Skip to content

Efficiency of CAR-T Therapy for Treatment of Solid Tumor in Clinical Trials: A Meta-Analysis.

Literature Information

DOI10.1155/2019/3425291
PMID30886654
JournalDisease markers
JCR QuartileQ2
Publication Year2019
Times Cited66
KeywordsCAR-T cell therapy, solid tumors, clinical trials, meta-analysis, treatment efficacy
Literature TypeJournal Article, Meta-Analysis
ISSN0278-0240
Pages3425291
Issue2019()
AuthorsBin Hou, Yao Tang, Wenhan Li, Qingnuo Zeng, Dongmin Chang

TL;DR

This meta-analysis of 22 studies involving 262 patients assesses the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy in solid tumors, revealing an overall response rate of only 9%, with neuroblastoma showing the best outcomes while gastrointestinal cancers exhibited minimal response. Despite the limited effectiveness observed, the study highlights potential for future improvements in CAR-T therapy through structural modifications, suggesting ongoing optimism for its application in solid tumors.

Search for more papers on MaltSci.com

CAR-T cell therapy · solid tumors · clinical trials · meta-analysis · treatment efficacy

Abstract

BACKGROUND Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has achieved unprecedented success among hematologic tumors, but its role in treating solid tumors is still unclear.

METHODS A comprehensive search of electronic databases up to June 1, 2018, was carried out by two independent reviewers. We included studies which focused on the association between CAR-T cell therapy and patient response rate and survival time in solid tumors.

RESULTS 22 studies with 262 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The overall pooled response rate of CAR-T cell therapy was 9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 4-16%). Subgroup analysis (analyses) demonstrated that CAR-T therapy could perform its best therapeutic effect on neuroblastoma, while barely works among gastrointestinal malignancies. Moreover, the treatment efficacy was not significantly impacted by different treatment strategies (lymphodepletion before T cell infusion, transfection method, cell culture duration, persistence of CAR-T cells, transfection efficacy, total cell dose, and administration of IL-2). Only T cell culture duration was associated with better clinical prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS Although CAR-T cell therapy did not have satisfactory responses in solid tumors, researchers were still holding an optimistic attitude towards its future efficacy with more modifications of its structure.

MaltSci.com AI Research Service

Intelligent ReadingAnswer any question about the paper and explain complex charts and formulas
Locate StatementsFind traces of a specific claim within the paper
Add to KBasePerform data extraction, report drafting, and advanced knowledge mining

Primary Questions Addressed

  1. What modifications to CAR-T cell therapy could enhance its efficacy in treating solid tumors?
  2. How does the response rate of CAR-T therapy in solid tumors compare to that in hematologic tumors?
  3. What are the potential mechanisms behind the limited effectiveness of CAR-T therapy in gastrointestinal malignancies?
  4. Are there specific patient characteristics that could predict a better response to CAR-T therapy in solid tumors?
  5. What future clinical trials are planned to explore the efficacy of CAR-T therapy in solid tumors, and what are their objectives?

Key Findings

Background and Objective

Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy has shown remarkable success in treating hematologic malignancies, but its effectiveness in solid tumors remains unclear. This study aims to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the response rates and survival outcomes associated with CAR-T therapy in patients with solid tumors.

Main Methods/Materials/Experimental Design

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases up to June 1, 2018. The selection criteria included clinical studies focusing on CAR-T therapy's impact on patient response rates and survival in solid tumors. A total of 22 studies involving 262 patients were included in the meta-analysis.

The data extraction process involved collecting information on patient demographics, tumor types, treatment strategies, and clinical outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using R software, with a focus on pooled response rates and survival data.

Mermaid diagram

Key Results and Findings

  • The overall pooled response rate for CAR-T therapy in solid tumors was found to be 9% (95% CI: 4-16%).
  • Subgroup analysis indicated that neuroblastoma had the highest therapeutic response, while gastrointestinal tumors showed minimal effectiveness.
  • The median overall survival (OS) time for patients receiving CAR-T therapy was 576 days, with one-year and three-year OS rates of 64.1% and 20.4%, respectively.
  • Factors influencing better clinical outcomes included T cell culture duration, with patients cultured for more than 14 days exhibiting superior results.
SubgroupPooled Response Rate95% CIHeterogeneity (I²)
Overall9%4%-16%55%
Neuroblastoma33%1%-91%Not reported
Gastrointestinal tumorsMinimalNot reportedNot reported

Main Conclusions/Significance/Innovativeness

The findings suggest that while CAR-T therapy demonstrates limited efficacy in solid tumors overall, there is potential for improvement, particularly in specific tumor types like neuroblastoma. The study emphasizes the need for ongoing modifications and enhancements in CAR-T cell design to improve treatment outcomes in solid tumors.

Limitations and Future Directions

The study highlights several limitations, including:

  • A lack of large-scale clinical data on CAR-T therapy for solid tumors.
  • Variability in evaluation standards for adverse events across studies.
  • Short-term survival data may not accurately reflect long-term patient benefits.

Future research should focus on enhancing CAR-T cell modifications, exploring combination therapies, and conducting larger clinical trials to better understand the long-term efficacy and safety of CAR-T therapy in solid tumors.

References

  1. Tumor-associated B7-H1 promotes T-cell apoptosis: a potential mechanism of immune evasion. - Haidong Dong;Scott E Strome;Diva R Salomao;Hideto Tamura;Fumiya Hirano;Dallas B Flies;Patrick C Roche;Jun Lu;Gefeng Zhu;Koji Tamada;Vanda A Lennon;Esteban Celis;Lieping Chen - Nature medicine (2002)
  2. Redirecting migration of T cells to chemokine secreted from tumors by genetic modification with CXCR2. - Michael H Kershaw;Gang Wang;Jennifer A Westwood;Russell K Pachynski;H Lee Tiffany;Francesco M Marincola;Ena Wang;Howard A Young;Philip M Murphy;Patrick Hwu - Human gene therapy (2002)
  3. Adoptive transfer of chimeric antigen receptor re-directed cytolytic T lymphocyte clones in patients with neuroblastoma. - Julie R Park;David L Digiusto;Marilyn Slovak;Christine Wright;Araceli Naranjo;Jamie Wagner;Hunsar B Meechoovet;Cherrilyn Bautista;Wen-Chung Chang;Julie R Ostberg;Michael C Jensen - Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy (2007)
  4. Gene therapy with human and mouse T-cell receptors mediates cancer regression and targets normal tissues expressing cognate antigen. - Laura A Johnson;Richard A Morgan;Mark E Dudley;Lydie Cassard;James C Yang;Marybeth S Hughes;Udai S Kammula;Richard E Royal;Richard M Sherry;John R Wunderlich;Chyi-Chia R Lee;Nicholas P Restifo;Susan L Schwarz;Alexandria P Cogdill;Rachel J Bishop;Hung Kim;Carmen C Brewer;Susan F Rudy;Carter VanWaes;Jeremy L Davis;Aarti Mathur;Robert T Ripley;Debbie A Nathan;Carolyn M Laurencot;Steven A Rosenberg - Blood (2009)
  5. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells down-regulate L-selectin expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. - Erica M Hanson;Virginia K Clements;Pratima Sinha;Dan Ilkovitch;Suzanne Ostrand-Rosenberg - Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) (2009)
  6. Enhanced tumor trafficking of GD2 chimeric antigen receptor T cells by expression of the chemokine receptor CCR2b. - John A Craddock;An Lu;Adham Bear;Martin Pule;Malcolm K Brenner;Cliona M Rooney;Aaron E Foster - Journal of immunotherapy (Hagerstown, Md. : 1997) (2010)
  7. Expression of a functional CCR2 receptor enhances tumor localization and tumor eradication by retargeted human T cells expressing a mesothelin-specific chimeric antibody receptor. - Edmund K Moon;Carmine Carpenito;Jing Sun;Liang-Chuan S Wang;Veena Kapoor;Jarrod Predina;Daniel J Powell;James L Riley;Carl H June;Steven M Albelda - Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research (2011)
  8. Antitumor activity and long-term fate of chimeric antigen receptor-positive T cells in patients with neuroblastoma. - Chrystal U Louis;Barbara Savoldo;Gianpietro Dotti;Martin Pule;Eric Yvon;G Doug Myers;Claudia Rossig;Heidi V Russell;Oumar Diouf;Enli Liu;Hao Liu;Meng-Fen Wu;Adrian P Gee;Zhuyong Mei;Cliona M Rooney;Helen E Heslop;Malcolm K Brenner - Blood (2011)
  9. Preclinical in vivo modeling of cytokine release syndrome induced by ErbB-retargeted human T cells: identifying a window of therapeutic opportunity? - Sjoukje J C van der Stegen;David M Davies;Scott Wilkie;Julie Foster;Jane K Sosabowski;Jerome Burnet;Lynsey M Whilding;Roseanna M Petrovic;Sadaf Ghaem-Maghami;Stephen Mather;Jean-Pierre Jeannon;Ana C Parente-Pereira;John Maher - Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) (2013)
  10. Targeting CXCL12 from FAP-expressing carcinoma-associated fibroblasts synergizes with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy in pancreatic cancer. - Christine Feig;James O Jones;Matthew Kraman;Richard J B Wells;Andrew Deonarine;Derek S Chan;Claire M Connell;Edward W Roberts;Qi Zhao;Otavia L Caballero;Sarah A Teichmann;Tobias Janowitz;Duncan I Jodrell;David A Tuveson;Douglas T Fearon - Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2013)

Literatures Citing This Work

  1. CAR-T with License to Kill Solid Tumors in Search of a Winning Strategy. - Benedetto Sacchetti;Andrea Botticelli;Luca Pierelli;Marianna Nuti;Maurizio Alimandi - International journal of molecular sciences (2019)
  2. Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T Cells for Targeting Solid Tumors: Current Challenges and Existing Strategies. - Lorraine Springuel;Caroline Lonez;Bertrand Alexandre;Eric Van Cutsem;Jean-Pascal H Machiels;Marc Van Den Eynde;Hans Prenen;Alain Hendlisz;Leila Shaza;Javier Carrasco;Jean-Luc Canon;Mateusz Opyrchal;Kunle Odunsi;Sylvie Rottey;David E Gilham;Anne Flament;Frédéric F Lehmann - BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy (2019)
  3. Engineering T cells for immunotherapy of primary human hepatocellular carcinoma. - Leidy D Caraballo Galva;Lun Cai;Yanxia Shao;Yukai He - Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao (2020)
  4. Getting CD19 Into Shape: Expression of Natively Folded "Difficult-to- Express" CD19 for Staining and Stimulation of CAR-T Cells. - Elisabeth Lobner;Anna Wachernig;Venugopal Gudipati;Patrick Mayrhofer;Benjamin Salzer;Manfred Lehner;Johannes B Huppa;Renate Kunert - Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology (2020)
  5. Comparison of Clinically Relevant Oncolytic Virus Platforms for Enhancing T Cell Therapy of Solid Tumors. - Victor Cervera-Carrascon;Dafne C A Quixabeira;Riikka Havunen;Joao M Santos;Emma Kutvonen;James H A Clubb;Mikko Siurala;Camilla Heiniö;Sadia Zafar;Teija Koivula;Dave Lumen;Marjo Vaha;Arturo Garcia-Horsman;Anu J Airaksinen;Suvi Sorsa;Marjukka Anttila;Veijo Hukkanen;Anna Kanerva;Akseli Hemminki - Molecular therapy oncolytics (2020)
  6. Adoptive immunotherapies in neuro-oncology: classification, recent advances, and translational challenges. - Sabino Luzzi;Alice Giotta Lucifero;Ilaria Brambilla;Mariasole Magistrali;Mario Mosconi;Salvatore Savasta;Thomas Foiadelli - Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis (2020)
  7. CAR T Cell Therapy in Pancreaticobiliary Cancers: a Focused Review of Clinical Data. - Muhammad Yasir Anwar;Grant R Williams;Ravi K Paluri - Journal of gastrointestinal cancer (2021)
  8. Intravital Imaging of Adoptive T-Cell Morphology, Mobility and Trafficking Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in a Mouse Melanoma Model. - Doreen Lau;Fabien Garçon;Anita Chandra;Laura M Lechermann;Luigi Aloj;Edwin R Chilvers;Pippa G Corrie;Klaus Okkenhaug;Ferdia A Gallagher - Frontiers in immunology (2020)
  9. Detection of response to tumor microenvironment-targeted cellular immunotherapy using nano-radiomics. - Laxman Devkota;Zbigniew Starosolski;Charlotte H Rivas;Igor Stupin;Ananth Annapragada;Ketan B Ghaghada;Robin Parihar - Science advances (2020)
  10. Lactate Exposure Promotes Immunosuppressive Phenotypes in Innate Immune Cells. - Rapeepat Sangsuwan;Bhasirie Thuamsang;Noah Pacifici;Riley Allen;Hyunsoo Han;Svetlana Miakicheva;Jamal S Lewis - Cellular and molecular bioengineering (2020)

... (56 more literatures)


© 2025 MaltSci - We reshape scientific research with AI technology