MaltSci 麦伴科研

Appearance

Popular Reports / aging-biology

This report is written by MaltSci based on the latest literature and research findings

How does caloric restriction extend lifespan? ​

Abstract ​

Caloric restriction (CR) has garnered significant attention as a powerful intervention capable of extending lifespan across a wide array of species, from simple organisms such as yeast and worms to more complex mammals, including primates. Defined as a reduction in caloric intake without causing malnutrition, CR has been associated with a multitude of health benefits, including enhanced metabolic health, reduced incidence of age-related diseases, and improved longevity. This review delves into the intricate mechanisms through which caloric restriction influences lifespan, contributing to a broader understanding of aging and its modulation. The review examines metabolic pathways involved in CR, including the insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway, the mTOR pathway, and the Sirtuin family of proteins, all of which regulate crucial cellular processes necessary for maintaining cellular integrity and function during aging. Furthermore, the role of cellular stress responses, genetic and epigenetic influences, and the impact of CR on age-related diseases such as cardiovascular health, neurodegenerative disorders, and cancer prevention are explored. The implications of these findings for human health are assessed, alongside the challenges of implementing CR in human populations. Finally, future directions in CR research are highlighted, including novel interventions, personalized approaches to lifespan extension, and ethical considerations associated with CR and its mimetics. This comprehensive synthesis aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse surrounding aging and the potential for dietary interventions to promote health and longevity.

Outline ​

This report will discuss the following questions.

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Mechanisms of Caloric Restriction and Lifespan Extension
    • 2.1 Metabolic Pathways Involved in Caloric Restriction
    • 2.2 Role of Cellular Stress Responses
    • 2.3 Genetic and Epigenetic Influences
  • 3 Effects of Caloric Restriction on Age-Related Diseases
    • 3.1 Cardiovascular Health
    • 3.2 Neurodegenerative Disorders
    • 3.3 Cancer Prevention
  • 4 Translational Research: From Model Organisms to Humans
    • 4.1 Insights from Animal Studies
    • 4.2 Human Studies and Clinical Trials
    • 4.3 Challenges in Implementation
  • 5 Future Directions in Caloric Restriction Research
    • 5.1 Novel Interventions and Alternatives to CR
    • 5.2 Personalized Approaches to Lifespan Extension
    • 5.3 Ethical Considerations and Public Health Implications
  • 6 Summary

1 Introduction ​

Caloric restriction (CR) has garnered significant attention as a powerful intervention capable of extending lifespan across a wide array of species, from simple organisms such as yeast and worms to more complex mammals, including primates. Defined as a reduction in caloric intake without causing malnutrition, CR has been associated with a multitude of health benefits, including enhanced metabolic health, reduced incidence of age-related diseases, and improved longevity. The foundational premise of this review is to delve into the intricate mechanisms through which caloric restriction influences lifespan, thereby contributing to a broader understanding of aging and its modulation.

The significance of CR extends beyond mere lifespan extension; it offers insights into the biological underpinnings of aging and the potential for developing therapeutic strategies aimed at promoting healthy aging in humans. As populations worldwide continue to age, understanding the mechanisms that govern longevity becomes increasingly vital. Research has shown that CR not only slows down the aging process but also mitigates the onset of various age-related diseases, thus highlighting its potential as a public health intervention [1][2]. The mechanisms underlying CR's effects are complex and multifaceted, involving metabolic pathways, cellular stress responses, and genetic and epigenetic influences that collectively contribute to its life-extending properties [3][4].

Current research on CR has made substantial strides in elucidating the molecular pathways involved. Key pathways such as the insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway, the mTOR pathway, and the Sirtuin family of proteins have been implicated in mediating the effects of CR [5][6]. These pathways are thought to regulate cellular processes such as metabolism, oxidative stress response, and inflammation, which are crucial for maintaining cellular integrity and function during aging [7][8]. Moreover, genetic studies in model organisms like Caenorhabditis elegans have identified specific genes that modulate lifespan in response to caloric intake, suggesting that genetic predispositions play a role in the efficacy of CR [2][9].

The organization of this review will follow a structured approach, beginning with an in-depth examination of the mechanisms of caloric restriction and lifespan extension. This section will explore metabolic pathways involved in CR, the role of cellular stress responses, and the influence of genetic and epigenetic factors. Following this, we will discuss the effects of CR on age-related diseases, focusing on cardiovascular health, neurodegenerative disorders, and cancer prevention. The review will then transition to translational research, assessing insights gained from animal studies and the implications for human health, including the challenges of implementing CR in human populations. Finally, we will highlight future directions in CR research, exploring novel interventions, personalized approaches to lifespan extension, and ethical considerations associated with CR and its mimetics [10][11].

In summary, this review aims to synthesize current research findings on caloric restriction and its role in extending lifespan, while also addressing the complexities and limitations of translating these findings from model organisms to humans. By doing so, we hope to contribute to the ongoing discourse surrounding aging and the potential for dietary interventions to promote health and longevity.

2 Mechanisms of Caloric Restriction and Lifespan Extension ​

2.1 Metabolic Pathways Involved in Caloric Restriction ​

Caloric restriction (CR) has been extensively studied for its role in extending lifespan across various species, including yeast, rodents, and potentially humans. The mechanisms underlying the lifespan-extending effects of CR involve complex metabolic pathways and signaling networks that modulate various biological processes.

One of the primary metabolic pathways influenced by CR is the insulin/insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) signaling pathway. This pathway is crucial for regulating growth and metabolism, and its inhibition has been linked to increased longevity. In addition, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, which regulates cell growth and metabolism in response to nutrients, plays a significant role in the effects of CR. By downregulating mTOR activity, CR promotes autophagy, a cellular recycling process that helps maintain metabolic fitness by removing damaged organelles and proteins, thereby counteracting age-associated decline [12].

Furthermore, CR has been shown to alter metabolic rates and reduce oxidative stress. Studies indicate that CR decreases the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) during cellular respiration, which is associated with reduced oxidative damage to cellular components such as proteins, lipids, and DNA [7]. This reduction in oxidative stress is believed to contribute significantly to the lifespan extension observed in CR-treated organisms.

The metabolic changes induced by CR also include alterations in lipid metabolism. For instance, CR has been associated with decreased lipogenesis and increased lipolysis and ketogenesis, which are processes that regulate fat storage and utilization [13]. These adaptations are thought to be mediated by the upregulation of specific factors such as fibroblastic growth factor 21 (FGF21), which is implicated in metabolic regulation and may promote better health status under CR conditions [13].

Additionally, CR influences the expression of genes involved in various metabolic pathways. For example, a study on male C57BL/6 mice revealed that CR significantly stimulated several metabolic pathways, including glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, fatty acid degradation, and the metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450 [14]. These pathways are crucial for maintaining energy homeostasis and overall metabolic health.

Moreover, the impact of CR on protein expression in the liver has shown that while certain pathways linked to aging, such as insulin/IGF-1 and NF-κB, do not exhibit significant changes at the protein level, other proteins related to carnitine biosynthesis and fatty acid metabolism are upregulated [14]. This indicates that the metabolic adaptations resulting from CR are multifaceted and may vary depending on the specific tissues and conditions examined.

In summary, caloric restriction extends lifespan through a combination of metabolic adaptations that involve the modulation of key signaling pathways, reduction of oxidative stress, and reprogramming of lipid metabolism. These changes collectively enhance cellular health and resilience, contributing to the observed increases in longevity across different species.

2.2 Role of Cellular Stress Responses ​

Caloric restriction (CR) has been widely recognized as an effective intervention for extending lifespan across various organisms, including yeast, rodents, and potentially humans. The mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are multifaceted, particularly emphasizing the role of cellular stress responses.

One significant aspect of how CR extends lifespan involves the activation of stress response pathways that enhance cellular resilience. Research indicates that caloric restriction promotes the activation of key regulatory genes and pathways associated with stress responses, thereby contributing to longevity. For instance, a study identified genes and metabolic pathways that are differentially regulated in CR-responsive versus non-responsive strains of yeast. It was found that altered mitochondrial function and the activation of the GCN4-mediated environmental stress response are intrinsically linked to lifespan variation in response to CR [15]. This suggests that CR enhances the organism's ability to cope with environmental stressors, which is critical for longevity.

Additionally, CR is associated with increased DNA repair mechanisms, which are vital for maintaining genomic stability and preventing age-related decline. The activation of antioxidant pathways and protective autophagy processes under CR conditions has been linked to the mitigation of oxidative stress, a significant contributor to aging [16]. Oxidative stress leads to cellular damage, and CR appears to reduce the levels of reactive oxygen species generated during metabolism, thereby lowering oxidative damage to proteins, lipids, and DNA [7].

Moreover, CR influences the regulation of cell cycle machinery, promoting cell survival while downregulating proliferation. This is believed to conserve stem cell reserves for critical needs, thereby enhancing long-term cellular health [8]. The ability of CR to induce quiescence in stem cells, combined with its impact on reducing energy expenditure associated with proliferation, contributes to a more stable cellular environment, which is conducive to longevity.

The involvement of nutrient-sensing pathways also plays a critical role in the lifespan extension associated with CR. For example, the activation of sirtuins, which are NAD+-dependent deacetylases, has been implicated in the beneficial effects of CR. Sirtuins are known to regulate various metabolic processes and stress responses, and their activation is thought to be a key factor in the longevity effects observed with CR [4].

In summary, caloric restriction extends lifespan primarily through the enhancement of cellular stress responses, which include improved DNA repair, reduced oxidative stress, activation of protective autophagy, and modulation of cell cycle dynamics. These mechanisms collectively foster an environment that supports cellular health and resilience, thereby contributing to the observed longevity benefits associated with caloric restriction.

2.3 Genetic and Epigenetic Influences ​

Caloric restriction (CR) has been extensively studied as a non-genetic intervention that significantly extends lifespan across various species, including yeast, rodents, and primates. The mechanisms by which caloric restriction influences longevity are complex and multifaceted, involving genetic and epigenetic factors that modulate cellular processes related to aging.

One of the primary genetic mechanisms implicated in the lifespan extension associated with caloric restriction is the activation of sirtuins, particularly SIRT1 in mammals, which is an ortholog of the yeast gene Sir2. SIRT1 is known to regulate metabolism, promote lipolysis, and inhibit adipogenesis by interacting with nuclear receptors such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) [17]. This activation of SIRT1 has been linked to various beneficial metabolic effects, including improved insulin sensitivity and reduced oxidative stress, which are crucial for extending lifespan [4].

Moreover, caloric restriction has been shown to induce epigenetic modifications that contribute to longevity. These modifications include alterations in DNA methylation and histone modifications, which dynamically influence gene expression and chromatin structure. Such epigenetic changes are believed to play a significant role in cellular senescence and aging [18]. Specifically, studies have indicated that caloric restriction leads to long-lasting epigenetic effects that can reprogram the expression of genes involved in immuno-metabolic processes, thereby enhancing healthspan and delaying the onset of age-related diseases [19].

The relationship between caloric restriction and epigenetic regulation is further underscored by findings that dietary changes can modify epigenetic marks associated with aging. For instance, the reprogramming of the epigenome in response to caloric restriction may help maintain genomic stability and cellular identity, both of which are critical for slowing the aging process [20]. Additionally, the epigenetic landscape is significantly remodeled during aging, and caloric restriction has been shown to mitigate some of these detrimental changes, suggesting that it may serve as a protective mechanism against age-related genomic instability [21].

Furthermore, the role of oxidative stress in aging has been highlighted as a critical factor that caloric restriction can mitigate. Studies indicate that caloric restriction reduces oxidative damage to cellular components, including proteins, lipids, and DNA, by lowering the production of reactive oxygen species during respiration [7]. This reduction in oxidative stress is linked to improved metabolic stability and longevity [3].

In summary, caloric restriction extends lifespan through a combination of genetic and epigenetic mechanisms. These include the activation of longevity-associated genes such as SIRT1, modulation of epigenetic modifications that affect gene expression, and reduction of oxidative stress. Understanding these mechanisms not only provides insights into the biology of aging but also opens avenues for potential therapeutic interventions aimed at promoting longevity and mitigating age-related diseases.

3 Effects of Caloric Restriction on Age-Related Diseases ​

3.1 Cardiovascular Health ​

Caloric restriction (CR) has been extensively studied for its role in extending lifespan and mitigating age-related diseases, particularly in the context of cardiovascular health. CR is defined as a reduction in caloric intake without malnutrition, typically ranging from 10% to 30% compared to an ad libitum diet. This dietary intervention has been shown to extend lifespan across various species, including yeast, worms, flies, rodents, and possibly non-human primates, while also reducing the incidence of age-related disorders such as diabetes, cancer, and cardiovascular diseases [5][22].

The mechanisms through which CR exerts its effects on longevity and health are multifaceted and not yet fully elucidated. However, several pathways have been identified as crucial mediators. These include alterations in metabolic rate, improved insulin sensitivity, and modifications to neuroendocrine function [22]. CR influences various molecular signaling pathways, such as insulin/insulin-like growth factor signaling, the target of rapamycin (TOR) pathway, adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling, and the Sirtuin family of proteins [5].

Specifically regarding cardiovascular health, CR has demonstrated beneficial effects on several cardiovascular risk factors. Studies indicate that CR can lead to improvements in blood pressure, lipid profiles, and inflammatory processes, all of which are critical in preventing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease [23]. Moreover, CR is associated with enhanced DNA repair mechanisms, increased mitochondrial regulation, and the activation of antioxidants, contributing to the overall health of the cardiovascular system [16].

The implications of CR on aging and cardiovascular health are particularly relevant given that aging is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, which remain a leading cause of mortality in older populations [24]. Evidence from animal studies and limited human trials suggests that CR can delay cardiac aging and may help prevent the development of cardiovascular diseases through its positive effects on metabolic health [23].

While the effects of CR are well-documented in animal models, translating these findings to humans remains a challenge. Nonetheless, ongoing research continues to explore the potential of CR mimetics—substances that can replicate the beneficial effects of CR without actual dietary restriction—as a means to promote cardiovascular health and longevity in humans [24].

In summary, caloric restriction extends lifespan and improves cardiovascular health through a complex interplay of metabolic alterations, enhanced cellular repair mechanisms, and modulation of key signaling pathways. This multifactorial approach not only contributes to longevity but also plays a critical role in mitigating age-related diseases, particularly cardiovascular conditions.

3.2 Neurodegenerative Disorders ​

Caloric restriction (CR) is recognized as a significant intervention that extends lifespan and mitigates age-related diseases, particularly neurodegenerative disorders. The mechanisms through which CR exerts these effects are multifaceted and involve a variety of biological processes.

Research indicates that CR promotes survival of individual cells and enhances their resistance to stress. This is achieved through several mechanisms, including the downregulation of cell proliferation and the induction of stem cell quiescence, which conserves stem cell reserves for critical needs (Erbaba et al. 2021) [8]. Additionally, CR has been shown to stimulate the expression of neurotrophic factors and stress proteins, which play a crucial role in neuronal protection by stabilizing cellular calcium homeostasis and inhibiting apoptosis, a form of programmed cell death (Mattson et al. 2001) [25].

CR also reduces oxidative stress and inflammation in the brain, which are key contributors to neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer's disease. For instance, it has been demonstrated that CR can prevent beta-amyloid neuropathology in Alzheimer transgenic models, suggesting a direct protective effect against the pathological hallmarks of this disease (Gillette-Guyonnet & Vellas 2008) [26]. The reduction in oxidative damage to proteins, lipids, and DNA is linked to decreased mitochondrial free radical generation, a crucial factor in the aging process (Gredilla & Barja 2005) [7].

Furthermore, CR enhances neurogenesis, the process by which new neurons are generated, which is essential for maintaining cognitive functions and brain plasticity. This effect is thought to be mediated through different mechanisms compared to those activated by exercise, suggesting that a combination of both interventions may synergistically reduce the risk of neurodegenerative diseases (Levenson & Rich 2007) [27].

Molecularly, CR is associated with the activation of key proteins such as SIRT1, which is involved in lifespan regulation. Studies have shown that pharmacological activation of SIRT1 can replicate the beneficial effects of CR, highlighting potential therapeutic avenues for delaying neurodegeneration (Gräff et al. 2013) [28].

In summary, caloric restriction extends lifespan and combats age-related neurodegenerative disorders through a complex interplay of cellular survival mechanisms, reduction of oxidative stress and inflammation, promotion of neurogenesis, and activation of critical longevity-related pathways. Further research is essential to fully elucidate these mechanisms and their implications for human health, particularly in the context of aging and neurodegenerative diseases.

3.3 Cancer Prevention ​

Caloric restriction (CR) is recognized as one of the most effective interventions for extending lifespan and preventing age-related diseases, including cancer. The underlying mechanisms by which CR achieves these effects are complex and multifaceted, involving metabolic, genomic, and epigenetic changes.

CR extends lifespan by reducing the incidence of age-related disorders such as cancer, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases across various species, including rodents and potentially non-human primates [5][22]. The mechanism of action includes the modulation of metabolic pathways, improved insulin sensitivity, and alterations in neuroendocrine function [22]. Specifically, CR is known to influence several key signaling pathways that are critical for longevity, such as the insulin/insulin-like growth factor signaling pathway, the target of rapamycin (TOR) pathway, and sirtuin signaling [5].

Research indicates that CR can lead to a rapid onset of genomic effects associated with longevity. For instance, in studies involving older mice, CR was shown to extend lifespan and reduce cancer incidence within eight weeks by decreasing tumor growth rates [29]. This rapid response suggests that CR can induce significant changes in gene expression that promote health and longevity, particularly in mitotic tissues, such as the liver [29].

Moreover, CR appears to exert protective effects against cancer by enhancing cellular mechanisms such as increased DNA repair, activation of antioxidant defenses, and promoting protective autophagy [16]. These processes are critical for mitigating the accumulation of molecular damage that typically occurs with aging. Additionally, CR has been associated with a reduction in oxidative stress, which is believed to play a significant role in the aging process and the development of age-related diseases [7].

The relationship between CR and cancer prevention is particularly noteworthy. CR modifies the tumor microenvironment and can make cancer cells more susceptible to standard treatments such as chemotherapy and radiation [30]. The metabolic pathways altered by CR are often linked to those involved in cancer progression, suggesting that CR could be a strategic approach to enhance the efficacy of cancer therapies [30].

Furthermore, epigenetic regulation has emerged as a significant factor in how CR influences aging and longevity. Changes in DNA methylation and histone modifications due to CR can lead to altered gene expression that impacts cellular senescence and longevity [18]. This epigenetic perspective provides a deeper understanding of how dietary interventions can affect the aging process at a molecular level.

In summary, caloric restriction extends lifespan and mitigates age-related diseases, including cancer, through a variety of mechanisms, including metabolic modulation, enhanced DNA repair, reduced oxidative stress, and epigenetic changes. These findings highlight the potential of CR as a therapeutic strategy not only for extending lifespan but also for improving healthspan and reducing the burden of age-related diseases.

4 Translational Research: From Model Organisms to Humans ​

4.1 Insights from Animal Studies ​

Caloric restriction (CR) has been extensively studied across various animal models and is recognized as a potent intervention for extending lifespan and improving health. The mechanisms through which caloric restriction operates are multifaceted and can be summarized based on findings from diverse studies.

CR has been shown to retard aging and increase lifespan in numerous species, including rodents, primates, and various invertebrates. The fundamental premise is that reducing caloric intake without malnutrition leads to a series of metabolic and physiological changes that enhance longevity. For instance, CR is associated with decreased metabolic rates and oxidative stress, improved insulin sensitivity, and alterations in neuroendocrine function [31].

In rodent studies, the extent of caloric restriction is directly correlated with lifespan extension. For example, a study indicated that a 30% caloric restriction in a 48-year-old man could potentially increase life expectancy by approximately 2.8 years [32]. Furthermore, it was found that both the degree of caloric restriction and the timing of its onset significantly influence the benefits observed; delayed onset of CR diminishes its efficacy [32].

Research on genetically diverse mice demonstrated that CR (20% and 40% reduction) and intermittent fasting (1 or 2 days of fasting per week) both led to lifespan extension in proportion to the degree of restriction. Notably, while 40% caloric restriction exhibited the most substantial effect on lifespan, it also resulted in adverse health consequences, such as loss of lean mass and altered immune responses [33]. This underscores that while CR can extend lifespan, it does not always correlate with improved health, indicating that the mechanisms underlying these effects are complex and context-dependent.

The role of metabolic pathways in mediating the effects of CR has been a significant focus. CR has been linked to reduced oxidative damage, which is thought to result from decreased mitochondrial free radical generation [7]. Moreover, alterations in gene expression related to fatty acid metabolism and carbohydrate metabolism were observed in response to CR, suggesting that CR influences longevity through metabolic adjustments [34].

Interestingly, while CR shows promise in extending lifespan in various animal models, its applicability to humans remains uncertain. Long-term studies in nonhuman primates have suggested beneficial effects of CR on health and longevity, with observations of reduced incidence of age-related diseases and preserved physiological functions [35]. However, the ethical and practical challenges of conducting similar long-term studies in humans complicate our understanding of CR's potential benefits in human aging [31].

Overall, caloric restriction extends lifespan through a combination of metabolic, oxidative, and physiological changes, which vary across species. While significant insights have been gained from animal studies, translating these findings to humans necessitates careful consideration of individual variability, dietary quality, and the long-term sustainability of caloric restriction interventions [36].

4.2 Human Studies and Clinical Trials ​

Caloric restriction (CR) is recognized as the most reliable intervention for extending lifespan across various species, including yeast, worms, fish, rats, and mice. The mechanisms by which CR promotes longevity, however, remain a subject of extensive research and debate.

CR typically involves a reduction of caloric intake by 10-30% compared to an ad libitum diet, leading to significant lifespan extension. The underlying mechanisms have not been fully elucidated but appear to be multifactorial. Studies indicate that CR can influence metabolic rates, oxidative stress, and the activation of specific signaling pathways related to aging and longevity, such as insulin/insulin-like growth factor signaling, the target of rapamycin (TOR) pathway, and sirtuin pathways[5][18][37].

In humans, the effects of prolonged CR have been shown to extend both median and maximal lifespan, as observed in various lower species. This extension is believed to be linked to alterations in energy metabolism, reduced oxidative damage, and improved insulin sensitivity[38][39]. Moreover, CR has been associated with favorable changes in endocrine and neuroendocrine systems, potentially leading to enhanced resilience against age-related diseases[18][37].

A significant aspect of CR's effectiveness lies in its ability to reduce insulin exposure. By lowering the levels of insulin and growth factors, CR helps maintain mitochondrial function and enhances the balance between insulin and growth hormone antagonism, which may contribute to longevity[40]. Additionally, epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation and histone modification, have been implicated in mediating the effects of CR on gene expression related to aging and cellular senescence[18].

Research also highlights the role of oxidative stress in the aging process. CR has been shown to decrease oxidative damage to cellular components, which is a critical factor in aging. Specifically, it reduces the generation of reactive oxygen species in various tissues, contributing to improved longevity[7]. Furthermore, CR has been associated with increased DNA repair mechanisms, enhanced autophagy, and improved metabolic regulation, all of which are vital for extending lifespan[16].

Despite the promising findings from animal studies, translating these benefits to humans poses challenges. While preliminary human studies indicate that CR can positively affect biomarkers of aging and chronic disease development, the extent of lifespan extension in humans remains less clear compared to model organisms[11][32]. The complexity of human physiology, coupled with the potential psychological and behavioral impacts of long-term caloric restriction, complicates the establishment of CR as a practical intervention for lifespan extension in humans[39].

In conclusion, caloric restriction extends lifespan through a combination of metabolic adaptations, reduced oxidative stress, improved insulin sensitivity, and potential epigenetic modifications. While animal studies provide a robust foundation for understanding these mechanisms, further research is essential to determine the applicability and efficacy of CR in promoting longevity in humans.

4.3 Challenges in Implementation ​

Caloric restriction (CR) has been extensively studied as a reliable intervention to extend lifespan across various species, from yeast to mammals. The mechanisms by which caloric restriction extends lifespan are multifaceted and not yet fully understood, but several key pathways and processes have been identified.

Prolonged caloric restriction has been shown to extend both median and maximal lifespan in a variety of lower species, including yeast, worms, fish, rats, and mice. The underlying mechanisms of this lifespan extension may involve significant alterations in energy metabolism, oxidative damage, insulin sensitivity, and functional changes in both the neuroendocrine and sympathetic nervous systems [38]. In particular, caloric restriction is thought to induce a metabolic adaptation characterized by reduced lipogenesis and enhanced lipolysis and ketogenesis, as evidenced by studies showing increased levels of fibroblastic growth factor 21 and adropin, which regulate lipid homeostasis [13].

Research on the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans has identified genetic pathways that contribute to lifespan extension through caloric restriction. Mutations in several "eat" genes, which disrupt feeding, have been found to significantly lengthen lifespan, suggesting that caloric restriction may operate through distinct genetic mechanisms independent of those regulating dauer formation [2]. Additionally, CR has been linked to increased DNA repair, activation of autophagy, and enhanced antioxidant responses, which collectively contribute to reduced oxidative stress and cellular damage [16].

In mammals, including humans, caloric restriction has been shown to alter biomarkers of aging and reduce the incidence of age-related diseases. Clinical studies have demonstrated that controlled energy-restricted diets can lead to improvements in insulin sensitivity, reductions in inflammation, and changes in gene expression associated with longevity [39]. However, the translation of these findings from model organisms to humans poses significant challenges, as the responses to caloric restriction can vary widely based on genetic and environmental factors [11].

Despite the promising data from animal studies, the application of caloric restriction in humans is complex. Research indicates that while caloric restriction can extend lifespan and improve health markers, its effectiveness may be influenced by individual genetics and metabolic responses. For example, a recent study on genetically diverse mice found that while caloric restriction led to significant lifespan extension, the health effects varied between interventions, suggesting that the relationship between dietary restriction and longevity is not straightforward [33].

Moreover, there are concerns regarding the potential negative effects of caloric restriction, such as loss of lean mass and changes in immune function, which could offset some of the benefits associated with lifespan extension [33]. This underscores the need for further research to identify optimal dietary interventions that maximize health benefits while minimizing adverse effects.

In summary, caloric restriction extends lifespan through a complex interplay of metabolic, genetic, and environmental factors. The mechanisms involve alterations in energy metabolism, oxidative stress responses, and hormonal signaling pathways. However, translating these findings into effective human interventions remains a significant challenge, necessitating further investigation into the long-term effects and individual variability in response to caloric restriction.

5 Future Directions in Caloric Restriction Research ​

5.1 Novel Interventions and Alternatives to CR ​

Caloric restriction (CR) is a well-documented intervention that extends lifespan across various species, including yeast, rodents, and primates. The mechanisms by which CR achieves this extension are multifaceted and continue to be an area of intense research. Understanding these mechanisms not only provides insights into aging but also opens avenues for novel interventions that could mimic the benefits of CR without the need for significant dietary changes.

The fundamental principle behind CR's effectiveness in extending lifespan lies in its ability to alter metabolic and cellular processes. For instance, CR has been shown to enhance DNA repair, improve mitochondrial function, activate antioxidant pathways, and promote protective autophagy [16]. Specifically, the reduction of caloric intake leads to decreased levels of insulin and insulin-like growth factor signaling, which are crucial for growth and metabolic regulation. This reduction can enhance the activation of longevity-associated proteins, such as sirtuins, which play significant roles in metabolic regulation and stress responses [4].

Recent studies have highlighted the importance of specific signaling pathways and metabolic adaptations induced by CR. For example, CR can lead to changes in gene expression related to lipid metabolism and energy homeostasis, thereby improving overall health status and resilience against age-related diseases [13]. Furthermore, CR has been associated with increased production of fibroblastic growth factor 21, which has potential implications for longevity [13].

In terms of future directions, research is increasingly focused on identifying alternative interventions that can replicate the benefits of CR without necessitating strict dietary restrictions. One promising area of exploration is intermittent fasting, which has shown potential in extending lifespan while being more sustainable for human application [33]. Additionally, metabolic mimetics, such as compounds that can induce ketosis, are being investigated for their ability to mimic the metabolic effects of CR [41].

The exploration of pharmacological agents that can activate similar pathways as CR is another avenue of interest. Such agents may target key regulators like AMPK or mimic the effects of caloric restriction by modulating nutrient-sensing pathways [42]. Moreover, understanding the circadian alignment of feeding and fasting may also provide insights into optimizing dietary interventions for longevity [10].

Overall, while caloric restriction remains a powerful tool for extending lifespan, the quest for novel interventions and alternatives that can provide similar benefits with less stringent dietary requirements is a promising frontier in aging research. The integration of genetic, metabolic, and lifestyle factors will be essential in developing effective strategies to enhance healthspan and lifespan in humans.

5.2 Personalized Approaches to Lifespan Extension ​

Caloric restriction (CR) has been extensively studied as a method to extend lifespan across various species, including yeast, worms, rodents, and primates. The mechanisms by which CR achieves this effect are complex and involve multiple biological pathways.

CR is defined as a reduction in caloric intake without malnutrition, typically ranging from 10% to 40% compared to an ad libitum diet. Studies have shown that CR can extend lifespan significantly; for example, in rodents, it has been documented to increase lifespan by approximately 30% to 50% depending on the species and the extent of restriction (Kuhla et al., 2014; Mattison et al., 2012). The underlying mechanisms through which CR promotes longevity include metabolic adaptations, reduced oxidative stress, and alterations in cellular signaling pathways.

One prominent hypothesis is the metabolic stability theory, which suggests that the capacity of an organism to maintain stable metabolic processes is a key determinant of longevity. CR is thought to enhance metabolic stability, leading to a reduced rate of aging (Demetrius, 2004). Additionally, CR has been associated with decreased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are known to contribute to cellular aging and damage (Gredilla & Barja, 2005). This reduction in oxidative stress is believed to result from decreased mitochondrial activity and improved mitochondrial function, thereby lowering the overall oxidative damage to proteins, lipids, and DNA (Gredilla & Barja, 2005).

Several signaling pathways have been identified as critical mediators of the benefits of CR. These include the insulin/IGF-1 signaling pathway, the target of rapamycin (TOR) pathway, and the sirtuin pathway. Activation of sirtuins, particularly SIRT1 in mammals, has been shown to play a significant role in mediating the effects of CR by regulating metabolism and promoting stress resistance (Wolf, 2006; Lin et al., 2000). Furthermore, the activation of autophagy, a cellular process that degrades and recycles damaged cellular components, is enhanced under CR conditions, contributing to cellular maintenance and longevity (Szafranski & Mekhail, 2014).

Research has also indicated that the timing of caloric restriction may influence its effectiveness. For instance, studies on circadian alignment of feeding have demonstrated that CR implemented with respect to circadian rhythms can lead to greater lifespan extension than CR alone, as seen in male C57BL/6J mice (Acosta-Rodríguez et al., 2022).

Future directions in CR research include exploring personalized approaches to lifespan extension. Given the variability in response to CR among individuals, factors such as genetic background, age, sex, and health status will likely play critical roles in determining the effectiveness of CR as a lifespan-extending intervention. Research in genetically diverse populations, such as the recent study on mice, suggests that genetic factors significantly influence lifespan and health outcomes in response to dietary interventions (Di Francesco et al., 2024). This indicates that a one-size-fits-all approach may not be feasible, and tailored CR strategies could enhance the effectiveness of lifespan extension in humans.

In conclusion, caloric restriction extends lifespan through a multifaceted interplay of metabolic, oxidative, and cellular mechanisms. Ongoing research aims to refine our understanding of these processes and develop personalized dietary interventions that optimize health and longevity outcomes.

5.3 Ethical Considerations and Public Health Implications ​

Caloric restriction (CR) is recognized as a significant intervention that extends lifespan across various species, from invertebrates to mammals. The mechanisms by which CR promotes longevity are complex and multifaceted, involving a range of biological pathways and processes.

One of the primary mechanisms proposed is the alteration of metabolic stability, which is thought to be a critical determinant of longevity. CR is believed to enhance metabolic stability by reducing oxidative stress and the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are known to contribute to aging and age-related diseases. Studies have indicated that CR reduces oxidative damage to proteins, lipids, and DNA, which correlates with a decrease in mitochondrial free radical generation, a key factor in the aging process [7].

Additionally, CR influences various nutrient-sensing signaling pathways, including the insulin/insulin-like growth factor signaling (IIS), the target of rapamycin (TOR) pathway, and the adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) signaling pathway. These pathways play crucial roles in regulating cellular metabolism and energy homeostasis, which are vital for longevity [5]. For instance, activation of Sirtuins, a family of proteins involved in cellular stress response and metabolism, has been linked to the beneficial effects of CR. Specifically, Sirt1, an ortholog of the yeast Sir2 gene, is activated during CR and is associated with enhanced fat metabolism and reduced adipogenesis [17].

Moreover, genetic studies in model organisms such as Caenorhabditis elegans have revealed distinct mechanisms through which CR extends lifespan. For example, mutations in specific genes (e.g., eat genes) that disrupt feeding lead to significant lifespan extension, indicating that CR may operate through pathways independent of traditional nutrient signaling [2]. Research also highlights the role of caloric restriction in promoting cellular adaptations that enhance survival, such as the downregulation of cell proliferation and the preservation of stem cell quiescence, which may contribute to healthier aging [8].

The impact of CR on healthspan is equally significant. CR has been shown to delay or prevent the onset of various age-related diseases, thus enhancing the quality of life in aging populations [13]. Studies on nonhuman primates have begun to provide insights into the relevance of CR to human aging, suggesting that physiological responses to CR in monkeys parallel those observed in rodent studies, reinforcing the potential applicability of CR findings to human health [43].

However, while CR shows promise in extending lifespan and healthspan, ethical considerations and public health implications arise from its application in humans. The feasibility of long-term CR in humans poses significant challenges, as it may not be sustainable without continuous support and motivation. Furthermore, the relationship between caloric intake, health outcomes, and longevity is complex and not yet fully understood, particularly in terms of how CR might be effectively implemented in human diets [32].

In conclusion, caloric restriction extends lifespan through a combination of metabolic, genetic, and cellular mechanisms that reduce oxidative stress, alter nutrient-sensing pathways, and promote cellular adaptations. Future research should focus on elucidating these mechanisms further and addressing the ethical and practical implications of applying CR in human populations.

6 Conclusion ​

Caloric restriction (CR) has emerged as a significant intervention for extending lifespan across various species, including yeast, rodents, and primates. The mechanisms underlying CR's efficacy are complex and multifaceted, involving metabolic adaptations, enhanced cellular stress responses, and genetic and epigenetic influences. Key findings indicate that CR modulates critical signaling pathways such as insulin/IGF-1, mTOR, and sirtuins, which play vital roles in regulating metabolism, oxidative stress, and inflammation. These pathways collectively contribute to improved healthspan by mitigating age-related diseases, including cardiovascular disorders, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer. Despite the promising results observed in animal studies, translating these findings to humans poses significant challenges, including variability in individual responses and the psychological and behavioral impacts of long-term dietary restriction. Future research directions should focus on identifying alternative interventions that mimic CR's benefits, exploring personalized dietary strategies, and addressing ethical considerations associated with CR implementation in human populations. By enhancing our understanding of the biological mechanisms and optimizing dietary interventions, we can pave the way for effective strategies to promote healthy aging and longevity.

References ​

  • [1] Rajindar S Sohal;Michael J Forster. Caloric restriction and the aging process: a critique.. Free radical biology & medicine(IF=8.2). 2014. PMID:24941891. DOI: .
  • [2] B Lakowski;S Hekimi. The genetics of caloric restriction in Caenorhabditis elegans.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America(IF=9.1). 1998. PMID:9789046. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.95.22.13091.
  • [3] Lloyd Demetrius. Caloric restriction, metabolic rate, and entropy.. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences(IF=3.8). 2004. PMID:15472153. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/59.9.b902.
  • [4] S J Lin;P A Defossez;L Guarente. Requirement of NAD and SIR2 for life-span extension by calorie restriction in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.. Science (New York, N.Y.)(IF=45.8). 2000. PMID:11000115. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5487.2126.
  • [5] Shin-Hae Lee;Kyung-Jin Min. Caloric restriction and its mimetics.. BMB reports(IF=3.3). 2013. PMID:23615258. DOI: 10.5483/bmbrep.2013.46.4.033.
  • [6] I Dilova;E Easlon;S-J Lin. Calorie restriction and the nutrient sensing signaling pathways.. Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS(IF=6.2). 2007. PMID:17260088. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-007-6381-y.
  • [7] Ricardo Gredilla;Gustavo Barja. Minireview: the role of oxidative stress in relation to caloric restriction and longevity.. Endocrinology(IF=3.3). 2005. PMID:15919745. DOI: 10.1210/en.2005-0378.
  • [8] Begun Erbaba;Ayca Arslan-Ergul;Michelle M Adams. Effects of caloric restriction on the antagonistic and integrative hallmarks of aging.. Ageing research reviews(IF=12.4). 2021. PMID:33246078. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2020.101228.
  • [9] Matt Kaeberlein;Kathryn T Kirkland;Stanley Fields;Brian K Kennedy. Sir2-independent life span extension by calorie restriction in yeast.. PLoS biology(IF=7.2). 2004. PMID:15328540. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020296.
  • [10] Victoria Acosta-Rodríguez;Filipa Rijo-Ferreira;Mariko Izumo;Pin Xu;Mary Wight-Carter;Carla B Green;Joseph S Takahashi. Circadian alignment of early onset caloric restriction promotes longevity in male C57BL/6J mice.. Science (New York, N.Y.)(IF=45.8). 2022. PMID:35511946. DOI: 10.1126/science.abk0297.
  • [11] John P Phelan;Michael R Rose. Why dietary restriction substantially increases longevity in animal models but won't in humans.. Ageing research reviews(IF=12.4). 2005. PMID:16046282. DOI: 10.1016/j.arr.2005.06.001.
  • [12] Frank Madeo;Andreas Zimmermann;Maria Chiara Maiuri;Guido Kroemer. Essential role for autophagy in life span extension.. The Journal of clinical investigation(IF=13.6). 2015. PMID:25654554. DOI: .
  • [13] Angela Kuhla;Steffi Hahn;Antje Butschkau;Sophie Lange;Andreas Wree;Brigitte Vollmar. Lifelong caloric restriction reprograms hepatic fat metabolism in mice.. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences(IF=3.8). 2014. PMID:24149425. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glt160.
  • [14] Lu Wang;Davina Derous;Xiahe Huang;Sharon E Mitchell;Alex Douglas;David Lusseau;Yingchun Wang;John R Speakman. The Effects of Graded Levels of Calorie Restriction: XIX. Impact of Graded Calorie Restriction on Protein Expression in the Liver.. The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences(IF=3.8). 2023. PMID:36757838. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glad017.
  • [15] Samantha McLean;Mitchell Lee;Weiqiang Liu;Rohil Hameed;Vikas Anil Gujjala;Xuming Zhou;Matt Kaeberlein;Alaattin Kaya. Molecular mechanisms of genotype-dependent lifespan variation mediated by caloric restriction: insight from wild yeast isolates.. Frontiers in aging(IF=4.3). 2024. PMID:39055969. DOI: 10.3389/fragi.2024.1408160.
  • [16] Kirk Szafranski;Karim Mekhail. The fine line between lifespan extension and shortening in response to caloric restriction.. Nucleus (Austin, Tex.)(IF=4.5). 2014. PMID:24637399. DOI: 10.4161/nucl.27929.
  • [17] George Wolf. Calorie restriction increases life span: a molecular mechanism.. Nutrition reviews(IF=4.9). 2006. PMID:16536186. DOI: 10.1301/nr.2006.feb.89-92.
  • [18] Yuanyuan Li;Michael Daniel;Trygve O Tollefsbol. Epigenetic regulation of caloric restriction in aging.. BMC medicine(IF=8.3). 2011. PMID:21867551. DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-98.
  • [19] Diego Hernández-Saavedra;Laura Moody;Guanying Bianca Xu;Hong Chen;Yuan-Xiang Pan. Epigenetic Regulation of Metabolism and Inflammation by Calorie Restriction.. Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)(IF=9.2). 2019. PMID:30915465. DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmy129.
  • [20] Gyeong Min Lim;Nagarajan Maharajan;Gwang-Won Cho. How calorie restriction slows aging: an epigenetic perspective.. Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany)(IF=4.2). 2024. PMID:38456926. DOI: 10.1007/s00109-024-02430-y.
  • [21] Noémie Gensous;Claudio Franceschi;Aurelia Santoro;Maddalena Milazzo;Paolo Garagnani;Maria Giulia Bacalini. The Impact of Caloric Restriction on the Epigenetic Signatures of Aging.. International journal of molecular sciences(IF=4.9). 2019. PMID:31022953. DOI: 10.3390/ijms20082022.
  • [22] Laura Bordone;Leonard Guarente. Calorie restriction, SIRT1 and metabolism: understanding longevity.. Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology(IF=90.2). 2005. PMID:15768047. DOI: 10.1038/nrm1616.
  • [23] Connie W Bales;William E Kraus. Caloric restriction: implications for human cardiometabolic health.. Journal of cardiopulmonary rehabilitation and prevention(IF=3.1). 2013. PMID:23748374. DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e318295019e.
  • [24] Irene Alfaras;Clara Di Germanio;Michel Bernier;Anna Csiszar;Zoltan Ungvari;Edward G Lakatta;Rafael de Cabo. Pharmacological Strategies to Retard Cardiovascular Aging.. Circulation research(IF=16.2). 2016. PMID:27174954. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.307475.
  • [25] M P Mattson;W Duan;J Lee;Z Guo. Suppression of brain aging and neurodegenerative disorders by dietary restriction and environmental enrichment: molecular mechanisms.. Mechanisms of ageing and development(IF=5.1). 2001. PMID:11322996. DOI: 10.1016/s0047-6374(01)00226-3.
  • [26] Sophie Gillette-Guyonnet;Bruno Vellas. Caloric restriction and brain function.. Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care(IF=3.5). 2008. PMID:18827571. DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328313968f.
  • [27] Cathy W Levenson;Nicholas J Rich. Eat less, live longer? New insights into the role of caloric restriction in the brain.. Nutrition reviews(IF=4.9). 2007. PMID:17958208. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2007.tb00319.x.
  • [28] Johannes Gräff;Martin Kahn;Alireza Samiei;Jun Gao;Kristie T Ota;Damien Rei;Li-Huei Tsai. A dietary regimen of caloric restriction or pharmacological activation of SIRT1 to delay the onset of neurodegeneration.. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience(IF=4.0). 2013. PMID:23699506. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5657-12.2013.
  • [29] Stephen R Spindler. Rapid and reversible induction of the longevity, anticancer and genomic effects of caloric restriction.. Mechanisms of ageing and development(IF=5.1). 2005. PMID:15927235. DOI: 10.1016/j.mad.2005.03.016.
  • [30] Colin E Champ;Renato Baserga;Mark V Mishra;Lianjin Jin;Federica Sotgia;Michael P Lisanti;Richard G Pestell;Adam P Dicker;Nicole L Simone. Nutrient restriction and radiation therapy for cancer treatment: when less is more.. The oncologist(IF=4.2). 2013. PMID:23299773. DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2012-0164.
  • [31] Leonie K Heilbronn;Eric Ravussin. Calorie restriction and aging: review of the literature and implications for studies in humans.. The American journal of clinical nutrition(IF=6.9). 2003. PMID:12936916. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/78.3.361.
  • [32] John R Speakman;Catherine Hambly. Starving for life: what animal studies can and cannot tell us about the use of caloric restriction to prolong human lifespan.. The Journal of nutrition(IF=3.8). 2007. PMID:17374682. DOI: 10.1093/jn/137.4.1078.
  • [33] Andrea Di Francesco;Andrew G Deighan;Lev Litichevskiy;Zhenghao Chen;Alison Luciano;Laura Robinson;Gaven Garland;Hannah Donato;Matthew Vincent;Will Schott;Kevin M Wright;Anil Raj;G V Prateek;Martin Mullis;Warren G Hill;Mark L Zeidel;Luanne L Peters;Fiona Harding;David Botstein;Ron Korstanje;Christoph A Thaiss;Adam Freund;Gary A Churchill. Dietary restriction impacts health and lifespan of genetically diverse mice.. Nature(IF=48.5). 2024. PMID:39385029. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08026-3.
  • [34] Yaru Liang;Yuqi Gao;Rui Hua;Maoyang Lu;Huiling Chen;Zhuoran Wang;Liyuan Li;Kaiqiang Hu;Yuemiao Yin;Kang Xu;Hongqi Gao;Qingfei Liu;Ying Qiu;Zhao Wang. Calorie intake rather than food quantity consumed is the key factor for the anti-aging effect of calorie restriction.. Aging(IF=3.9). 2021. PMID:34493691. DOI: 10.18632/aging.203493.
  • [35] Joseph W Kemnitz. Calorie restriction and aging in nonhuman primates.. ILAR journal(IF=3.1). 2011. PMID:21411859. DOI: 10.1093/ilar.52.1.66.
  • [36] Chiara Ruocco;Maurizio Ragni;Enzo Nisoli. The heat of longevity: sex differences in lifespan and body temperature.. Frontiers in pharmacology(IF=4.8). 2024. PMID:39654619. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1512526.
  • [37] Leanne M Redman;Eric Ravussin. Endocrine alterations in response to calorie restriction in humans.. Molecular and cellular endocrinology(IF=3.6). 2009. PMID:19007855. DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.10.014.
  • [38] Julie V Smith;Leonie K Heilbronn;Eric Ravussin. Energy restriction and aging.. Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care(IF=3.5). 2004. PMID:15534428. DOI: 10.1097/00075197-200411000-00005.
  • [39] Leanne M Redman;Eric Ravussin. Caloric restriction in humans: impact on physiological, psychological, and behavioral outcomes.. Antioxidants & redox signaling(IF=6.1). 2011. PMID:20518700. DOI: 10.1089/ars.2010.3253.
  • [40] T Parr. Insulin exposure and aging theory.. Gerontology(IF=3.0). 1997. PMID:9142513. DOI: 10.1159/000213848.
  • [41] Richard L Veech;Patrick C Bradshaw;Kieran Clarke;William Curtis;Robert Pawlosky;M Todd King. Ketone bodies mimic the life span extending properties of caloric restriction.. IUBMB life(IF=3.2). 2017. PMID:28371201. DOI: 10.1002/iub.1627.
  • [42] Carles Cantó;Johan Auwerx. Calorie restriction: is AMPK a key sensor and effector?. Physiology (Bethesda, Md.)(IF=10.3). 2011. PMID:21841070. DOI: 10.1152/physiol.00010.2011.
  • [43] Julie A Mattison;George S Roth;T Mark Beasley;Edward M Tilmont;April M Handy;Richard L Herbert;Dan L Longo;David B Allison;Jennifer E Young;Mark Bryant;Dennis Barnard;Walter F Ward;Wenbo Qi;Donald K Ingram;Rafael de Cabo. Impact of caloric restriction on health and survival in rhesus monkeys from the NIA study.. Nature(IF=48.5). 2012. PMID:22932268. DOI: 10.1038/nature11432.

MaltSci Intelligent Research Services ​

Search for more papers on MaltSci.com ​

Caloric Restriction · Lifespan Extension · Metabolic Pathways · Cellular Stress Responses · Aging

© 2025 MaltSci