MaltSci 麦伴科研

Appearance

Popular Reports / Neuroscience

This report is written by MaltSci based on the latest literature and research findings

How does brain-computer interface work? ​

Abstract ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have emerged as a transformative technology, enabling direct communication between the human brain and external devices by interpreting neural signals. This technology holds immense potential, particularly for individuals with motor disabilities, offering new avenues for rehabilitation and interaction with the environment. BCIs operate through a complex interplay of mechanisms including signal acquisition, processing, and the translation of neural signals into actionable commands. The report outlines three main types of BCIs: invasive, non-invasive, and hybrid approaches, each with unique advantages and applications. Invasive BCIs provide high-resolution recordings of brain activity but involve surgical risks, while non-invasive BCIs, primarily utilizing electroencephalography (EEG), offer safer alternatives with broader accessibility. Hybrid BCIs combine multiple modalities to leverage residual functionalities, enhancing user control. Applications span across medical rehabilitation, assistive devices, gaming, and communication, showcasing BCIs' versatility. However, ethical considerations surrounding privacy, accessibility, and societal impacts necessitate careful navigation as the technology evolves. Future directions in BCI research emphasize technological innovations, interdisciplinary approaches, and the need for comprehensive ethical frameworks to ensure equitable access and responsible use of these technologies. As BCIs continue to advance, their potential to augment human capabilities and transform interactions with technology is both promising and profound.

Outline ​

This report will discuss the following questions.

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Mechanisms of Brain-Computer Interfaces
    • 2.1 Signal Acquisition Techniques
    • 2.2 Signal Processing and Feature Extraction
    • 2.3 Translation of Neural Signals into Commands
  • 3 Types of Brain-Computer Interfaces
    • 3.1 Invasive BCIs
    • 3.2 Non-invasive BCIs
    • 3.3 Hybrid Approaches
  • 4 Applications of BCIs
    • 4.1 Medical Applications: Rehabilitation and Assistive Devices
    • 4.2 Non-medical Applications: Gaming and Communication
    • 4.3 Emerging Applications in Research and Industry
  • 5 Ethical Considerations and Challenges
    • 5.1 Privacy and Data Security
    • 5.2 Accessibility and Equity
    • 5.3 The Future of Human-Computer Interaction
  • 6 Future Directions in BCI Research
    • 6.1 Technological Innovations
    • 6.2 Interdisciplinary Approaches
    • 6.3 Potential Societal Impacts
  • 7 Conclusion

1 Introduction ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have emerged as a groundbreaking technology that enables direct communication between the human brain and external devices, revolutionizing the way we interact with technology. By interpreting neural signals, BCIs facilitate control of computers, prosthetics, and various assistive technologies, offering profound implications for individuals with motor disabilities. The potential of BCIs to restore functionality to those affected by neuromuscular disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, stroke, and spinal cord injury, underscores their significance in both medical and non-medical fields[1][2]. As research in this area accelerates, understanding the underlying mechanisms of BCIs, their applications, and the ethical considerations surrounding their use becomes increasingly crucial.

The significance of BCIs lies not only in their ability to restore lost functions but also in their capacity to enhance human-computer interaction. BCIs provide a unique non-muscular channel for communication, allowing users to convey intentions and commands through their brain activity alone[3]. This capability is particularly transformative for individuals who are completely paralyzed or 'locked in,' enabling them to interact with their environment in ways that were previously unimaginable. As technology continues to evolve, the implications of BCIs extend beyond rehabilitation; they have the potential to augment human capabilities in various domains, including gaming, communication, and even professional applications such as surgery[1].

Current research in the field of BCIs has made significant strides, yet challenges remain. The mechanisms of BCIs can be broadly categorized into three main components: signal acquisition, signal processing, and the translation of neural signals into actionable commands. Signal acquisition involves capturing brain activity through various techniques, such as electroencephalography (EEG) and intracortical recordings[1][4]. The subsequent processing of these signals is crucial for enhancing their quality and extracting meaningful features that can be classified into commands[3]. Recent advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning have shown promise in improving the reliability and accuracy of these processes, particularly in noise suppression and user intention estimation[5].

This report is organized to provide a comprehensive overview of BCIs, beginning with an exploration of the mechanisms that underpin their operation. Section 2 will delve into the specifics of signal acquisition techniques, processing methods, and the translation of neural signals into commands. Following this, Section 3 will categorize the various types of BCIs, distinguishing between invasive, non-invasive, and hybrid approaches. Section 4 will highlight the diverse applications of BCIs, focusing on their roles in medical rehabilitation, non-medical contexts such as gaming and communication, and emerging applications in research and industry. Ethical considerations and challenges associated with BCI technology will be addressed in Section 5, examining issues related to privacy, accessibility, and the future of human-computer interaction. Finally, Section 6 will outline future directions in BCI research, emphasizing the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and the potential societal impacts of these technologies.

In summary, the exploration of brain-computer interfaces represents a vital intersection of neuroscience, engineering, and ethics, offering a glimpse into the future of human interaction with technology. As we continue to unravel the complexities of the brain and develop more sophisticated interfaces, the implications for enhancing communication and restoring autonomy for individuals with disabilities are profound and far-reaching.

2 Mechanisms of Brain-Computer Interfaces ​

2.1 Signal Acquisition Techniques ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) operate through a series of intricate mechanisms that facilitate direct communication between the brain and external devices. Central to the functionality of BCIs is the process of signal acquisition, which is crucial for capturing the brain's electrical activity and translating it into actionable commands.

Signal acquisition in BCIs can be categorized into two main types: invasive and non-invasive methods. Non-invasive techniques primarily involve the use of electroencephalography (EEG), which records electrical activity from the scalp. Invasive methods, on the other hand, include electrocorticography (ECoG), local field potentials, and single-unit recordings, which involve placing electrodes directly on or within the brain tissue to obtain more precise signals (Ortiz-Rosario & Adeli, 2013) [6].

The process begins with the acquisition of brain signals, where various neuroimaging modalities are employed to monitor different functional brain activities, such as electrical, magnetic, or metabolic activity. These signals are then preprocessed to enhance their quality and remove artifacts that may obscure the underlying neural information. Techniques used in signal enhancement are essential for improving the performance of BCIs, as they address the noise and interference that can arise during signal acquisition (Nicolas-Alonso & Gomez-Gil, 2012) [3].

Once the signals are acquired and preprocessed, the next steps involve feature extraction and classification. Feature extraction techniques aim to identify relevant patterns in the brain signals that correlate with specific user intentions. This is followed by the classification step, where mathematical algorithms—such as linear discriminant analysis, support vector machines, and artificial neural networks—are employed to translate the extracted features into commands that control external devices (Salahuddin & Gao, 2021) [7].

The effectiveness of BCIs is heavily dependent on the accuracy and reliability of the signal acquisition techniques employed. Advances in this area are critical, as they directly impact the ability of BCIs to function effectively in real-world applications. Challenges in signal acquisition include achieving a balance between signal fidelity, invasiveness, and biocompatibility, which are essential for enhancing the safety and efficacy of BCI technologies (Sun et al., 2025) [8].

In summary, the operation of brain-computer interfaces hinges on sophisticated signal acquisition techniques that encompass both invasive and non-invasive methods. The success of these interfaces relies on a robust pipeline that includes signal acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, and classification, ultimately enabling users to control external devices through their brain activity. The continuous evolution of these technologies promises to expand the potential applications of BCIs, particularly in assisting individuals with neuromuscular disorders and enhancing human-computer interaction.

2.2 Signal Processing and Feature Extraction ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) operate through a sophisticated interplay of hardware and software systems that facilitate direct communication between the human brain and external devices. The fundamental mechanism of BCIs involves the acquisition of brain signals, their processing, and the translation of these signals into commands that control various outputs, such as computers or prosthetic devices.

The BCI process can be broken down into several critical steps: signal acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, classification, and control interface. Each of these steps plays a vital role in ensuring that the BCI functions effectively.

  1. Signal Acquisition: This initial step involves the use of various neuroimaging modalities to monitor different types of brain activity, including electrical, magnetic, or metabolic signals. Common methods for signal acquisition include electroencephalography (EEG), which captures electrical activity from the scalp, and intracortical recordings, which involve direct measurement from the brain tissue itself. The choice of modality impacts the resolution and quality of the data collected (Nicolas-Alonso & Gomez-Gil, 2012; Shih et al., 2012).

  2. Preprocessing: After acquiring the brain signals, the next step is to enhance these signals by removing artifacts and noise that can interfere with accurate interpretation. This step is crucial, as EEG signals are often contaminated by various types of interference, including muscle activity and electrical noise from the environment. Techniques such as filtering and artifact removal algorithms are employed to improve signal quality (Lun et al., 2023).

  3. Feature Extraction: This step involves identifying and extracting relevant features from the preprocessed signals that represent the user's intentions. Various algorithms are used in this phase, such as the Common Spatial Pattern (CSP) algorithm, which projects the EEG data into a space that maximizes the variance between different mental states. However, CSP can be sensitive to noise, prompting the development of more robust methods for feature extraction, such as deep learning approaches that automatically learn features from the data (Li et al., 2017; Wang et al., 2020).

  4. Classification: Once features are extracted, machine learning algorithms are applied to classify the brain signals based on the user's intended actions. This classification process translates the brain's electrical activity into specific commands for controlling devices. Advanced techniques, including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), have shown promise in improving classification accuracy and handling individual differences among users (Lun et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2020).

  5. Control Interface: Finally, the classified signals are relayed to the control interface, which executes the desired action based on the user's commands. This interface can control a wide range of devices, from computer cursors to robotic arms, enabling individuals with severe disabilities to interact with their environment (Shih et al., 2012; Barnova et al., 2023).

In summary, the effectiveness of BCIs hinges on the seamless integration of these components, each of which must function optimally to ensure accurate interpretation of brain signals and reliable control of external devices. Ongoing research continues to refine these processes, aiming to enhance the robustness, accuracy, and usability of BCIs for individuals with motor impairments and other neurological conditions.

2.3 Translation of Neural Signals into Commands ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) function by acquiring, analyzing, and translating brain signals into commands that can control external devices, thus providing a non-muscular channel for communication and control. The primary mechanism of BCIs involves several critical steps: signal acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, classification, and command execution.

Initially, BCIs acquire brain signals through various neuroimaging modalities, such as electroencephalography (EEG), intracortical recordings, or electrocorticography. Each of these methods captures different types of brain activity, such as electrical, magnetic, or metabolic signals. For example, EEG measures electrical activity from the scalp, while intracortical electrodes record neuronal activity directly from the cortex [3].

Once the signals are acquired, they undergo preprocessing to enhance their quality. This step is crucial for removing artifacts caused by muscle movements or other physiological noise, which can obscure the neural signals of interest [3]. Advanced signal enhancement techniques are employed to ensure that the resulting signals are stable and reliable.

The next phase involves feature extraction, where specific characteristics of the brain signals that correlate with user intentions are identified. This is followed by classification, where algorithms are used to interpret these features and translate them into commands that the BCI can use to operate devices. The classification process is often refined through machine learning techniques, allowing the BCI to adapt to the user's unique brain activity patterns [9].

BCIs also rely on a bidirectional communication model where both the user and the BCI system learn to adapt to each other. This mutual adaptation is essential for improving the performance of the interface, as both the user must learn to generate the appropriate brain signals and the system must effectively interpret these signals [10]. The interaction between the user's brain signals and the BCI's response can significantly influence the effectiveness of the interface, underscoring the importance of user training and system optimization [2].

In practical applications, BCIs have been developed to assist individuals with severe neuromuscular disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or spinal cord injuries. These devices allow users to control cursors, robotic arms, or even neuroprostheses, providing them with a means to communicate or perform tasks that would otherwise be impossible due to their disabilities [11].

Overall, the translation of neural signals into commands within BCIs is a complex interplay of signal acquisition, processing, and user-system interaction, which together facilitate the control of external devices through thought alone. Future advancements in BCI technology will hinge on improvements in signal acquisition hardware, long-term validation studies, and the enhancement of system reliability, aiming to achieve performance levels comparable to natural muscle-based functions [1].

3 Types of Brain-Computer Interfaces ​

3.1 Invasive BCIs ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are sophisticated systems that facilitate direct communication between the brain and external devices by translating neural activity into commands that control these devices. BCIs can be categorized into invasive and non-invasive types, with invasive BCIs (eBCIs) being particularly notable for their potential to enhance cognitive functions and assist individuals with severe motor impairments.

Invasive BCIs typically involve the implantation of electrodes directly into the brain, allowing for high-resolution recordings of neuronal activity. These electrodes can be categorized into several types, including intracortical recording interfaces (IRIs), electrocorticography (ECoG) electrodes, and depth electrodes used in stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) and deep brain stimulation (DBS). Each of these modalities has unique characteristics and applications in the realm of BCIs.

Intracortical recording interfaces consist of arrays of penetrating electrodes implanted in the motor cortex, which capture and conduct neural signals from local ensembles of neurons. These multielectrode arrays (MEAs) provide the high speed and spatiotemporal resolution necessary for the precise control of external assistive devices, such as prosthetic limbs. Despite significant advancements in BCI technology, chronic function is often compromised by acute recording failures associated with the implanted devices, which has led researchers to explore design innovations aimed at enhancing long-term stability and performance [12].

Electrocorticography (ECoG) involves the placement of electrodes on the surface of the brain, providing a less invasive alternative to intracortical electrodes while still enabling high-fidelity recordings of cortical activity. This method has been utilized to decode movement intentions and control robotic devices, offering promising results for individuals with severe motor disabilities [13]. Additionally, depth electrodes, typically used in SEEG and DBS, allow for the monitoring of deep brain structures, providing insights into complex motor functions and potential therapeutic applications [13].

The operational principle of invasive BCIs relies on the ability to decode motor intentions from the recorded neural signals. For instance, through the application of advanced signal processing algorithms, BCIs can interpret specific patterns of neuronal firing that correspond to desired movements or commands. Recent studies have demonstrated that these systems can achieve multi-dimensional control, comparable to traditional methods that rely on implanted electrodes [14]. The development of adaptive algorithms further enhances the capability of BCIs, allowing for real-time adjustments based on the user's neural signals [14].

In summary, invasive BCIs utilize various electrode technologies to record brain activity, enabling the translation of neural signals into commands for external devices. This interface not only holds promise for restoring lost motor functions in individuals with severe disabilities but also raises ethical and societal considerations regarding cognitive enhancement and the implications of such technologies on personal identity and autonomy [15]. The continued evolution of invasive BCI technology will likely lead to improved functionality and expanded applications in both medical and non-medical domains.

3.2 Non-invasive BCIs ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are systems that facilitate direct communication between the brain and external devices, enabling individuals to control devices through brain activity. They are particularly valuable for individuals with severe motor disabilities, allowing for communication and control without the need for muscular movement. BCIs can be categorized into two main types: invasive and non-invasive interfaces.

Non-invasive BCIs utilize external devices to capture brain signals, primarily through electroencephalography (EEG). These systems record electrical activity from the scalp, making them safer and more user-friendly compared to their invasive counterparts, which require surgical implantation of electrodes. Non-invasive BCIs have gained traction due to their practicality and potential applications in various fields, including rehabilitation, assistive technology, and recreational use [16].

The operation of non-invasive BCIs typically involves several key steps:

  1. Signal Acquisition: Non-invasive BCIs collect neural signals using electrodes placed on the scalp. These electrodes detect the electrical activity generated by neurons, which can be classified into different types of brain waves, such as alpha, beta, and gamma rhythms [17].

  2. Signal Processing: The raw EEG signals undergo processing to filter out noise and extract relevant features. Advanced algorithms are employed to decode the brain signals into actionable commands. Techniques such as machine learning are often used to improve the accuracy and efficiency of this decoding process [18].

  3. Command Execution: Once the brain signals are decoded, they are translated into commands that control external devices, such as computer cursors, robotic arms, or even virtual reality environments. The user's intent is interpreted through the patterns of brain activity, allowing for real-time interaction with the device [19].

  4. Feedback Mechanism: Effective BCIs often incorporate feedback systems that allow users to see the results of their commands. This feedback helps users adjust their brain activity to improve control over the device. For instance, visual or auditory feedback can inform users whether their intended action was successfully executed [18].

Recent advancements in non-invasive BCI technology have focused on enhancing user engagement and performance. For example, hybrid systems that combine EEG with other modalities, such as eye tracking, have shown promise in improving control accuracy and user experience [20]. Additionally, innovations in electrode technology have led to improved signal quality and reduced interference, further enhancing the effectiveness of non-invasive BCIs [21].

The applications of non-invasive BCIs are vast. They are being explored for use in rehabilitation for patients with neurological injuries, enabling them to regain some level of control over their environment. Furthermore, non-invasive BCIs are being developed for controlling complex robotic systems, thus expanding their utility beyond simple tasks to more intricate interactions [22].

In conclusion, non-invasive brain-computer interfaces represent a rapidly evolving field with significant potential to transform how individuals interact with technology, particularly for those with motor impairments. The integration of advanced signal processing techniques and innovative designs continues to push the boundaries of what non-invasive BCIs can achieve, promising a future where brain activity can be harnessed for a wide range of applications.

3.3 Hybrid Approaches ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) function as a direct communication pathway between the human brain and external devices, enabling individuals to control technology using their neural activity. BCIs typically rely on the recording of brain signals, which are then processed and translated into commands for controlling devices, thereby bypassing traditional neuromuscular pathways.

The concept of hybrid brain-computer interfaces (hybrid BCIs) represents a significant advancement in this field. A hybrid BCI combines multiple modalities to enhance user interaction and improve performance. For instance, a hybrid BCI can integrate electroencephalographic (EEG) signals with other types of inputs, such as electromyographic (EMG) signals or even additional sensory inputs. This multimodal approach allows users to utilize all their remaining functionalities in conjunction with the BCI, effectively leveraging residual muscle activity alongside brain signals.

In the framework of hybrid BCIs, various configurations have been explored. One notable example is the combination of motor imagery (MI) and steady-state visual evoked potentials (SSVEP) in a dual-channel EEG setting. This configuration has been shown to achieve high classification accuracy (97.4 ± 1.1%) for hybrid tasks, demonstrating the potential of combining different BCI modalities to enhance information transfer rates and recognition accuracy [23].

Moreover, hybrid BCIs can be designed to operate either simultaneously or sequentially. For example, a hybrid BCI might utilize an imagery-based brain switch to activate a secondary BCI system, such as an SSVEP-based control for a prosthetic device. This method has been shown to reduce false positive rates significantly, thereby improving user experience and control reliability [24].

The advantages of hybrid approaches extend beyond mere performance improvements. They can also accommodate users' varying levels of physical capability and fatigue, allowing for a more stable and reliable interface even as users experience muscle fatigue throughout the day [25].

Furthermore, hybrid BCIs can incorporate advanced algorithms for real-time processing and feedback, which are critical for user engagement and effective interaction with the interface. For instance, incorporating intelligent systems that adapt to the user's context and environment can significantly enhance the functionality of BCIs [26].

Overall, hybrid BCIs represent a promising direction in the evolution of brain-computer interfaces, aiming to improve usability and performance by integrating multiple modalities and leveraging the user's remaining functionalities. The continuous development in this area holds the potential to revolutionize how individuals with disabilities interact with technology, providing them with greater autonomy and control over their environments.

4 Applications of BCIs ​

4.1 Medical Applications: Rehabilitation and Assistive Devices ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) serve as direct communication pathways between brain activity and external devices, enabling individuals to control these devices through their neural signals. This technology is particularly impactful in the medical field, especially in rehabilitation and assistive devices for patients with severe disabilities.

BCIs operate by recording and interpreting brain signals, typically using techniques such as electroencephalography (EEG). The fundamental principle involves translating these signals into commands that can control external devices like robotic limbs, communication aids, or rehabilitation systems. The effectiveness of BCIs hinges on their ability to accurately decode brain activity associated with specific thoughts or intentions, allowing for real-time interaction with external environments [1].

In the context of rehabilitation, BCIs are designed to facilitate recovery of motor functions and enhance the quality of life for individuals with conditions such as stroke, spinal cord injury, or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). These systems can help patients regain control over their movements or assist in communication. For instance, BCIs can be employed to provide feedback during motor tasks, promoting neural plasticity and recovery by engaging the areas of the brain responsible for movement and sensation [27].

Several applications of BCIs in rehabilitation have been identified. One approach involves using BCIs to facilitate motor imagery-based training, where patients imagine performing movements, and the BCI provides feedback based on their brain activity. This method can strengthen the neural connections associated with those movements, thereby aiding in recovery [28]. Additionally, BCIs can be integrated with functional electrical stimulation (FES) or robotic devices to assist patients in executing desired movements, thereby closing the sensorimotor loop and providing necessary sensory feedback [29].

Assistive BCIs specifically aim to enable communication for individuals who are paralyzed or unable to speak. These interfaces can allow users to control computer cursors, prosthetic devices, or even communication boards solely through their thoughts, offering a means of interaction with the environment that was previously unavailable [30]. For instance, BCIs have been effectively utilized to enable patients with locked-in syndrome to communicate by selecting letters or words through thought-controlled systems [31].

Moreover, BCIs are being explored for their potential to augment cognitive rehabilitation, particularly in patients with memory impairments or neurodegenerative diseases. By providing feedback on brain activity associated with cognitive tasks, BCIs can help guide therapeutic interventions aimed at improving cognitive functions [32].

In conclusion, brain-computer interfaces represent a transformative technology in the medical field, particularly for rehabilitation and assistive applications. They leverage the brain's activity to enable patients to interact with their environment, regain lost functions, and improve their quality of life. The ongoing advancements in BCI technology promise to further enhance these applications, making them more accessible and effective for a broader range of patients.

4.2 Non-medical Applications: Gaming and Communication ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) function by establishing a direct communication pathway between the brain and external devices, allowing users to control these devices using brain signals rather than traditional neuromuscular pathways. This technology primarily involves the acquisition, processing, and translation of neural signals into actionable commands for various applications, including both medical and non-medical fields.

In the realm of non-medical applications, BCIs have shown significant promise in areas such as gaming and communication. In gaming, BCIs can enhance user experience by allowing players to control game elements through thought, thus creating a more immersive and interactive environment. This approach can be particularly appealing in virtual reality settings, where traditional input devices may be cumbersome or limiting. The ability to control gameplay through neural activity not only adds a novel layer to gaming but also opens up new possibilities for game design and user engagement.

In terms of communication, BCIs can facilitate direct brain-to-computer interaction, enabling users to communicate without the need for physical movement. This is especially relevant for individuals with severe disabilities who may have limited or no ability to speak or type. BCIs can decode brain signals associated with intended speech or typing, translating these signals into text or synthesized speech. Such applications can significantly enhance the quality of life for users by providing them with a means to express themselves and interact with others more freely.

The development of BCIs has progressed rapidly, with numerous studies exploring their underlying technologies, including signal generation and processing techniques. Recent advancements have focused on improving the accuracy and reliability of signal acquisition, utilizing both invasive and non-invasive methods. For instance, electroencephalography (EEG) is a widely used non-invasive technique that captures electrical activity from the scalp, while more invasive approaches involve implanting electrodes directly into the brain to achieve higher resolution and precision in signal detection.

Moreover, the integration of BCIs into gaming and communication raises several ethical considerations, particularly concerning privacy and the potential for misuse of the technology. As BCIs become more prevalent, it is crucial to address these ethical issues to ensure responsible development and deployment of BCI technologies.

In summary, brain-computer interfaces work by translating brain activity into commands that can control external devices, with non-medical applications in gaming and communication offering exciting possibilities for enhancing user interaction and engagement. The continuous evolution of BCI technology, alongside the exploration of its ethical implications, will shape the future landscape of both recreational and communicative experiences [7][15][30].

4.3 Emerging Applications in Research and Industry ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) are innovative systems that facilitate direct communication between the brain and external devices by interpreting brain signals and translating them into commands for those devices. The fundamental mechanism involves the acquisition, analysis, and processing of neural signals, which can then be used to control various applications.

The primary applications of BCIs can be categorized into several domains, particularly in the medical field. BCIs are particularly promising for individuals with neuromuscular disorders such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, cerebral palsy, stroke, and spinal cord injuries. They enable these individuals to communicate or control devices without relying on normal neuromuscular pathways. This is achieved through the acquisition of brain signals via techniques such as electroencephalography (EEG), intracortical recordings, or electrocorticography, which capture brain activity and convert it into actionable commands for devices like robotic arms, prosthetics, or computer cursors (Shih et al. 2012; Mak & Wolpaw 2009).

Emerging applications of BCIs extend beyond traditional rehabilitation and communication. Recent advancements have highlighted their utility in areas such as emotion recognition, sleep monitoring, and cerebral resuscitation. For instance, BCIs can assist in rehabilitation by providing feedback that may induce beneficial neural plasticity, thereby aiding recovery post-stroke or spinal cord injury (Chaudhary et al. 2016). Furthermore, there is ongoing research into using BCIs for cognitive enhancement, which could unlock human neurocognitive potential (Gordon & Seth 2024).

In addition to medical applications, BCIs are also being explored in research and industry contexts. The versatility of BCIs allows for their integration into various fields, including robotics, gaming, and education. For example, in robotics, BCIs can enable users to control robotic systems directly with their thoughts, thereby enhancing human-robot interaction. In gaming, BCIs can provide immersive experiences by allowing players to control gameplay through neural commands, thereby creating a new paradigm of interaction (Salahuddin & Gao 2021).

However, the deployment of BCIs in practical applications faces several challenges. Issues such as signal acquisition reliability, user comfort, and ethical considerations regarding privacy and autonomy must be addressed to facilitate widespread adoption. The technology requires further development to enhance the performance and usability of BCIs, ensuring they can function effectively in real-world environments (McFarland & Wolpaw 2017; Saha et al. 2021).

Overall, the potential of BCIs in both medical and non-medical applications is vast, offering exciting prospects for enhancing human capabilities and improving the quality of life for individuals with disabilities. As research progresses, BCIs may increasingly become integrated into everyday life, leading to transformative changes in how humans interact with technology.

5 Ethical Considerations and Challenges ​

5.1 Privacy and Data Security ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) function by establishing a direct communication pathway between the human brain and external devices, facilitating the translation of neural signals into actionable commands for various applications. This technology primarily utilizes electroencephalography (EEG) to capture brain activity, which is then processed to interpret the user's intentions. While BCIs hold significant promise for medical rehabilitation and enhancing communication, they also raise critical ethical considerations, particularly concerning privacy and data security.

The processing of neural data through BCIs introduces unique risks, as this data is inherently sensitive due to its intimate connection to an individual's mental states and personal thoughts. Ethical concerns are primarily focused on privacy and the secure handling of this neural data. The current regulatory frameworks, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), often lack explicit provisions addressing the nuances of neural data, leading to potential gaps in user protection. Recent legislative efforts in U.S. states like Colorado and California have made strides to incorporate neural data into privacy laws, yet significant challenges remain, including issues related to consent, data ownership, and the potential for misuse of information obtained from BCIs [33].

Furthermore, the public's perception of BCIs is fraught with ethical concerns, particularly regarding the implications of their use. A study highlighted that 98% of respondents expressed apprehension about implantation risks, and 92% were concerned about the costs associated with BCI technologies [34]. This reflects a broader societal unease about the balance between the benefits of BCIs and the potential for exacerbating inequalities and infringing on individual autonomy.

The privacy of users is further complicated by the fact that EEG signals can reveal not only task-specific information but also sensitive personal data such as identity and emotional states. Research has demonstrated that user identity can be inferred from EEG data, prompting the need for robust privacy protection measures [35]. Techniques such as identity-unlearnable data transformations have been proposed to mitigate these risks, ensuring that while the BCI maintains its functionality, the user's identity remains protected [35][36].

In summary, while BCIs present transformative opportunities for enhancing human capabilities, they simultaneously pose significant ethical challenges, particularly in the realms of privacy and data security. The need for comprehensive regulatory frameworks and ethical guidelines is paramount to safeguard user interests and ensure that the development of BCI technologies aligns with societal values and individual rights. The ongoing discourse among stakeholders, including ethicists, technologists, and potential users, is essential to navigate these complexities and promote responsible innovation in this rapidly evolving field [33][34].

5.2 Accessibility and Equity ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) represent a significant advancement in neurotechnology, enabling direct communication between the brain and external devices. This technology has the potential to enhance the lives of individuals with neurological disorders by providing innovative solutions for rehabilitation, communication, and personal autonomy. However, the development and application of BCIs also raise a multitude of ethical considerations and challenges, particularly regarding accessibility and equity.

BCIs function by acquiring brain signals, analyzing them, and translating them into commands that are relayed to output devices. These devices can include cursors, robotic arms, prostheses, and wheelchairs, among others. The primary goal of BCIs is to restore or replace lost functions for individuals disabled by neuromuscular disorders, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, cerebral palsy, stroke, or spinal cord injury [1]. As such, they can significantly improve the quality of life for users by allowing them to regain lost capabilities or even acquire new ones [37].

Despite the promise of BCIs, ethical issues surrounding their use are profound. These include concerns about personhood, autonomy, privacy, and the potential for stigmatization [38]. The direct connection between the human brain and computer systems raises questions about who controls the technology and how it may affect users' identities and agency. Ethical frameworks such as consequentialism, deontology, and virtue ethics have been applied to examine these issues, indicating a need for careful consideration of the implications of BCI technology [39].

One of the critical challenges is ensuring accessibility and equity in the development and deployment of BCIs. As the technology evolves, there is a risk that it may exacerbate existing inequalities in healthcare access. For instance, individuals from lower socioeconomic backgrounds may not have the same opportunities to benefit from BCIs, which could lead to disparities in health outcomes [34]. Public perceptions and attitudes toward BCIs also play a role; a study indicated that many individuals expressed ethical concerns about the risks associated with BCI implantation, including costs and safety [34].

Moreover, the discussion surrounding BCIs is complicated by their potential applications beyond medical uses, such as cognitive enhancement and entertainment. The ethical implications of using BCIs for enhancement raise fundamental questions about human identity and the nature of selfhood [15]. The prospect of cognitive enhancement through BCIs introduces concerns regarding fairness, as not everyone may have equal access to such enhancements, potentially leading to a new form of inequality.

To address these challenges, it is essential to establish clear regulatory frameworks and ethical guidelines that prioritize safety, privacy, and equitable access. Engaging stakeholders, including potential users, ethicists, and technologists, in the design process can help ensure that technological developments align with public concerns and ethical standards [34]. Additionally, educational initiatives aimed at improving public understanding of BCIs and fostering open discourse are crucial for building trust and addressing ethical dilemmas associated with this emerging technology.

In conclusion, while BCIs hold transformative potential for individuals with disabilities, their ethical implications and challenges, particularly regarding accessibility and equity, must be carefully navigated to ensure that the benefits of this technology are realized fairly and responsibly.

5.3 The Future of Human-Computer Interaction ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) represent a groundbreaking technology that facilitates direct communication between the human brain and external devices, bypassing traditional neuromuscular pathways. BCIs acquire brain signals, analyze them, and translate them into commands that control various devices, such as computers, robotic limbs, and prostheses. The primary aim of BCIs is to restore or replace functions for individuals with severe neuromuscular disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, cerebral palsy, stroke, and spinal cord injuries[1].

The functioning of a BCI involves several key steps: signal acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, classification, and control interface. Initially, brain signals are captured using various neuroimaging modalities, including electroencephalography (EEG), intracortical recordings, and electrocorticography. These modalities monitor different types of brain activity, such as electrical, magnetic, or metabolic signals[3]. Following acquisition, the signals undergo preprocessing to enhance their quality and remove artifacts, which is critical for improving performance[3]. Subsequently, feature extraction techniques identify relevant patterns within the signals that correspond to user intentions. These patterns are then classified to generate commands that can control external devices[3].

The implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning has significantly advanced BCI technology. AI algorithms enhance various aspects of BCI performance, including calibration, noise suppression, and mental state estimation. This integration allows for more accurate interpretations of brain signals, contributing to the overall effectiveness of BCIs in clinical and rehabilitation settings[5].

Despite the promising capabilities of BCIs, several ethical considerations and challenges must be addressed. These include concerns about privacy, as BCIs can access sensitive information regarding a user's mental state and intentions. There are also potential security vulnerabilities associated with the transmission and storage of brain data, which could be exploited if not properly managed[30]. Furthermore, the reliability and safety of BCI systems must be improved to ensure they can function effectively in real-world environments[1].

Looking to the future, BCIs hold immense potential to transform human-computer interaction. As technology progresses, BCIs may enhance not only communication and rehabilitation for disabled individuals but also augment the capabilities of healthy users in various domains, including surgery and complex task performance[1]. The ongoing research and development in this field promise to yield systems that are more portable, user-friendly, and reliable, paving the way for broader applications across different sectors of society[5]. As such, BCIs are poised to play a critical role in the evolution of human-computer interaction, fostering deeper integration between human cognitive processes and technological systems.

6 Future Directions in BCI Research ​

6.1 Technological Innovations ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) function as communication systems that enable direct interaction between brain activity and external devices, such as computers or robotic limbs. The operational principle of BCIs involves several critical steps: signal acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, classification, and control interface.

Initially, BCIs acquire brain signals through various neuroimaging modalities, including electroencephalography (EEG), intracortical recordings, and electrocorticography. These modalities capture different forms of brain activity, such as electrical, magnetic, or metabolic signals. The captured signals are then subjected to preprocessing to enhance their quality and remove artifacts, which is crucial for accurate signal interpretation [3].

Following preprocessing, the next step is feature extraction, where specific characteristics of the brain signals that correlate with user intentions are identified. This process often involves sophisticated mathematical algorithms to translate the extracted features into commands that can control external devices. The classification step further refines these commands, allowing for real-time interaction with the external environment [29].

The main goal of BCIs is to assist individuals with severe disabilities, such as those resulting from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or spinal cord injuries, by restoring communication capabilities or enabling control over assistive devices. BCIs have shown promise in facilitating communication for patients who are "locked in," allowing them to express their wishes or operate devices using their brain signals alone [2].

In terms of future directions, BCI research is focusing on several technological innovations. Key areas of advancement include improving signal-acquisition hardware to make it more portable, safe, and effective across various environments. There is also a significant emphasis on validating BCI systems through long-term studies involving users with severe disabilities, ensuring that these systems are not only functional in controlled settings but also reliable in everyday situations [1].

Moreover, enhancing the reliability of BCI performance to approach that of natural muscle-based functions is a critical objective. This includes developing more robust algorithms for signal classification and feature extraction that can adapt to the dynamic nature of brain signals, which are often influenced by time-variant psycho-neurophysiological fluctuations [40].

Lastly, the integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning into BCI technology is anticipated to play a pivotal role in refining the interaction between users and devices, thereby enhancing the overall user experience and effectiveness of BCIs in real-world applications [41].

Overall, the evolution of BCI technology is characterized by interdisciplinary collaboration, encompassing neurobiology, engineering, psychology, and computer science, with the aim of creating more effective and user-friendly systems that can significantly improve the quality of life for individuals with motor disabilities.

6.2 Interdisciplinary Approaches ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) function by establishing a direct communication pathway between the brain and external devices, enabling users to control these devices through brain activity rather than conventional neuromuscular pathways. The core operation of BCIs involves several key steps: signal acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, classification, and control interface.

  1. Signal Acquisition: BCIs capture brain signals using various techniques, including electroencephalography (EEG), intracortical recordings, and electrocorticography. Each method has its advantages and limitations, affecting the BCI's performance and user experience [3].

  2. Preprocessing: Once the signals are acquired, they undergo preprocessing to enhance signal quality and remove artifacts. This step is crucial as it improves the accuracy of subsequent analysis [3].

  3. Feature Extraction and Classification: The next phase involves extracting relevant features from the processed signals that correlate with user intent. These features are then classified using machine learning algorithms to translate brain activity into commands for controlling external devices. Current BCIs can achieve information transfer rates of 10-25 bits per minute, which, while limited, can still facilitate basic communication for users with severe disabilities [2].

  4. Control Interface: Finally, the classified signals are used to operate a computer or other devices, allowing users to perform tasks such as controlling a cursor, operating a robotic arm, or even typing [2].

As for future directions in BCI research, several areas are being emphasized:

  • Interdisciplinary Approaches: The development of BCIs is inherently interdisciplinary, integrating fields such as neurobiology, psychology, engineering, mathematics, and computer science. This collaboration is vital for addressing the complex challenges associated with BCI technology [2].

  • Advancements in Signal Processing: Future BCIs are expected to leverage improved signal processing techniques to enhance the reliability and precision of brain signal interpretation. Researchers are actively exploring novel algorithms and methodologies to boost performance and user experience [42].

  • User-Centric Design: It is crucial to focus on the user experience by ensuring that BCIs are user-friendly and adaptable to individual needs. Research is ongoing to identify optimal BCI applications that match user capabilities and preferences, thereby increasing acceptance and usability [43].

  • Ethical Considerations: As BCIs become more prevalent, ethical concerns regarding privacy, data security, and informed consent are gaining attention. Establishing robust legislative frameworks will be essential to guide the responsible use of BCI technologies [42].

  • Real-World Applications: There is a strong push to validate BCI systems in long-term studies involving real-world applications. This will help to ensure that BCIs are not only effective in controlled environments but also reliable in everyday situations [42].

In summary, BCIs represent a promising frontier in technology that requires continued interdisciplinary collaboration to overcome existing challenges and to harness their full potential across various applications, particularly in healthcare and assistive technologies.

6.3 Potential Societal Impacts ​

Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) function by establishing a direct communication pathway between the brain and external devices, allowing users to control these devices using neural signals instead of traditional neuromuscular pathways. BCIs acquire brain signals, analyze them, and translate them into commands that can operate external devices such as computers, prosthetics, or robotic arms. The core components of a BCI system include signal acquisition, preprocessing, feature extraction, classification, and the control interface. Signal acquisition can be achieved through various methods, including electroencephalography (EEG), intracortical recordings, and electrocorticography, each monitoring different aspects of brain activity [1].

In recent years, the development of BCIs has significantly progressed, particularly in terms of their applications in rehabilitation, communication for individuals with severe disabilities, and even cognitive enhancement. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning techniques into BCI systems has been identified as a promising direction, addressing challenges related to signal noise, calibration, and the estimation of mental states [5]. The application of these technologies aims to enhance the reliability and effectiveness of BCIs, thereby improving user experience and expanding their utility in everyday life [15].

Looking ahead, the future of BCI research is poised to explore several critical areas. Firstly, advancements in non-invasive and invasive technologies are expected to enhance the precision and usability of BCIs, potentially allowing for seamless integration into daily activities. Additionally, the focus on user training protocols and interface design will be essential in making BCIs more intuitive and accessible for users [44]. The potential for BCIs to augment cognitive abilities raises ethical considerations regarding privacy, autonomy, and social inequality, which will need to be addressed as the technology evolves [15].

The societal impacts of BCIs are profound, as they could redefine how individuals interact with technology and each other. The ability to restore communication and mobility to individuals with severe disabilities can significantly enhance their quality of life and independence [45]. However, the introduction of cognitive enhancement technologies poses ethical dilemmas regarding the definition of normalcy and the implications of enhancing human capabilities. Questions surrounding who benefits from such technologies and the potential for widening societal gaps will be crucial in shaping public policy and ethical frameworks around BCI development [15].

In conclusion, while BCIs hold immense potential for transforming both medical and non-medical applications, their development must be accompanied by careful consideration of ethical, legal, and societal implications to ensure that these technologies benefit all members of society equitably.

7 Conclusion ​

The exploration of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) reveals significant advancements in technology that bridge the gap between human cognitive processes and external devices. Key findings indicate that BCIs operate through intricate mechanisms involving signal acquisition, processing, and translation of neural signals into actionable commands. Current research highlights the effectiveness of both invasive and non-invasive approaches, with a growing emphasis on hybrid systems that combine multiple modalities for enhanced user experience. Despite the promising applications of BCIs in medical rehabilitation and non-medical fields such as gaming and communication, challenges remain, particularly concerning privacy, accessibility, and ethical implications. Future research should prioritize interdisciplinary collaboration to address these challenges, enhance the reliability of BCI systems, and ensure equitable access to these transformative technologies. The societal impacts of BCIs are profound, with the potential to redefine human-computer interaction and improve the quality of life for individuals with disabilities, while also necessitating careful consideration of ethical frameworks to guide their development and use.

References ​

  • [1] Jerry J Shih;Dean J Krusienski;Jonathan R Wolpaw. Brain-computer interfaces in medicine.. Mayo Clinic proceedings(IF=6.7). 2012. PMID:22325364. DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.12.008.
  • [2] Jonathan R Wolpaw;Niels Birbaumer;Dennis J McFarland;Gert Pfurtscheller;Theresa M Vaughan. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and control.. Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology(IF=3.6). 2002. PMID:12048038. DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(02)00057-3.
  • [3] Luis Fernando Nicolas-Alonso;Jaime Gomez-Gil. Brain computer interfaces, a review.. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)(IF=3.5). 2012. PMID:22438708. DOI: 10.3390/s120201211.
  • [4] Bertrand Rivet;Antoine Souloumiac;Virginie Attina;Guillaume Gibert. xDAWN algorithm to enhance evoked potentials: application to brain-computer interface.. IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering(IF=4.5). 2009. PMID:19174332. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2012869.
  • [5] Katerina Barnova;Martina Mikolasova;Radana Vilimkova Kahankova;Rene Jaros;Aleksandra Kawala-Sterniuk;Vaclav Snasel;Seyedali Mirjalili;Mariusz Pelc;Radek Martinek. Implementation of artificial intelligence and machine learning-based methods in brain-computer interaction.. Computers in biology and medicine(IF=6.3). 2023. PMID:37329623. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107135.
  • [6] Alexis Ortiz-Rosario;Hojjat Adeli. Brain-computer interface technologies: from signal to action.. Reviews in the neurosciences(IF=4.1). 2013. PMID:24077619. DOI: .
  • [7] Usman Salahuddin;Pu-Xian Gao. Signal Generation, Acquisition, and Processing in Brain Machine Interfaces: A Unified Review.. Frontiers in neuroscience(IF=3.2). 2021. PMID:34588951. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2021.728178.
  • [8] Yike Sun;Xiaogang Chen;Bingchuan Liu;Liyan Liang;Yijun Wang;Shangkai Gao;Xiaorong Gao. Signal acquisition of brain-computer interfaces: A medical-engineering crossover perspective review.. Fundamental research(IF=6.3). 2025. PMID:40166113. DOI: 10.1016/j.fmre.2024.04.011.
  • [9] D J McFarland;J R Wolpaw. EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces.. Current opinion in biomedical engineering(IF=4.2). 2017. PMID:29527584. DOI: 10.1016/j.cobme.2017.11.004.
  • [10] Dennis J McFarland;Jonathan R Wolpaw. Brain-computer interface use is a skill that user and system acquire together.. PLoS biology(IF=7.2). 2018. PMID:29965965. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2006719.
  • [11] Dennis J McFarland. Brain-computer interfaces for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.. Muscle & nerve(IF=3.1). 2020. PMID:32034787. DOI: 10.1002/mus.26828.
  • [12] Bhagya Gunasekera;Tarun Saxena;Ravi Bellamkonda;Lohitash Karumbaiah. Intracortical recording interfaces: current challenges to chronic recording function.. ACS chemical neuroscience(IF=3.9). 2015. PMID:25587704. DOI: 10.1021/cn5002864.
  • [13] Xiaolong Wu;Benjamin Metcalfe;Shenghong He;Huiling Tan;Dingguo Zhang. A Review of Motor Brain-Computer Interfaces Using Intracranial Electroencephalography Based on Surface Electrodes and Depth Electrodes.. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society(IF=5.2). 2024. PMID:38949928. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2024.3421551.
  • [14] Jonathan R Wolpaw;Dennis J McFarland. Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans.. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America(IF=9.1). 2004. PMID:15585584. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0403504101.
  • [15] Emma C Gordon;Anil K Seth. Ethical considerations for the use of brain-computer interfaces for cognitive enhancement.. PLoS biology(IF=7.2). 2024. PMID:39466848. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002899.
  • [16] Bradley J Edelman;Shuailei Zhang;Gerwin Schalk;Peter Brunner;Gernot Muller-Putz;Cuntai Guan;Bin He. Non-Invasive Brain-Computer Interfaces: State of the Art and Trends.. IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering(IF=12.0). 2025. PMID:39186407. DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2024.3449790.
  • [17] Bin He;Bryan Baxter;Bradley J Edelman;Christopher C Cline;Wendy Ye. Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interfaces Based on Sensorimotor Rhythms.. Proceedings of the IEEE. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers(IF=25.9). 2015. PMID:34334804. DOI: 10.1109/jproc.2015.2407272.
  • [18] Yike Sun;Anruo Shen;Chenlin Du;Jingnan Sun;Xiaogang Chen;Xiaorong Gao. A Real-Time Non-Implantation Bi-Directional Brain-Computer Interface Solution Without Stimulation Artifacts.. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society(IF=5.2). 2023. PMID:37665696. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3311750.
  • [19] B J Edelman;J Meng;D Suma;C Zurn;E Nagarajan;B S Baxter;C C Cline;B He. Noninvasive neuroimaging enhances continuous neural tracking for robotic device control.. Science robotics(IF=27.5). 2019. PMID:31656937. DOI: 10.1126/scirobotics.aaw6844.
  • [20] Minho Kim;Byung Hyung Kim;Sungho Jo. Quantitative evaluation of a low-cost noninvasive hybrid interface based on EEG and eye movement.. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society(IF=5.2). 2015. PMID:25376041. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2014.2365834.
  • [21] Sen Lin;Jingjing Jiang;Kai Huang;Lei Li;Xian He;Peng Du;Yufeng Wu;Junchen Liu;Xilin Li;Zhibao Huang;Zenan Zhou;Yuanhang Yu;Jiaxin Gao;Ming Lei;Hui Wu. Advanced Electrode Technologies for Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interfaces.. ACS nano(IF=16.0). 2023. PMID:38064282. DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.3c06781.
  • [22] Hairong Zheng;Lili Niu;Weibao Qiu;Dong Liang;Xiaojing Long;Guanglin Li;Zhiyuan Liu;Long Meng. The Emergence of Functional Ultrasound for Noninvasive Brain-Computer Interface.. Research (Washington, D.C.)(IF=10.7). 2023. PMID:37588619. DOI: 10.34133/research.0200.
  • [23] Li-Wei Ko;Oleksii Komarov;Shih-Chuan Lin. Enhancing the Hybrid BCI Performance With the Common Frequency Pattern in Dual-Channel EEG.. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society(IF=5.2). 2019. PMID:31180893. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2920748.
  • [24] Gert Pfurtscheller;Teodoro Solis-Escalante;Rupert Ortner;Patricia Linortner;Gernot R Müller-Putz. Self-paced operation of an SSVEP-Based orthosis with and without an imagery-based "brain switch:" a feasibility study towards a hybrid BCI.. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society(IF=5.2). 2010. PMID:20144923. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2010.2040837.
  • [25] Robert Leeb;Hesam Sagha;Ricardo Chavarriaga;José Del R Millán. A hybrid brain-computer interface based on the fusion of electroencephalographic and electromyographic activities.. Journal of neural engineering(IF=3.8). 2011. PMID:21436524. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/8/2/025011.
  • [26] B Z Allison;R Leeb;C Brunner;G R Müller-Putz;G Bauernfeind;J W Kelly;C Neuper. Toward smarter BCIs: extending BCIs through hybridization and intelligent control.. Journal of neural engineering(IF=3.8). 2012. PMID:22156029. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2560/9/1/013001.
  • [27] Bruce H Dobkin. Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation.. The Journal of physiology(IF=4.4). 2007. PMID:17095557. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.123067.
  • [28] L E H van Dokkum;T Ward;I Laffont. Brain computer interfaces for neurorehabilitation – its current status as a rehabilitation strategy post-stroke.. Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine(IF=4.6). 2015. PMID:25614021. DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2014.09.016.
  • [29] Ujwal Chaudhary;Niels Birbaumer;Ander Ramos-Murguialday. Brain-computer interfaces for communication and rehabilitation.. Nature reviews. Neurology(IF=33.1). 2016. PMID:27539560. DOI: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.113.
  • [30] Xiu-Yun Liu;Wen-Long Wang;Miao Liu;Ming-Yi Chen;Tânia Pereira;Desta Yakob Doda;Yu-Feng Ke;Shou-Yan Wang;Dong Wen;Xiao-Guang Tong;Wei-Guang Li;Yi Yang;Xiao-Di Han;Yu-Lin Sun;Xin Song;Cong-Ying Hao;Zi-Hua Zhang;Xin-Yang Liu;Chun-Yang Li;Rui Peng;Xiao-Xin Song;Abi Yasi;Mei-Jun Pang;Kuo Zhang;Run-Nan He;Le Wu;Shu-Geng Chen;Wen-Jin Chen;Yan-Gong Chao;Cheng-Gong Hu;Heng Zhang;Min Zhou;Kun Wang;Peng-Fei Liu;Chen Chen;Xin-Yi Geng;Yun Qin;Dong-Rui Gao;En-Ming Song;Long-Long Cheng;Xun Chen;Dong Ming. Recent applications of EEG-based brain-computer-interface in the medical field.. Military Medical Research(IF=22.9). 2025. PMID:40128831. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-025-00598-z.
  • [31] Marc W Slutzky. Brain-Machine Interfaces: Powerful Tools for Clinical Treatment and Neuroscientific Investigations.. The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry(IF=3.9). 2019. PMID:29772957. DOI: 10.1177/1073858418775355.
  • [32] Qiheng He;Yi Yang;Peicong Ge;Sining Li;Xiaoke Chai;Zhongqiu Luo;Jizong Zhao. The brain nebula: minimally invasive brain-computer interface by endovascular neural recording and stimulation.. Journal of neurointerventional surgery(IF=4.3). 2024. PMID:38388478. DOI: 10.1136/jnis-2023-021296.
  • [33] Hong Yang;Li Jiang. Regulating neural data processing in the age of BCIs: Ethical concerns and legal approaches.. Digital health(IF=3.3). 2025. PMID:40162168. DOI: 10.1177/20552076251326123.
  • [34] Austen El-Osta;Mahmoud Al Ammouri;Shujhat Khan;Sami Altalib;Manisha Karki;Eva Riboli-Sasco;Azeem Majeed. Community perspectives regarding brain-computer interfaces: A cross-sectional study of community-dwelling adults in the UK.. PLOS digital health(IF=7.7). 2025. PMID:39908280. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000524.
  • [35] Lubin Meng;Xue Jiang;Jian Huang;Wei Li;Hanbin Luo;Dongrui Wu. User Identity Protection in EEG-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces.. IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society(IF=5.2). 2023. PMID:37651476. DOI: 10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3310883.
  • [36] Xiaoqing Chen;Siyang Li;Yunlu Tu;Ziwei Wang;Dongrui Wu. User-wise perturbations for user identity protection in EEG-based BCIs.. Journal of neural engineering(IF=3.8). 2025. PMID:39423826. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad88a5.
  • [37] Johannes Kögel;Ralf J Jox;Orsolya Friedrich. What is it like to use a BCI? - insights from an interview study with brain-computer interface users.. BMC medical ethics(IF=3.1). 2020. PMID:31906947. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-019-0442-2.
  • [38] Sasha Burwell;Matthew Sample;Eric Racine. Ethical aspects of brain computer interfaces: a scoping review.. BMC medical ethics(IF=3.1). 2017. PMID:29121942. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-017-0220-y.
  • [39] Zhe Zhang;Yanxiao Chen;Xu Zhao;Wang Fan;Ding Peng;Tianwen Li;Lei Zhao;Yunfa Fu. A review of ethical considerations for the medical applications of brain-computer interfaces.. Cognitive neurodynamics(IF=3.9). 2024. PMID:39712096. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-024-10144-7.
  • [40] Simanto Saha;Khondaker A Mamun;Khawza Ahmed;Raqibul Mostafa;Ganesh R Naik;Sam Darvishi;Ahsan H Khandoker;Mathias Baumert. Progress in Brain Computer Interface: Challenges and Opportunities.. Frontiers in systems neuroscience(IF=3.5). 2021. PMID:33716680. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2021.578875.
  • [41] Xiaorong Gao;Yijun Wang;Xiaogang Chen;Shangkai Gao. Interface, interaction, and intelligence in generalized brain-computer interfaces.. Trends in cognitive sciences(IF=17.2). 2021. PMID:34116918. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.04.003.
  • [42] Evelyn Karikari;Konstantin A Koshechkin. Review on brain-computer interface technologies in healthcare.. Biophysical reviews(IF=3.7). 2023. PMID:37974976. DOI: 10.1007/s12551-023-01138-6.
  • [43] Baraka Maiseli;Abdi T Abdalla;Libe V Massawe;Mercy Mbise;Khadija Mkocha;Nassor Ally Nassor;Moses Ismail;James Michael;Samwel Kimambo. Brain-computer interface: trend, challenges, and threats.. Brain informatics(IF=4.5). 2023. PMID:37540385. DOI: 10.1186/s40708-023-00199-3.
  • [44] Jelena Mladenović. Standardization of protocol design for user training in EEG-based brain-computer interface.. Journal of neural engineering(IF=3.8). 2021. PMID:33217745. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/abcc7d.
  • [45] Joseph N Mak;Jonathan R Wolpaw. Clinical Applications of Brain-Computer Interfaces: Current State and Future Prospects.. IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering(IF=12.0). 2009. PMID:20442804. DOI: 10.1109/RBME.2009.2035356.

MaltSci Intelligent Research Services ​

Search for more papers on MaltSci.com ​

Brain-Computer Interface · Neural Signals · Rehabilitation Applications · Ethical Considerations · Technological Innovations

© 2025 MaltSci