MaltSci 麦伴科研

Appearance

Popular Reports / Emerging Frontiers

This report is written by MaltSci based on the latest literature and research findings

How does AI assist in clinical decision making? ​

Abstract ​

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical decision-making is transforming healthcare by addressing the complexities of modern patient care. Traditional methods often struggle with the vast amounts of data generated from electronic health records, imaging studies, and genomic data. AI technologies, particularly machine learning and natural language processing, facilitate the analysis of this data, enabling the identification of patterns and generation of evidence-based recommendations. This review explores the various applications of AI in clinical settings, including diagnostic support systems, treatment recommendation systems, and predictive analytics for patient outcomes. AI has demonstrated significant benefits, such as improved diagnostic accuracy, optimized treatment plans, and enhanced patient engagement. However, challenges related to data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the ethical implications of AI usage remain critical concerns. The need for regulatory frameworks to guide the implementation of AI in clinical practice is essential. Future directions in AI research should focus on overcoming these challenges while ensuring that AI technologies complement the expertise of healthcare professionals. By synthesizing current literature and case studies, this report highlights the transformative potential of AI in clinical decision-making and the necessary considerations for its responsible application.

Outline ​

This report will discuss the following questions.

  • 1 Introduction
  • 2 Overview of AI in Healthcare
    • 2.1 Definition and Types of AI
    • 2.2 Historical Context and Evolution
  • 3 AI Applications in Clinical Decision-Making
    • 3.1 Diagnostic Support Systems
    • 3.2 Treatment Recommendation Systems
    • 3.3 Predictive Analytics for Patient Outcomes
  • 4 Benefits of AI in Clinical Decision-Making
    • 4.1 Improved Diagnostic Accuracy
    • 4.2 Enhanced Efficiency and Workflow
    • 4.3 Personalized Medicine Approaches
  • 5 Challenges and Limitations
    • 5.1 Data Privacy and Security Concerns
    • 5.2 Algorithmic Bias and Fairness
    • 5.3 Integration into Clinical Practice
  • 6 Future Directions and Ethical Considerations
    • 6.1 Regulatory Frameworks for AI in Healthcare
    • 6.2 Ethical Implications of AI in Patient Care
    • 6.3 The Role of Clinicians in an AI-Enhanced Environment
  • 7 Conclusion

1 Introduction ​

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in clinical decision-making marks a pivotal transformation in healthcare, driven by the exponential growth of medical data and the increasing complexity of patient care. Traditional clinical decision-making processes often struggle to keep pace with the vast amounts of information generated from diverse sources, including electronic health records, imaging studies, and genomic data. As healthcare professionals seek to synthesize this information to make timely and accurate decisions, AI technologies—particularly machine learning and natural language processing—have emerged as powerful allies. These technologies facilitate the analysis of large datasets, enabling the identification of patterns and the generation of evidence-based recommendations, ultimately enhancing clinical outcomes and operational efficiency [1][2].

The significance of AI in clinical decision-making cannot be overstated. By improving diagnostic accuracy, optimizing treatment plans, and facilitating personalized medicine, AI has the potential to reshape the patient care landscape. For instance, AI-driven diagnostic support systems can assist clinicians in recognizing subtle disease patterns that may otherwise go unnoticed, while treatment recommendation systems can analyze patient data to propose tailored therapeutic strategies [3][4]. Furthermore, predictive analytics can provide insights into patient outcomes, allowing for proactive interventions that can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality [5]. As such, the integration of AI not only promises to enhance individual patient care but also aims to alleviate the growing burden on healthcare systems.

Despite the promising potential of AI, its application in clinical settings is not without challenges. Issues related to data privacy and security, algorithmic bias, and the integration of AI into existing clinical workflows pose significant barriers to widespread adoption [6][7]. Moreover, the ethical implications surrounding AI usage, particularly in sensitive areas such as resuscitation decisions, necessitate careful consideration and the establishment of regulatory frameworks to guide its implementation [8]. As healthcare providers navigate these complexities, understanding clinician perceptions of AI technologies and their impact on decision-making processes becomes crucial [9].

This review is organized as follows: Section 2 provides an overview of AI in healthcare, including definitions, types, and the historical context of its evolution. Section 3 delves into specific applications of AI in clinical decision-making, examining diagnostic support systems, treatment recommendation systems, and predictive analytics for patient outcomes. Section 4 discusses the benefits of AI, highlighting improved diagnostic accuracy, enhanced efficiency, and personalized medicine approaches. Section 5 addresses the challenges and limitations associated with AI integration, focusing on data privacy, algorithmic bias, and clinical practice integration. Section 6 explores future directions and ethical considerations, including the need for regulatory frameworks and the role of clinicians in an AI-enhanced environment. Finally, Section 7 concludes with a summary of the key findings and implications for future research and practice.

Through this comprehensive exploration, we aim to illuminate how AI is reshaping clinical decision-making processes, providing valuable insights for healthcare professionals, policymakers, and researchers alike. By synthesizing current literature and case studies, this report seeks to highlight both the transformative potential of AI and the critical considerations that must be addressed to ensure its responsible and effective implementation in clinical practice.

2 Overview of AI in Healthcare ​

2.1 Definition and Types of AI ​

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in healthcare, particularly in enhancing clinical decision-making processes. AI encompasses various technologies that simulate human cognitive functions, such as machine learning, natural language processing, and data analytics, to assist healthcare professionals in making informed decisions. The application of AI in clinical settings can be categorized into several types, each contributing uniquely to patient care and operational efficiency.

One of the primary ways AI assists in clinical decision-making is through improved disease diagnosis. AI algorithms can analyze vast datasets, including electronic health records, medical imaging, and genomic data, to identify patterns that may not be immediately apparent to human clinicians. For instance, AI has been shown to enhance diagnostic accuracy in medical imaging, detecting conditions such as cancer more effectively than traditional methods[10]. This capability allows clinicians to make more accurate diagnoses, which is crucial for determining appropriate treatment plans.

AI also plays a significant role in treatment selection and personalization. It can analyze patient data to recommend tailored treatment options based on individual characteristics, including genetic profiles and previous responses to therapies. This is particularly relevant in precision medicine, where understanding a patient's unique biological makeup can lead to more effective and targeted treatment strategies[11]. By sorting through extensive clinical trial data and real-world evidence, AI can predict patient responses to specific treatments, thereby optimizing therapeutic outcomes and minimizing adverse effects[12].

In addition to diagnosis and treatment, AI enhances clinical decision-making through predictive analytics. By utilizing historical patient data, AI can forecast disease progression and potential complications, enabling proactive management of patient care. This predictive capability is vital in chronic disease management, where timely interventions can significantly improve patient outcomes[13].

AI tools also facilitate better patient engagement and compliance. Virtual health assistants powered by AI can provide patients with reminders, educational resources, and support, fostering adherence to treatment plans. This aspect of AI not only improves patient involvement in their care but also helps clinicians monitor patient progress more effectively[14].

Despite the numerous advantages AI brings to clinical decision-making, challenges remain. Issues related to data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the need for human oversight must be addressed to ensure the responsible integration of AI into healthcare. Clinicians must be trained to interpret AI-generated recommendations and maintain a critical perspective on the information provided by these systems[15].

In summary, AI assists in clinical decision-making by improving diagnostic accuracy, personalizing treatment options, providing predictive insights, and enhancing patient engagement. The successful implementation of AI technologies in healthcare has the potential to revolutionize patient care, making it more efficient, effective, and equitable. However, ongoing efforts to address ethical and regulatory challenges are essential for harnessing the full potential of AI in clinical practice[16][17][18].

2.2 Historical Context and Evolution ​

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in healthcare, particularly in clinical decision-making. Its integration into medical practice has evolved gradually, significantly enhancing the ability of clinicians to interpret vast amounts of data and improve patient outcomes. The historical context of AI in healthcare highlights a progression from traditional methods of diagnosis and treatment to sophisticated AI-driven systems that augment clinical decision-making processes.

The potential of AI in healthcare is largely attributed to its capability to analyze large volumes of clinical data, enabling predictive analytics, improved diagnostics, and personalized treatment plans. For instance, AI applications have been developed to enhance medical imaging diagnostics and pathology reports, which are crucial for accurate disease identification and treatment planning [19]. This evolution is underscored by the advent of advanced algorithms, including machine learning and deep learning, which have been instrumental in developing predictive models and diagnostic tools that can operate with high accuracy and efficiency [1].

In the realm of neurology, AI has demonstrated its promise by supporting expert-level clinical decision tools that facilitate the diagnosis and prognosis of neurological diseases. As noted by Pedersen et al. (2020), the synergy between cutting-edge AI models and high-quality clinical data can lead to significant improvements in clinical outcomes, though it is emphasized that these models are not universally applicable to all clinical data types [3]. The necessity for robust data quality and human expertise is critical in building effective AI systems that can truly support clinical decisions.

AI's role extends beyond diagnostics; it also aids in surgical decision-making. Loftus et al. (2020) highlight that AI can enhance surgical decision processes by providing real-time data analysis, which allows surgeons to make informed decisions under pressure. Traditional clinical decision-support systems often fall short due to time constraints and data management challenges. However, AI can automate these processes, enabling a more streamlined and efficient approach to surgical decision-making [7].

Moreover, AI has significant implications for specific medical fields such as assisted reproductive technologies. Letterie (2023) discusses how AI tools can optimize various aspects of reproductive health, including oocyte and embryo selection, thereby improving patient outcomes and clinical workflows [20].

Despite the promise of AI in enhancing clinical decision-making, there are inherent challenges and limitations. Issues related to algorithmic bias, the interpretability of AI models, and the necessity for ethical considerations are paramount for successful implementation [21]. The effectiveness of AI systems hinges on their ability to complement human expertise rather than replace it. For instance, the collaboration between AI and medical professionals can mitigate diagnostic errors by addressing cognitive bottlenecks in clinical settings [21].

In conclusion, AI's historical evolution in healthcare illustrates a significant shift towards data-driven decision-making, enhancing the capabilities of healthcare providers. The integration of AI into clinical practice is expected to continue evolving, with ongoing research aimed at refining these technologies and addressing the ethical and practical challenges they present. The future of AI in healthcare appears promising, as it offers innovative solutions to improve diagnostic accuracy, treatment personalization, and overall patient care.

3 AI Applications in Clinical Decision-Making ​

3.1 Diagnostic Support Systems ​

Artificial intelligence (AI) plays a transformative role in clinical decision-making, particularly in the realm of diagnostic support systems. These systems utilize advanced algorithms and machine learning techniques to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of diagnoses, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

AI assists clinicians by integrating and analyzing vast amounts of health-related data, which includes patient records, imaging data, and other relevant health information. For instance, machine learning models can identify patterns and correlations within large datasets, allowing for the development of predictive models that inform clinical decisions. These models can be trained on historical data to predict patient outcomes, thus aiding in diagnosis and treatment planning [1].

One significant application of AI in clinical decision support is its use in the management of complex conditions such as sepsis. AI-derived algorithms have demonstrated great potential in various stages of sepsis management, including early prediction, prognosis assessment, and mortality prediction. By providing real-time insights and recommendations, AI systems help clinicians make timely and informed decisions, which is critical given the high mortality associated with sepsis [4].

In the context of radiology, AI decision support systems utilize techniques such as Bayesian networks and neural networks to assist radiologists in making diagnostic decisions. These systems process large volumes of imaging data to help select appropriate radiologic procedures and formulate accurate diagnoses. For example, Bayesian networks can estimate the probability of outcomes based on extensive medical knowledge, enhancing the decision-making process in imaging [22].

Furthermore, the synergy of multi-modal data and AI technologies in medical diagnosis represents a burgeoning area of interest. By integrating diverse data types, including genetic, physiological, and imaging data, AI can provide a more comprehensive analysis of diseases. This approach not only improves diagnostic accuracy but also enables personalized treatment plans tailored to individual patient profiles [23].

Despite the promise of AI in enhancing clinical decision-making, several challenges remain. The alignment of AI algorithms with the subjective reasoning processes of clinicians is crucial. Studies have shown that while clinicians have a generally positive sentiment towards AI-assisted diagnosis, they often perceive current AI tools as not significantly enhancing their diagnostic capabilities. This misalignment suggests that further development is needed to ensure that AI systems complement rather than hinder clinical judgment [9].

In conclusion, AI serves as a powerful tool in clinical decision-making by providing diagnostic support systems that analyze complex data, predict outcomes, and assist clinicians in making informed decisions. The ongoing integration of AI into healthcare holds the potential to significantly enhance diagnostic accuracy and improve patient care, although it necessitates careful consideration of its limitations and the need for alignment with human reasoning.

3.2 Treatment Recommendation Systems ​

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized as a transformative tool in clinical decision-making, particularly in treatment recommendation systems across various medical fields. The utilization of AI encompasses the integration of sophisticated algorithms and large datasets to enhance the accuracy and efficiency of clinical decisions, ultimately aiming to improve patient outcomes.

One of the significant applications of AI in clinical decision-making is its role in managing complex conditions such as sepsis. AI has been employed to develop Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) that assist healthcare providers in predicting patient conditions and optimizing management strategies. For instance, algorithms can predict early signs of sepsis, assess prognosis, and determine optimal management pathways, thereby addressing delays in treatment that are often associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in critically ill patients [4]. A notable example is the development of the AI Clinician, which utilizes reinforcement learning to analyze vast amounts of patient data and derive optimal treatment strategies for sepsis, outperforming human clinicians in decision-making accuracy [24].

In oncology, AI's impact is particularly pronounced in the management of diseases such as advanced melanoma. AI systems can process large datasets to identify the most effective therapeutic options tailored to individual patient profiles, taking into account the heterogeneous nature of melanoma and the complexities of treatment resistance [25]. By analyzing previous treatment outcomes and patient characteristics, AI can aid oncologists in making informed decisions about therapy, thus potentially reducing the incidence of ineffective treatments [25].

Moreover, AI's capabilities extend to enhancing diagnostic accuracy, which is crucial for treatment recommendations. For example, in the context of ulcerative colitis, AI-assisted technologies are being developed to improve diagnosis through advanced endoscopic techniques and histological analysis. This advancement not only streamlines the diagnostic process but also informs subsequent treatment plans [26].

Furthermore, the integration of AI in surgical decision-making illustrates its potential to augment complex, high-stakes decisions. AI models can analyze real-time data from electronic health records, providing surgeons with actionable insights that enhance decision-making related to operative procedures and postoperative management [7].

Despite these advancements, the application of AI in clinical decision-making is not without challenges. Issues such as algorithm bias, data standardization, and the interpretability of AI models remain critical areas that require ongoing research and development [1]. The successful integration of AI into clinical practice hinges on addressing these limitations to ensure that AI systems are not only effective but also trusted by healthcare professionals and patients alike.

In summary, AI significantly enhances clinical decision-making through treatment recommendation systems by leveraging vast amounts of patient data, optimizing management strategies for complex conditions, and improving diagnostic accuracy. As AI technology continues to evolve, its role in shaping the future of clinical practice holds great promise for personalized patient care.

3.3 Predictive Analytics for Patient Outcomes ​

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool in clinical decision-making, particularly through its applications in predictive analytics for patient outcomes. The integration of AI into healthcare facilitates the analysis of vast amounts of data, enabling clinicians to make informed decisions based on predictive models that can anticipate various clinical outcomes.

One of the key areas where AI is making significant strides is in the intensive care unit (ICU). A scoping review conducted by González Garcés et al. (2025) highlights the implementation of AI models to support prognostic decisions for critically ill patients nearing the end of life. The study reviewed 28 articles published between 2015 and 2025, demonstrating that AI algorithms exhibited good performance in predicting critical outcomes such as mortality, withdrawal of life support, and clinical deterioration. However, the variability in the types of algorithms, data sources, and reported metrics posed challenges for direct comparisons between studies, indicating a need for standardized methodologies in AI applications in clinical settings [27].

In the context of chronic liver disease, D'Amico et al. (2023) emphasized the potential of machine learning in modeling advanced chronic liver conditions. They noted that AI can leverage big data—comprising diverse health-related patient information—to develop predictive models that identify the transition from mild to clinically significant portal hypertension and assess the efficacy of treatments. This capability allows for timely interventions and improved patient management, although the authors caution that several limitations, such as risk of bias and the interpretability of AI models, must be addressed for widespread clinical acceptance [1].

AI's influence extends to surgical decision-making as well. Loftus et al. (2020) discussed how AI could augment traditional surgical decision-making processes, which often rely on heuristics and individual judgment. They proposed that AI could enhance decision-making by providing real-time data analysis from electronic health records, thereby improving the accuracy of surgical interventions and postoperative management. This integration could transform surgical care by supporting decisions related to operative procedures, informed consent, and resource utilization [7].

Furthermore, AI has been recognized for its role in enhancing diagnostic capabilities across various medical specialties. Conley (2025) outlined how AI is revolutionizing diagnostic processes through predictive analytics and improved medical imaging diagnostics. Although there are limitations to AI's current applications in clinical decision-making, the potential for AI to improve diagnostic accuracy and support clinical decisions is promising [19].

Overall, AI's ability to analyze complex datasets and predict patient outcomes represents a significant advancement in clinical decision-making. By enhancing prognostic capabilities, improving diagnostic accuracy, and supporting treatment decisions, AI has the potential to transform patient care across various medical domains. However, for AI to be fully integrated into clinical practice, ongoing research, validation of models, and addressing ethical concerns related to algorithm bias and accountability are essential.

4 Benefits of AI in Clinical Decision-Making ​

4.1 Improved Diagnostic Accuracy ​

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative force in clinical decision-making, particularly in enhancing diagnostic accuracy across various medical domains. The integration of AI technologies into clinical practice provides several benefits, which can be summarized as follows:

  1. Enhanced Diagnostic Accuracy: AI significantly improves the diagnostic performance of healthcare professionals. For instance, in a study assessing the impact of AI on the diagnosis of pulmonary adenocarcinoma, it was found that AI greatly increased physicians' diagnostic accuracy regardless of time pressure. Specifically, when no time pressure was applied, AI significantly improved diagnostic sensitivity without altering specificity. Under time constraints, both sensitivity and specificity were enhanced, showcasing AI's ability to support clinicians in making more accurate diagnoses even in high-pressure environments (Li et al., 2022) [28].

  2. Support for Clinicians with Varying Self-Efficacy: The benefits of AI are particularly pronounced among physicians with lower self-efficacy. In scenarios where no time pressure was present, physicians with low self-efficacy showed marked improvements in diagnostic accuracy when aided by AI, while those with high self-efficacy did not experience significant benefits. However, under time pressure, both groups benefited equally from AI assistance, indicating that AI can help level the playing field for clinicians of varying confidence levels (Li et al., 2022) [28].

  3. Reduction of Diagnostic Errors: In emergency medicine, where rapid decision-making is crucial, AI can help mitigate diagnostic errors. The chaotic nature of emergency departments often leads to cognitive overload for clinicians, increasing the likelihood of mistakes. AI offers solutions by streamlining information gathering, enhancing clinical decision support (CDS), and providing real-time feedback, which collectively can reduce the incidence of diagnostic errors and improve patient safety (Taylor et al., 2025) [29].

  4. Improvement in Human-Computer Collaboration: AI systems have been shown to enhance diagnostic accuracy beyond the capabilities of either AI or human clinicians alone. For example, in the context of skin cancer recognition, AI-based support was found to improve diagnostic outcomes significantly, especially for less experienced clinicians who benefitted the most from AI assistance. This collaboration allows for a more robust diagnostic process, where insights from AI can inform and refine human decision-making (Tschandl et al., 2020) [30].

  5. Facilitation of Personalized Medicine: AI's ability to analyze vast datasets of medical images and patient information allows for more personalized diagnostic approaches. For instance, in liver disease management, AI can identify subtle image features that may be overlooked by human eyes, thereby enhancing the accuracy of diagnoses and enabling tailored treatment strategies (Nishida, 2024) [31].

  6. Integration of AI with Diagnostic Tools: The integration of AI with nanosensors and other diagnostic tools has led to significant advancements in clinical diagnostics. AI enhances the sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity of these tools, facilitating real-time analysis and improving overall diagnostic performance (Yin, 2025) [32].

In summary, AI serves as a powerful ally in clinical decision-making, driving improvements in diagnostic accuracy, supporting clinicians of varying expertise, and reducing diagnostic errors. The ongoing evolution of AI technologies promises to further enhance personalized medicine and optimize patient outcomes in diverse healthcare settings.

4.2 Enhanced Efficiency and Workflow ​

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become an integral component in clinical decision-making, particularly in enhancing efficiency and workflow within healthcare settings. The implementation of AI technologies in clinical environments offers a multitude of benefits that directly contribute to improved patient outcomes and operational effectiveness.

AI assists in clinical decision-making by streamlining various processes and enabling more accurate and timely interventions. For instance, in Intensive Care Units (ICUs), AI has shown significant advancements, such as the early detection of sepsis and the prediction of cardiac arrest. Predictive models have been demonstrated to reduce sepsis-related mortality by up to 20%, showcasing the potential of AI to enhance clinical outcomes through proactive management (Arabfard et al. 2025) [33].

Moreover, AI tools are designed to optimize workflow efficiency by reducing the cognitive and manual burdens on healthcare professionals. In radiology, AI applications have been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy and shorten the time to clinical action based on imaging results. These applications can accelerate imaging acquisition and improve the efficiency of various time-intensive steps in the care pathway (Gu et al. 2025) [34]. By facilitating quicker decision-making, AI not only enhances the operational workflow but also supports clinicians in delivering timely care to patients.

In addition to improving workflow, AI integration has also been linked to increased medication accuracy, with reported improvements of up to 30%, and a reduction in adverse events by 25% (Arabfard et al. 2025) [33]. Such enhancements are crucial in high-stakes environments where the rapid and accurate delivery of care is essential.

AI's role extends beyond immediate clinical applications; it is also revolutionizing clinical trials by addressing challenges related to data management and patient recruitment. AI can automate data generation and management throughout the trial lifecycle, thereby improving efficiency and reducing the time required for drug development (Chopra et al. 2023) [35]. This capability not only streamlines the research process but also ensures that clinical trials can adapt more swiftly to emerging data, ultimately leading to more effective therapies reaching patients faster.

Furthermore, the integration of AI into clinical practice promotes a more personalized approach to patient care. By linking clinical data with advanced analytics, AI can assist healthcare providers in formulating tailored treatment plans that consider individual patient characteristics and preferences (Hoskin 2025) [36]. This personalized management is essential for optimizing therapeutic outcomes and enhancing patient engagement in their own care.

In conclusion, AI significantly enhances clinical decision-making by improving efficiency and workflow across various healthcare settings. Through early detection of critical conditions, optimization of operational processes, and the facilitation of personalized care, AI demonstrates a transformative potential that can lead to better health outcomes and more effective healthcare delivery systems. However, it is crucial to address the ethical considerations and integration challenges associated with AI to fully realize its benefits in clinical practice.

4.3 Personalized Medicine Approaches ​

Artificial intelligence (AI) plays a transformative role in clinical decision-making, particularly within the realms of personalized medicine. Its applications extend across various aspects of healthcare, including diagnostics, treatment recommendations, and the optimization of therapeutic strategies.

AI enhances clinical decision-making by integrating and analyzing large datasets from health records, genetics, and immunology. This integration allows for a comprehensive understanding of individual patient profiles, which is essential for personalized medicine. For instance, AI-driven analytics enable clinicians to identify high-risk patients and predict disease activity by leveraging clinical, genomic, and immunological data [37]. Machine learning models have demonstrated significant proficiency in variant calling, pathogenicity prediction, and splicing analysis, thus improving the precision of diagnostics and therapeutic interventions [37].

Moreover, AI contributes to the optimization of treatment strategies by facilitating the development of personalized therapies tailored to the genetic makeup and specific health conditions of patients. In pediatric oncology, for example, AI applications have led to improved diagnostics and risk stratification, which enhance the effectiveness of targeted therapies [38]. The ability of AI to predict therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects further supports the selection of the most appropriate treatment plans, thereby improving patient outcomes [39].

In the context of pharmacology, AI's role in drug discovery is pivotal. It accelerates the identification of drug candidates and optimizes dosing regimens based on individual genetic profiles, which reduces adverse reactions and enhances therapeutic efficacy [40]. This personalized approach not only improves treatment outcomes but also contributes to cost reduction in healthcare by minimizing trial-and-error prescribing [40].

Furthermore, AI technologies enhance the efficiency of clinical workflows by providing decision support tools that assist healthcare providers in diagnosing diseases and developing treatment plans. These tools leverage vast datasets to identify patterns and insights that may not be readily apparent to human clinicians [14]. This capability is particularly crucial in complex cases where traditional methods may fall short.

Despite these advancements, the integration of AI into clinical practice is not without challenges. Ethical considerations, such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the need for human oversight, are paramount to ensure responsible implementation [38]. The balance between leveraging AI's capabilities and maintaining the humanistic values of care is essential for the future of personalized medicine [41].

In conclusion, AI significantly enhances clinical decision-making through its ability to process and analyze complex data, leading to personalized treatment strategies that improve patient outcomes. Its ongoing development promises to further refine these approaches, although careful consideration of ethical implications and the preservation of humanistic values in medicine remains critical.

5 Challenges and Limitations ​

5.1 Data Privacy and Security Concerns ​

Artificial intelligence (AI) plays a transformative role in clinical decision-making by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, optimizing workflows, and improving patient management. However, the integration of AI into healthcare systems is fraught with challenges and limitations, particularly concerning data privacy and security.

AI assists in clinical decision-making primarily through the analysis of vast amounts of data, including patient records, imaging studies, and real-time health monitoring data. By leveraging machine learning algorithms, AI can identify patterns and insights that may not be readily apparent to human clinicians, thereby supporting more informed decision-making. For instance, AI tools have been shown to improve diagnostic accuracy in various medical fields, including radiology and pathology, where they can assist in tumor detection and treatment planning [42].

Despite these advancements, several challenges hinder the widespread adoption of AI in clinical settings. One significant concern is the quality and representativeness of the data used to train AI systems. Issues such as inconsistent data quality, biases in algorithm development, and the potential for over-reliance on technology can undermine the effectiveness of AI tools and erode clinician trust [42].

Data privacy and security are paramount concerns in the deployment of AI in healthcare. The increasing reliance on AI necessitates the collection and analysis of sensitive patient information, which raises ethical and legal issues surrounding data protection. AI systems are often vulnerable to data breaches, unauthorized access, and privacy violations, especially when large datasets are involved [43]. The ability to anonymize patient data may be compromised, leading to risks of re-identification and potential harm to patient privacy [43].

Furthermore, the integration of AI into clinical workflows can introduce cybersecurity risks. AI systems may be susceptible to specific attacks that could compromise patient data integrity or lead to erroneous clinical decisions. This necessitates robust security measures and governance frameworks to ensure the safe use of AI technologies in healthcare [44].

In summary, while AI has the potential to significantly enhance clinical decision-making, its implementation is challenged by data privacy and security concerns, necessitating a careful and responsible approach to its integration into healthcare systems. Addressing these challenges requires collaboration among stakeholders, including regulators, healthcare providers, and AI developers, to establish clear guidelines and promote trustworthy AI systems [45].

5.2 Algorithmic Bias and Fairness ​

Artificial intelligence (AI) plays a transformative role in clinical decision-making by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, treatment personalization, and patient outcome predictions. Through advanced technologies such as machine learning, neural networks, and natural language processing, AI applications significantly improve healthcare efficiency across various specialties, including cardiology, ophthalmology, and emergency medicine [46]. However, the integration of AI into clinical practice is fraught with challenges and limitations, particularly concerning algorithmic bias and fairness.

One of the primary challenges associated with AI in healthcare is algorithmic bias, which can arise from the datasets used to train AI models. Many existing biomedical datasets are not representative of the entire population, leading to AI systems that may reinforce existing biases. For instance, if certain demographic groups are underrepresented in the training data, the AI algorithms may perform poorly for those groups, potentially leading to misdiagnoses or inadequate treatment recommendations [47].

Algorithmic bias can have severe consequences in clinical settings, including exacerbating health disparities. AI systems can inadvertently perpetuate biases related to age, gender, race, and socioeconomic status, which can result in unequal access to treatment and diagnostic inaccuracies across different demographic groups [48]. The ethical implications of these biases are profound, as they challenge the principles of justice and fairness in healthcare delivery. This is particularly concerning as AI technologies are increasingly relied upon to support critical clinical decisions [49].

To address these issues, it is essential to implement strategies that promote fairness in AI applications. One recommended approach is the use of diverse and representative datasets during the training phase to ensure that AI systems can generalize well across different populations [46]. Furthermore, employing fairness-aware algorithms and conducting algorithm audits can help identify and mitigate biases in AI systems [49].

Transparency in AI model development and decision-making processes is also crucial. By making the algorithms more interpretable, healthcare professionals can better understand how decisions are made, which can enhance trust and accountability in AI applications [48]. Moreover, the involvement of multidisciplinary teams, including clinicians, ethicists, and AI researchers, is vital for developing responsible and equitable AI solutions in healthcare [50].

In summary, while AI holds significant potential to assist in clinical decision-making, the challenges posed by algorithmic bias and fairness must be carefully managed. Addressing these issues through diverse data representation, transparency, and interdisciplinary collaboration will be essential to ensure that AI technologies serve all populations equitably and effectively in healthcare settings.

5.3 Integration into Clinical Practice ​

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized for its transformative potential in clinical decision-making, enhancing various aspects of patient care, diagnostics, and treatment strategies. However, its integration into clinical practice faces significant challenges and limitations that must be addressed to realize its full benefits.

AI assists in clinical decision-making primarily through its ability to analyze vast amounts of data quickly and accurately. Tools derived from machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), and natural language processing (NLP) algorithms can process complex medical datasets, improving diagnostic precision and treatment personalization. For instance, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have significantly enhanced the accuracy of medical imaging diagnoses, while NLP algorithms facilitate the extraction of insights from unstructured data, such as electronic health records (EHRs) [51]. This capability enables clinicians to make more informed decisions based on real-time, data-driven insights.

Despite these advancements, the integration of AI into clinical workflows encounters numerous challenges. One major issue is the "black-box" nature of many AI models, which often lacks transparency in how decisions are made. This opacity can lead to clinician mistrust and reluctance to rely on AI-driven recommendations [42]. Moreover, algorithmic bias remains a critical concern, as AI systems trained on non-representative datasets may perpetuate existing disparities in healthcare delivery [52]. The need for explainable AI (XAI) is emphasized as a potential solution to enhance interpretability and build trust among healthcare professionals [51].

Another significant barrier to AI integration is the inconsistency in data quality and availability. Many AI applications depend on high-quality, well-annotated datasets for training and validation. However, issues such as selection bias, missing data, and confounding factors complicate the implementation of AI systems [53]. Additionally, the evolving landscape of regulations and ethical considerations can hinder the development and deployment of AI tools, as healthcare organizations must navigate compliance while ensuring patient safety [54].

Furthermore, the transition from proof-of-concept to practical application is often fraught with difficulties. Successful AI initiatives require multidisciplinary collaboration among stakeholders, including clinicians, data scientists, and regulatory bodies [55]. However, communication gaps and a lack of shared vision can impede progress. Healthcare professionals often express concerns regarding the potential for AI to replace traditional clinical roles, which may exacerbate resistance to its adoption [56].

In summary, while AI holds great promise for enhancing clinical decision-making through improved diagnostics and personalized treatment strategies, its integration into clinical practice is challenged by issues of transparency, data quality, algorithmic bias, and regulatory complexities. Addressing these limitations through enhanced collaboration, better data management, and the development of explainable AI frameworks will be essential for achieving meaningful advancements in healthcare delivery.

6 Future Directions and Ethical Considerations ​

6.1 Regulatory Frameworks for AI in Healthcare ​

Artificial Intelligence (AI) plays a transformative role in clinical decision-making, enhancing the capabilities of healthcare professionals and streamlining various clinical processes. AI-powered tools are increasingly capable of matching or exceeding specialist-level performance across multiple domains, thus democratizing healthcare access. These systems can analyze vast datasets to uncover complex relationships and generate new evidence-based knowledge, which can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes[57].

AI applications in clinical settings include advanced diagnostic support systems that assist in identifying diseases through medical imaging analysis and other data-driven methodologies. The integration of AI into clinical workflows not only optimizes resource allocation but also aims to reduce disparities in care delivery across different demographic and socioeconomic groups[57].

Despite the promising benefits of AI in healthcare, several ethical and regulatory challenges must be addressed to ensure its responsible implementation. Key ethical concerns include issues of bias, transparency, accountability, and patient autonomy. The potential for AI systems to perpetuate or even exacerbate existing biases in healthcare delivery is particularly alarming. For instance, if the training datasets for AI models are not representative of diverse populations, the resulting algorithms may yield biased outcomes that adversely affect certain groups[58].

Moreover, the opaque nature of many AI systems raises questions about the accountability of decisions made by these technologies. There is a pressing need for robust governance frameworks that can guide the ethical deployment of AI in clinical practice. Such frameworks should encompass regulations that ensure data privacy, algorithmic fairness, and system transparency, thereby fostering trust among healthcare providers and patients alike[58].

The regulatory landscape surrounding AI in healthcare is evolving, with an emphasis on establishing clear guidelines that address the ethical implications of AI technologies. Current regulations aim to safeguard patient data while facilitating the innovation of AI applications in healthcare. This involves navigating complex legal frameworks that govern data usage, informed consent, and the implications of AI-driven clinical decisions[59].

In summary, while AI holds significant promise for enhancing clinical decision-making and improving patient care, its integration into healthcare systems must be approached with caution. The establishment of ethical guidelines and regulatory frameworks is crucial to mitigate risks associated with bias and ensure that AI technologies are deployed in a manner that respects patient rights and promotes equitable healthcare outcomes[60][61]. Future research and development should focus on addressing these challenges, fostering an environment where AI can be effectively utilized to benefit all patients while upholding ethical standards and regulatory compliance.

6.2 Ethical Implications of AI in Patient Care ​

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has emerged as a significant tool in enhancing clinical decision-making across various medical domains. Its application promises to improve the accuracy of predictions and facilitate patient autonomy by allowing individuals to receive treatments that align with their preferences. AI can enhance beneficence by providing reliable information that supports surrogate decision-making, thereby potentially leading to better patient outcomes (Benzinger et al. 2023) [62].

However, the integration of AI into clinical practice raises several ethical implications. One primary concern is that reducing ethical decision-making to statistical correlations may inadvertently limit patient autonomy. Critics argue that AI lacks the human qualities necessary for replicating the nuanced process of ethical deliberation, which is essential in clinical settings (Benzinger et al. 2023) [62]. Additionally, the risk of perpetuating existing biases through AI systems poses a significant ethical challenge, as these biases can affect the fairness and justice of medical decisions (Montalbano 2025) [59].

AI's role in clinical decision-making also intersects with issues of accountability and safety. Current frameworks for accountability in healthcare may not adequately address the moral implications of decisions made by AI systems. The traditional models of assigning blame and ensuring safety may need to be revised, as human clinicians may have limited control and understanding of AI decision-making processes (Habli et al. 2020) [63]. The complexities introduced by AI necessitate a dynamic model of assurance that considers safety as an ongoing process rather than a one-time assessment during the design phase (Habli et al. 2020) [63].

Moreover, the use of AI in clinical settings could impact informed consent practices. As AI tools can provide granular comparisons of physician performance, the traditional "comparative abilities" exception to informed consent may be challenged. This shift could empower patients to make more informed decisions regarding their care, but it also risks exacerbating healthcare disparities, as wealthier patients may gain access to more skilled providers through these insights (Appel 2025) [64].

In conclusion, while AI has the potential to significantly enhance clinical decision-making by improving accuracy and supporting patient autonomy, its implementation must be approached with caution. Ethical considerations surrounding autonomy, accountability, bias, and informed consent must be thoroughly addressed to ensure that AI contributes positively to patient care without compromising ethical standards (Benzinger et al. 2023; Montalbano 2025; Habli et al. 2020) [59][62][63].

6.3 The Role of Clinicians in an AI-Enhanced Environment ​

Artificial intelligence (AI) plays a transformative role in clinical decision-making by leveraging large volumes of data to improve diagnostic accuracy and treatment strategies. The integration of AI in healthcare is motivated by the need to address challenges such as escalating costs, limited access to care, and the demand for personalized treatment options. AI empowers clinicians by providing predictive analytics, enhancing medical imaging diagnostics, and refining pathology reports, which can significantly improve patient outcomes across various medical specialties [19].

AI assists clinicians by analyzing vast datasets to identify patterns that may not be immediately apparent to human practitioners. This capability allows for more accurate diagnoses and informed decision-making. For instance, AI can assist in interpreting complex medical images, thus improving the reliability of diagnostics [19]. Moreover, AI-powered tools can optimize hospital operations and management, thereby streamlining workflows and reducing administrative burdens, which in turn allows clinicians to focus more on patient care [65].

However, the deployment of AI in clinical settings raises several ethical considerations. The opaque nature of AI algorithms can lead to challenges in accountability and transparency. There is a potential for bias in AI systems, which can affect clinical decisions and patient outcomes, particularly if the training data is not representative of the diverse patient population [59]. Additionally, the integration of AI into healthcare must prioritize data privacy and the ethical use of patient information [65].

As the role of AI in clinical environments expands, it is crucial for clinicians to maintain a central role in the decision-making process. This human oversight ensures that AI technologies serve human ends, respect personal identity, and promote meaningful human interaction [66]. The future of AI in healthcare hinges on creating a collaborative environment where AI tools augment rather than replace the clinician's expertise, ultimately enhancing the patient-physician relationship rather than undermining it [66].

In summary, AI significantly enhances clinical decision-making through improved data analysis and operational efficiencies, but its integration must be carefully managed to address ethical challenges and maintain the essential human elements of medical practice.

7 Conclusion ​

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical decision-making represents a significant advancement in healthcare, offering numerous benefits including improved diagnostic accuracy, personalized treatment options, and enhanced operational efficiency. Key findings indicate that AI technologies, such as machine learning and natural language processing, can analyze vast datasets to identify patterns that inform clinical decisions, thereby transforming patient care. However, the current landscape reveals substantial challenges, particularly concerning data privacy, algorithmic bias, and the need for effective integration into existing clinical workflows. These challenges underscore the importance of developing robust regulatory frameworks and ethical guidelines to govern AI applications in healthcare. Future research should focus on addressing these issues while exploring innovative solutions that leverage AI to further enhance patient outcomes. As healthcare continues to evolve, the role of clinicians in an AI-enhanced environment will remain critical, ensuring that AI serves as a tool to augment human expertise rather than replace it, ultimately fostering a collaborative approach to patient care.

References ​

  • [1] Gennaro D'Amico;Agostino Colli;Giuseppe Malizia;Giovanni Casazza. The potential role of machine learning in modelling advanced chronic liver disease.. Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver(IF=3.8). 2023. PMID:36586769. DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.12.002.
  • [2] Clara Balsano;Patrizia Burra;Christophe Duvoux;Anna Alisi;Fabio Piscaglia;Alessio Gerussi; . Artificial Intelligence and liver: Opportunities and barriers.. Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver(IF=3.8). 2023. PMID:37718227. DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.08.048.
  • [3] Mangor Pedersen;Karin Verspoor;Mark Jenkinson;Meng Law;David F Abbott;Graeme D Jackson. Artificial intelligence for clinical decision support in neurology.. Brain communications(IF=4.5). 2020. PMID:33134913. DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa096.
  • [4] Miao Wu;Xianjin Du;Raymond Gu;Jie Wei. Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision Support in Sepsis.. Frontiers in medicine(IF=3.0). 2021. PMID:34055839. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.665464.
  • [5] Albert Boonstra;Mente Laven. Influence of artificial intelligence on the work design of emergency department clinicians a systematic literature review.. BMC health services research(IF=3.0). 2022. PMID:35585603. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08070-7.
  • [6] Nikola Biller-Andorno;Andrea Ferrario;Susanne Joebges;Tanja Krones;Federico Massini;Phyllis Barth;Georgios Arampatzis;Michael Krauthammer. AI support for ethical decision-making around resuscitation: proceed with care.. Journal of medical ethics(IF=3.4). 2022. PMID:33687916. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2020-106786.
  • [7] Tyler J Loftus;Patrick J Tighe;Amanda C Filiberto;Philip A Efron;Scott C Brakenridge;Alicia M Mohr;Parisa Rashidi;Gilbert R Upchurch;Azra Bihorac. Artificial Intelligence and Surgical Decision-making.. JAMA surgery(IF=14.9). 2020. PMID:31825465. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.4917.
  • [8] Matthias Braun;Patrik Hummel;Susanne Beck;Peter Dabrock. Primer on an ethics of AI-based decision support systems in the clinic.. Journal of medical ethics(IF=3.4). 2020. PMID:32245804. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105860.
  • [9] Hyeyoung Hah;Deana Shevit Goldin. How Clinicians Perceive Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Technologies in Diagnostic Decision Making: Mixed Methods Approach.. Journal of medical Internet research(IF=6.0). 2021. PMID:34924356. DOI: 10.2196/33540.
  • [10] Georg Langs. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging is a tool for clinical routine and scientific discovery.. Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism(IF=4.4). 2024. PMID:38007360. DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152321.
  • [11] Debanjan Mukherjee;Debajyoti Roy;Shubham Thakur. Transforming Cancer Care: The Impact of AI-driven Strategies.. Current cancer drug targets(IF=3.5). 2025. PMID:38988158. DOI: 10.2174/0115680096323564240703102748.
  • [12] Claudio Carini;Attila A Seyhan. Tribulations and future opportunities for artificial intelligence in precision medicine.. Journal of translational medicine(IF=7.5). 2024. PMID:38702711. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-024-05067-0.
  • [13] Yosri A Fahim;Ibrahim W Hasani;Samer Kabba;Waleed Mahmoud Ragab. Artificial intelligence in healthcare and medicine: clinical applications, therapeutic advances, and future perspectives.. European journal of medical research(IF=3.4). 2025. PMID:40988064. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-025-03196-w.
  • [14] Shuroug A Alowais;Sahar S Alghamdi;Nada Alsuhebany;Tariq Alqahtani;Abdulrahman I Alshaya;Sumaya N Almohareb;Atheer Aldairem;Mohammed Alrashed;Khalid Bin Saleh;Hisham A Badreldin;Majed S Al Yami;Shmeylan Al Harbi;Abdulkareem M Albekairy. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice.. BMC medical education(IF=3.2). 2023. PMID:37740191. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z.
  • [15] Alessia Romagnoli;Francesco Ferrara;Roberto Langella;Andrea Zovi. Healthcare Systems and Artificial Intelligence: Focus on Challenges and the International Regulatory Framework.. Pharmaceutical research(IF=4.3). 2024. PMID:38443632. DOI: 10.1007/s11095-024-03685-3.
  • [16] Diana Gina Poalelungi;Carmina Liana Musat;Ana Fulga;Marius Neagu;Anca Iulia Neagu;Alin Ionut Piraianu;Iuliu Fulga. Advancing Patient Care: How Artificial Intelligence Is Transforming Healthcare.. Journal of personalized medicine(IF=3.0). 2023. PMID:37623465. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13081214.
  • [17] Ahmed Al Kuwaiti;Khalid Nazer;Abdullah Al-Reedy;Shaher Al-Shehri;Afnan Al-Muhanna;Arun Vijay Subbarayalu;Dhoha Al Muhanna;Fahad A Al-Muhanna. A Review of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare.. Journal of personalized medicine(IF=3.0). 2023. PMID:37373940. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13060951.
  • [18] Muhammad Saqib;Muhammad Iftikhar;Fnu Neha;Fnu Karishma;Hassan Mumtaz. Artificial intelligence in critical illness and its impact on patient care: a comprehensive review.. Frontiers in medicine(IF=3.0). 2023. PMID:37153088. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1176192.
  • [19] Nicholas Conley. Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosis and Clinical Decision-Making.. Primary care(IF=4.3). 2025. PMID:41110911. DOI: 10.1016/j.pop.2025.07.004.
  • [20] Gerard Letterie. Artificial intelligence and assisted reproductive technologies: 2023. Ready for prime time? Or not.. Fertility and sterility(IF=7.0). 2023. PMID:37210064. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.05.146.
  • [21] Luca Introzzi;Joshua Zonca;Federico Cabitza;Paolo Cherubini;Carlo Reverberi. Enhancing human-AI collaboration: The case of colonoscopy.. Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver(IF=3.8). 2024. PMID:37940501. DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2023.10.018.
  • [22] C E Kahn. Artificial intelligence in radiology: decision support systems.. Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc(IF=5.5). 1994. PMID:7938772. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.14.4.7938772.
  • [23] Xi Xu;Jianqiang Li;Zhichao Zhu;Linna Zhao;Huina Wang;Changwei Song;Yining Chen;Qing Zhao;Jijiang Yang;Yan Pei. A Comprehensive Review on Synergy of Multi-Modal Data and AI Technologies in Medical Diagnosis.. Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)(IF=3.7). 2024. PMID:38534493. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11030219.
  • [24] Matthieu Komorowski;Leo A Celi;Omar Badawi;Anthony C Gordon;A Aldo Faisal. The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care.. Nature medicine(IF=50.0). 2018. PMID:30349085. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0213-5.
  • [25] Antonino Guerrisi;Italia Falcone;Fabio Valenti;Marco Rao;Enzo Gallo;Sara Ungania;Maria Teresa Maccallini;Maurizio Fanciulli;Pasquale Frascione;Aldo Morrone;Mauro Caterino. Artificial Intelligence and Advanced Melanoma: Treatment Management Implications.. Cells(IF=5.2). 2022. PMID:36552729. DOI: 10.3390/cells11243965.
  • [26] Petar Uchikov;Usman Khalid;Nikola Vankov;Maria Kraeva;Krasimir Kraev;Bozhidar Hristov;Milena Sandeva;Snezhanka Dragusheva;Dzhevdet Chakarov;Petko Petrov;Bistra Dobreva-Yatseva;Ivan Novakov. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis.. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)(IF=3.3). 2024. PMID:38786302. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14101004.
  • [27] Mariana González Garcés;Juanita Valencia García;Jerónimo Cárdenas Montoya;Camilo Jiménez Triana;Erwin Hernando Hernández Rincón. Artificial intelligence-based models for clinical prognosis at the end of life in the ICU.. International journal of medical informatics(IF=4.1). 2026. PMID:41124938. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2025.106156.
  • [28] Jiaoyang Li;Lingxiao Zhou;Yi Zhan;Haifeng Xu;Cheng Zhang;Fei Shan;Lei Liu. How does the artificial intelligence-based image-assisted technique help physicians in diagnosis of pulmonary adenocarcinoma? A randomized controlled experiment of multicenter physicians in China.. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA(IF=4.6). 2022. PMID:36228127. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocac179.
  • [29] R Andrew Taylor;Rohit B Sangal;Moira E Smith;Adrian D Haimovich;Adam Rodman;Mark S Iscoe;Suresh K Pavuluri;Christian Rose;Alexander T Janke;Donald S Wright;Vimig Socrates;Arwen Declan. Leveraging artificial intelligence to reduce diagnostic errors in emergency medicine: Challenges, opportunities, and future directions.. Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine(IF=3.2). 2025. PMID:39676165. DOI: 10.1111/acem.15066.
  • [30] Philipp Tschandl;Christoph Rinner;Zoe Apalla;Giuseppe Argenziano;Noel Codella;Allan Halpern;Monika Janda;Aimilios Lallas;Caterina Longo;Josep Malvehy;John Paoli;Susana Puig;Cliff Rosendahl;H Peter Soyer;Iris Zalaudek;Harald Kittler. Human-computer collaboration for skin cancer recognition.. Nature medicine(IF=50.0). 2020. PMID:32572267. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-0942-0.
  • [31] Naoshi Nishida. Advancements in Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Imaging Diagnostics for the Management of Liver Disease-Applications and Challenges in Personalized Care.. Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)(IF=3.7). 2024. PMID:39768061. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11121243.
  • [32] Shuo Yin. Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Nanosensors for Clinical Diagnostics: Current Advances and Future Prospects.. Biosensors(IF=5.6). 2025. PMID:41149307. DOI: 10.3390/bios15100656.
  • [33] Masoud Arabfard;Alvin D Jeffery;SeyedTayeb Moradian;Hong-Gu He;Vinciya Pandian;Amir Vahedian-Azimi. The Ideal Human Care in Green ICU: An integrated AI framework for future ICU care.. Intensive & critical care nursing(IF=4.7). 2025. PMID:40897580. DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2025.104213.
  • [34] Zehui Gu;Siddhant Dogra;Mutita Siriruchatanon;Jerard Kneifati-Hayek;Stella K Kang. Radiology Workflow Assistance With Artificial Intelligence: Establishing the Link to Outcomes.. Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR(IF=5.1). 2025. PMID:41106573. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2025.10.018.
  • [35] Hitesh Chopra; Annu;Dong K Shin;Kavita Munjal; Priyanka;Kuldeep Dhama;Talha B Emran. Revolutionizing clinical trials: the role of AI in accelerating medical breakthroughs.. International journal of surgery (London, England)(IF=10.1). 2023. PMID:38259001. DOI: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000705.
  • [36] P J Hoskin. The Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Cancer Care.. Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))(IF=3.0). 2025. PMID:39368900. DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2024.09.003.
  • [37] Yi-Ming Chen;Tzu-Hung Hsiao;Ching-Heng Lin;Yang C Fann. Unlocking precision medicine: clinical applications of integrating health records, genetics, and immunology through artificial intelligence.. Journal of biomedical science(IF=12.1). 2025. PMID:39915780. DOI: 10.1186/s12929-024-01110-w.
  • [38] Archana Reddy Bongurala;Dhaval Save;Ankit Virmani. Progressive role of artificial intelligence in treatment decision-making in the field of medical oncology.. Frontiers in medicine(IF=3.0). 2025. PMID:40018354. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1533910.
  • [39] Francesco Costa;Juan Jose Gomez Doblas;Arancha Díaz Expósito;Marianna Adamo;Fabrizio D'Ascenzo;Lukasz Kołtowski;Luca Saba;Guiomar Mendieta;Felice Gragnano;Paolo Calabrò;Lina Badimon;Borja Ibañez;Roxana Mehran;Dominick J Angiolillo;Thomas Lüscher;Davide Capodanno. Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy: applications and perspectives.. European heart journal(IF=35.6). 2025. PMID:40662528. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf474.
  • [40] Fazil Ahmad. Optimizing Treatment: The Role of Pharmacology, Genomics, and AI in Improving Patient Outcomes.. Drug development research(IF=4.2). 2025. PMID:40285487. DOI: 10.1002/ddr.70093.
  • [41] Konstantinos Dean Boudoulas;Konstantinos Marmagkiolis;Filippos Triposkiadis;Harisios Boudoulas. Humanistic values of the physician in the era of artificial intelligence.. Hellenic journal of cardiology : HJC = Hellenike kardiologike epitheorese(IF=3.0). 2025. PMID:40345621. DOI: 10.1016/j.hjc.2025.04.005.
  • [42] Karthik N Rao;Veronica Fernandez-Alvarez;Orlando Guntinas-Lichius;M P Sreeram;Remco de Bree;Luiz P Kowalski;Arlene Forastiere;Pia Pace-Asciak;Juan P Rodrigo;Nabil F Saba;Ohad Ronen;Ewa Florek;Gregory W Randolph;Alvaro Sanabria;Jan B Vermorken;Ehab Y Hanna;Alfio Ferlito. The Limitations of Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Oncology.. Advances in therapy(IF=4.0). 2025. PMID:40299277. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-025-03198-4.
  • [43] Blake Murdoch. Privacy and artificial intelligence: challenges for protecting health information in a new era.. BMC medical ethics(IF=3.1). 2021. PMID:34525993. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-021-00687-3.
  • [44] Yueye Wang;Chi Liu;Keyao Zhou;Tianqing Zhu;Xiaotong Han. Towards regulatory generative AI in ophthalmology healthcare: a security and privacy perspective.. The British journal of ophthalmology(IF=3.5). 2024. PMID:38834290. DOI: 10.1136/bjo-2024-325167.
  • [45] Maria Cristina Savastano;Clara Rizzo;Claudia Fossataro;Daniela Bacherini;Fabrizio Giansanti;Alfonso Savastano;Giovanni Arcuri;Stanislao Rizzo;Francesco Faraldi. Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: Progress, challenges, and ethical implications.. Progress in retinal and eye research(IF=14.7). 2025. PMID:40473198. DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2025.101374.
  • [46] Sribala Vidyadhari Chinta;Zichong Wang;Avash Palikhe;Xingyu Zhang;Ayesha Kashif;Monique Antoinette Smith;Jun Liu;Wenbin Zhang. AI-driven healthcare: Fairness in AI healthcare: A survey.. PLOS digital health(IF=7.7). 2025. PMID:40392801. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000864.
  • [47] Natalia Norori;Qiyang Hu;Florence Marcelle Aellen;Francesca Dalia Faraci;Athina Tzovara. Addressing bias in big data and AI for health care: A call for open science.. Patterns (New York, N.Y.)(IF=7.4). 2021. PMID:34693373. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100347.
  • [48] Ellison B Weiner;Irene Dankwa-Mullan;William A Nelson;Saeed Hassanpour. Ethical challenges and evolving strategies in the integration of artificial intelligence into clinical practice.. PLOS digital health(IF=7.7). 2025. PMID:40198594. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000810.
  • [49] Daiju Ueda;Taichi Kakinuma;Shohei Fujita;Koji Kamagata;Yasutaka Fushimi;Rintaro Ito;Yusuke Matsui;Taiki Nozaki;Takeshi Nakaura;Noriyuki Fujima;Fuminari Tatsugami;Masahiro Yanagawa;Kenji Hirata;Akira Yamada;Takahiro Tsuboyama;Mariko Kawamura;Tomoyuki Fujioka;Shinji Naganawa. Fairness of artificial intelligence in healthcare: review and recommendations.. Japanese journal of radiology(IF=4.1). 2024. PMID:37540463. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-023-01474-3.
  • [50] Mingxuan Liu;Yilin Ning;Salinelat Teixayavong;Mayli Mertens;Jie Xu;Daniel Shu Wei Ting;Lionel Tim-Ee Cheng;Jasmine Chiat Ling Ong;Zhen Ling Teo;Ting Fang Tan;Narrendar RaviChandran;Fei Wang;Leo Anthony Celi;Marcus Eng Hock Ong;Nan Liu. A translational perspective towards clinical AI fairness.. NPJ digital medicine(IF=15.1). 2023. PMID:37709945. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-023-00918-4.
  • [51] Prasanna Sakthi Aravazhi;Praveen Gunasekaran;Neo Zhong Yi Benjamin;Andy Thai;Kiran Kishor Chandrasekar;Nikhil Deep Kolanu;Priyadarshi Prajjwal;Yogesh Tekuru;Lissette Villacreses Brito;Pugazhendi Inban. The integration of artificial intelligence into clinical medicine: Trends, challenges, and future directions.. Disease-a-month : DM(IF=4.3). 2025. PMID:40140300. DOI: 10.1016/j.disamonth.2025.101882.
  • [52] He Xu;Yueqing Wang;Yangqin Xun;Ruitai Shao;Yang Jiao. Artificial intelligence for clinical reasoning: the reliability challenge and path to evidence-based practice.. QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians(IF=6.4). 2025. PMID:40489895. DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcaf114.
  • [53] Jenna Wiens;Kayte Spector-Bagdady;Bhramar Mukherjee. Toward Realizing the Promise of AI in Precision Health Across the Spectrum of Care.. Annual review of genomics and human genetics(IF=7.9). 2024. PMID:38724019. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-010323-010230.
  • [54] Victoria E Kusztos;Douglas A Simonetto. Challenges and Future Perspectives for Artificial Intelligence in Hepatology: Breaking Barriers for Better Care.. Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology(IF=3.2). 2025. PMID:40475117. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2025.102579.
  • [55] Jobbe P L Leenen;Paul Hiemstra;Martine M Ten Hoeve;Anouk C J Jansen;Joris D van Dijk;Brian Vendel;Guido Versteeg;Gido A Hakvoort;Marike Hettinga. Exploring the complex nature of implementation of Artificial intelligence in clinical practice: an interview study with healthcare professionals, researchers and Policy and Governance Experts.. PLOS digital health(IF=7.7). 2025. PMID:40333664. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000847.
  • [56] Zoe Hu;Ricky Hu;Olivia Yau;Minnie Teng;Patrick Wang;Grace Hu;Rohit Singla. Tempering Expectations on the Medical Artificial Intelligence Revolution: The Medical Trainee Viewpoint.. JMIR medical informatics(IF=3.8). 2022. PMID:35969464. DOI: 10.2196/34304.
  • [57] Debesh Jha;Gorkem Durak;Vanshali Sharma;Elif Keles;Vedat Cicek;Zheyuan Zhang;Abhishek Srivastava;Ashish Rauniyar;Desta Haileselassie Hagos;Nikhil Kumar Tomar;Frank H Miller;Ahmet Topcu;Anis Yazidi;Jan Erik Håkegård;Ulas Bagci. A Conceptual Framework for Applying Ethical Principles of AI to Medical Practice.. Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)(IF=3.7). 2025. PMID:40001699. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering12020180.
  • [58] Ciro Mennella;Umberto Maniscalco;Giuseppe De Pietro;Massimo Esposito. Ethical and regulatory challenges of AI technologies in healthcare: A narrative review.. Heliyon(IF=3.6). 2024. PMID:38384518. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26297.
  • [59] Palmer Montalbano. Ethical and Legal Considerations of Medical Artificial Intelligence.. Primary care(IF=4.3). 2025. PMID:41110915. DOI: 10.1016/j.pop.2025.07.009.
  • [60] Elizabeth A Johnson;Katherine M Dudding;Jane M Carrington. When to err is inhuman: An examination of the influence of artificial intelligence-driven nursing care on patient safety.. Nursing inquiry(IF=3.0). 2024. PMID:37459179. DOI: 10.1111/nin.12583.
  • [61] Riccardo Saccà;Rachele Turrini;Francesco Ausania;Stefania Turrina;Domenico De Leo. The ménage à trois of healthcare: the actors in after-AI era under patient consent.. Frontiers in medicine(IF=3.0). 2023. PMID:38269319. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1329087.
  • [62] Lasse Benzinger;Frank Ursin;Wolf-Tilo Balke;Tim Kacprowski;Sabine Salloch. Should Artificial Intelligence be used to support clinical ethical decision-making? A systematic review of reasons.. BMC medical ethics(IF=3.1). 2023. PMID:37415172. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-023-00929-6.
  • [63] Ibrahim Habli;Tom Lawton;Zoe Porter. Artificial intelligence in health care: accountability and safety.. Bulletin of the World Health Organization(IF=5.7). 2020. PMID:32284648. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.19.237487.
  • [64] Jacob M Appel. Physician assessment, comparative abilities and artificial intelligence: implications for informed consent.. Journal of medical ethics(IF=3.4). 2025. PMID:40074325. DOI: 10.1136/jme-2024-110689.
  • [65] Shiva Maleki Varnosfaderani;Mohamad Forouzanfar. The Role of AI in Hospitals and Clinics: Transforming Healthcare in the 21st Century.. Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)(IF=3.7). 2024. PMID:38671759. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11040337.
  • [66] Fabrice Jotterand;Clara Bosco. Keeping the "Human in the Loop" in the Age of Artificial Intelligence : Accompanying Commentary for "Correcting the Brain?" by Rainey and Erden.. Science and engineering ethics(IF=3.0). 2020. PMID:32643058. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-020-00241-1.

MaltSci Intelligent Research Services ​

Search for more papers on MaltSci.com ​

Artificial Intelligence · Clinical Decision Making · Diagnostic Support Systems · Treatment Recommendation Systems · Data Privacy

© 2025 MaltSci