lisa B Frankel;Rasmus Kjøbsted;Nicolai Krogh;Alicia Lundby;Simon Bekker-Jensen;Fridtjof Lund-Johansen;Jesper V Olsen. Spatial-proteomics reveals phospho-signaling dynamics at subcellular resolution.. Nature communications(IF=15.7). 2021. PMID:34876567. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-27398-y.
  • [22] Josie A Christopher;Charlotte Stadler;Claire E Martin;Marcel Morgenstern;Yanbo Pan;Cora N Betsinger;David G Rattray;Diana Mahdessian;Anne-Claude Gingras;Bettina Warscheid;Janne Lehtiö;Ileana M Cristea;Leonard J Foster;Andrew Emili;Kathryn S Lilley. Subcellular proteomics.. Nature reviews. Methods primers(IF=56.0). 2021. PMID:34549195. DOI: 10.1038/s43586-021-00029-y.
  • [23] Xin Ming M Zhou;Anjali J D'Amiano;Charles Lu;Vrinda Madan;Sara Khoshniyati;Jack Kollings;Noah E Sunshine;Sachin S Surwase;Joel C Sunshine. Spatial proteomics for investigating solid tumor resistance mechanisms.. Cancer metastasis reviews(IF=8.7). 2025. PMID:41060425. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-025-10292-0.
  • [24] Simon Davis;Connor Scott;Janina Oetjen;Philip D Charles;Benedikt M Kessler;Olaf Ansorge;Roman Fischer. Deep topographic proteomics of a human brain tumour.. Nature communications(IF=15.7). 2023. PMID:38001067. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-43520-8.
  • [25] Chiara Bungaro;Michele Guida;Benedetta Apollonio. Spatial proteomics of the tumor microenvironment in melanoma: current insights and future directions.. Frontiers in immunology(IF=5.9). 2025. PMID:40443654. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1568456.
  • [26] Giulia Fiorentino;Andrew Smith;Giovanna Nicora;Riccardo Bellazzi;Fulvio Magni;Silvia Garagna;Maurizio Zuccotti. MALDI mass spectrometry imaging shows a gradual change in the proteome landscape during mouse ovarian folliculogenesis.. Molecular human reproduction(IF=3.5). 2023. PMID:36734599. DOI: 10.1093/molehr/gaad006.
  • [27] Vivian Delcourt;Julien Franck;Jusal Quanico;Jean-Pascal Gimeno;Maxence Wisztorski;Antonella Raffo-Romero;Firas Kobeissy;Xavier Roucou;Michel Salzet;Isabelle Fournier. Spatially-Resolved Top-down Proteomics Bridged to MALDI MS Imaging Reveals the Molecular Physiome of Brain Regions.. Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP(IF=5.5). 2018. PMID:29122912. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M116.065755.
  • [28] Oliver M Crook;Tom Smith;Mohamed Elzek;Kathryn S Lilley. Moving Profiling Spatial Proteomics Beyond Discrete Classification.. Proteomics(IF=3.9). 2020. PMID:32558233. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201900392.
  • [29] Laurent Gatto;Lisa M Breckels;Thomas Burger;Daniel J H Nightingale;Arnoud J Groen;Callum Campbell;Nino Nikolovski;Claire M Mulvey;Andy Christoforou;Myriam Ferro;Kathryn S Lilley. A foundation for reliable spatial proteomics data analysis.. Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP(IF=5.5). 2014. PMID:24846987. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M113.036350.
  • [30] Kavya Sharman;Nathan Heath Patterson;Andy Weiss;Elizabeth K Neumann;Emma R Guiberson;Daniel J Ryan;Danielle B Gutierrez;Jeffrey M Spraggins;Raf Van de Plas;Eric P Skaar;Richard M Caprioli. Rapid Multivariate Analysis Approach to Explore Differential Spatial Protein Profiles in Tissue.. Journal of proteome research(IF=3.6). 2023. PMID:35849531. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00206.
  • [31] Fangmei Xie;Naite Xi;Zeping Han;Wenfeng Luo;Jian Shen;Jinggeng Luo;Xingkui Tang;Ting Pang;Yubing Lv;Jiabing Liang;Liyin Liao;Haoyu Zhang;Yong Jiang;Yuguang Li;Jinhua He. Progress in research on tumor microenvironment-based spatial omics technologies.. Oncology research(IF=4.1). 2023. PMID:37744276. DOI: 10.32604/or.2023.029494.
  • [32] Yanfen Xu;Xi Wang;Yuan Li;Yiheng Mao;Yiran Su;Yize Mao;Yun Yang;Weina Gao;Changying Fu;Wendong Chen;Xueting Ye;Fuchao Liang;Panzhu Bai;Ying Sun;Shengping Li;Ruilian Xu;Ruijun Tian. Multimodal single cell-resolved spatial proteomics reveal pancreatic tumor heterogeneity.. Nature communications(IF=15.7). 2024. PMID:39572534. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-54438-0.

MaltSci Intelligent Research Services ​

Search for more papers on MaltSci.com ​

Spatial Proteomics · Protein Localization · Mass Spectrometry Imaging · Cellular Function · Disease Mechanisms

© 2025 MaltSci