MaltSci 麦伴科研

Appearance

Popular Reports / Public Health

This report is written by MaltSci based on the latest literature and research findings

How does emergency response handle health crises? ​

Abstract ​

The management of health crises through emergency response systems has become increasingly important, particularly in light of recent global challenges such as pandemics, natural disasters, and bioterrorism threats. This report explores the framework of emergency response, emphasizing its definition and significance in safeguarding public health. The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted critical gaps in preparedness and response strategies, underscoring the need for a collaborative approach involving governmental and non-governmental organizations. The report identifies key components of effective emergency response systems, including mental health integration, resource management, and the role of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in providing epidemiological support. Additionally, the contributions of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and the importance of community engagement in health crisis management are discussed. Technological integration, particularly the use of data analytics and communication technologies, is shown to enhance the efficiency of emergency responses. Case studies from the COVID-19 pandemic and natural disasters reveal valuable lessons regarding coordination, resource allocation, and the importance of a comprehensive approach. Ultimately, the findings emphasize the necessity of establishing robust emergency response frameworks that prioritize equity, collaboration, and resilience in public health systems.

Outline ​

This report will discuss the following questions.

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 The Framework of Emergency Response
    • 2.1 Definition and Importance of Emergency Response
    • 2.2 Key Components of Emergency Response Systems
  • 3 Stakeholders in Health Crisis Management
    • 3.1 Roles of Governmental Agencies
    • 3.2 Contributions of Non-Governmental Organizations
    • 3.3 Community Involvement and Public Engagement
  • 4 Technological Integration in Emergency Response
    • 4.1 Use of Data and Analytics
    • 4.2 Communication Technologies and Their Impact
  • 5 Case Studies of Health Crises
    • 5.1 Analysis of the COVID-19 Pandemic Response
    • 5.2 Lessons Learned from Natural Disasters
  • 6 Challenges and Barriers in Emergency Response
    • 6.1 Resource Allocation and Funding Issues
    • 6.2 Coordination Among Various Agencies
  • 7 Conclusion

1 Introduction ​

The management of health crises through emergency response systems has gained unprecedented attention in recent years, particularly due to the global challenges posed by pandemics, natural disasters, and bioterrorism threats. These crises underscore the importance of robust emergency response mechanisms that can mitigate the impact on populations and ensure public health safety. The COVID-19 pandemic, for instance, revealed significant gaps in preparedness and response strategies, highlighting the need for a comprehensive understanding of how various stakeholders, including governmental and non-governmental organizations, interact to manage health emergencies effectively [1].

The significance of this research lies in its potential to inform and enhance future emergency response frameworks. By analyzing the roles of diverse stakeholders—such as public health agencies, hospitals, and community organizations—this report aims to identify best practices and areas for improvement in health crisis management. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for developing strategies that not only address immediate threats but also foster long-term public health resilience. Furthermore, the integration of technology and communication within emergency response systems plays a pivotal role in ensuring timely and effective interventions [2].

Current research on emergency response systems reveals a fragmented landscape where coordination among various agencies often falters, leading to ineffective responses. For instance, studies have shown that the lack of a unified approach can exacerbate the consequences of health crises, as seen in the Brazilian response to COVID-19, which was characterized by inadequate governance and communication failures [1]. Moreover, lessons from humanitarian emergencies illustrate the necessity of building local capacity and adapting responses to the unique challenges posed by different contexts [3].

This report is organized into several key sections. The first section outlines the framework of emergency response, defining its importance and key components. Following this, we will explore the roles of various stakeholders in health crisis management, detailing the contributions of governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, and community involvement. The report will then delve into the technological integration in emergency response, examining the use of data analytics and communication technologies. Case studies of past health crises, particularly the COVID-19 pandemic and natural disasters, will be analyzed to draw lessons and identify best practices. Finally, we will discuss the challenges and barriers faced in emergency response, focusing on resource allocation, funding issues, and the need for improved coordination among agencies.

In conclusion, by comprehensively examining the mechanisms and strategies employed in emergency response systems, this report aims to contribute to a deeper understanding of how to enhance public health responses to future crises. Through collaborative efforts and the adoption of best practices, we can work towards a more effective and resilient health crisis management framework that ultimately protects and promotes the well-being of communities.

2 The Framework of Emergency Response ​

2.1 Definition and Importance of Emergency Response ​

Emergency response to health crises is a critical aspect of public health management, particularly in the face of events such as pandemics, natural disasters, and humanitarian emergencies. Effective emergency response frameworks are essential for mitigating the impact of such crises on populations. The definition of emergency response encompasses the actions taken to address urgent public health threats that may arise from various factors, including infectious disease outbreaks, environmental disasters, and social upheaval.

The importance of emergency response lies in its capacity to safeguard public health and maintain societal stability during times of crisis. An effective response not only addresses immediate health needs but also lays the groundwork for recovery and resilience against future emergencies. For instance, the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the inadequacies in institutional strategies that exacerbate social inequalities, thereby amplifying the negative consequences of health emergencies. A "whole-of-society" approach is necessary to determine effective strategies in health emergency responses, emphasizing the integration of diverse societal actors and resources [1].

In evaluating emergency responses, particularly in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, several parameters of risk governance emerge as critical. These include risk communication, transparency and accessibility of data, negotiation between actors, social cohesion, public participation, and reliance on technical and scientific evidence. The Brazilian response to COVID-19 exemplifies the shortcomings that can occur when these parameters are neglected, resulting in a governance approach characterized by chaos, confusion, and disinformation [1].

Establishing a robust emergency response mechanism also involves the creation of an emergency material reserve system to ensure that necessary resources are available during health crises. This includes timely provision of medical supplies and equipment to facilitate effective responses. Research indicates that current capabilities for disease prevention and control need significant improvement, as evidenced by the implementation rates of health projects, which were reported at only 59.3% for disease prevention and control initiatives [2].

Moreover, the role of institutions such as the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is pivotal in public health emergency responses. The CDC has provided essential epidemiological support in various humanitarian emergencies worldwide, emphasizing the need for developing epidemiological tools and building local capacity for health system recovery [3].

Lastly, addressing behavioral health emergencies also requires a collaborative approach that involves both clinical and law enforcement sectors. A comprehensive continuum-of-crisis care model is proposed to reduce unnecessary law enforcement involvement in behavioral health crises, highlighting the importance of systemic reform to improve responses to such emergencies [4].

In summary, emergency response frameworks are integral to managing health crises effectively. They require a multifaceted approach that incorporates risk governance, resource management, inter-institutional collaboration, and a focus on health equity to enhance overall public health resilience.

2.2 Key Components of Emergency Response Systems ​

Emergency response systems play a critical role in managing health crises, which can arise from various public health emergencies, including natural disasters, pandemics, and humanitarian crises. A comprehensive framework for emergency response encompasses several key components that ensure effective management and support for affected populations.

One of the primary aspects of emergency response is the integration of mental health considerations throughout all phases of disaster management, including preparedness, response, and recovery. This approach is essential for addressing the unique developmental, social, emotional, and behavioral needs of children, who are particularly vulnerable during crises. For instance, establishing a "pediatric disaster system of care" involves collaboration with community touch points such as schools and faith-based organizations to enhance access to mental health services. Strategies like psychological first aid, mental health screening, and stepped care approaches help in effectively identifying and addressing the mental health needs of children during disasters[5].

In addition to mental health support, the establishment of an emergency material reserve mechanism is crucial for responding to public health emergencies. This mechanism ensures that necessary resources are available to manage health crises effectively. Research indicates that there is a significant gap in the implementation of disease prevention and control projects, with an average completion rate of 45.8% for inspection projects by health supervision agencies. To bridge this gap, it is recommended that training for relevant personnel be enhanced and that a robust emergency material reserve system be developed to provide timely resources for crisis management[2].

Furthermore, the role of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in public health emergency responses highlights the importance of epidemiologic support in humanitarian interventions. The CDC's Emergency Response and Recovery Branch has engaged in extensive collaboration with national and international partners to respond to health crises effectively. Lessons learned from past responses emphasize the need for developing epidemiologic tools suitable for resource-limited contexts, building local capacities for health system recovery, and adapting responses to evolving public health threats[3].

Lastly, addressing behavioral health emergencies requires a collaborative approach that integrates the efforts of law enforcement and clinical services. This is particularly relevant given the challenges faced by individuals experiencing behavioral health crises, who often encounter inadequate care in emergency departments. A comprehensive continuum-of-crisis care model that provides alternatives to law enforcement involvement can significantly improve outcomes. It is essential to consider policy implications related to stakeholder engagement, financing, and health equity as communities strive to implement these necessary changes[4].

In summary, an effective emergency response system must integrate mental health considerations, establish robust resource mechanisms, leverage epidemiologic support, and foster collaboration between various stakeholders to address health crises comprehensively.

3 Stakeholders in Health Crisis Management ​

3.1 Roles of Governmental Agencies ​

Emergency response to health crises involves a coordinated effort among various stakeholders, particularly governmental agencies, to effectively manage and mitigate the impacts of such events. The interplay between state and local leadership, as well as federal support, is critical in preparedness and response strategies.

The historical context shows that state and local leadership is essential in addressing public health emergencies, but this often contrasts with the technical demands of preparedness and response. Since 2001, new laws, regulations, executive orders, and policies have been developed to enhance the federal government's role in responding to public health emergencies. However, the financial mechanisms in place for disaster response often do not align with the urgent need to prevent the spread of infectious agents. For instance, some funding models require a gubernatorial request before federal assistance can be activated, which can delay critical responses to emerging health threats[6].

State declarations of a "public health emergency" are vital as they grant flexibility and guidance to the health sector in responding to crises. These declarations can mobilize resources, facilitate collaboration among various levels of government, and integrate public health systems into the response framework. The analysis of state public health emergency declarations reveals that such measures were employed during significant events like Hurricanes Katrina and Sandy and the H1N1 influenza outbreak. These instances highlighted the necessity of having robust public health emergency powers and the potential benefits of utilizing these authorities effectively[7].

In summary, the management of health crises requires a comprehensive approach that includes the strategic involvement of governmental agencies at all levels. This coordination is crucial for timely and effective responses to protect public health and ensure that the necessary resources and regulations are in place to address the challenges posed by health emergencies.

3.2 Contributions of Non-Governmental Organizations ​

Emergencies significantly disrupt health systems and hinder regular and timely access to service delivery, which poses substantial challenges for managing health crises. During humanitarian crises, the response from stakeholders often prioritizes immediate needs, such as injuries and infectious diseases, rather than addressing noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). This tendency arises from the urgent nature of crises, where the focus is predominantly on life-threatening conditions that require immediate attention.

However, neglecting NCDs in emergency settings can lead to long-term negative consequences for affected populations. Such neglect can result in increased morbidity, unnecessary preventable deaths, and further strain on already stressed healthcare systems. This underscores the importance of a comprehensive approach that integrates NCD management into emergency response frameworks.

The contributions of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are critical in this context. NGOs often play a pivotal role in humanitarian assistance, providing essential services and support in crisis situations. They can help bridge the gap in healthcare delivery by advocating for the inclusion of NCDs in emergency response strategies and facilitating access to necessary care for chronic conditions.

The paper titled "Noncommunicable Diseases and Global Health Security: Scaling up Action in Humanitarian Crises for Sustainable Recovery" outlines a threefold purpose aimed at enhancing health crisis management. First, it argues for high-level commitments to integrate NCDs into the Global Health Security Agenda (GHSA), promoting more effective action toward sustainable recovery. Second, it advocates for a well-coordinated integrated health systems response that holistically addresses NCDs during humanitarian emergencies. This approach emphasizes the need to strengthen pre-crisis infrastructure, improve the quality of NCD surveillance data, and enhance the health workforce and overall health system readiness.

Lastly, the paper explores the challenges associated with effective NCD management in emergencies, highlighting the necessity for multisectoral collaboration, partnerships, and resource mobilization. Such collaborative efforts are essential to enhance preparedness, response, and recovery initiatives in health crises, ensuring that the healthcare needs of all affected populations, including those with NCDs, are adequately addressed [8].

3.3 Community Involvement and Public Engagement ​

Emergency response to health crises is a multifaceted process that necessitates the involvement of various stakeholders, with community engagement and public participation being pivotal components. The effectiveness of health crisis management relies on strong partnerships and collaborative efforts among local community structures, health professionals, and governmental organizations.

Risk communication and community engagement (RCCE) is identified as a key pillar in public health emergency response. It ensures the accurate sharing of health information, promotes the adoption of protective behaviors among affected populations, and fosters collaborative participation from all stakeholders, particularly local communities. The success of RCCE programs hinges on several factors, including the establishment of clear program plans and guidelines, well-defined coordination structures, and effective reporting and documentation measures of program activities. Moreover, RCCE activities must emphasize strengthening local structures to facilitate active community participation in interrupting disease transmission [9].

The importance of community engagement (CE) in enhancing health system resilience is further underscored by empirical evidence from Liberia's Ebola epidemic. During this crisis, health system stakeholders indicated that CE played a crucial role in addressing the outbreak. Various forms of CE were employed, with meaningful engagement—such as the formation of community-based surveillance teams—being particularly effective. The findings suggest that communities should be treated as active participants rather than passive recipients of health response efforts. Establishing communication platforms for CE prior to a crisis is also recommended, as it can lead to improved communication and increased trust in health authorities, thereby enhancing overall health system response efforts [10].

Furthermore, the "Equity in Epidemic Response" framework highlights the necessity of integrating equity as a foundational element in public health responses to infectious disease emergencies. This framework outlines six high-impact areas that must be addressed, including community partnerships and engagement, communication, and accessibility of outbreak resources. It emphasizes the need for equitable approaches in response efforts to minimize health consequences, especially among vulnerable populations [11].

In addressing behavioral health emergencies, a comprehensive approach that involves both law enforcement and clinical responses is essential. The current challenges in handling behavioral health crises, including inadequate care in emergency departments and the disproportionate impact on marginalized communities, necessitate systemic reforms. Best practices for law enforcement responses and the development of a continuum-of-crisis care model that provides alternatives to traditional law enforcement involvement are recommended. This collaborative approach aims to align the goals of law enforcement and clinicians, thereby enhancing the overall effectiveness of emergency responses to health crises [4].

In summary, effective emergency response to health crises requires a coordinated effort that emphasizes community involvement, equitable approaches, and comprehensive strategies that engage multiple stakeholders. Strengthening local capacities, fostering trust, and ensuring clear communication are essential for enhancing health system resilience and improving outcomes during public health emergencies.

4 Technological Integration in Emergency Response ​

4.1 Use of Data and Analytics ​

The handling of health crises through emergency response systems has evolved significantly, particularly with the integration of advanced technologies and data analytics. Effective emergency management requires a well-coordinated technological framework that enhances the speed and efficiency of risk warning and emergency response systems. The integration of multiple emerging technologies, such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and big data analytics, plays a crucial role in this process.

A comprehensive analysis of technological integration mechanisms in emergency engineering planning reveals that the synergy between risk warning and emergency response systems is critical for effective crisis management. Centrality and connectivity are identified as key characteristics of core technologies, influencing integration patterns within these systems. The integration within the warning network is found to significantly enhance the integration within the response network, indicating that advancements in one area can directly benefit the other[12].

Moreover, the role of data in emergency management is paramount. Health information systems (HIS) face the challenge of collecting timely and detailed information necessary for responding to humanitarian crises. The integration of HIS in emergencies requires coordination among various humanitarian agencies, often led by organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO). This coordination is essential to avoid fragmented and contradictory statistics, which can negatively impact humanitarian interventions. A rigorous and coordinated auditing process for health statistics is recommended to ensure their reliability and utility in crisis situations[13].

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, big data technology has emerged as a pivotal tool for local governments in managing epidemic emergencies. The application framework developed for COVID-19 management includes stages such as migration, preparedness, response, and recovery. For instance, Hainan Province in China implemented advanced big data management mechanisms to enhance its epidemic emergency management capabilities, demonstrating the feasibility and value of integrating big data technology into public health strategies[14].

Furthermore, the concept of analytics empowerment capability is gaining traction in humanitarian service systems. This capability involves leveraging structured and unstructured data to inform decision-making processes during crises. Key components identified include analytics culture, technological sophistication, and training, which collectively enhance the ability of humanitarian systems to sense, seize, and address crisis situations effectively[15].

Overall, the integration of data and analytics into emergency response systems not only facilitates real-time detection and early warning systems but also improves overall resilience and effectiveness in managing health crises. The combination of advanced technologies and robust data management frameworks represents a transformative approach to public health emergency management, capable of significantly mitigating the impacts of such crises[16].

4.2 Communication Technologies and Their Impact ​

Emergency response to health crises is increasingly relying on technological integration to enhance communication and improve the overall efficiency of risk warning and emergency response systems. The challenges posed by public health emergencies often lead to unpredictable situations that require timely and effective management. Technological advancements, particularly in communication technologies, play a crucial role in addressing these challenges.

A comprehensive analysis of technological integration mechanisms reveals that a well-coordinated technological framework can significantly improve the speed and efficiency of emergency response systems. Central to this integration are key characteristics such as centrality and connectivity within the network structures that underpin risk warning and emergency response. The study conducted by Zhang and Lu (2025) highlights that the integration of diverse technologies enhances the coordination between warning networks and response networks, creating a synergistic effect that is essential for effective emergency management[12].

Moreover, the implementation of digital twin technology, as explored by Sun et al. (2025), provides innovative solutions for managing public health emergencies. This technology facilitates the digitalization, intelligence, and visualization of the entire health emergency management process, which includes preventive measures, real-time detection, early warning systems, and intelligent emergency response management. By employing the PPRR framework (prevention, preparedness, response, and recovery), digital twin technology offers a holistic approach that can significantly enhance management efficiency and bolster coordinated responses to health crises[16].

In addition to digital twin technology, the integration of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine (PPPM) into emergency medical responses is vital for optimizing healthcare management during crises. Gaebel et al. (2024) emphasize the importance of advanced information technology systems in transforming humanitarian aid. They propose a modern electronic patient record system designed for emergency medical teams, which not only improves patient management but also enables predictive analytics, preventive strategies, and personalized care protocols. This system aims to fill critical gaps in current emergency medical response strategies, particularly during sudden-onset disasters[17].

The impact of communication technologies on emergency response cannot be overstated. According to Chan et al. (2004), advancements in communication technologies, including next-generation wireless Internet and geopositioning technologies, have the potential to vastly improve emergency medical responses during mass-casualty incidents. These technologies enhance information management, provider safety, and resource coordination, thereby improving the overall effectiveness of disaster response efforts[18].

In summary, the integration of advanced communication technologies and innovative systems within emergency response frameworks is essential for effectively managing health crises. By enhancing coordination, improving real-time communication, and facilitating data management, these technologies contribute to more resilient public health systems capable of responding to emergencies efficiently.

5 Case Studies of Health Crises ​

5.1 Analysis of the COVID-19 Pandemic Response ​

The handling of health crises, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, has highlighted the complexities and challenges of emergency response systems. Various studies have examined these responses, revealing critical insights into the effectiveness of coordination, resource mobilization, and multi-agency collaboration.

In Pakistan, the public health emergency management system faced significant difficulties during the COVID-19 pandemic. An assessment conducted revealed that the overall score of the emergency response coordination system was only 49% across all agencies involved. Challenges were particularly evident in leadership, legislation, and financing, with 44% of agencies reporting these issues as obstacles to effective response. Notably, none of the agencies had a fully developed framework for joint planning and response, although roles and responsibilities were relatively clear for most agencies, scoring 55%. The study emphasized that effective public health emergency response is reliant on multi-departmental coordination, resource mobilization, and clearly defined roles for each agency. It concluded that Pakistan must proactively address these challenges to enhance future pandemic responses[19].

In contrast, the World Health Organization (WHO) demonstrated a different approach at the global level, emphasizing a whole-of-society response. The WHO, as the lead agency within the United Nations system, coordinated efforts through the Crisis Management Team and UN Country Teams. Case studies from Mali, Cox's Bazar in Bangladesh, and Uzbekistan illustrated how WHO facilitated a comprehensive response to COVID-19 by leveraging local volunteers and engaging various sectors. This strategy not only strengthened the public health response but also ensured continuity in other critical areas such as education and livelihoods. Key themes that emerged included risk communication and community engagement, which were vital for effective operationalization of the response. The WHO's experience underscored the necessity of preparing for future health and non-health emergencies by developing multi-sectoral preparedness plans[20].

Furthermore, an international comparison of emergency medical supply systems among China, the United States, Australia, and Canada revealed common issues faced globally during the pandemic. These included inadequate types and quantities of emergency medical supplies in reserve, insufficient production capacity, and an imperfect command mechanism for the deployment and transportation of these supplies. The study emphasized that a robust reserve system for emergency medical supplies is essential for effectively managing public health emergencies. It called for improved coordination and cooperation mechanisms internationally to address the challenges posed by global health crises[21].

In summary, the analysis of emergency responses during the COVID-19 pandemic reveals that effective crisis management requires a well-coordinated approach that integrates multiple sectors, clear roles, and sufficient resources. Lessons learned from these case studies can inform future strategies to enhance resilience and preparedness for health emergencies.

5.2 Lessons Learned from Natural Disasters ​

Emergency response to health crises, particularly in the context of natural disasters, necessitates a comprehensive and adaptive approach that integrates multiple facets of healthcare and community support systems. The literature highlights several key strategies and lessons learned from past experiences in managing such emergencies.

One critical aspect of emergency response is the capacity of the healthcare system to surge rapidly during disasters. The U.S. emergency care system plays a vital role not only in providing acute care but also in supporting the broader community needs during health crises. In times of disaster, this system must accommodate a significant influx of patients, often with minimal notice. Innovations and adaptations prompted by everyday demands on the system can enhance its effectiveness in responding to emergencies. However, excessive utilization of emergency services can strain resources and diminish surge capacity when it is most needed (Lurie et al., 2013) [22].

Furthermore, addressing the mental health needs of affected populations is essential, especially for vulnerable groups such as children. A study emphasizes the importance of integrating mental health considerations throughout all phases of disaster management—preparedness, response, and recovery. This includes utilizing resources such as crisis lines and mobile crisis units, as well as fostering partnerships with community organizations to create a "pediatric disaster system of care." Such partnerships are crucial for ensuring equitable access to mental health services, particularly for marginalized communities and those living in high-poverty areas (Hoffmann et al., 2025) [5].

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has also underscored the significance of developing epidemiologic tools tailored for resource-limited contexts during humanitarian emergencies. Their retrospective review of responses from 2007 to 2016 highlights the need for building local capacity for health system recovery and adapting responses to evolving public health threats. This adaptability is critical in fragile states, where the complexity of emergencies can severely impact public health security (Boyd et al., 2017) [3].

In summary, effective emergency response to health crises, particularly during natural disasters, involves a multi-faceted approach that includes enhancing surge capacity in healthcare systems, integrating mental health support, and building local capabilities for sustainable recovery. The lessons learned from past disasters emphasize the importance of collaboration across various sectors and the need for adaptive strategies to meet the unique challenges posed by different types of emergencies.

6 Challenges and Barriers in Emergency Response ​

6.1 Resource Allocation and Funding Issues ​

Emergency response in health crises faces significant challenges, particularly concerning resource allocation and funding issues. The increasing demand for emergency department services, coupled with public health emergencies and threats such as bioterrorism, has led to overcrowding, long waiting times, and patient safety concerns, as highlighted by Clancy (2007). The need for effective triage systems and reliable tools to manage patient flow is critical in these scenarios, as traditional emergency care systems are often overwhelmed by the volume of patients requiring immediate attention.

In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, ethical considerations have emerged regarding the allocation of limited healthcare resources. D'Errico et al. (2021) discuss the logistical and ethical dilemmas that arise when healthcare professionals must make decisions about which patients receive access to critical care resources, such as respiratory support. This situation underscores the importance of establishing clear criteria for patient admission to different therapeutic pathways to mitigate ethical conflicts and ensure fair resource distribution.

Furthermore, the prioritization of emergency care on a global scale remains inadequate, particularly in low and middle-income countries. Chipendo et al. (2021) identify several barriers that hinder the effective advocacy for emergency care, including poor problem definition, coalition building challenges, and a lack of data to support urgent action from policymakers. These factors contribute to the ongoing struggle for emergency care advocates to elevate the priority of emergency services and secure necessary funding and resources.

In addition to these ethical and logistical challenges, administrative barriers significantly impact the delivery of emergency medical care. Pilgrim et al. (2010) emphasize the need for coordinated and accountable emergency care systems, which require alignment of various administrative structures, including reimbursement and regulatory frameworks. These systems often complicate the provision of optimal care and may threaten the sustainability of integrated emergency services.

Overall, the response to health crises necessitates a multifaceted approach that addresses these challenges and barriers, focusing on effective resource allocation, ethical considerations in care delivery, and the need for improved administrative frameworks to support emergency care systems.

6.2 Coordination Among Various Agencies ​

Effective coordination among emergency department (ED) teams and emergency medical services (EMS) teams is crucial for handling health crises, yet several challenges impede this process. A study by Reddy et al. (2009) identifies three major challenges that significantly affect the coordination between these teams: the ineffectiveness of current information and communication technologies, a lack of common ground, and breakdowns in information flow.

The first challenge pertains to the ineffectiveness of existing information and communication technologies. These technologies are essential for facilitating real-time communication and information sharing during emergencies. However, their limitations can hinder the ability of ED and EMS teams to work cohesively, thereby impacting the overall response to health crises.

The second challenge is the lack of common ground between ED and EMS teams. This lack of shared understanding and mutual awareness can lead to miscommunications and inefficiencies in the response efforts. It underscores the necessity for both teams to establish a common framework and shared protocols that can guide their interactions during emergencies.

Lastly, breakdowns in information flow present a significant barrier to effective coordination. When information does not flow seamlessly between ED and EMS teams, it can result in critical delays and misunderstandings that compromise patient care and safety. This emphasizes the importance of designing inter-team coordination systems that address socio-technical issues, such as awareness, context, and workflow, to enhance communication and operational efficiency during crises.

In addition to these challenges, the COVID-19 pandemic highlighted further complexities in decision-making processes during public health emergencies. A qualitative case study by Brubacher et al. (2024) examined the use of evidence in policy-making in British Columbia, Canada, revealing that while many believed the early COVID-19 policy response was evidence-informed, there was significant uncertainty regarding the types of evidence utilized and how it influenced decision-making. Respondents pointed out a lack of coordination and continuity across data sources, as well as insufficient guidelines on evidence-use, which led to fragmentation in the decision-making process.

The study concluded that to improve responses to future health crises, it is essential to enhance the flow of information between policy-makers and researchers, ensure coordination in data collection and usage, and maintain transparency in decision-making processes. Clear mechanisms for integrating various forms of evidence into decision-making will strengthen preparedness and improve the overall effectiveness of emergency responses in public health scenarios.

In summary, addressing the challenges of coordination among ED and EMS teams, as well as enhancing the integration of evidence in policy-making, are critical steps in improving the handling of health crises. This requires a concerted effort to design systems that facilitate communication, establish common protocols, and ensure a smooth flow of information to enable a more effective emergency response.

7 Conclusion ​

The analysis of emergency response systems in managing health crises reveals several key findings that emphasize the need for comprehensive and coordinated approaches. First, effective emergency response frameworks must integrate mental health considerations, establish robust resource mechanisms, and leverage the strengths of various stakeholders, including governmental agencies, non-governmental organizations, and community involvement. The importance of a 'whole-of-society' approach is evident, where collaboration among diverse entities is essential for timely and effective responses. Current research highlights the fragmented nature of emergency responses, often exacerbated by inadequate coordination and resource allocation, as seen in the Brazilian response to COVID-19. Future research should focus on enhancing the integration of technology, improving communication systems, and developing best practices that address the unique challenges posed by different health crises. By fostering local capacities and ensuring equitable access to healthcare, we can build resilient public health systems that are better equipped to manage future emergencies. Ultimately, the lessons learned from past health crises underscore the critical need for adaptive strategies that prioritize collaboration, preparedness, and community engagement in emergency response efforts.

References ​

  • [1] Gabriela Marques Di Giulio;Ione Maria Mendes;Felipe Dos Reis Campos;João Nunes. Risk governance in the response to global health emergencies: understanding the governance of chaos in Brazil's handling of the Covid-19 pandemic.. Health policy and planning(IF=3.1). 2023. PMID:37074071. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czad016.
  • [2] Yumeng Sun. Establishment of the emergency material reserve mechanism for public health emergencies and optimization of the management of various functional departments.. Frontiers in public health(IF=3.4). 2022. PMID:36711328. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1092375.
  • [3] Andrew T Boyd;Susan T Cookson;Mark Anderson;Oleg O Bilukha;Muireann Brennan;Thomas Handzel;Colleen Hardy;Farah Husain;Barbara Lopes Cardozo;Carlos Navarro Colorado;Cyrus Shahpar;Leisel Talley;Michael Toole;Michael Gerber. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Public Health Response to Humanitarian Emergencies, 2007-2016.. Emerging infectious diseases(IF=6.6). 2017. PMID:29155669. DOI: 10.3201/eid2313.170473.
  • [4] Margaret E Balfour;Arlene Hahn Stephenson;Ayesha Delany-Brumsey;Jason Winsky;Matthew L Goldman. Cops, Clinicians, or Both? Collaborative Approaches to Responding to Behavioral Health Emergencies.. Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)(IF=3.2). 2022. PMID:34666512. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000721.
  • [5] Jennifer A Hoffmann;Alba Pergjika;Kimberly Burkhart;Christopher Gable;Ashley A Foster;Mohsen Saidinejad;Trevor Covington;Desiree Edemba;Sara Mullins;Merritt Schreiber;Lee S Beers. Supporting Children's Mental Health Needs in Disasters.. Pediatrics(IF=6.4). 2025. PMID:39689730. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2024-068076.
  • [6] Rebecca Katz;Aurelia Attal-Juncqua;Julie E Fischer. Funding Public Health Emergency Preparedness in the United States.. American journal of public health(IF=9.6). 2017. PMID:28892446. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303956.
  • [7] Lainie Rutkow. An analysis of state public health emergency declarations.. American journal of public health(IF=9.6). 2014. PMID:25033156. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.301948.
  • [8] Téa E Collins;Amanda Karapici;Daria Berlina. Noncommunicable Diseases and Global Health Security: Scaling up Action in Humanitarian Crises for Sustainable Recovery.. Annals of global health(IF=3.2). 2025. PMID:40487710. DOI: 10.5334/aogh.4788.
  • [9] Laston Gonah. Key Considerations for Successful Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) Programmes During COVID-19 Pandemic and Other Public Health Emergencies.. Annals of global health(IF=3.2). 2020. PMID:33262935. DOI: 10.5334/aogh.3119.
  • [10] Kathryn M Barker;Emilia J Ling;Mosoka Fallah;Brian VanDeBogert;Yvonne Kodl;Rose Jallah Macauley;K Viswanath;Margaret E Kruk. Community engagement for health system resilience: evidence from Liberia's Ebola epidemic.. Health policy and planning(IF=3.1). 2020. PMID:32040166. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czz174.
  • [11] Precious-Junia de-Winton Cummings;Kelly K Baker;Leah Appell;Marina Del Rios;Daniel J Diekema;Tricia Kitzmann;Naomi Marroquin;Gus Raymond;Martha L Carvour. Equity in epidemic response: an action-oriented framework for guiding public health in equitable responses to major infectious disease emergencies.. International journal for equity in health(IF=4.1). 2025. PMID:40075487. DOI: 10.1186/s12939-025-02433-2.
  • [12] Xiaojun Zhang;Liangdong Lu. Technological Integration in Emergency Management: Bridging Risk Warning and Emergency Response Systems.. Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis(IF=3.3). 2025. PMID:41139475. DOI: 10.1111/risa.70124.
  • [13] Michel Thieren. Health information systems in humanitarian emergencies.. Bulletin of the World Health Organization(IF=5.7). 2005. PMID:16184277. DOI: /S0042-96862005000800011.
  • [14] Zijun Mao;Qi Zou;Hong Yao;Jingyi Wu. The application framework of big data technology in the COVID-19 epidemic emergency management in local government-a case study of Hainan Province, China.. BMC public health(IF=3.6). 2021. PMID:34736445. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-12065-0.
  • [15] Shahriar Akter;Saradhi Motamarri;Shahriar Sajib;Ruwan J Bandara;Shlomo Tarba;Demetris Vrontis. Theorising the Microfoundations of analytics empowerment capability for humanitarian service systems.. Annals of operations research(IF=4.5). 2021. PMID:34803203. DOI: 10.1007/s10479-021-04386-5.
  • [16] Tianze Sun;Jialin Lu;Qicheng Li;Yuhui Kou. Can digital twin technology revolutionize public health emergency management? Insights from the PPRR framework.. Frontiers in public health(IF=3.4). 2025. PMID:41080840. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1631339.
  • [17] Jan Gaebel;Erik Schreiber;Thomas Neumuth. The Emergency Medical Team Operating System - a vision for field hospital data management in following the concepts of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.. The EPMA journal(IF=5.9). 2024. PMID:38841618. DOI: 10.1007/s13167-024-00361-9.
  • [18] Theodore C Chan;Jim Killeen;William Griswold;Leslie Lenert. Information technology and emergency medical care during disasters.. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine(IF=3.2). 2004. PMID:15528589. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.018.
  • [19] Majid Ali Tahir;Mumtaz Ali Khan;Aamer Ikram;Tamoor Hamid Chaudhry;Afreenish Amir;Muhammad Tahir;Ijaz Ul Haq;Shahbaz Ahmed Zaki;Arslan Salam;Sidra Wali;Wasay Munir;Muhammad Salman. Coordination strategies and concept of operations implemented during activation of public health emergency operations center for COVID-19 response in Pakistan.. Scientific reports(IF=3.9). 2023. PMID:37914904. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-46234-5.
  • [20] Gina Samaan;Michelle McPherson;Johan Eidman;Offeibea Obubah;Jean-Pierre Baptiste;Lianne Kuppens;Kai Von Harbou;Miftahul Fahmi Sembiring;Shambhu Acharya;Peter Graaff. The World Health Organization's Actions Within the United Nations System to Facilitate a Whole-of-Society Response to COVID-19 at Country Level.. Frontiers in public health(IF=3.4). 2021. PMID:35118047. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.831220.
  • [21] Xu Wang;Wenhui Wu;Peipei Song;Jiangjiang He. An international comparison analysis of reserve and supply system for emergency medical supplies between China, the United States, Australia, and Canada.. Bioscience trends(IF=5.0). 2020. PMID:32389940. DOI: 10.5582/bst.2020.03093.
  • [22] Nicole Lurie;Gregg S Margolis;Kristin L Rising. The US emergency care system: meeting everyday acute care needs while being ready for disasters.. Health affairs (Project Hope)(IF=8.1). 2013. PMID:24301401. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0771.

MaltSci Intelligent Research Services ​

Search for more papers on MaltSci.com ​

Emergency Response · Health Crisis · Public Health · Technological Integration · Community Engagement

© 2025 MaltSci